Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.
Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?
Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.
I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.
While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.
Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.
I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.
Yesterday there was an alleged terrorist attack in London. The date was March 22nd, i.e. 322, the number best known from Skull and Bones. This along with other facts had led people to think it was a false flag attack. It probably was, but I’ll wait for more facts to appear before making a judgement. Rather, I’ll comment on the reactions of people to this attack, people who unquestionably believe the official story.
Twitter is flooded with #PrayForLondon. Just this by itself is evidence of Orwellian Newspeak where words lose their meaning. I remember once, in the long long time ago era, when the word “pray” meant trying to commune with God, or ask God for help. Nowadays it doesn’t really mean anything. It is a copula word used to link a city to a terrorist event and the grieving that ensues. A copula is a word used in linguistics used to link subject and predicate, for example in “London is a city”, the word “is” is a copula. It does not mean anything by itself, but it used to form a coherent sentence. I’d wager that most people who use hashtags such as #PrayForLondon are atheists, and therefore would never pray. In fact, I don’t think they know what the word means. They probably think it means “I’m sad because of”, so it would be #I’mSadBecauseOfLondon. Why does London make them sad? Because the media told them to feel so.
Twitter seems also full of locust liberals who think the attack was perpetrated by Muslims, and they want to excuse their behaviour because they were Muslims. These people are almost literal Golems as their ways of thinking is very Talmudic. Actions and their moral repercussions are based on identity politics, instead of a logically consistent moral code. If the attackers had been White Christians, they would condemn all White Christians, but since they are allegedly Muslims, the liberals defend them. I wonder how they would react if the attackers were Japanese Buddhists?
I myself am not sure whether the attackers were Muslims, MI5, Mossad or what, or if the attack actually occurred or was a hoax, but these Twitter people seem to believe it was Muslims.
The reason these locust liberals excuse it is, as I wrote yesterday in my rant how the modern left does not challenge social norms, they want everything destroyed. They excuse alleged violent Muslim behaviour because deep-down they believe it will bring forth more destruction. Their only value and purpose in life is to bring more confusion and destruction. They will rationalize anything that happens with this underlying thought.
The mindscape of the modern liberal is not human. They do not understand reason nor logic, nor do they have moral principles. Otherwise they would not excuse these alleged violent actions perpetrated by a potentially hostile outside force.
When I was younger I considered myself a leftist, and I was all for challenging traditional gender roles, the traditional family, religion and so on. Now, years later, however I consider those things challenged and the traditional values came on top the challenge against ideologies of the modern world. The traditional way may not be optimal way of doing things, but so far the alternatives I’ve seen have been inferior the fruits that they yield. The modern, Social Justice Warrior-dominated left on the other hand is not interested in challenging the old ways, they’re only interested in destruction.
Let’s illustrate how challenging something or someone works; Hulk Hogan is the heavyweight champion, but Andre the Giant thinks he is stronger than Hogan so he challenges him for the title. They have a match and the stronger one, or better fighter, wins. (I am aware that wrestling is scripted.) It’s a simple as that. Maybe I think that Andre the Giant will win since he is bigger than Hogan, but after seeing the match I must concede that Hogan is a better wrestler despite this. The Social Justice Warrior, however, is not interested in challenging their opponent. They instead hide in their safe spaces, and avoid direct challenges with their opposition. When they do fight their opponents, they tend to do it in very underhanded ways. Let’s say that the Social Justice Warriors decide, arbitrarily, like they make most of their decisions, that Andre the Giant is a better wrestler. They do not wish to see him and Hogan fight it out in a ring. Instead they would do something like poison Hulk Hogan one day prior to the match so he cannot attend, therefore Andre is declared the new champion. This reveals the lack of faith of the modern left in their own ideologies. In the end, they only want to see that which they despise the most destroyed, since there is nothing they truly love.
The left, as it is now, are like locusts that exist only to annihilate. There is no worker’s paradise they seek. It is an excuse to destroy what they hate; anything that is healthy and wholesome. That is why they ally themselves with the destructive elements of Islam, and are ultimately ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.
There is nothing wrong with wanting to challenge the prevailing social order. In fact, anyone who despises the Current Year social norms of globalism, feminism, political correctness and all the rest, is challenging prevailing social norms: this far-left insanity. It is now the traditionalists, conservatives and right-wingers who are challenging social norms, and usually coming on top. This is not a very unique insight. Rather, I’ve been wondering why my views on certain social issues have changed, and how. Perhaps I haven’t changed that much since my youth, but the world has.
