The Manchester Terrorist Bombing and Eric Schiffer

I already mentioned Eric Schiffer in my first article on the Manchester terrorist attack after an Ariana Grande concert. I am now even more convinced that the attack was a false flag or a hoax, since I’ve seen some very obvious crisis actor videos, or Disingenuous Relatives of Victims. I’ll probably write about that at a later date, but now I’ll focus on a person who might be somehow involved in the false flag: Eric Schiffer.

 

Schiffer / Grande Connection

A couple of days after the attack, Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News about the attack. His role in the interview was that of a “crisis management expert”. As far as I know Eric Schiffer was not anywhere near the attack site, nor is he even British. He does, however, state in the interview that he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.”

Ariana Grande has described her mother as follows: “My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.” This was mentioned in an Illuminati Watcher article. Ariana’s mother is Joan Grande. Based on LinkedIn, the company seems to be HMC Communiations. Assuming that’s the correct Joan Grande. There’s no profile picture, and very little information about her.

 

Eric gets around

Eric Schiffer seems to have his finger in many pies. His own website says he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants.” His LinkedIn profile also states he is the chairman of DigitalMarketing.com.

He has also been interviewed many times by various media organizations, so he seems to be well-connected among the elite.  In 2014 he was interviewed by Newsmax TV as an economist.  In 2016 he was a “tech expert” in a CGTN America clip. There are dozens of his interviews on Youtube.

Schiffer has been quoted by Salon about his statement on Donald Trump’s alleged anti-Semitic ties. In 2015 he wrote an article on The Washington Times how people shouldn’t be too politically correct when talking about Islamic terrorism. He was quoted by Forbes in connection to the controversy that PewDiePie is allegedly a Nazi. He is involved with a charity called “The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Annual Gala”. I’m not sure if Schiffer himself is a Jew, but his girlfriend Dr. Jenn Mann is.

These are just a few examples of how Eric Schiffer seems to be well-respected and connected in global elite, although I hadn’t heard about him before. Perhaps Americans know him better though.

 

Eric’s Companies

Now I’ll take a look at the companies Schiffer is involved with. Patriarch Organization or Patriarch Equity sounds like a sinister umbrella organization from a B-movie. And as far as I know they are, since I didn’t find much information about what they actually do, and with whom they are connected. They apparently control businesses in the digital industry and develop them somehow. I don’t know which businesses they have “helped”.

Digital Marketing (DM) sounds a less ominous version of Patriarch. They seem to be involved with, as the name suggests, marketing in digital media. The client list of the company is interesting though. It has some big names: Activision, Du Pont, Intel, Microsoft, Boeing, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Fox and you can see the rest below.

 

I just realized Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News and Fox is a client of his company. Isn’t that sort of a conflict of interest?

Anyway, something tells DM isn’t just helping faceless corporations make more money, but is involved in manipulating people’s opinions on a deeper level.

 

Reputation Management

Speaking of manipulating people’s opinions, let’s check out Reputation Management Consultants (RMC). This is where it gets good. It is as the name suggests involved in salvaging people’s reputations.

 

This includes suppression of information: “RMC offers much more than a fast suppression of negative search listings. Our compelling, quality content will be created and placed with your branding in mind.”

This is as it sounds: if search engines keep offering negative opinions on you, RMC will somehow manipulate the results to make you seem better.

 

They help “high-profile businesses and individuals”, such as politicians, high profile business owners, multinational corporations and local not-for-profit organizations.

 

They suppress negative views of their client by promoting existing press releases, or they write their own propaganda pieces to make you look good. They also create “Social Network profiles” to help their client. Sounds like paid shills to me.

 

They allege to be a successfull business, and work with “the wealthiest men and women in the world and high profile invididuals”. I wonder who exactly has been their client? Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, all of them?

 

I don’t know if all of this is legal, but sounds morally questionable as hell. You basically pay this corporation to lie for you across the internet and media. Not to mention that Eric Schiffer is also connected to Digital Marketing that works with defense contractors like Du Pont and Boeing, i.e. the military-industrial complex. Therefore I wouldn’t be suprised if the online shills you see, especially after false flags like the Manchester bombing, are controlled by RMC. I also suspect Eric Schiffer, or one of his companies, were somehow involved with the Manchester attack, or alleged attack. Perhaps they hire or control crisis actors as well. I cannot prove anything, yet. So this is still just my hunch.

That’s all I have now. I should probably check out Joan Grande’s company, HMC Communications, and verify that this Joan is actually Ariana Grande’s mother. I’m not very good at researching the backgrounds and connections of corporations, or their money trails, so I hope if someone else can do deeper research on Patriarch especially.

