The Revelation of the Corrupt Politicians is Deliberate

Five years ago I wrote the article Illuminati may try to Fake its “Death” where I said there will be a global revolution eventually, but we should be wary of the world that emerges after the revolution.

I also wrote:

“We seem to be in the Externalization of the Hierarchy phase of the New World Order/Illuminati plan. It basically means the Illuminati want people to realize how corrupt and unjust the current system is so we’ll ask for change. Problem-Reaction-Solution. That is why they are allowing people like Ron Paul to gain attention. The Illuminati controls the political game. It is safe to say, Ron Paul wouldn’t be where he is right now, if they considered him a threat. They would have assassinated his persona or the person himself.”

Just replace Ron Paul with Donald Trump and all of this is much more applicable to 2016 than it was to 2011. Although Wikileaks has been around for ten years and has made some revelations in the past, now the corrupt nature of the system is made so obvious even the most ignorant will hear about it. It is known (Khaleesi) that Hillary Clinton lied about the email stuff, we know about her and Obama’s involvement with ISIS, we know she stole the Democratic candidacy from Bernie Sanders, just today a tape was released where she talks about rigging the election in Palestine, and now it seems the FBI might investigate Hillary’s actions after all. The purpose of this is to make you ask for change.

Even the president of South Korea, Park Geun-hye, was recently revealed to have had a “Shadow President, Choi Soon-sil, who told her what to do. The Wikileaks emails revealed some information about the “Shadow Government” in the US. I don’t think this is accidental that these revelations come at the same time. Moreover South Korea is allegedly controlled by a secret society of “8 Goddesses” (8선녀) consisting of 8 women, but that’s another story.

A couple of weeks ago I wrote a piece urging Americans to vote Trump as it might make a difference as unlikely as it sounds. I suppose I still stick to that, but I would urge them not to rely on Trump. Maybe he gets elected, maybe he will make things better, but don’t put your faith on him fixing things. He is another chess piece in the plan to reveal the corrupt nature of the political elite so you’d get angry and get out your torches and pitch-forks. The trick is, however, as I wrote 5 years ago, that the Shadow Elite behind the political elite will attempt to hide themselves and let the politicians take the fall. It’s like the generals of an army pretend the colonels and captains have been in charge all along as they skulk away in secret.

Additionally, although I like that character that Trump presents in public, I find it alarming that myself agreeing with all sorts of internet media personalities, who support Trump, but whose views I generally don’t agree with. This is another reason to be wary of getting caught up by the Trump Train.

If and when corrupt politicians like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, Wall Street manipulators, some bankers, and other globalist schemers get exposed and really start paying for their crimes, don’t let them fool you that that’s the extent of the corruption and the conspiracy. There is a hidden elite behind these frontmen and women we see on television. Their secret socities have existed in the background at least centuries and they won’t go away until we force them.

I don’t know what is going to happen with the US presidential election. Will Hillary go to jail or will she be elected? Will Trump win, will actually Hillary’s vice president, Tim Kaine, take office? His name has interesting connotation, Caine, and he’s supposedly Jesuit-educated. Maybe Trump’s VP, Mike Pence, will become president. The suggestion that there will only be chaos and no election has been mentioned among conspiracy researchers as well, and that Obama will remain for a third term. That is distinct possibility too. Or perhaps we will see something completely different. I’ve predicted previously that Hillary Clinton will win, so I’ll stick to that, but I really don’t know what will happen.

 

P.S.

Whatever happens, and whoever becomes the president, the point is to look beyond the surface so you’re not tricked by the smoke and mirrors.

 

Links:

Illuminati may try to Fake its “Death”: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/articles/illuminatifakedeath/

Troubling revelations about Seoul’s ‘Shadow President’: The Korea Herald columnist: http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/troubling-revelations-about-seouls-shadow-president-the-korea-herald-columnist

Founders of China came from Egypt and Greece?

Last January I argued that Cathay, associated to be the archaic name for China, did not refer to China, but to another kingdom north of China, which was inhabited by white, not Asian, people. I suggest you read it first. I’ve recently discovered two claims that sort of support my argument.

