Invasion of the Butt-Snatchers

Last year I wrote about zombies; how we are already surrounded by countless, unconscious people repeating their routines with little understanding of anything. They’re stuck to their smart phones and meaningless hobbies like politics. This makes the people who aren’t zombified feel pretty lonely, but ultimately zombies are slow and dumb, and cannot really harm you unless you give them the opportunity to do so. I think that is about to change.

I was going to write about Pod People, the Invasion of the Body Snatchers, after the Zombie-article but other things came up. Right now I see that it wasn’t the time for that quite yet. But right now I think the zombies are leveling up, or being upgraded, to become Pod People.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a science-fiction horror film from 1956 where alien plant-like pods try to take over the world by absorbing people into the pod, killing them and creating a clone with their appearance and memories, but the clones don’t have souls or emotions. The aliens do it slowly and covertly until they have a distinct majority, when they take over overtly.

The movie was, of course, an analogy for Communism. I thought the Red Scare paranoia of the 50s and 60s was funny when I saw Body Snatchers as a teenager twenty years ago, but I don’t think it’s funny anymore, since the Commies are at my doorstep. There have been two remakes of the movie in the seventies and nineties. The seventies version has Donald Sutherland and Leonard “Spock” Nimoy in it, but I don’t remember much of it. I’ve always liked the nineties version, since I’m a nineties kid.

How it relates to today is quite obvious the New World Religion with the Rainbow Flag. Yesterday I perused through Facebook and it looked like 1/3 or 1/4 of my friends had added the rainbow effect to their profile pics. I find this sort of mass behaviour really disturbing, regardless of what one’s view on homosexuality or gay is marriage is. Can’t they see how they are being controlled by the media-political complex?

After the gay marriage law in the States, Head-Pharaoh Obama (I mean puppet) said Americans need to shift religious views to accept gay marriage. Well, this doesn’t affect just Americans. The Rainbow Religion has been celebrated all over the world. Maybe I should move to the Middle-East, that might be last region in the world to accept it?

Anyways, I don’t think the message about shifting religious views means just that conservatives should become more progressive, but that they should shift their religious views from their previous religion, Christianity, Islam, agnosticism, atheism, Buddhism or whatever, into the New World Religion of Transhuman Inclusiveness. I think the fact that the White House is now the Rainbow House reflects a much deeper change in the spiritual beliefs of America and the world than that they are merely being “tolerant” of those who are different.

How this is related to the Pod People then? I can’t help but feel that those of us who still have a mind of our own and have a hard time accepting this new religion, will find ourselves in situations similar to the characters in the Body Snatcher-movies. If you say something like: “I think marriage is a bond between a man and  a woman”, or “I find it disturbing that people are suddenly showing that Rainbow Flag everywhere”, the Pod People are going to point their finger at you and scream hater, Nazi, or homophobe. They will of course tell their friends, and they will ostracize you for not seeing the multi-coloured light (which is ultimately brown).

I’m not saying this to try to stir panic, but just to give a heads up on what to expect. Some people clearly do not have souls. Either they’ve lost them or never had them in the first place. They just go with the program no matter what.

This whole thing isn’t ultimately about homosexuality. I don’t care what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms, or if two guys wanna call themselves husband and wife. I guess I’m leaning toward the idea that a marriage has to have a man and a woman, but ultimately it’s an individual’s choice how to view the issue. My beef is with the fact that this Rainbow Religion is not about any individual opinion. Either you get into the alien pod with everyone else, or you will be eliminated.

I also don’t think it is a co-incidence that recently Bruce Jenner “transformed” into a woman and it was all over the news, and the Charleston shooting happened and the Confederate Flags are being replaced with the Rainbow Flag. These things, and the promotion of the Rainbow Flag, all are steps on the path toward where the Matrix movie started: in small cybernetic pods.



Invasion of Body Snatchers:

Obama:  Americans need to shift religious views to accept gay marriage:

Confederate flag down, rainbow flag up: this is the American pride we’ve been waiting for :


Saturn, Rainbows and other gay stuff:


Charleston “Crisis Actors” and the Victimhood Agenda


It appears that some of the family members of the victims of the Charleston church shooting seem rather fake. Some call them Crisis Actors, but I prefer to use the awkward moniker Disingenuous Relatives of Victims (DRV).