 

Links:

Ariana Grande speaks out on UK deadly blast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

Joan Grande: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joan-grande-a2538510/

Eric Schiffer: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

Eric Schiffer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ericschiffer/

Newsmax TV interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

Damage control: How does Donald Trump convince Americans he’s not an anti-Semite when he’s surrounded by them?: http://www.salon.com/2017/03/19/damage-control-how-does-donald-trump-convince-americans-hes-not-an-anti-semite-when-hes-surrounded-by-them/

Say no to walking on eggshells: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/21/eric-schiffer-say-no-walking-eggshells/

Here’s Why PewDiePie Will Still Earn Millions, Even After Anti-Semitic Videos: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maddieberg/2017/02/16/heres-why-pewdiepie-will-still-earn-millions-even-after-anti-semitic-videos/#1884bc024e68

Philanthropist and Socialite Eric Schiffer, Attends The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Gala Hosted by Larry King: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/01/prweb337818.htm

Patriarch: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

Digital Marketing: http://digitalmarketing.com/

Reputation Management Consultants: https://www.reputationmanagementconsultants.com

Advertisements

Questionable Details in the Manchester Attack

I’ve been looking more into the Manchester terrorist attack that occured during or after an Ariana Grande concert on Monday. It increasingly seems like a hoax or a drill rather than an actual terrorist attack.

 

Balloon Pop

Apparently someone tweeted from the arena just after the alleged explosion that they heard a big balloon pop, but everyone else freaked out because of it.

 

Masonic Symbolism

I saw someone on the internet point out that one of the pictures supposedly portraying one of the survivors resembles a hoodwinker Freemason. The clothes are similar, as are the pant-legs.

 

Manchester Arena Note

Yesterday there was a note on the Manchester Arena website confirming that there was an “incident”:

“We can confirm there was an incident as people were leaving the Ariana Grande show last night.

The incident took place outside the venue in a public place.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims.

Please follow @gmpolice on Twitter for all further updates.”

 

I didn’t see this note anymore on their website, so I’m glad I saved it yesterday. I find the wording curious: “We can confirm there was an incident”. It sort of suggests that there was uncertainty whether or not the there was an “incident”. Why call it incident, and not an attack, explosion or something clearer?

Another interesting bit is how they state that the “incident took place outside the venue in a public place”. It sounds rather legalize. It happened in a public place so we are no culpable in way. Also I thought the alleged explosion happened at the ticket office, so wouldn’t it still technically be in the arena, and not a public place?

 

Professional Photographer at the Scene

The photographer who took most of the pictures of the aftermath of the bombing is Joel Goodman. He is a professional photographer and a suspicious character.

These staged looking pictures were taken by him, as was the picture above showing the man dressed in white with leg injuries.

 

Our friend Joel has also tweeted his support for Comet Ping Pong in the past. I wonder if he’s friends with Alefantis?

 

Living Dead Girl

Youtuber Lift the Veil noticed something interesting. One girl, Gerogina Callander,  who was allegedly killed in the attack looks very much like a survivor from the event, Jessica.

The girl on the left is Georgina, who allegedly died, and Jessica is on the right. They look very similar, especially on Lift the Veil’s video. On this screenshot they don’t look as alike, because the lighting and the facial expressions on the girls are different, so I recommend watching the video.

 

But wait, there’s more. Another Youtuber, Russianvids, made a rebuttal to this video. He says the two girls look similar on purpose, but they are actually two different girls. Russianvids suggests that this done to discredit conspiracy researchers who will eventually catch on with this similarily and claim they are the same, but after that someone can prove they are two different girls. This would discredit anyone who says this was false flag or a hoax attack. I find Russianvids’ argument compelling.

Moreover, Russianvids point out that both girls, Georgina and Jessica had met Ariana Grande a couple of years ago and took a picture with her. This was apparently at the same event, since Ariana Grande seems to be wearing the same clothes in both pictures with the girls. There’s no way this is a coincidence.

Georgina and Ariana
Jessica and Ariana with a third chick

 

That’s not all. Day before the concert, Georgina had said on her Twitter account: “Kill me kill me kill me please tell me they are coming to manchester tomorrow”. She was probably talking about Ariana and her band when she said “they”. Yet if she was going to the concert, wouldn’t she have a ticket and she should know they were coming to Manchester. Then again I don’t really understand teen girl logic. However, this sounds more like some magical spell or ritual thingy that she’s saying “kill me” and then she is allegedly killed.

One last thing is to refer to Lift the Veil’s video. In it two girls, Jessica and her friend are being interviewed. Jessica’s friend sounds like a lousy actor and does not sound at all like she underwent a life threatening situation recently. Jessica is at least convincing in her performance that she is grieving, but she does not seem to be shedding tears.

 

The Announcement

There is a video that someone apparently took with their cellphone as they were leaving the concert arena. There is an announcent in the PA that goes as follows: “Ladies and gentlemen, please take your time. There’s no need to [unclear words] (punt shot?). There’s no problems here. Just take your time and exit the building.”

This is supposedly after the explosion. “No problems here”? I can understand they are trying to make the crowd remain calm, but this doesn’t sound like there has been a serious explosion/ terrorist attack. It sounds more like a drill.

This clip can be seen on another of Lift the Veil’s videos around 35:18.

 

Concertgoers in Confusion

I found a little clip interviewing a few different survivors of this horrendous attack. There’s girl being interviewed around 0:10. She says: “It was just a real loud bang. We have no idea what it were, but… Everyone just started running. We didn’t think anything of it, but then everyone was screaming at us to run so…”

Then after that one young man is being interviewed with a friend next to him. He says they heard the bang too, but according to him people were saying it was a speaker. Then people “chilled out”. As they went to the exit, he says there was blood across the floor and the ran. As he starts talking about the blood he develops a smile on his face. After that he says they went outside and there was girl bleeding .