One claim comes from a Chinese geochemist, Sun Weidong, who suggests that the founders of the Chinese people originated from ancient Egypt. The other is that the Terracotta Warriors may have been built with the aid of Greek artisans.

I’ll look at the Egypt connection first.

 

From Egypt to China?

Business Insider reports on Sun Weidong who studied Chinese literary classics. The terrain described therein supposedly matches Egypt better than China. Weidong suggests that the Hyksos may have been the progenitors of China. They were “the Western Asian people who ruled parts of northern Egypt as foreigners between the 17th and 16th centuries B.C., until their eventual expulsion.” This may be true, but then again I think Michael Tsarion has stated that the Hyksos were the Jews.

I get the impression from the article that Weidong thinks the founders of China were Asian people who lived in Egypt but migrated to China. I’m more inclined to think they were white, or whatever race the ancient Egyptians were. They came to China in much the same way as the Viracochas did in South America. They brought various social and technological advancements to the South Americans. According to Chinese myth Fuxi and Nuwa did similar things. Here’s a picture of them:

fuxiandnuwa

Maybe they were Reptilians, or then again maybe the snake/fish-tail is only symbolical of something, such a bloodline or DNA. I think Zeus also had a similar tail.

Then there’s the small fact that Egypt is famous for its pyramids, but there are also pyramids in China, although they’re not as famous.

chinese-pyramid

I think these pieces of evidence suggest that a global interconnected culture existed in the ancient world.

 

Terracotta and the Greeks

The other interesting claim I found was reported by The Telegraph. They write: “An extensive study of sites in Xinjiang Province, China, have revealed European-specific mitochondrial DNA, suggesting Westerners travelled, settled and died there before and during the time of the First Emperor: 1,500 years earlier than currently accepted.” The scientists also suggest that the Terracotta statues may have been inspired by Greek art, and that a Greek sculptor may have been at the scene to aid the locals in making the statues.

The article does not explain in great detail how exactly are the statues based on Greek art, and Xinjiang isn’t really part of China as the majority of inhabitants there are the Eurasian Uyghurs. I’m also not sure how the finding of the European DNA in Xinjiang is connected to the Terracotta Warriors, as the statues are in Xian which is in Shaanxi province, which is quite far away from Xinjiang. It sounds like The Telegraph is trying to force two disconnected stories into one, the DNA discovery and alleged similarities between Greek art and the Terracotta statues. Nevertheless, if these scientists argue that white Europeans were in China 2000 years ago, I’ll still take it as supporting evidence for my Cathay-theory, even if it is a bit shaky.

 

Relation to Cathay

How do these stories support my idea that Cathay was not China then? They suggest that there has been kingdom north of China inhabited by white Europeans since 200 BC. The kingdom, Cathay, was destroyed probably a few centuries ago and the evidence of it was covered up by the Jesuits. Even the Wikipedia article on Cathay offers evidence of this cover-up.

Either China was already inhabited by the Chinese when the founders of their civilization came from Egypt, assuming Weidong’s hypothesis is correct, who taught them new technologies. Or the immigrants from Egypt came to China first, and the Chinese arrived later from elsewhere in Asia.

 

Links:

A decorated scientist has ignited a passionate debate with claims that the founders of Chinese civilization were not Chinese: https://archive.is/hfFVx

Famed Chinese Terracotta Warriors could have been made with the help of the Greeks, archaeologists reveal: https://archive.is/LREiP

Marco Polo did not go to China: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/marco-polo-did-not-go-to-china/

Americans, please vote for Trump

I’ve stated in the past that I think Donald Trump is controlled opposition, and I haven’t really changed my tune. Knowing how corrupt the system there is little chance of anyone genuine and decent of becoming the nominee for either Republicans or Democrats, and even if Trump is genuine he has a snowball’s chance in hell of getting elected. That’s what my reason tells me. However, I could be wrong. Reason has limits, and certainly my reason does.