There’s a decent Japanese anime called Mob Psycho 100. It’s a satirical story of a teenage boy with powerful psychic abilities. He is able to exorcise spirits and he’s stronger than any other person with psychic abilities. (The series is sort similar in tone to One Punch Man for those interested in anime.) Yet this isn’t about anime, but about human nature and how well Mod Psycho 100 presents it.
Warning spoilers! If you’re intending on watching the anime and do not wish to learn what happens, I suggest you don’t read this yet.
The main character, Mob, has a mentor or master, Arataka Reigen, whom Mob looks up to. The master is con man, but he has fooled Mob into thinking he is a psychic as well. Reigen has an agency for helping people who are being pestered by evil spirits. Sometimes his clients aren’t actually being affected by spirits, and Reigen pretends they are, and he performs some sort of fake ritual to exorcise the spirits, performs a massage on them, or does other nice things to them. When there is an actual spirit affecting them, he asks Mob to exorcise them for him. Naturally Reigen charges money for his services. Despite being a con man, Reigen usually does make his clients feel better, whether or not there is a spirit involved. He cons people, yet he also helps them.
In the final episode of Mob Psycho 100, Mob and his friends have infiltrated the compound of the Japanese branch of a nefarious secret society, Claw, ruled by powerful psychics who want to take over the world. The logo of Claw even resembles the Illuminati all-seeing-eye. In the final episode there is naturally a confrontation between Mob and his friends between the leaders of Claw. Mob’s friends advice him to use his powers to vanquish their enemies, but when his master Reigen arrives on the scene, he tells Mob he shouldn’t hurt people and advices him to run away instead. However, they are unable to escape and Reigen ends up saving the day.
Reigen ends up beating the boss of Claw and his minions of the Japanese branch. He is able to do that because Mob inadvertently lends his powers to Reigen. So in the end the con man saves the day. Whenever Mob goes all out in using his powers, he goes into some sort of berserk mode that can end up being harmful for himself and others, so by Reigen using Mob’s powers he is in fact saving Mob from doing something harmful, i.e. while Mob may have been able to defeat their enemies with his powers, but it might have cost him dearly.
This reminds me of Donald Trump in some way. While I do think Trump is a con man in some sense, he did do a great favour to all us by defeating Hillary Clinton in the election. Like Timothy Alberino put it before the election, that Trump is a knight in slimy armour, and the only one who can defeat the dragon that is Hillary. Perhaps, Mob somehow represents the people of earth who saw what a disaster Hillary would be as a president, and we loaned our powers to Trump to defeat her. Had we done it ourselves, it might have cost us as well. Like Nietzsche said: “He who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself“.
Now that Trump has done what we wanted him to do, we should not expect too much from him, since he is a con man. He did defeat the dragon, but if we delude ourselves to think he is truly a magnificent hero, it won’t end well. Perhaps we needed a con man, someone who tells us half-truths to get the job done, since I don’t think that humanity is prepared to face the truth. We always need a good lie to get us going. This includes us “truthers” as much as the average “sheeple”.
I think all goes back to the garden of Eden when Adam and Eve were too willing to buy the lie sold by the serpent that they’d be as gods. There is something in our make-up that we prefer a lie, and a liar, to someone who tells the absolute truth. Had Trump been a paragon of virtue, we wouldn’t have given him the time of day. If and when Trump’s lies start to cause damage, then maybe we’ll just conjure up another con man to save us from him.
In Mob Psycho 100 the boss of Claw even says that they think they are special because they have psychic powers, but Reigen says they are not, and people won’t like them just because of that. Reigen says they are basically children who never grew up. This is reminiscent of the Social Justice Warrios who think of themselves as unique snowflakes and more special than everyone else, but everyone despises them. This parallels with Trump defeating political correctness with his victory in the election.
It all comes down to humanity being unwilling to come to terms with reality, and we invent another lie to protect ourselves from an older lie that has become unbearable.
Tomorrow is going to be sixth anniversary of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan that lead to the nuclear disaster in Fukushima. I already wrote about this two months ago and questioned what we are being told about radiation.