The girl seems like she is genuine. That she was actually at the concert, heard a loud bang and then followed the crowd when they ran away. From this, I get the impression that possible some of the people in the audience might have been sort of agents provocateur, or agents panicateur. Their purpose was to cause panic after the bang.

The young with his calm demeanor and smile does not seem genuine. I think he is lying, although the smile could result from nervousness and incredulity. He might have simply been planning to go a concert and have fun, and not expect to see any people bleeding as it’s something you usually see only in the movies. However, I don’t find him credible. I just think he is a bad actor.

 

I am not saying anything definite yet, but this whole thing seems contrived. So far it seems like another false flag or a hoax, like we’ve seen in the past. I’ve also seen plenty of shills in Youtube comment sections and internet forums trying to dissuade people from investigating this, and trying to convince you it wasn’t certainly a false flag.

 

Links:

Manchester Arena: http://www.manchester-arena.com/

Manchester Bombing False Flag – Dead Victim is Alive!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-ufj7swnHc&t=1s

Response Video To “Lift The Veil” Comparison Of Georgina vs. Jessica – 100% Predictive Programming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNGHWJFaHQo

Manchester Bombing False Flag | Another Hoax in the UK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpLI8WNlVt8

Manchester terror attack: Concertgoers describe hearing loud bang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xeuy6cp6CU

 

 

 

 

Ariana Grande concert bombing: Where’s the blood and the bodies?

The Bureau of False Flags strikes again. Probably. Last night a suicide bomber allegedly blew himself up, and at least 22 other people, in an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England. So far I haven’t seen much evidence of dead people nor of any explosion.

 

The Evidence

These couple of images are the most evidence I’ve seen so far of any explosion. The first one’s been shared by several media outlets. There’s a girl with ripped jeans and a bandage on her knee being escorted by police officers. The girl though doesn’t look injured. There’s no wounds on her legs. There’s some blood on her arm, which I initially missed. But I don’t even see dust or dirt on her. How do her jeans just rip from an explosion and leave her intact? I’ve seen similar questionable physics in other terrorist attacks.

 

I saw this picture on the CNN website. It has a middle-aged man being escorted by another man. He has bandages on both of his legs, and tge bandage on his right leg is a bit bloody. This at least looks somewhat real, so it actually might be real. Although this guy looks pretty clean otherwise. If he was caught in the explosion, he was probably on the fringes of the blast area. Still, I’d expect to see some dust or blood from other victims on his clothes. Unless he changed his clothes to look good in the photoshoot.

 

There are videos of people escaping from the venue and screaming in panic. They’re holding pink balloons. I assume they got them at the concert. I’ve heard testimonies of people claiming there was an explosion, but so far the only evidence of an explosion is a video from outside the concert venue from a car’s dashcam. You can hear a boom and see a bright flash. The guy in the car shouts “No!” a few seconds after the explosion. He sounds like he is sleeping and having a nightmare, or something. It sounds weird, off and delayed.

I do think there was a loud boom, and probably a bright flash, but I still aren’t convinced there was an actual explosion. The audience may simply have been deceive to think there was an actual explosion.

And if there was a real bomb and an explosion, how did the bomber get his bomb through security? Western nations have been beefing up their security measures year by year ever since 9/11, but they never yield results. The only terrorist attacks the authorities have managed to curb before they happen, are ones that have been orchestrated by the authorities themselves, such as the FBI has done in the US.

It’s of course too early to say what this event was: a false flag, a hoax, or a “genuine” terrorist attack. You might argue, what’s the point of faking such an attack? Wouldn’t it just be easier to set the bomb and blow up a bunch of people? The people behind these attacks clearly have very low scruples. If they have no qualms about pretending to kill people indiscriminately, why would they mind killing people either? Perhaps it is an issue of legality. The people working for the hypothetical Bureau of False Flags might be have certain criteria they have to follow, such as not killing people, i.e. damaging the property of the state. These people could be engaged in developing highly advanced propaganda, but that’s all they are allowed to do: use smoke and mirrors. In this sense it’s basically your fault if you believe the story they told, the same as if you go see a Hollywood movie and think it’s real. These people are only doing performance art.

Wasn’t there a law signed in the US around the time of Sandy Hook that allows the media to legally lie to you? This Ariana Grande concert was in the UK, so the same law shouldn’t apply, but there might be similar laws in the UK.

 

Pushing Propaganda

I first heard about this alleged terrorist attack this morning as I woke up and switched on Youtube on my phone. There was video by Stefan Molyneux discussing this incident. I usually don’t watch his videos, but since it seemed there was a new terrorist attack I was curious.

Naturally, as you might expect from Molyneux, his video had little in the terms of relevant content and was mostly emotionally manipulative. He was describing graphic images of people running from the concert hall with blood and body parts all over them. So far, I’ve seen nothing like it. Very little blood, no detached body parts. I’d like to see the videos he’s seen of the attack.