There are videos on Youtube where alleged family members of the victims of the alleged church shooting do not seem at all upset by their family members having been brutally murdered. This suggests that either those people are really bad actors, or they’re hypnotized or drugged in some way. But one more disturbing detail is that most of them claim to forgive the attacker immediately, try only to focus on the positive and all that. They’re basically a robotic alien’s view of how a human being, who has recently experienced a great trauma, behaves.

Youtuber Redsilverj also points out how the Crisis Actors/DRVs behaved similarly in the Sandy Hook hoax. This happy victimhood has become a trend in other suspected false flags as well. In my opinion this is an agenda to try condition people to accept victimhood for the bad things that are happening to them or will happen in the near future, and refrain from blaming or protecting themselves from the source of this violence.

This is quite curious, since on the other hand in movies and video games there is a lot of programming of the dark avenging hero. The bad guy kills their wife or brother and this gives them justification to go kill people. This reminds of the Aeon of Horus the Avenger that Aleister Crowley talked about. The super-passive Disingenuous Relatives of Victims and the avenging heroes clearly are clearly contradictory. I’m not sure what the greater agenda is. Of course these two aspects of social engineering may be fabricated by two different groups with little or no interaction with the other. But I’m considering another option.

Maybe Crowley wasn’t just making stuff up, nor was he trying to bring about any “Satanic” Age of Horus, but it is the normal next step in the spiritual matrix of this world. Our current era has been full murder, oppression and lies. Perhaps the revenge of Horus basically just means that the identity of these global criminals are being revealed, and they will get their just desserts. These DRVs who avoid blaming the murderer that killed their family members are there to persuade you to do the same when the darkest conspiracies on this earth are truly revealed to the public. This revelation of both conspiracies and conspirators has been going on for a few decades now, but I wouldn’t say any complete revelation has occurred yet, since most people still have their own idea on who the real culprit is, but they don’t really know. We’re all pointing our fingers around; it’s the Illuminati, lizards, Jews, Jesuits, Masons, crypto-Nazis, capitalists, communists and so on. Some of those groups are no doubt involved, but it’s a different matter saying who’s really the mastermind.

I cannot say with any certainty the DRV’s blasé attitude toward the murder of family members is related to what I wrote, but I find it interesting how it seems to be in complete contrast to the avenger-mentality that seems to be going on as well.



Redsilverj on the Charleston shooting:

Aleister Crowley & the Aeon of Horus by Michael Tsarion:

The Beast & the Hidden God by Freeman:

Our Society is not Materialistic, it’s Idealistic

People sometimes bemoan how society only cares about the accumulation of materialistic possessions, and how people are just hedonistic and seeks pleasures of the flesh. I don’t think that’s really true anymore. The material side of life is somehow connected to reality, whereas where society is headed today seems to detach itself more and more from reality each passing month.

For one, you’d think materialistic people care about their most precious material possession, the body, yet people are increasingly growing more sick due to the amount of artificial ingredients in their diet, GMOs, chemtrails and all that. And they don’t really care. The multi-million drug industry is really just to distract them from the discomfort their unhealthy body brings them.

Accruing symbols of material wealth such as the latest plasma screen TVs and iPhones is not as much about being materialistically wealthy, but about the idea of being a successful person. Additionally these electronic devices are there to distract us away from the material world into games, movies and social media.

Nowadays the greatest virtue is… well it’s mostly non-existent. It’s mainly about avoiding being an intolerant, right-wing terrorist and a hater. As long as you haven’t said or done anything that someone might construe as homophobic, sexist or racist, you are clean. But if you do something like that, you’re fair game to be hunted down by the angry mob. It’s all about your social image, or the idea that people hold about you.

There’s something very teenage girl-like in society these days. You’re supposed to follow the latest fashion on who to hate, because hating the right target such as Christian homophobes is not hating really. Only when Christians hate homos, it’s hate. This week the object of hate is the Confederate Flag, of course. As long as you hate it like everyone else, you are a good citizen, but if you don’t, you’re evil.