The information we’ve received about Fukushima is fairly conflicting in my opinion. The Dai-ichi plant is supposedly still leaking radiation and has been doing so for five years, yet we haven’t seen any grand scale environmental disaster or health problems due to it. Certainly the Japanese government and media suppressed some information relating to Fukushima, and there have been reports of health issues in some Japanese people, mutated vegetables and other alarming, yet not obviously disastrous issues. When the Fukushima disaster occurred, I was expecting tons of obvious health issues, mutations and whatnot to occur in Japan. Something so drastic that it cannot be covered up. Yet life in most parts of Japan goes on as normal.
In my opinion there is a great deal we are not being told. Either about Fukushima itself or about nuclear power. Just last month Fox News reported that the radiation level are at “unimaginable” levels, and the “highest they’ve been since 2011 when a tsunami hit the coastal reactor”. I’ve been seeing reports like this every now and then since 2011. It seems to me that either the reports are wrong, or that radiation isn’t as harmful as we’ve been lead to believe. There have also been several claims over the years that Tokyo should not be inhabited anymore or that it will become uninhabited in X years.
On the other hand, plenty of main stream media outlets are saying that radiation from Fukushima is not a big deal.
I don’t know what is going on, except that the information we are getting is contradictory. Therefore I will propose a few different possibilities for what is going on. Some of them are more fringe than others.
Theories on what is going on
One possibility is as I suggested in my previous article, “How do we know that Radioactivity is actually harmful?”, that maybe radiation really is not as harmful as they claim. It might even have beneficial qualities to it. I should remind of the late nuclear engineer, Galen Winsor, who claimed that uranium is not harmful. He even ate some of it in front of a video camera. Maybe he was lying, maybe he was a fraud but he seems credible to me, and suggest seeing some of his videos on Youtube.
Another possibility on Fukushima is that maybe Tepco actually managed to clean up most of the damage caused by the nuclear accident, and the reports in the media that claim the reactor is still leaking are disinformation to cause fear or for other reasons. Alternatively, maybe someone or something else had cleaned site. Perhaps nature has an effective method of diluting the harmful effects of nuclear waste and radiation. Or maybe it was friendly aliens. I don’t find this a credible possibility, but it is still a possibility.
Then again, maybe all we’ve been told about nuclear power is a lie. Maybe they never even split the atom, and atom bombs and nuclear power plants use a different kind of technology that we haven’t been told of. I recall reading about a conspiracy theory on the internet long time ago that claims atom bombs are a hoax. It has resurfaced recently. Even back then I thought the claim is so far off I don’t think anyone would make it up just for the purposes of disinformation. It probably has some truth to it. If this is true, then nuclear power plants probably produce electricity through a method other than nuclear fission.
I don’t know what is going on with Fukushima and nuclear power in general, but if it is not as bad as it seems, it’s good news. Maybe Japan’s environment wasn’t as devastated as I and many others thought by the disaster. The effects of radiation could be more subtle, though, and only manifest in a very obvious way only after years. However, it seems to me we are not getting the whole story. On one side the media is saying, it’s nothing, don’t worry about it, and on the other they are saying that it’s still leaking and the radiation levels are getting worse.
I have gathered up a few examples of Jews and how Jewishness affects them. The people in question are a Hungarian politician, Csanád Szegedi, a Sicilian man (and his grandmother), Christopher Columbus, and David Seaman, a controversial Pizzagate researcher.
Perhaps a title that says a few examples on being Jewish would be more accurate, but case studies sounds much nicer.
The Hungarian Politician
Csanád Szegedi was a Hungarian nationalist politician known for his “anti-Semitic” remarks. However, he eventually he discovered he himself is a Jew. The NPR website states the following:
“[I]n 2010 a prisoner confronted him with evidence that he had Jewish roots. According to the AP, Szegedi tried to bribe the prisoner to keep him quiet, but rumors and innuendo reached a fever pitch by late last year and in June, Szegedi conceded that his mother was a Jew. According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.”
Szegedi’s eventual reaction to this was to become a Jew. In fact, he appears to be making aliya, i.e. immigrating to Israel. Or maybe he already did it. Prior to these revelations Szegedi has accused Jews of “‘buying up’ the country” and he “railed about the ‘Jewishness’ of the political elite and claimed Jews were desecrating national symbols”, according to The Star.