Molyneux was also indirectly but obviously suggesting that it was another terrorist attack by Muslims. This is probably true, but so far the identity of the alleged attacker hasn’t been revealed. Yet, Molyneux is spinning his usual emotionally manipulative narrative. He ends the video by saying: “Do you wanna be popular, or do you want to live?”

He’s pushing the Dark Hero narrative that I’ve seen in the movies, video games and the Alt-Right media over the years: to survive and fight the monsters, you have to become worse than the monsters. This is once again like Albert Pike described in his alleged letter to Giuseppe Mazzini about goading the regular people to rise up to exterminate the Nihilist and atheist revolutionaries, and end up dooming themselves.

Naturally I do oppose the Islamization of Europe. It’s is a real threat whether or not terrorist attacks like these have been perpetrated by Muslims or intelligence agencies as false flags. Yet people like Molyneux and many others who point their fingers only at Muslims and other superficial troublemakers like Liberal elites, are behaving like if in the Lord of the Rings you were warning the Free Peoples against orc armies, but ignoring the existence of Sauron and the Ring Wraiths.

As a philosopher, Molyneux is a complete fraud. Either he is too dumb to see this, or he is working for the wrong side.

 

Occult Stuff

I found an article on the Illuminati Watcher website from 2013 discussing how Ariana Grande is fascinated by demons and magic. Perhaps this attack was some sort of occult ritual. I wonder what song Ariana Grande sang just prior to the alleged explosion?

She’s also worked for Nickelodeon and like most other pop stars is probably under MK Ultra mind control. Last year there was even some incident of her licking donuts in a donut shop.

 

Conclusion

It’s still too early to say what this event was, but using Occam’s Razor the most logical explanation is that it’s false flag or a hoax some sort, since that’s how most terrorist attacks turn out to be. Moreover, the most widely circulated picture of the attack looks hokey as heck. But I’ll have to wait and see what sort of evidence turns up.

 

EDIT:

I found an intriguing interview on Fox News regarding this terrorist attack. They are interviewing “crisis management expert” Eric Schiffer. He is the CEO of Patriarch Equity.

The interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

The reason, I suppose, for this interview is to tell you how to feel, and how to passively accept terrorism.  Since as far as I know, Eric Schiffer wasn’t at the concert. He doesn’t have any special information on the incident. He does mention, however, he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.” This is interesting, since the Illuminati Watcher article quotes Ariana saying:

“My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.”

So she works for the military-industrial complex. I wonder if Eric Schiffer’s Patriarch also co-operates with them. At the very least, it seems Ariana Grande’s family and Schiffer seem to belong to the same elite circles.

Finding what Patriarch Equity does is not so easy. First of all there are a few different companies that use some variation of the name Patriarch. But I think the one that Schiffer leads is this one: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

They deal with developing and improving “businesses in the digital industry”. It doesn’t seem like “crisis management” company though. Yet Patriarch seems very shadowy to me. The About Us section does not even mention any names of the employees. It doesn’t mention Eric Schiffer as the CEO. I did find Eric Schiffer’s website though: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

It mentions he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants. Most of all he enjoys his charity work on behalf of the Clinton Health Access Initiative and Benevolent.net.” He worked with the Clintons? Interesting.

Schiffer’s website also says: “Eric Schiffer is a best-selling author, and a successful entrepreneur.” He’s written some books, and apparently he’s an entrepreneur. It doesn’t mention here either that he’s a “crisis management expert”. Perhaps he’s a “crisis actor management expert”. He does seem to be a man of many talents as I found a couple of other interviews with him on Youtube:

In this Newsmax TV clip from 2014 he’s on as an economist or something talking about gas prices and Iraq: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip from 2016 has Schiffer on as “tech expert”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

I’m not sure if he’s an actor or some sort of conspirator mastermind. I have a hunch that Patriarch Equity might be somehow tied to the hypothetical Bureau of False Flags. Patriarch might have been somehow involved in this attack. So far, these are only hunches, though. This guy seems suspicious though.

Maybe the Feminists were right all along: there might be a patriarchy controlling us.

 

 

Links:

Fans evacuate Ariana Grande concert arena after blast :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jnL_e6RCQI

Dashcam captures moment of the explosion: http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/05/23/explosion-dashcam-video-sg-mobile-orig.cnn

What Pisses Me Off About The Ariana Grande Terrorist Attack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzAQwATXZ4o

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

How Albert Pike’s letter can aid us in the Nationalist Revival: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/pikes-letter/

ARIANA GRANDE NAMED IN DNC LEAK?!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gWMDYAwtM4

The Infamous NASA Tether Incident with UFOs

Anyone who has watched several videos on the UFO phenomenon has probably seen the NASA STS-75 tether experiment video with weird floating things around a stick (allegedly) in space. UFO researchers usually describe the floating things as UFOs. The official explanation, apparently, is that they are debris illuminated by the sun. I don’t believe in either explanation.

 

Back when I saw the video, 10 years ago or so, I didn’t know what to think of it. The “UFOs” looked more like jellyfish, amoebas, or at least something organic, whereas as my preconception was if they were UFOs they should be round, metallic flying saucers. The whole video confused me. Back then me, and many other conspiracy minded people, expected NASA to have a Secret Space Program of some sort, and possibly be hiding an extraterrestrial presence.