I recently heard that some people have drawn parallels between Trump and King Cyrus, or Cyrus the Great, from the Bible. He was a pagan Persian king who did great deeds for the Israelites. When the Bible says Israel, I don’t think it’s talking about Zionist Jews, but different kind of people. Despite Cyrus not believing in their God, God guided his hand to do great deeds. There are suggestions that God, call it synchronicity, Infinite Consciousness or what you will, is doing the same with Trump.

Trump clearly is no saint, not a godly person, yet he has done some good things, such as shed light on Hillary Clinton’s crimes. Timothy Alberino even called him our knight in slimy armor, the only one who can slay the dragon that is Hillary Clinton. According to Alberino, Trump is going to the lair to battle the dragon and we should support him even if we don’t know if he’s going to succeed or not. Frankly, I don’t know if he wants to succeed or not, but I agree with Alberino that there is chance, a tiny one at that, that Trump might be able to do it. This is why we should support him.

Let’s assume for a moment that Trump really is in it to win it, and wants to make not only America, but the world a better place for all people, not just the globalist elite. If that’s the case, he how could he get elected since the elections are bound to be fixed? Already back in the day George W. Bush got into office due to election fraud, allegedly. Alberino pointed out in his video that a landslide victory is hard to steal. Already when the Brexit results in Britain were announced they were supposedly very even, but I thought that was a fabrication, that in reality the Leave-vote had a much bigger majority than we were told. I think that if the American people were allowed to vote, without any shenanigans the vote would be something like 80% for Trump, 20% for Hillary. I think very few people actually like Hillary, but she gets a bunch of votes from people who hate Trump. Yet I think it’s still a fairly small amount of crazy liberals who truly hate him, it’s just the media has made it seem like more people hate Trump than actually do.

There is also the precedent of the Austrian presidential election earlier this year. The liberal Alexander Van der Bellen won due to blatant voter fraud. I also wrote about it, but to my surprise the election result was later overturned as invalid. So law and justice actually worked that time. People in the West have gotten more savvy to the corrupt nature of our democratic system, and nowadays it’s not just us conspiracy nuts who are paying attention to it. If Hillary Clinton is going to steal the election somehow, she might not be able to do by simply having her minions rig the vote. If she does, her presidency would lose all semblance of legitimacy. This might, however, be what the globalists want; have a completely illegitimate president, even more so than Bush (who won by possible fraud) and Obama (who probably isn’t even American) to run the country to the ground completely. But that’s another story.

I have to admit there is only a sliver of hope that Trump is genuine, and that he might be able to win. It is a long-shot, no doubt. There is million-to-one chance that Trump will beat Hillary, but those are just the odds you need to slay a dragon. I suggest you take it. So I beg of you Americans, vote for Trump. I’ve heard the argument that voting for Trump is choosing the lesser of two evils, and one comment was that you shouldn’t vote for evil at all. This might be true, but maybe Trump isn’t evil after all. God might be on his side, as odd as it sounds.

I am well-aware of what I am arguing for; suppressing your reason and putting your faith in God, or chance. I suppose you could say that is a desperate act, but these are desperate times. Hillary Clinton basically wants to rule in hell, i.e. make hell on earth. If you vote Trump, you won’t lose anything except a bit of your time, regardless of the result of the election. I’d vote for him if I could, but I can’t since I’m Finnish. So please Americans, do it right this time.

There is still almost a month before the election, so a lot can happen. A lot of revelations about Trump, an October Surprise, be a false flag, a war, an assassination. But unless any concrete proof surfaces that demonstrates that Trump is a blood-drinking Luciferian or something to that extent, or he just gives up for no good reason and gives Hillary the election thus revealing he never wanted to win in the first place, I hope you vote for him. It might make a difference.

