Category Archives: Philosophy

Bible vs Christianity, Illuminati Trannies, and 33

Back in 2014 I wrote an article titled “The Fourth Abrahamic Religion”, which referred to atheism or Scientism. I’m going to look back on how I saw the world differently back then compared to now, and discuss where I was correct and incorrect.

First of all I do still think that militant atheism, or Scientism is part of this continuation often called Abrahamic religions. It’s even more obvious now than it was back then with Social Justice Warriors, i.e. Cultural Marxists, becoming more overt with their crazy schemes. While most of them are atheists and anti-religion, many of them are still curiously pro-Islam. Where I think I was wrong though is that Christianity is just one of those harmful, or digital, religions. Or more accurately I don’t think the Bible is part of these man-made delusions. Christianity might be,

 

A Tale of Two Christianities

I’m not claiming that this is a completely unique position, since Alexander Hislop wrote similar sentiments in The Two Babylons in the 19th century. Yet he was basically saying that Catholicism is Mesopotamian mystery religions in disguise, but if I recall correctly he had a positive view of Protestantism. I think that most main stream forms of Christianity, and most people who call themselves Christians, are either wittingly or unwittingly worshipping such mystery religions, or they simply have their man-made religion that coats itself in Biblical imagery.

There are basically two types of Christians: deliberately false ones, and apathetically false ones. The deliberately false Christians are Luciferians, Satanists, Jesuits, or crypto-Jews, that pretend to be Christian to fool others. The apathetic Christians do not really care about the greater questions of life. They merely want to be nice and have a nice life without offending others, and acting superficially Christian of simply part of their culture. They honestly believe that their unbiblical lifestyle is what God and Jesus is all about.

Perhaps you could call me hypocritical, since I do not consider myself Christian, yet I am judging Christians. Maybe I am. In recent years I’ve merely come to the realization that the Bible seems to hold more answers than any other source I’ve seen so far.

 

The Abrahamic Religions

I don’t know if it is accurate or not to call Judaism, Christianity, Islam and atheism Abrahamic religions or not, or if only the people who truly follow the Bible should be called Abrahamic. I don’t want to discuss semantics right now. Perhaps you could say Biblically inspired pagan (man-made) religions vs the religion of the Bible.

Also in my article I was praising animistic and polytheistic religions for exuding life with little evidence to back my claims. Those comments seem silly to me now, and reflect my spiritual bias of the day. It’s not to say that I think that those kind of religions are necessarily bad now either, but I just have very little actual experience with them so I cannot say how they are. I try not to idolize or demonize something I don’t know much about.

 

Trannies, Fallen Angels and the Flat Earth

In just recent months my change in perspective has allowed me to see some conspiracies from a different, and hopefully more accurate, viewpoint. One obvious clue to the relevance of the Bible is the fact that both actual science and the Bible seem to support the fact that the earth does not seem to be curved into a ball, and is not moving. I still do not have all of the facts regarding all of this, but admitting to myself that the earth is probably flat gives a certain inner peace, instead of resisting it out of the fear of sounding silly or going too far against the grain.

For the last few months I’ve been thinking about the idea the movie They Live presents. Every conspiracy nut knows that the basic idea of the movie is true in some sense, but the trick is to figure out how much of an allegory the movie is, or how literal. Are the shadowy elites really aliens, demons, fallen angels, undead spirits of Nephilim trapped on earth, Jesuits, Freemasons, Jews, or what exactly? Are we being controlled by actual non-human entities, humans possessed by such beings, or simply human beings who belong to secret societies?

A couple of Youtubers might have uncovered some important clues to this question: MrE (nothing to do with Rocking MrE) and Russianvids. Both have made videos of the transpocalypse, which refers to the claim that many celebrities, actors, politicians, even royalty, are actually secretly transgender. The claim sounds ridiculous at first, but when you bother to take a look at some of the evidence, it doesn’t sound so silly. MrE claims that basically any actress who has won an Oscar is a transgender. I’m not sure if I would go that far, but there’s something there worth investigating.