Nowadays, myself, and many others (which is a good reason to remain skeptical of this concept as well), question whether NASA really ever had anything to do with space exploration, except maybe faking the notion that they really do send astronauts and probes out into space. There are also some videos suggesting that some, if not all, of the footage supposedly showing astronauts in space were actually filmed underwater. With this in mind, the tether experiment starts to make more sense.

 

The Official Story

Before I explain what I think is going on in the video, I’m going to go over some official facts about the tether experiment. The STS-75 mission was conducted between February and March of 1996. The primary objective was to put a Tethered Satellite System into orbit and attach a tether, or a cable, to it. The more specific objectives were according NASA’s website:

“[C]haracterize the current-voltage response of the TSS-orbiter system, characterize the satellites high-voltage sheath structure and current collection process, demonstrate electric power generation, verify tether control laws and basic tether dynamics, demonstrate the effect of neutral gas on the plasma sheath and current collection, characterize the TSS radio frequency and plasma wave emissions and characterize the TSS dynamic-electrodynamic coupling.”

On top of that they also flew a “Microgravity Payload (USMP3-)designed to investigate materials science and condensed matter physics.” I don’t really know what all of these things mean. I’m no astrophysicist. I also don’t know if the experiment actually occurred or not, and whether it was a complete hoax or not.

Wikipedia and NASA articles do not even mention the infamous UFO footage. Instead I had to go to RationalWiki to read what the official explanation for the UFOs is. It goes as follows:

“NASA mission video recordings of the tether experiment show what appear to be a number of bright objects swirling around the tether. Astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the bright spots seen near the tether were ‘a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us’ that was illuminated by the sun.”

The debris does look alive and somewhat autonomous, and not like inanimate debris, to me. But what do I know.

 

Underwater UFOs

Now that we got the official story out of the way, I can discuss what I think is going on in the video. I am talking about the video now. I don’t know whether the actual STS-75 experiment occurred or not. Perhaps the experiment did take place, but the video was hoaxed for whatever reason.

Anyway, I already mentioned that the video looks like there are amoebas or other organic lifeforms in it. I think the video was filmed underwater. I have two different scenarios on it. How the “debris” or the “UFOs” move looks like they are alive to me. One scenario is that the footage was actually filmed up there in what is usually called space, but instead of an empty void up there, there is actually water up there as the Bible suggests. If there is water up there, clearly NASA isn’t telling everything about it, so there might be some sort of nautical lifeforms up there as well.

The second, and more likely, scenario is that the footage was filmed in a bucket full of water under a microscope. There tether in the picture is not actually some huge thing out in space, but a small needle in a pool of water. With a microscope shooting at it, it’s supposed to look big. The “UFOs” are actually some sort of microbial lifeforms that were either deliberately or accidentally released into the water. Perhaps NASA wanted to create this UFO controversy over the video for some reason, or a whistleblower wanted to sabotage the fake video.

Now that I look at the footage with new eyes, it looks like it’s underwater. I probably would not associate the video with outer space unless I had been told it.

 

Sex in Space

The Wikipedia article does not mention the alleged UFOs, but it does mention another interesting tidbit: an allegedly fraudulent NASA document that claimed STS-75 was studying sex in microgravity. Apparently “Document 12-571-3570” was published on a Usenet newsgroup in November 28, 1989. It claimed that:

“[A]stronauts aboard space shuttle mission STS-75 performed a variety of sex acts to determine which positions are most effective in zero gravity. The document goes on to report that of the 10 positions tested, six required the use of a belt and an inflatable tunnel, while four were contingent on hanging on. The document also discusses a video record of the 10 one-hour sessions in the lower deck of the shuttle, and notes that the subjects added their own personal footnotes to help scientists.”

This document was published in 1989, seven years before the “real” STS-75 tether experiment. I don’t know if these claims of sex in space were just a joke, or other kind of hoax, or if there is any truth behind it. I don’t even know whether NASA, or any other human agency, has ever gone into space or not. If all the claims of going to space are false, then claims of studying sex in space would be false too. However, I don’t find Wikipedia’s logic for debunking the document very convincing: “The real STS-75 mission occurred in 1996, 7 years after the text was published, and consisted of an all-male crew, clearly indicating that the document is a hoax.”

I don’t think seven male astronauts, many of whom are probably Freemasons or other Luciferians occultists, having sex with each other is a far-out concept. Perhaps the goal of NASA is to boldly sodomize where no-man has sodomized before. Maybe the Microgravity Payload aboard the shuttle referred to microgravity cumload.

 

Conclusion

Whatever the truth behind the “sex in space” document is, I don’t find either of the usual explanations on the tether video plausible. I don’t think the pulsating things are spaceships, nor do I think they are merely debris. I think the whole thing was filmed underwater for whatever reason.