What makes this interesting is that Szegedi changed his critical stance on Jews after finding out that he is a Jew, instead of fighting the Jewish elite and continuing to promote Hungarian nationalism. He embraced his Jewishness. There are two different viewpoints on what makes a person a Jew, is it genetic or a cultural/religious thing. If Jewishness is genetic in a way that it makes Jews behave differently, then shouldn’t he have been pro-Jewish to begin with? Instead this case might support the argument that Jews behave in a Jewey way because they are raised in a certain way.
Then again maybe Szegedi knew he was a Jew to begin with, but hid his identity from others, but after he was outed, he forsook Hungarian nationalism as people wouldn’t trust him anymore. Alternatively, perhaps he was intrigued by Jews to begin with because of his Jewish genetics, but only after Szegedi learned he is Jewish he understood his interest in Jews.
Another interesting tidbit is how NPR described his mother being a Jew: “According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.” Are you Jews somehow spiritual affected by this law that force them to behave a certain way?
Jews in Sicily
An article in The Economist titled “Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring” describes one Jewish man, Gabriele Spagna, who grew up as normal Sicilian, presumably a Catholic, but his grandmother on her deathbed had confided to him that she was had been Jewish all along, while pretending to be something else. Apparently this revelation also turned Spagna into a practising Jew as well. He seems beholden to Jewish law as well.
Columbus a crypto-Jew?
I had heard of conspiracy theories before alleging that Christopher Columbus had been a crypto-Jew, a Jew who pretends to be Christian while practicing in secret, but I found an article on Daily Mail saying that some (main stream?) historian are claiming the same thing. According to these historians Columbus had been a “Marrano”, crypto-Jew, and he had been looking for a safe haven for Jews in his voyages.
All of these three accounts, Szegedi, Spagna and Columbus, seem to suggest that Jews are never really Christians or Europeans, instead they owe allegiance to their Jewishness.
David Seaman is a main stream journalist who became well-known for his coverage of Pizzagate on his Youtube channel, but a rather intriguing controversy has arisen around him in the last week.
I discovered his Youtube channel around the time that Pizzagate started trending around the internet. I was a bit skeptical of Seaman at first, since he said he had worked for Huffington Post, yet his coverage of Pizzagate was reasonable, and I was happy to see a main stream journalist promote the topic so I followed him for a few months. Eventually though I stopped following him for a few different factors: he didn’t seem to be bringing much new research on Pizzagate, I began to suspect he was more interested in getting donations, and he looked Jewish and his name sounds Jewish as well. Once or twice Seaman even said something like grown people had gotten physically sick and vomited due to their research on Pizzagate, which I found a bit excessive. It sounds more like a character in a movie might say, instead of something that actually happens, so it got my alarm bells ringing. I stopped following him maybe a month ago, and did not pay more attention to him until now.
I try not to judge people simply on the grounds that they are Jewish yet centuries of European heritage, two Millennia of Christian teachings, and my personal observations have taught me that you should not trust Jews, and it appears it was a sensible course of action.
A week ago a Youtuber by the name of Nathan Stolpman published a video on his channel, Lift the Veil, exposing some dubious facts about Seaman. Shortly after this Seaman deleted all of his videos. It seems Seaman had been “shilling” for (his own words) a company called Goldmoney, owned by an Israeli Jew, and Seaman appeared to be promoting Pizzagate more for attention and money instead truly caring about the issue. Stolpman even found out that Seaman had written a book “Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself” in 2008. The book describes how you can promote yourself and make money by figuring out a topic before it becomes popular if you keep talking about it. If you can make people associate yourself as the guy who discovered it, you can gain a lot of views and clicks. It appears Pizzagate was a topic that allowed him to gain buzz.
Certainly it is normal for anyone with a Youtube channel or a blog like mine to take advantage of buzz and comment on trending topics, since they are issues that people find interesting. Nothing wrong with that as long as you’re being honest and bringing something to the table. However, I don’t think Seaman has been honest about it.
I won’t go into all of the details of what Seaman has said and done, but I suggest looking into what Stolpman has uncovered and drawing your own conclusions. I have. To me Seaman is another example of a Jew that exploits other people for his personal benefit and monetary gain. And yes, he is Jewish, it was stated in an interview Seaman did with some Youtuber whose name I don’t recall.