Apparently there are some Youtubers who have been discussing these Illuminati trannies, as MrE, calls them for years. I didn’t know until fairly recently that there is allegedly a tranny epidemic among the rich and famous. I did know that Michelle Obama is allegedly a man. I even wrote about it back in 2014. Back then I also heard claims that tennis players Serena and Venus Williams are trannies. Although I wasn’t convinced back then, at least it would make more sense for two men to pretend female in order to excel at sports, but I couldn’t figure out what would be the point in pulling the deception that the First Lady is a man. I wrote about these alleged celebrity trannies a month ago, but back then I was still somewhat unsure what to think of it. Now I have a better view of things.

First of all, if what people like MrE say is correct, that it is basically the religion of many of these elite families to become transgender like Baphomet, and they’ve been doing it for decades, if not centuries, or even millennia, then it’s “normal” for Michelle Obama to be transgender as well. (S)he probably wouldn’t even have been the first tranny First Lady in America. Another thing is that Kerth Barker, who I’ve quoted in the past, said in Angelic Defenders & Demonic Abusers that the generational Satanist families do habitually engage in transvestite activity, i.e. men pretend they are female and vice versa. I don’t recall him saying anything about them actually going through surgery to transition to another gender, but the basic idea is still the same.

Another thing is that if in fact many of these elite families are Satanists or Luciferians, the old idea of the Black Mass is to do what righteous people or the Bible does in reverse. Russianvids also shows a page from a book by Alesteir Crowley (or his translation of Eliphas Levi’s book?) in many of his videos where Crowley describes how you should de everything backwards. These are things I knew of Satanism and the Black Mass even when I was a teenager. I just always thought they sounded silly so I didn’t pay much attention to it. The idea of backmasking in music has been clearly known for decades even among people who are not interested in conspiracies. But if the Satanists really do engage in doing things backwards, reversing one’s gender does not sound like a stretch at all.

MrE says in many of his videos how the Illuminati trannies are “unclean bodies for immortal spirits of Nephilim trapped on earth” or something to that extent. Quite frankly it sounds reasonable to me.

 

Numerology 33

Another thing I’ve learned is some practical numerology from Russianvids. I’ve heard over the course of many years many conspiracy researchers say how the Illuminati or Masons love their numerology and they encode things, but I never really got it. I wasn’t sure are the researchers making it up to sound smart or are they talking about something real. Russianvids is the guy who seems to understand numerology, and make his viewers understand it as well. It comes down to recognizing how the Masons encode the 33 into their fake events. Russianvids has countless videos pointing this out. The latest is from the London Bridge terror attack showing plenty of police cars on the scene with the licence plate adding up to 33.

I also like Russianvids’ explanation of the Masonic 33. Everyone knows how 33 is important to Freemasons, but no-one really knows what it means, but according to Russianvids it refers to the third of the angels that rebelled against God. A simple but reasonable explanation. It also explains why these fallen angels, or their minions, would put their brand on everything.

Russianvids uses a numerology program to decode words. I downloaded the same program a little while ago. First I checked out the name of several people I know. None of them were 33, or any other obvious occult number. So it probably is not simply a co-incidence that these numbers are so frequent among the elites. Then yesterday I found some use for the numerology program. There is a newstory of an artist, Dana Schutz, who painted a picture of dead black teen. Then two other artists, or provocators, started protesting the painting, because a White person is appropriating Black culture, or something. These protestors are Hannah Black and Parker Bright. It just happens that “Hannah Black” is 33 in Chaldean numerology. “Parker” is 33 in Pythagorean numerology. “Bright” sounds like a reference to Lucifer. I do believe that this controversy over the painting is a deliberate stunt by the Masons to divide and conquer people. Whites vs Black. Social Justice Warriors vs normal people.

 

Conclusion

I think most people, even conspiracy minded people, stay away from the “craziest” conspiracy theories because want to bargain with the norms set by society. “9/11 might have been an inside job, but Hollywood actresses are not trannies.” “NASA might have faked the moon landings, but the earth is not flat.” The underlying psychological factor here is that people are trying to run a thin line between reality and acceptability. I will accept this “crazy” but true thing, but I will reject that one, so it evens out. There is always some line people won’t cross to avoid sounding too ridiculous. However the only line you should care about is the line between truth and lies.

And have a gander at the Youtube channels of MrE and Russianvids if you haven’t done so far.