 

EDIT: I found a Youtube video saying similar things about the tether video. They beat me to it by a week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5buFZr5huI

 

Links:

STS-75: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-75

STS-75: https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-75/mission-sts-75.html

STS-75 incident: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/STS-75_incident

Document 12-571-3570: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_12-571-3570

The tether incident: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XDgDYDDhyA

 

Occult Symbolism of Eurovision 2017

I’m doing this a week late since the Eurovision song contest was held a week ago, but since one of my readers asked for my opinion on the symbolism of the Current Year Eurovision I feel obligated to write blog post about it.

I browsed through the final fairly quickly so it’s possible I missed something, and also I should point out these are just my impressions and interpretations of the show. Perhaps the people designing the show did not intend to signal these things.

 

Diversity Strikes Back

The slogan of the contest was “Celebrate Diversity”, which when translated into normal speech means: annihilate diversity, or promote monoculturalism. David Icke said years ago that when the elites say something, they usually mean the opposite. It’s absolutely true when it comes to “diversity”. Overall, celebrating the destruction was one of the themes I saw in the Eurovision contest.

The logo is a ring of red and black balls. They could be planets, represent the Ouroborous, horns of a bull (or Osiris), or perhaps the pearl necklace of Orion. I’m not sure what they are meant to represent, if anything.

 

The Start of the Show

As the show started each artist came on the stage as if to introduce themselves. Most of the men were effeminate cucks, and the women just looked weird. At the beginning the camera panned onto the stage, and also a few times during the show as can be seen in the picture below. It reminded me of CERN.

 

Another interesting bit was when the artists introduced themselves every waved their arms in celebration, except Portugal’s Salvador Sobral, who ended winning the contest. He seemed reserved and humble, whereas most others were very flashy and superficial. I don’t know if this is significant, but he seemed a bit nervous. Perhaps he knew he was going to win, or perhaps his behaviour represented his unique nature that European resonated with, and therefore voted for him.

 

Another interesting bit is that Israel (which isn’t even European) was the first contestant in the show. Maybe the order was chosen randomly, or perhaps it’s supposed to mean Israel First, Europe Second.

 

Israel

Now I will discuss some of the symbols I saw during the performances of certain artists. Israel had this black sun or iris in the background.

 

Poland

Poland’s song was about freedom and liberation. At first I figured it was just a generic topic for a song, but then I noticed something. There was a night sky with stars in the background. It made me think “A Thousand Points of Light”. Or that according to the Bible, the stars are angels. These stars might represent angels.

 

Later the word “Freedom” appear in the background. The stars or angels want to freedom, i.e. they are imprisoned.

 

In the end they turns into a birds (free as a bird) as the angels are freed. I interpret the presentation to mean the celebration as the fallen angels of Lucifer are freed.

 

The song by the Polish singer, Kasia Mos, isn’t even really about freedom. It’s more a passionate love song. It does have these lines though:

“Like two animals on the run
Not afraid to fly into the sun
Invisible, we don’t leave a trace
We’re shadows in love, we were ghosts”

“Not afraid to fly into the sun” is an obvious reference to Icarus, the symbol of hubris. Also “we” are invisible and do not leave a trace. It sounds like a secret society.

 

Belarus

Next in line is Belarus. There was a planet and a bridge (London Bridge is falling down? in the background. Is the planet Nibiru or something?

 

Toward the end of the performance there was a sun, or a big star in the background. The singers were standing on an airship of some sort. The background show had a Victorian space adventure feel to it.

 

The lyrics say the following:

“Present day will become a birth
Of new wills and better thoughts

Story of my life
Will shine brighter

The sun will sparkle in our blood
The entire beauty of your eyes”

A herald of the New World Order or a new race, the Moonchild?

Artistically speaking I found the Belarus song to be one of the best in the contest. The singers were obnoxiously cheerful to behold, but their song was pretty decent, at least for Eurovision standards.

 

Austria

The Austrian perfomance has the moon in center stage. The astrological theme in the whole show is obvious. And the singer seems like an obvious cuck.

 

Armenia

The Armenian singer looks like a witch, and the performance looks like she’s in hell. There’s also a hindu-like imagery in the performance. There is a symbol in the background that looks hindu to me, and at one point the singer and two dancers create a multi-armed deity icon at some point.

 

The lyrics go as follows:

“Over deeps, over hills
She casts her wings and now it feels
Love is one

Flying high she became
A sun who’s love and light the same
For everyone”

Seems like an angel. “Love is one” sounds very Current Year “love is love” Luciferian breaking down the boundaries crap. Sun’s love and light sounds like Lucifer to me.

 

Netherlands

The Netherlands singers remind me of three witches, but maybe it’s just me. At one point, figure of a person appears to be falling into the sun, or something like that. The singers say “angel”. Is the figure Lucifer? Is this an ode to Lucifer?

 

Italy

Italy’s song is Occidentali’s Karma, or Westerner’s Karma. It sounds like a celebration of the fall of the West.  The dancing monkey or gorilla might represent the degradation or dumbing down of people, to turn this world into the Planet of the Apes.

The venue in the music video is a Buddhist temple, but in the performance on stage the chakra system is shown in the background.

 

Both in the music video and the performance the singer does an odd pose while dancing. I think it’s some sort of symbol.

 

It looks like the sign of Saturn.

 

Or the sign of Jupiter reversed.