I was suspicious of him before this, and Stolpman/Lift the Veil confirmed my suspicions. The way Seaman has responded to Stolpman’s revelations is dishonest in my opinion as well. He has not proven them false, instead Seaman has tried to sidestep the issue and make it seem as if he is being attacked for telling the truth about Pizzagate. That is not the case at all, at least not when it comes to the videos on Lift the Veil’s channel. But once again, I suggest you look into it yourself instead of taking my word for it.
All of the cases of Jewish behaviour seem to lend credence to the “anti-Semitic” view that Jews do not feel beholden to the morals of the goyim. As the Talmud says, different principles apply to Jews and to goyim. Gypsies are similar in this respect. Stealing from non-Gypsies is allowed, while stealing from other Gypsies is not. Most other people, such as Europeans and East-Asians at least think that stealing and exploiting others is wrong. It matters little whether the person you are stealing from is of your race or religion or an outsider. Of course, there are still many immoral people in every ethnic group, but the initial values that the society promotes differ between Jews and the rest of us.
My reason for pointing this out is simply that you should be aware of how Jews think. Their morals are different than yours. It is foolish to expect them to think like we do.
The alleged pedophile scandal Pizzagate is a controversial issue even among conspiracy-minded people. Some think it is a honeypot or a distraction, whereas as others believe it is a lead to an actual pedophile ring. I’ve seen and heard various claims and quotes from the John Podesta e-mails leaked by Wikileaks, but I decided to take a look at them for myself, and verify the basics.
Podesta and Pizza
I looked through all of the Podesta e-mails from Wikileaks that mention the word “pizza”. Most of the e-mails simply seem to be talking about regular pizza. At least on the surface there is nothing suspicious about them. When these Democrats hold their fundraisers and meet-ups to scheme to further their political agenda they need to eat, and they seem to like pizza, a lot. I can imagine this political planning to be tedious, so I presume good food makes it much nicer to get started, However, they seem to be somewhat obsessed with pizza (although they mention other foods too) which is a bit weird, but nothing too incriminating.
Then there’s a couple of e-mails that mention pizza in an unusual context. There’s an e-mail that says:
“The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.
I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black) that was left on the kitchen island. Happy to send it via the mail if you let me know where I should send it. I also meant to inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are in the house.”
Would love to get a pizza for an hour? Or come over”
There’s a list going around on the internet, I think it originally appeared on Reddit, that says it’s come for pedophilia stuff such as pizza meaning girl, hotdog referring to boy, and map meaning semen and so on. If indeed this is some sort of pedophile ring, I can see pizza see the code for pizza and hotdog making sense, but it never really made sense to me that map is refers to semen. Especially if the first e-mail says: “The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has semen that seems girl-related. […] They can send it if you want.” Why would they send a semen-filled handkerchief back to John Podesta? Wouldn’t they just dispose of the evidence? Unless if “sending” is code for disposing of it.
The second e-mail talks about getting a pizza for an hour. That’s odd as well. You don’t get pizza for an hour. You usually do an activity for a period time, such as getting a prostitute, play games or something like that. I don’t know who Mary is, is but the context of the e-mail sounds like Mary (a prostitute, a loose woman?) is not free, so let’s get pizza (a girl, prostitute) for an hour.
Yet I am not convinced the source for these alleged pedophile code words is legit. Could these words, pizza and map, be code for something else such as drugs or some occult ritual? Might Mary refer to marijuana, and since Mary is not free, i.e. they cannot get hold of weed, so they go get pizza (another drug?) for an hour. I suppose that might make sense. This seems to like something they do for their enjoyment though, and not referring to some sort of clandestine political language.
There are some mentions of a “pizza oven”. Based on the context it does not sound like an actual pizza oven, but I figured it might be code an altar to Moloch or something like that, since in ancient times people used to sacrifice children to Moloch in fire. One Hillary Clinton e-mail from Wikileaks mentions someone sacrificing a chicken to Moloch, although that might be a joke Yet the context of the e-mails does not indicate that in my opinion. Another possibility I thought of might be that “pizza oven” is a drug lab or something, but once again the context doesn’t seem credible.
But let’s assume for a moment that “pizza” refers to some sort of drug. A map might refer to instructions to a drug cave of some sort, or a cypher to lead you to such a place. In this context sending the handkerchief with a map to Podesta makes more sense.