 

Links:

The Fourth Abrahamic Religion: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/the-fourth-abrahamic-religion/

Russianvids: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTrZJrLbsoN171bMFQKN5Xw/featured

MrE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAgVKvt3syB7gV-hL9bMTYw

Is Michelle Obama a man?: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/is-michelle-obama-a-man/

Apparently Hollywood actresses are male: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2017/04/05/apparently-hollywood-actresses-are-male/

Why Dana Schutz Painted Emmett Till: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/why-dana-schutz-painted-emmett-till

 

Cubical Earth Model

I was lying in bed wondering about all things conspiratorial, metaphysical and biblical when I had an alternative interpretation for the shape of the earth pop in my head.

If you want to see the model I am proposing, I suggest you skip down to the My Model paragraph. It’s late, I’m half asleep so I ramble on about stuff that probably isn’t news to most people.

 

Flat Earth confessions and Biblical rambling

I don’t consider myself a flat earther, but I am almost a flat earther. The claims of the “scientific” establishment that the earth is spherical sound flimsy at best. The pictures we have of a spherical earth that is actually shaped like an oblate pearoid from NASA are all photoshopped. Moreover I’ve seen plenty of videos from flat earth researchers with weather balloons high up showing no curvature. I’ve seen people show videos showing a city on the other side of a huge lake although the city should be hidden behind curvature. And of course the behaviour of water, i.e. always trying to find level, makes no sense on a sphere. Out in the real world water never behaves like it does on the NASA pictures of the “blue marble” where water curves around the ball. Therefore I don’t think there is curvature.

I also do not think the earth is moving. I reject the heliocentric Copernican model, like most flat earthers. Yet why I don’t consider myself a flat earther is that I don’t subscribe to any particular flat earth model. I don’t necessarily think the earth is flat. Currently though based on what I’ve seen, there seems to be no curvature, i.e. the earth seems flat, but the keyword is “seems”. It is possible we are missing a key piece in puzzle that would turn everything upside down. It is possible (although I don’t think so, yet it is possible) that much of the evidence for flat earth has been faked somehow. So I don’t like to call myself a flat earther. You might think this is an insignificant semantic difference, but it is very significant to me.

What I do believe, however, is that the Bible is the most reliable source of information when it comes to the nature of earth. I don’t consider myself Christian. I do not think that the Bible is necessarily the infallible word of God. I have not found Jesus. I consider myself a skeptic when it comes to most things. This means I tend to resist believing in anything until I have to admit to myself the weight of evidence forces me to believe in what is in front of me. Over the course of many years and theoretical ruminations I have been forced to admit to myself that the Bible usually knows better than all of modernity. Whether its me coming to understand how atheism is deluded cult, or that the Theory of Evolution is a lie or a delusion. I came to understand these things based on reason and observation, which eventually lead me to pay more attention to the Bible.

I don’t know if the Bible is perfect or not, or if it’s been altered or not, or if some sections of it have been cut out. I don’t quite know who or what Jesus is, but as the rulers of this world seem to despise him, there must be something significant about him.

The Bible then is probably the most reliable source when it comes to the shape of the earth (there might be other ancient texts like that, but I don’t know about them). Let’s see some of the basic ideas that flat earther’s usually mention:

1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”

Psalm 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm …”

Psalm 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable …”

Psalm 104:5: “Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.”

Isaiah 45:18: “…who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast…”

Clearly according to the Bible the earth is unmovable. Very different to the “everything is spinning” -model of Copernicus. The earth is also apparently set on pillars.

1 Samuel 2:8 “For the pillars of the earth are the LORD’s, and on them he has set the world.”

This however opens more questions, such as what are the pillars set on? The Bible also refers to “four corners” of the earth:

Ezekiel 7:2 “An end, the end is come upon the four corners of the land.”

This might mean the earth has four corners, or it might simply be a metaphorical expression.

Genesis 1: 6-7 “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.”

I’ve found the notion of the Firmament fascinating even before I really understood what it is. It is some sort of solid substance, like a brass mirror that separates the waters above (outer space in modern parlance) from the waters below on earth. This is usually conceived as some kind of dome, like that of a snow globe.