 

Portugal

Portugal won the show, but I don’t have much to say about the performance as it almost put me to sleep.

The lyrics say:

“My dear, listen to my prayers
I beg you to return, to want me again”

He could be praying for the return of Lucifer or the Nephilim.

 

Azerbaijan

I actually thought the Azerbaijan performance was sort of interesting. At the end the singer draws a cross on the back of black-robed dancers. The Mark of Cain?

 

Spain

In the Spanish performance there’s the planet Saturn in the background. Nuff’ said. The singer annoys the hell out of me.

Is it just me, or does it seems like every male singer seems like a short manlet? The Swedish guy looked normal/tall though. But most seem short.

 

United Kingdom

In the UK show, the singer is standing on an oyster shell like Venus. Her image is split into three by mirrors, possibly representing her alters created through mind control. The song is about madness after all.

 

Germany

The music video of the German song was full of obvious triangles or pyramids.

 

There was a pyramid in the background at some point in the live performance as well, but it wasn’t as obvious.

 

I feel bad for the artist. It seems to me that she is completely controlled and subjugated by the industry, and probably has to perform all sorts of favours to her handlers. Perhaps the triangles in the video represent how whole of Germany has been subjugated by the Illuminati.

The lyrics go: “I’m almost a sinner, nearly a saint”

Sounds Luciferian to me where morals are just decided on a whim.

 

Ukraine

A huge head of a titan or Nephilim is in the background in the Ukrainian performance.

 

The song is about time. Is the giant Cronos or Saturn?

 

Sweden

The Swedish artist did the OK sign with his hand both in the music video, and the performance. What it means I do not know, since I’ve heard in the past that it means 666. Nowadays it’s supposedly a racist Alt-Right Trump supporter symbol for White supremacy.

 

Bulgaria

There seems to be the abyss in the background  in the Bulgarian performance. It’s like Leviathan is coming up.

 

France

The dome above the stage turns into a spaceship at some point during the French performance. The dome looks like a space helmet to begin with, but during this song it’s most obvious.

 

The Lowdown

I left out some performances since I didn’t have much to say about them. I noticed some over-arching themes such as astrology and space. There were stars, the moon, the sun, Saturn in various performances. The Italian performance had a symbol that resembles an astrological one.

Religious themes were fairly prevalent as well. Some songs talked about angels. Germany’s mentioned a saint. Portugal’s song had prayer. Italy’s performance featured Buddhism and Hinduism. Armenia had a hindu-feel as well.

Sure, religious themes have been employed in song writing since forever, so this does not necessarily imply some bigger scheme.

Overall I see the Eurovision 2017 performance as another celebration to Lucifer, the return of the Nephilim, or Osiris, or whatever you want to call the religious obsession of the elites. I might simply be interpreting things  through my own bias, as I’ve been researching this sort of stuff for years. Some of the symbolism might be innocuous, but I don’t think all of it is.

If there is some sort of occult agenda behind this, I don’t think the artists are necessarily wittingly involved, but I wouldn’t rule it out either. In this day and age I don’t think it’s impossible that the Illuminati, or whatever you want to call the secret societies, could put their puppet in place in every single country involved in the contest.

 

 

Links:

Flashlight (Poland) lyrics: http://www.karaoke-lyrics.net/lyrics/eurovision-song-contest/kasia-mos-flashlight-poland-803554

Belarus lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/02/03/historyja-majho-zyccia-lyrics-navi-belarus-eurovision-2017/171088/

Armenia lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/04/05/fly-with-me-lyrics-artsvik-armenia-eurovision-2017/183853/

Portugal lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/03/18/amar-pelos-dois-lyrics-salvador-sobral-portugal-eurovision-2017/181079/

Germany lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/02/01/perfect-life-lyrics-germanys-unser-song-2017/170594/

The Final: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehH0_UXtQlY

 

 

By whom, when and why was Great Wall of China built?

I find several details on the official history of the Great Wall of China questionable. This has been bothering me for over a year since I claimed that Marco Polo did not go to China, he went to Cathay, a different kingdom. As this is somewhat of a current issues since Donald Trump may be building his own Great Wall of ‘Murica I thought of revisiting it.

 

The Qin Wall

According to official history, the first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang, built the first section of the wall around 220-206 BC. Prior to this China consisted of several small kingdoms, but the emperor unified them, and built the wall to keep out hostile nomads. Or rather he unified already existing fortifications and walls from the various kingdoms in China and unified them into a bigger wall. This wall was, according to China Highlights website, 5,000 kilometers long. It supposedly took 20 years to build. China Highlights points out that there are historical records that suggest that “300,000–500,000 soldiers were assigned to both build and guard the Qin Great Wall with the help of 400,000–500,000 conscripted laborers. Other records suggest that up to 1.5 million men were used during the peak of Qin construction.”

This sounds like a huge amount of people, especially since Qin, according to a Wikipedia estimate, had a population of 20,000,000 at the time. If 1.5 million men were involved in the construction of the wall, it would be around 13% of the population. Moreover of that 20,000,000 at least half would be women, then there would be young boys and old men who couldn’t work, so I wonder how many of the able-bodied men in Qin would not have been working on the wall? This sounds dubious to me. On top of that, building the wall supposedly took 20 years. According to Wikipedia the Great Pyramid of Giza also took around 10-20 years to build. Building the great wall was probably even more arduous than the pyramid. And of course, many critically thinking people find the official claims about the building of the pyramid dubious as well.