There’s also a couple of instances where the Democrats’ love of pizza seems a bit excessive. One is:
“A woman recently told the campaign her family skipped a pizza dinner at their favorite place so that they could make a difference in this election. That is the commitment that drives this campaign.”
Is skipping a pizza dinner really such a big deal?
“During her [Hillary Clinton] 2008 bid, she teared up at a campaign event in New Hampshire when describing the rigors of campaign life: lack of sleep, an overreliance on pizza and limited ability to exercise.”
“Overreliance on pizza” is a bit off as well. It would make more sense if pizza referred to speed, crack or a drug that gives you more energy.
Two e-mails have an attachment with a pizza-related picture. The first one has two women and a child eating pizza.
It was sent supposedly by Doug Band and among the recipients are John and Tony Podesta and Huma Abedin. Doug only says:
“As John said, it doesn’t get any better than this”
The two women are reporters Laura Ling and Euna Lee. The child is Euna Lee’s daughter. They were investigating human trafficking along the border of China and North Korea back in 2009, but they crossed over to North Korea and were arrested. Bill Clinton flew to North Korea and got them released. The e-mail with the picture was sent soon after they got back home. I’ll get back to the two reporters later.
The second e-mail appears to be originally from James Alefantis of Comet Ping Pong pizzeria to John Podesta. It says:
“My graphics guy sent this Do not forward :)”
It was shared by Tony Podesta to his brother John. Tony’s comment is:
“Our pizza logo
Are you around this sunday”
It is Hillary Clinton’s logo with a pizza on it and Comet Ping Pong green comet. The comment from from Alefantis and Tony Podesta seem to suggest that pizza certainly seems be some sort of inside joke among this group of people, and they don’t want others to know about it. What could that meaning be? It might refer to pedophilia as has been suggested, or drugs, or perhaps this:
A pizza slice is shaped like a triangle like the capstone of the pyramid on the dollar bill with the all-seeing eye. If all of the pizza stuff refers to the all-seeing eye, the Illuminati or other occult forces the “overreliance on pizza” might mean possession by spirits. I know this is a long-shot, but there are a few videos of Hillary Clinton where she does appear possessed.
Whatever the meaning of pizza is for these people, I do think it has a significance other than normal food.
Comet Ping Pong on Social Media
The Podesta e-mails clearly establish a connection between Comet Ping Pong and John Podesta. Comet Ping Pong’s Facebook page says the place is a “Family style restaurant in Washington, District of Columbia”. Is that so? Many pictures have been shared from James Alefantis’, and other people connected with place, Instagram accounts’ that portray dubious values. I’ll take a look at only a few of them.
This picture was shared by jimmycomet, i.e. Alefantis. It shows a child being taped to a table. Although it does not necessarily suggest child trafficking or anything so sinister, would you want your “family” restaurant being associated with such things?
Another picture shows with a half-naked woman holding a pizza slice in front of her private area. It was shared by joshuaryanv, or Joshua Ryan Vogelsong, who supposedly works for Comet Ping Pong.
Based on Vogelsong’s Facebook page he appears to be a blatant transvestite of some sort. Is this suitable behaviour for someone working for a family restaurant?
One picture was shared by pizzaboyzz. In it a woman appears to be gang banged or gang raped by pizza, and she has a third eye. It has been tagged by joshuaryanv with the words cometpingpong.
These people do seem to equate pizza with something sexual. These people who work in a family restaurant. I think it’s safe to say these people are creepy perverts at least, even if this does not prove they are involved in a pedophile ring.
The picture with the third eye reminds me of a statue of Moloch I saw on Wikipedia. The statue has a third on its forehead, and an eye in the chest as well.
The statue of the other hand reminds me of one of the antagonists of He-Man, Merman, but maybe it’s just me.
James Alefantis’ Instagram profile picture features a classical Greco-Roman statue. It just appears that the person depicted in the statue is Antinous. He was the homosexual lover of the Roman emperor Hadrian, and is supposedly some sort of symbol for pedophilia.
The subjects I’ve discussed so far do not offer unquestionable proof that the Podestas, Clintons or staff of Comet Ping Pong are involved in child trafficking. However, what I do think they establish is that the word pizza does seem to have a special, hidden meaning for this Democratic cabal, and at least the staff of Comet Ping Pong seem to associate pizza with something sexual and that they are creepy perverts.