I believe the Firmament exists, although I don’t know it for a fact. It is not necessarily though shaped like a dome though. As far as I know, the Bible does not describe its exact shape.

The earth seems be a circle of some kind, or there is a circle on the earth:

Proverbs 8:27 “When he established the heavens, I was there; when he drew a circle on the face of the deep,”

Now this passage varies significantly in different translations:

King James: “When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:

New Living Translation: “I was there when he established the heavens, when he drew the horizon on the oceans.”

According to my understanding “circle” is the most accurate translation. King James’ “compass” reminds me of the Masonic square and compass. Living Translation’s replacement of “circle” with “horizon” is weird, and seems like deliberate disinformation to me.

Let’s get on with the show. My point is that the Bible does not make clear what the exact shape of the Earth is, but it does mention certain distinctive attributes such as the Firmament and lack of movement. Many flat earthers say the Bible is a flat earth book. I wouldn’t go that far, but certainly the Bible is more a flat earth book than heliocentric spinning ball book.

 

My Model

It’s late, half of my brain is half asleep and finally I can get on with showing the model I came up with. I’ve heard some people mention before that maybe the earth is a cube, but I hadn’t really seen a proper model of it. Anyway, here is the model I envisioned:

The circle of the earth is on the bottom of this cube. The Firmament is the top of the cube, or its “lid”. The cube has walls, probably of some solid material. The reason we don’t see the walls even from a high mountaintop or an airplane is that the earth is so huge, the walls are far, far away. So basically the proportions on the picture are wrong. The circle in the center should be smaller, or the cube around it should be bigger, but you should get the point.

If the earth has pillars, they would probably be under the box, or perhaps they are on the four corners of the box. The blue/green area in the middle would probably be something like the commonly used flat earth map:

 

Perhaps around the edges are the ice walls that many theorize about, or something else. There might be hundreds of thousands of kilometres, maybe even millions, from the edge of the ice wall to the walls of the box.

The box picture above is basically what I imagined. However as I was googling for a suitable cube, I found this crop circle image:

 

It supposedly appeared in 2012 on a field in Britain, I believe. Perhaps that is actually the shape of the earth. On the outside is the circle of the earth, and within the circle is the box. And we are within the box.

One interesting bit I noticed is that if you put “circle inside a cube” into Google image search, you don’t really find any circles inside a cube, but you get pictures of a sphere inside a cube. Were those pictures made by spherical earth Creationists?

I also had an interpretation of outer space, or the blackness we see at night with stars twinkling up there. It might actually be a reflection of hell. Maybe it’s a mirage, an upside down image of hell that is below us. The stars are fallen angels trapped in hell cajoling us with their light. This could be what “as above, so below” means. We don’t see hell from the box, but we see a reflection of it at night. During the day, perhaps we see heaven. This is just an idea though.

I don’t believe in this cube model myself either. Yet the idea popped into my head so I thought I should share it. Maybe someone else has already come up with a similar model, but I haven’t seen it yet.

 

Links:

Thinking outside the box: ‘Crop cube’ that looks like a 250ft 3D block appears in field of wheat: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2209554/Crop-cube-looks-like-250ft-3D-block-appears-field-wheat.html

What did Nietzsche mean by God is dead?

I’ve had this idea rolling around in my head for a long time, but I think I have a decent idea of what Nietzsche meant by his famous phrase “God is dead”.

Let’s just get right to it. For the sake of the argument, the guy below is God. People worship and revere him, and want to protect him from his enemies.

God

 

Eventually the faithful get so worried about the well-being of God, that they build an armour to protect him. This is actually the first sign that people are losing faith in God, as they don’t trust God to take care of himself.

God’s armour

 

Still at first, God is safe inside the armour and people continue to worship him. Over time though, God gets pissed off at the whole situation and leaves, or simply suffocates, leaving the armour for people to worship. People keep worshipping the hollow armour, and religion becomes a meaningless ritual with no substance to it. This is what “God is dead, and we have killed him” means.

Later on people can take a look inside the armour and see there is no God there, and say God never existed in the first place. Whether or not God actually exists or existed at any point as an entity in the universe is not as relevant as the fact that there is an inherent need in most people to have faith in God. That in itself does change how people behave, hopefully for the better.

