Europe is flooding with refugees from Africa and the Middle-East, as everyone knows. The question is why? No, the answer is not humanitarian concerns. No-one in the bureaucracy gives a flying fuck about human beings. They use such terminology only when it suits them to manipulate the short-sighted masses.
Sure it’s nice and humane to give aid to those less fortunate, but it’s even more human to have a degree of common sense. If people of Europe were like Jesus who could indefinitely multiply to fish and bread to feed the masses, I’m sure they’d do it. Alas, we cannot do that, and we have a limited amount of resources, and most of our money seems to be going through a Black Hole somewhere in Greece, we can easily say Europe does not have the resources to carry all of Africa and Middle-East on its shoulders. It would be nice to do so, like it would be nice to feed that beggar on the street, but when the option is feeding your family or the beggar, the choice should be clear. Yet it’s not apparently.
The majority though, seems unwilling to take reality into account when dealing with mass immigration, since they don’t want to be called racist, hater, Nazi or Islamophobe. And no, they do not care about the poor Africans, not genuinely. They just want live their little lives, and play along to avoid being tried by the Inquisition for heresy, which nowadays means saying something politically incorrect. If indeed the masses cared about Africa, for instance, they would have done something about their governments before they murdered thousands of Libyans and destroyed the country’s infrastructure four years ago. Obama and French president Sarkozy were instrumental in promoting the destruction of Libya. Where was the humanitarian concern back then? But of course no-one could oppose Obama, since that would be racist.
I have this crazy extremist New Age ideology of trying to fix problems before they become problems, such as Europeans and Americans having done before something about their insane governments before they managed to destroy Libya and sodomized Gaddafi to death. I did sympathize with Libyans back then, still do. But I don’t want them as refugees in my country of Finland, since it’s not our responsibility. We have enough of our own problems with the EU, US and traitorous politicians.
I think the Libyan refugees should get to move into the White House (or Rainbow House as it is nowadays), or the French presidential mansion, since they’re the ones responsible. They should also pay war reparations to Libya. But not the countries that didn’t have anything to do with the Libyan war.
How about we stop being reactionary, and stop the globalist war machine before they destroy countries and try to force their populations to become refugees? I’m sure it’s a beneficial arrangement for both parties. The European nations don’t get the extra burden of refugees, and the people from the “third world” countries do not get their families murdered and country bombed to hell. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a bleeding heart liberal who cares about them poor Africans and Muslims, or a right-wing racist who hates them. It’s best for all of us if their countries don’t get bombed to bits.
If at this point you think I’m some racist right-winger, I suggest you go pop a few anti-propaganda pills first. Let’s look at this situation in Europe and the refugee countries. Seemingly endless floods of people are pouring into Europe. Is it not prudent to ask why? Instead of acting emotionally, and say they’re people too, and we should help them. If you care that much, why don’t you go help them personally instead of just passively acquiescing to anything the media, the EU and the government says? You don’t really care about them. You just want to be a “good person” who isn’t judged or labelled by society.
So why are the people flooding into Europe? Are the African and Middle-Eastern countries simply so shitty, they’re no place for human beings to live in? If so, why is that so? Are the people there somehow incapable of taking care of themselves? They need us nice White folk to take care of them. Is this the updated version of White Man’s burden? In the 19th century Europeans invaded other countries with the pretext of educating the savages. I thought nowadays that practice is seen as racist. Nowadays White Man is no longer invading the countries of other men (they’re just bombing them to bits), but the “savages” are heading into our countries. Same shit, different direction. The attitude that we are somehow better than other people is as racist now as it was then.
The root of the problem is, however, the practice of spreading democracy. In Libya it meant the destruction of the country’s infrastructure, and ass-raping the president to death with a bayonet. This is what democracy looks like! Now they are doing the same in Syria. Ukraine is more or less in the same boat even though it’s a White country. It is a well-oiled engine of destruction and destitution. Unless we do something now, Syria and Ukraine (maybe Yemen too), will be in as crippled as Libya in a few years.
I have a radical suggestion, or more of redefinition of our so-called racial imperative; the White Man’s Burden is not to civilize or democratize the savages, but to stop the insane machine that is our governments from causing any more havoc. Compassion for the refugees is meaningless emotional porn, I’d rather make sure the military industrial complex does not cause any more refugees.
And voting won’t make any fucking difference. Action will.
Gaddafi’s last moments: ‘I saw the hand holding the gun and I saw it fire’: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/20/muammar-gaddafi-killing-witnesses