A couple of days ago I changed my Facebook pic to the Confederate Flag to support freedom of speech, and preservation and understanding of history. Today I noticed one guy commented on it disapprovingly and unfriended me. I think this is hilarious. Now this one image offends everyone so much, while a week ago it was acceptable. All because a guy allegedly killed a bunch of people, and happened to have pictures of himself with the flag. I wonder if next week someone goes on a killing spree, and then they find pictures of him on Facebook eating strawberries, and there’s a text saying “I love strawberries”. I guess strawberries are the next symbol of hate.

It’s only about the image that an object, a person or a word represents to the majority. Or rather what the media claims the thing represents, and the soulless masses adopt it as gospel. It doesn’t matter that American civil war wasn’t as black and white deal of good versus evil as the propagandists these days say it was. It won’t matter that countless people have eaten strawberries for thousands of years without being evil, but since in this moment in time the people with mindset of a goldfish feel that this particular item symbolizes evil, it must be banned.

On the other hand, now that the Confederate Flag is a symbol of hate, the Rainbow Flag of the LGBT people is a positive symbol. So positive symbol in fact that even the White House became the Rainbow House. It’s just fucking disgusting. Not because I mind gays being gay, but how it is being used in political manipulation. Homosexuality too is no longer about two people of the same sex having a romantic relationship together. It has been reduced/elevated into a sacrosanct ideal. You’re supposed to be sporting this multi-coloured flag of tolerance. That’s what matters, not the actual act of being gay by doing gay stuff.

These days society brainwashes you to believe that as long as the idea you believe in sounds good in theory, all is good. It doesn’t matter what the reality is. Democracy sounds nice of paper; people get to decide what they want to do with their lives, but to anyone who still has a soul notices quite fast that de-facto democracy is a tyranny of the mind. These modern ideas of tolerance and inclusiveness sound nice on the surface, but in fact they are a severe form of totalitarianism, except that it’s not really about the state; it’s about the ideology of the month. It all comes down to despising reality, and trying to create a mass illusion to replace reality. The only way it can appear to work is to forbid everyone from speaking the truth, and cajoling them into promoting the illusion.


“There’s panic at London Heathrow…”

I recently traveled to an undisclosed secret location in Asia. I had to stop by the Heathrow airport in London to transfer planes. It’s the first time I set foot on British soil, and I was a bit excited, even though I was going to spend only a couple of hours there. However, judging by the airport it seemed I landed hundreds of kilometers east of London.

Most of the airport staff were Pakistani or Indian. Since I did not ask everyone their ethnic origin I cannot be sure, but some of the women were wearing head scarves, and therefore apparently Muslim, they were probably Pakistani. So I’m just going to call them Pakistanis from now on for sake of simplicity.

Most of the staff in the airport in Helsinki have been Finnish, the staff in Beijing and Hong Kong have been Chinese, in the Incheon airport (close to Seoul) the staff has been Korean, in Bangkok they’ve been Thai, and in Osaka international they’ve been Japanese. The airport in Amsterdam was ethnically a bit more diverse when I’ve been through it, but it didn’t leave the impression it was dominated by a foreign ethnicity. Why is London different?

I’ve got several theories about it. Many of them ridiculous. First of all, maybe native Britons are simply so unreliable that few of the are hired to the airport. Then again Pakistani airport personnel may be superior to people of other nations, and therefore they are hired. Maybe the airports in Helsinki and Beijing should hire them as well. Or maybe the Pakistanis are remnants of the British empire, and forced to work in the airport as indentured servants while the native Britons play cricket all day.

Seriously speaking, the Pakistanis work there because of globalization and mass immigration, which, you could say, originates from the days of imperialism. Now the displacement of people from their homelands, and invasion of them is more socialist, soft and seemingly benevolent. This what it is, the displacement of people from their homeland, both for the Pakistanis and the Britons.