To put this hollow armour analogy in a more abstract way, is that at first people had a genuine faith in God whether or not this faith was reciprocated by an actual God. Over the course of time this genuine God was replaced by a man-made image of God. Man got rid of the real thing in favour of a man-made facsimile. I suppose the underlying motivation is that if man made God, man can also control him.

The Left is no longer interested in challenging Social Norms

When I was younger I considered myself a leftist, and I was all for challenging traditional gender roles, the traditional family, religion and so on. Now, years later, however I consider those things challenged and the traditional values came on top the challenge against ideologies of the modern world. The traditional way may not be optimal way of doing things, but so far the alternatives I’ve seen have been inferior the fruits that they yield. The modern, Social Justice Warrior-dominated left on the other hand is not interested in challenging the old ways, they’re only interested in destruction.

Let’s illustrate how challenging something or someone works; Hulk Hogan is the heavyweight champion, but Andre the Giant thinks he is stronger than Hogan so he challenges him for the title. They have a match and the stronger one, or better fighter, wins. (I am aware that wrestling is scripted.) It’s a simple as that. Maybe I think that Andre the Giant will win since he is bigger than Hogan, but after seeing the match I must concede that Hogan is a better wrestler despite this. The Social Justice Warrior, however, is not interested in challenging their opponent. They instead hide in their safe spaces, and avoid direct challenges with their opposition. When they do fight their opponents, they tend to do it in very underhanded ways. Let’s say that the Social Justice Warriors decide, arbitrarily, like they make most of their decisions, that Andre the Giant is a better wrestler. They do not wish to see him and Hogan fight it out in a ring. Instead they would do something like poison Hulk Hogan one day prior to the match so he cannot attend, therefore Andre is declared the new champion. This reveals the lack of faith of the modern left in their own ideologies. In the end, they only want to see that which they despise the most destroyed, since there is nothing they truly love.

The left, as it is now, are like locusts that exist only to annihilate. There is no worker’s paradise they seek. It is an excuse to destroy what they hate; anything that is healthy and wholesome. That is why they ally themselves with the destructive elements of Islam, and are ultimately ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to challenge the prevailing social order. In fact, anyone who despises the Current Year social norms of globalism, feminism, political correctness and all the rest, is challenging prevailing social norms: this far-left insanity. It is now the traditionalists, conservatives and right-wingers who are challenging social norms, and usually coming on top. This is not a very unique insight. Rather, I’ve been wondering why my views on certain social issues have changed, and how. Perhaps I haven’t changed that much since my youth, but the world has.

 

People love a good Con Man

There’s a decent Japanese anime called Mob Psycho 100. It’s a satirical story of a teenage boy with powerful psychic abilities. He is able to exorcise spirits and he’s stronger than any other person with psychic abilities. (The series is sort similar in tone to One Punch Man for those interested in anime.) Yet this isn’t about anime, but about human nature and how well Mod Psycho 100 presents it.

Warning spoilers! If you’re intending on watching the anime and do not wish to learn what happens, I suggest you don’t read this yet.

The main character, Mob, has a mentor or master, Arataka Reigen, whom Mob looks up to. The master is con man, but he has fooled Mob into thinking he is a psychic as well. Reigen has an agency for helping people who are being pestered by evil spirits. Sometimes his clients aren’t actually being affected by spirits, and Reigen pretends they are, and he performs some sort of fake ritual to exorcise the spirits, performs a massage on them, or does other nice things to them. When there is an actual spirit affecting them, he asks Mob to exorcise them for him. Naturally Reigen charges money for his services. Despite being a con man, Reigen usually does make his clients feel better, whether or not there is a spirit involved. He cons people, yet he also helps them.

In the final episode of Mob Psycho 100, Mob and his friends have infiltrated the compound of the Japanese branch of a nefarious secret society, Claw, ruled by powerful psychics who want to take over the world. The logo of Claw even resembles the Illuminati all-seeing-eye. In the final episode there is naturally a confrontation between Mob and his friends between the leaders of Claw. Mob’s friends advice him to use his powers to vanquish their enemies, but when his master Reigen arrives on the scene, he tells Mob he shouldn’t hurt people and advices him to run away instead. However, they are unable to escape and Reigen ends up saving the day.