 

Links:

Is Donald Trump a Modern-Day Cyrus?: http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/in-the-line-of-fire/55754-is-donald-trump-a-modern-day-cyrus

Cyrus the Great in the Bible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_the_Great_in_the_Bible

AA PODCAST: Trump, Our Knight in SLIMY Armor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvfuKV2qkeE

Austrian presidential election, 2016: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_presidential_election,_2016#Second_round_re-vote

My Prediction for the Future of America: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/07/28/my-prediction-for-the-future-of-america/

Alleged voter fraud in Austria: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/05/24/alleged-voter-fraud-in-austria/

What does the Monarch stand for in Monarch Mind Control?

One aspect of MK Ultra mind control is called Monarch Mind Control. The word monarch has perplexed me for a long time why is it used here?

The word monarch has two basic meanings; a type of butterfly and “one who rules alone”, basically a king or a queen. The monarch butterfly is often used to symbolize mind control, but how it is the connection here? One explanation I’ve heard is that the mind control victim experiences a kind of chrysalis and emerges as a new person, or alter, from the cocoon after being subjected to various types of torture and conditioning. Fritz Springmeier also said in his interview with Chuck and Kim Ochelli in 2015 something to the extent that some genes are inherited in the same way as monarch butterflies’, but I don’t remember exactly what he said.

My personal theory on the matter of the monarch is related to genes and the second meaning for the word, ruler, i.e. royalty. Many conspiracy researchers, including Fritz Springmeier, have discussed the notion of the 13 Illuminati bloodlines that rule the world. While I do not know if there are exactly 13 of these bloodlines and whether they call themselves Illuminati or not, it is well documented that a kind of royal bloodline is still ruling over most of the world. The vast majority of US presidents have been related to each other and European royalty. Even former vice-president Dick Cheney is related to Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton is related to the Bush family. And so on.

There clearly is some sort of “noble” family ruling the world. Most conspiracy researchers who discuss this issue describe this bloodline as somehow wicked, and seem to suggest that the idea that they rule over the masses is somehow immoral. While it is certainly true that this ruling family, or community of interconnected bloodlines, has acted fiendishly in recent centuries to say the least, but I theorize that the bloodline itself may not be wicked.

It is called Monarch Mind Control; the monarchs are being mind controlled. Perhaps the monarchs themselves are not wicked, but the ones controlling them are. I theorize that the purpose of this bloodline is to rule over people, and they are the only ones that can. Without this bloodline society would descend into chaos. The reason that the vast majority of the masses who see George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or whoever of the blood, on a podium talking are inclined to put their faith in the speaker, no matter what that person is saying. They have a certain unique attribute that makes the listener compliant on a genetic level. You can, of course, resist the effect if you are conscious of it, or of the vile actions of the speaker, but if you are unaware, then you are bound to be affected.

If my theory is correct (and I don’t mean this theory necessarily entirely my unique invention as I’ve read and listened to countless researchers over the years and may have gathered bits and pieces from different people) then the way to fix the world’s problems is not to overthrow the ruling elite, but to release them of the mind control. If a regular guy like or you who probably do not possess the mystical genetic marker try to run a huge nation, it would probably fail despite our good intentions or intelligence. We just don’t have the genetic component that is required to sway the masses.

The Rh negative blood type probably has something to do with all of this as well, but I don’t know about it in great detail.

That’s basically my theory. Too often I hear this fairly Marxist idea in conspiracy research that the world is so messed up because we are ruled over by these evil oligarchs and if we just get rid of them everything will be fine. The oligarchs we have now are indeed evil, but are downtrodden masses genuinely any better? There is the old saying that a country gets the kind of leader it deserves. If we just fetched our guillotines and executed the ruling class, soon after we’d just have more of the same. Perhaps the world wouldn’t be as centralized, but we’d just have local thugs oppressing us. I’m not saying we should be happy with the status quo, but that we need to look for alternative explanations on what is going on, and how to fix things.

When I look at someone like Hillary Clinton I despise what she has done, but when I see all of these weird seizures she has I can’t help but feel sorry for her. It’s like this poor woman is possessed by an evil entity. I think we should help her if we can. The human inside this husk for the globalist Luciferian agenda may simply be another victim.

 

Links:

Jaded Chuck and Kim Interview Fritz Springmeier 6 20 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXnCe3KtZZE