The Great Wall of China website states that over a million men died building the wall. Wouldn’t it have been easier just to have those men fight the invading nomads instead of working them to death on the wall?

 

The Ming Wall

Much of the Great Wall we know today was built during the Ming dynasty around 1368-1644 AD. Much of the Qin wall has been lost. The Ming wall was 6,259 km long, a bit over a thousand kilometers longer than the Qin wall. According to China Highlights it took over 200 years to build this wall. This sounds more reasonable, however, it doesn’t mean necessarily that they spent all of the time building the wall. There might have been periods of inaction when it came to the wall.

The Great Wall certainly is genuine enough. I’ve climbed it as well, the feeling up there was marvellous. It really felt like a spiritual place, and not a place of war. Certain historical claims of the wall though might be different.

 

Lack of References

A book by J. Marshall Unger titled “Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning” has a chapter by the name of “The Great Wall of China and other exotic fables”. In it the author suggests that the Great Wall is indeed a fable constructed during the Ming period, and no older references to it exist. Even Wikipedia, i.e. main stream history seems to concur.

In an article on the History of the Great Wall of China, it is mentioned that “One of the first mentions of a wall built against northern invaders is found in a poem, dated from the seventh century BC”. Yet this is 500 years before the Great Wall of Qin was allegedly built. Walls and fortifications certainly existed before the Great Wall did. However, in the section on the Qin dynasty the article states: “Details of the construction [of the Qin wall] were not found in the official histories, but it could be inferred that the construction conditions were made especially difficult by the long stretches of mountains and semi-desert that the Great Wall traversed, the sparse populations of these areas, and the frigid winter climate.” Yes, you can infer whatever you want if you unquestionably accept the story, however it seems off that there are no records the greatest feat of human engineering ever that took decades to finish. You’d think there was some sort of scholar who would have recorded the details for posterity both to ensure that Qin could maintain their defenses and also to glorify the magnificence of their emperor. Perhaps someone did, and the records have been lost, or perhaps there was no record since there was no wall.

Wikipedia does quote a Han dynasty (206 BC-220 AD) statesman Zhufu Yan’s comment on the construction. However, it appears his quote comes from the histriography book “Zizhi Tongjian”, which was published in 1084, at least 800 years after the Han dynasty ended. This sounds unreliable to say the least.

 

What does all of this mean?

I believe there is disinformation and a cover-up regarding the Great Wall. For what reason, I do not know, but I have a few different scenarios.

One is that the Qin wall never existed and it was invented during the Ming dynasty for some reason. One might be to give posthumous prestige to emperor Qin Shi Huang. Another might be that there had been another construction similar to the Great Wall, but the purpose had been different. Perhaps the lack of scholarly evidence of this construction is due to Jesuit missionaries creating ties with China around the time of the Ming dynasty. They might have confiscated ancient manuscripts or destroyed them.

If the construction was not simply a wall used for defense and transporting troops, what was it then? This is purely speculation, but it might have been some sort of aqueduct or perhaps even a power grid of some sort. China could hold all sorts of ruins and relics of an ancient civilization that are kept under wraps. There are pyramids in China that have not been excavated. Perhaps there are ruins under some sections of the Great Wall, and since the wall is there, it is a great excuse not to excavate there.

We have a clear image of how the walls look today, many people, like myself, have visited the wall, or at least seen many pictures of it. Perhaps it looked different in the past.

In 2009 it was announced that new sections of the Great Wall were uncovered spanning 180 miles. This might be true, or perhaps they are simply manufacturing these ruins, or “reconstructing” them, for tourism. Maybe there are ruins that would reveal an ancient civilization with an advanced technology in China and they are destroying it and making look like just another section of the wall.

 

Links:

The Great Wall of the Qin Dynasty: http://www.chinahighlights.com/greatwall/history/qin-dynasty-wall.htm

How Long It Took to Build the Great Wall of China: http://www.chinahighlights.com/greatwall/fact/building-time.htm

Great Pyramid of Giza: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza

Why was the Great Wall of China Built ?: http://www.great-wallofchina.com/why-was-the-great-wall-of-china-built.html

Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning: https://books.google.fi/books?id=fRqKreZFVTYC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=china+great+wall+was+an+aqueduct&source=bl&ots=1-XsgUj7X9&sig=O3dF5rhNmWKcnm9Lntm0Rzwv9Z4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjC8ZmDm7DKAhUGqHIKHUjxB2wQ6AEISDAJ#v=onepage&q=china%20great%20wall%20was%20an%20aqueduct&f=false

History of the Great Wall of China: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Great_Wall_of_China

Zizhi Tongjian: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zizhi_Tongjian

Jesuit China missions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_China_missions

180 Hidden Miles of Great Wall Found: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/world/asia/21wall.html?_r=0

My other writings on ancient China:

https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/marco-polo-did-not-go-to-china/

https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/china-egypt-greece/