Now you might say I’m just a horrible racist, and the ethnic Pakistanis are British citizens, many of them may have even been born in Britain. But you’d be wrong. The one’s I talked to were not British, as they did not speak British English, they spoke English with an Indian/Pakistani accent. There was one British woman at the security check with a strong British accent, and a Chinese woman had hard time understanding what she was saying. British English, especially the local dialects, can be difficult to understand for foreigners. Thankfully I trained myself with Monty Python, Fast Show and all that stuff when I was a teenager so I’m fine with it.  Anyway, back to the story. That one woman with a thick native accent, was British, the Pakistanis were not British.

The Pakistanis certainly should not be blamed for not speaking actual British English, since they are not British. Since the British empire controlled half the world and forced their language onto others, you shouldn’t expect everyone to speak it perfectly. I’m using their language too, and I have a Finnish accent when I speak.

Ethnic identity and race are not just some bureaucratic construct you can be given to others by governments. Even if you gave me a British passport and citizenship, it would not make me British. It would just be a wad of papers saying I was, which does not make it true. The same goes for these Pakistanis. You can neither wipe off their original ethnicity by granting them some bureaucratic papers, nor can you make them British with those papers. It is insanity to claim you can do this. It is more insane to claim someone is racist for pointing out this fact.

I didn’t have any problem with the Pakistani individuals on the airport; they seemed to handle their job well enough. It’s just that I don’t see what sense is there in dislocating all these people out of their homes, and doing the same for the native Britons.



Blur – He Thought of Cars:

Culture of Critique

I used to consider myself a leftist before I “woke up” and realized the left-right paradigm in politics is made up of all sorts of false choices. Then I tried to disassociate myself from both political directions, although in recent years I’ve found myself going a bit to the right for two reasons: because the majority of leftists seem to be completely spineless hypocrites, and right-wing thought nowadays is at least somewhat grounded in reality, while leftism has went completely off the deep end.

One of the main reasons why I considered myself a leftist, because I was anti-war. I thought that’s one of the basics of leftist thought, that war should be avoided at all costs. I was of course against the War on Terror started by Bush. When Obama, a supposed leftist, became the king of the world you’d think he would’ve stopped the War on Terror, or when he didn’t do that all of the leftists would have called him out for the liar that he is. Of course they haven’t since they’re spineless Gollums, who are anti-war only, because under normal circumstances they’d consider themselves to be on the losing side. Then there’s the insanity of Cultural Marxism, which claims the highest values in our life is homosexuality, transgenderism and erosion of all natural culture, particularly Western culture.

I certainly believe that homosexuals have a right to do what they want in the privacy of their own bedrooms, but nowadays quite ironically leftists want to invade that privacy. They want all of us to peek in on gays couples doing their business, clapping and rooting for them for being so brave. I believe in the right of gays to be gays, but not in the sexual equality heterosexuality and homosexuality. If mine or your parents had been gay, we probably wouldn’t have been born. There’s this practical natural function that heterosexuality provides, which makes it more relevant than gay sex. I don’t want to see this small minority of homosexuals being persecuted for the way they are, nor celebrated for being aberrant. Just let them be.

Transgenderism, like the Bruce Jenner transformation, I’d allow since I believe in the right of human beings to do harm to themselves if they so desire. I guess they should be politely dissuaded from it first. However people like that are emotionally and hormonally very imbalanced, and their insanity should not be praised.

Criticism of one’s own culture is one of the corner stones of leftist thought, and something I agree with in principle. The Western civilization has done  a lot of morally questionable things in the last few centuries, such as imperialism, murdering and forcing people from their lands in the Americas, imposing Christianity on others, implementation of corporations, communism, excess social inequality and so on…

These are things we Westerners should not be very proud of, instead we should look at the mistakes of history and try learn from them. Look at history to provide constructive criticism. Modern leftism however is very critical of most things Western, but offers mostly deconstructive criticism. It basically says: “We’ve sinned in the past so we should perish in a fiery inferno.” Leftists no longer care about improving things, they just wanna fuck shit up. Modern leftists also tend to ignore the failings in other cultures, and focus on deconstructing the West. I still have that leftist view that I wish to be more critical of my own culture than especially a culture I’ve never even visited. I think that is a sensible view, since I cannot properly criticize a culture if I don’t know much about it. But the important thing in all criticism, be it of art, science or culture, is to point out potentially fatal flaws and offer hints for improvement. That is something modern leftists vehemently despise.