The Two Reporters
Now let’s take a look at the two reporters who were arrested in North Korea. Laura Ling is Chinese-American, and Euna Lee is Korean-American. They “were stopped on March 17  by soldiers near North Korea’s border with China while researching a report about women and human trafficking. They faced years of imprisonment in the gulag-like confines of a North Korean prison camp”, according to New York Times.
In August of the same year, Bill Clinton, flew to North Korea and managed to negotiate their freedom. To me this suggests that these women were important to the Clintons and the Democratic Cabal somehow. I do not think Bill Clinton did it just out of the kindness of his heart, nor do I think he simply went to Pyongyang asked Kim Jong-il nicely who then obliged. He probably had to give something valuable to Kim.
The two women were apparently filming refugees fleeing from North Korea to China. However, they had been harshly criticized in South Korea for their behaviour. New York Times quoted South Korean pastor Lee Chan-woo:
“The reporters visited our place with a noble cause,” he added. “I did my best to help them. But I wonder how they could be so careless in handling their tapes and notebooks. They should have known that if they were caught, they would suffer for sure, but also many others would be hurt because of them.”
It appears they screwed up the refugee helping operation by exposing it by their alleged incompetence. The details on what they were actually investigating are a bit contradictory, since according to some claims they were investigating “women and human trafficking”, and according to others they were filming refugees. Smuggling refugees out of a country might constitute as human trafficking, yet it’s not clear whether they were investigating people who were trafficked for sex trade, or they were simply reporting on the North Korean refugees who were fleeing to China. These things might be related, but sounds like it’s two different aspects of the same thing at least.
Then there’s the photo of Laura Ling and Euna Lee eating pizza with Lee’s daughter, and Doug Band saying: “As John said, it doesn’t get any better than this”. Sure, you might just think these Democrats are celebrating after the Bill Clinton managed to rescue them from the clutches of Kim Jong-il. If the picture simply showed the women safe and sound I might buy it, but they’re eating pizza, and look grossly elated, and the background is ominously dark as well. I think something else is going on.
The three possible scenarios that I can think of for this curious incident are:
The reporters were investigating refugees and whatnot, screwed up and were rescued by Bill Clinton, since he’s such a nice guy.
The reporters were investigating a human trafficking ring that the Democratic cabal is somehow involved with. The reason Bill Clinton got them out of North Korea is to silence them. Had they remained in North Korea, their results of their investigation might have leaked outside. Bill Clinton probably bought Kim Jong-il’s silence along with the two women, in exchange for something. The picture of them eating pizza is a kind of blackmail picture, or proof of iniationg into their cabal. As long as the reporters keep quiet nothing happens to them, but if they don’t horrible things will ensue.
There is a human trafficking operation between China and North Korea that the Democratic cabal is involved with. The two women already worked for the cabal (I saw claims they worked for Al Gore) and were there to ruin the affairs of human rights activists who were helping people get away from the human trafficking ring. The two women were basically agents posing as reporters. The picture of them eating pizza means they truly are celebrating after a job well done. Then again, maybe North Korean government had heard about these two agents and managed to arrest them, but Bill Clinton made Kim Jong-il an offer he couldn’t refuse.
I don’t find scenario 1. credible, so I think it has to be 2. or 3. However there might be other explanations as well, but these were the ones that made sense to me.
I’ll post pictures of the two reporters along with the picture of them eating pizza to make sure that they are indeed the same people.
The people in the pictures seem to match.
This post is long enough already. Very little of this should be new to people who have been paying close attention to Pizzagate. I cannot confirm with 100% accuracy that there is a pedophile ring in Democratic party, but I absolutely think this warrants investigation. People should be concerned with this issue. When there’s smoke, there’s fire. It might be that Pizzagate, or Comet Ping Pong, is some sort of distraction, but if it is, it distracts from an even bigger issue.
My look on Pizzagate is still fairly superficial, and many people on 8chan’s /pol, Voat and where-ever have done a great deal more research on it. Yet I wanted to check the facts for myself instead of relying on others. I am annoyed by the ostriches who stick their head in the sand on Pizzagate. Don’t be an ostritch, yet being skeptical of each and every Pizzagate claim is prudent.
Just as I uploaded this my internet connection stoppd working. Obviously it’s working now, but I find this a curious co-incidence.