Right-wingers, in my experience, tend to rather look at the positive aspects of their own culture. If taken to extremes, this can lead to completely ignoring the fact that people of all cultures and races are capable of mistakes and atrocities, and pretty much every culture has done something nasty against other. A fine example would be the bible belt people in America who supported Bush on his crusade simply, because they perceived Bush to be one of them against the middle-eastern Islamic terrorists.

Like I said, we should offer constructive criticism and advice, so here it is; let’s try to find some degree of balance and sanity. I think society needs both types people, the leftist thinking, and the rightist thinking, but both need to have a grasp on reality. Nowadays mainly it’s the leftists who have gone totally crazy, but there are some signs of some right-wingers heading off the cliff as well. For example I’m all for “White” people or Europeans being proud of their race and culture, and I oppose the mass immigration forced on us, but protection of one’s borders and culture should not devolve into a reptilian brain-dominated xenophobia where everything is seen in terms of race or nationality.

This life is not a Movie

Several years ago I participated in a few Live Action Role-Playing games (LARP). It’s when you dress up and act as a fantasy character for one night. Sort of like acting and improvised theater, but there’s no central script you follow.

Anyways, a certain portion of the games were really much fun, but some parts were disappointing, since often not much anything interesting happened. This was to a large degree due to most other players being really boring passive. In the games I took part in maybe 25% of the players actually sought to Consciously Co-create™ an interesting story, whereas most people simply sat on their asses waiting for something to happen, as if the game was a play or a movie in a threater where you are supposed to be a passive observer. I found that rather annoying.

It’s been over 10 years since I participated in a LARP, but I’ve noticed similar attitudes in many people. They expect society, the world or life itself to behave like a movie where you just sit on your ass, and the most you are supposed to do to influence the world is to press a button to choose what channel you are watching. This applies to politics, religion, and arts and entertainment.

When you vote for a politician you write a number on a ballot or press a button which may or may not in the end have some influence whether or not some guy you’ve never even met gets elected, and gets to make decisions that affect your life. Ultimately the influence you wield over society is at best a cosmetic one. Do you want your politician to represent the red, blue, green, pink or purple party?

There’s loads of premade packages on religion to choose from, so you don’t have to do the hard soul-searching yourself. Do you want to follow buddhist, Christian, Muslim, Jewish or atheist dogma? Oh, you choose Christian. Catholic, protestant or orthodox? And so on.

What irks me even more than people choosing the prepaid package on politics and religion is when they do it on art, music and all that. It’s represents a complete lack of personal taste. I’ve seen too many people like the music that’s in the Top 40 charts this month. The next month you have to have different favourites. It’s not too difficult to look beyond the corporate regurgitated crap to find music you actually like. Yet many people seem unwilling to make the hard decision of actually finding out what makes them feel good. A lot of people just listen to the Rihannas and Lady Gagas, because that’s what everyone is supposed to do. They read Harry Potter, because you are a terrorist if you don’t.

The world is truly an extension of your consciousness. I don’t mean that in some New Age mystical sense, but it simply means you have the power to affect your environment. If you have to have that new plasma screen TV just because everyone else has it, you’re doing it wrong, but if you really like to watch movies on that big screen, then good for you. Nevertheless if you have that TV in your living room it’s proof of conscious action, whether it’s the masterful manipulation of the advertiser, or your own decision to acquire it.

There’s no script to life. No predetermined way we’re supposed to act. We’re certainly not supposed to follow the agendas of our insane governments or corporate overlords. Just because some so called elites have formulated a plan for a New World Order or Agenda 21 doesn’t mean reality necessarily has to submit to that plan. The only, and I do mean only, way these insane plans can succeed if we go along with them. If we choose to go our own way and/or oppose their plans, they cannot succeed. This life is not a movie. The world will not follow anyone’s script, we might if we choose to, but we don’t have to.

We have to power create a paradise on earth, or a hell. It’s doesn’t mean either option will be easy, and that’s why we often don’t bother trying to create things for ourselves. It takes some effort, so we’d rather watch the movie than do it ourselves.