Reigen ends up beating the boss of Claw and his minions of the Japanese branch. He is able to do that because Mob inadvertently lends his powers to Reigen. So in the end the con man saves the day. Whenever Mob goes all out in using his powers, he goes into some sort of berserk mode that can end up being harmful for himself and others, so by Reigen using Mob’s powers he is in fact saving Mob from doing something harmful, i.e. while Mob may have been able to defeat their enemies with his powers, but it might have cost him dearly.

This reminds me of Donald Trump in some way. While I do think Trump is a con man in some sense, he did do a great favour to all us by defeating Hillary Clinton in the election. Like Timothy Alberino put it before the election, that Trump is a knight in slimy armour, and the only one who can defeat the dragon that is Hillary. Perhaps, Mob somehow represents the people of earth who saw what a disaster Hillary would be as a president, and we loaned our powers to Trump to defeat her. Had we done it ourselves, it might have cost us as well. Like Nietzsche said: “He who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself“.

Now that Trump has done what we wanted him to do, we should not expect too much from him, since he is a con man. He did defeat the dragon, but if we delude ourselves to think he is truly a magnificent hero, it won’t end well. Perhaps we needed a con man, someone who tells us half-truths to get the job done, since I don’t think that humanity is prepared to face the truth. We always need a good lie to get us going. This includes us “truthers” as much as the average “sheeple”.

I think all goes back to the garden of Eden when Adam and Eve were too willing to buy the lie sold by the serpent that they’d be as gods. There is something in our make-up that we prefer a lie, and a liar, to someone who tells the absolute truth. Had Trump been a paragon of virtue, we wouldn’t have given him the time of day. If and when Trump’s lies start to cause damage, then maybe we’ll just conjure up another con man to save us from him.

In Mob Psycho 100 the boss of Claw even says that they think they are special because they have psychic powers, but Reigen says they are not, and people won’t like them just because of that. Reigen says they are basically children who never grew up. This is reminiscent of the Social Justice Warrios who think of themselves as unique snowflakes and more special than everyone else, but everyone despises them. This parallels with Trump defeating political correctness with his victory in the election.

It all comes down to humanity being unwilling to come to terms with reality, and we invent another lie to protect ourselves from an older lie that has become unbearable.

 

Links

Mob Psycho 100: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mob_Psycho_100

 

The Red Pill, or rather Suppository, of the Alt-Right

I wrote a year ago how the taking the red pill is another false choice like the blue pill. Stay clear of drugs. Recently it’s become even more obvious to me how right I was.

When I listened to the interview of Reactionary Jew on Radio 3Fourteen a few weeks ago, the most annoying thing about the whole interview is how the Reactionary Jew over-used the term red pill. Him, and many other Alt-Righters use it as if once you are “red pilled” you know everything. There is no longer need for you to look into matters further. You don’t need to think or question anymore. You are red pilled.

I can accept people using the term red pilled in the sense that you are red pilled on an issue, such as being red pilled on 9/11. You understand that the official story doesn’t make sense, building 7 fell down even though no plane hit it and so forth, but it does not mean you know everything about 9/11. But this isn’t how most people use the term nowadays.

I’ve been reading people’s comments on the Mike Enoch doxing and his leftist faghag Jew-wife. Some of his fans and supporters try to excuse the fact that this supposed “neo-Nazi” White Nationalist who pretended to hate Jews was married to one since Mike Enoch supposedly red pilled so many people and brought them into the movement? What does red pilling then even mean? Enoch tells his followers about the duplicity of the Jews, turns them against the Jews, but when it’s found out Enoch is literally and figuratively in bed with Jews they say it doesn’t matter? It just means the red pill is worthless. Enoch’s followers learned nothing. All they got is a celebrity to fawn over. Additionally, since the Alt-Righters seem to be only concerned with bringing more people to their movement, instead of making sure they have decent and trustworthy people, it’s a clear sign that they only care about quantity, not quality. The Alt-Right is not a political movement. It is a gentleman’s club where pretentious dilettantes just want to hold glasses of wine in their hand while they discuss their hobbies and other trivial matters. Their precious 14 words, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”, are nothing but a fashion statement. The same as far-left SJWs who sit in Starbucks tweeting on their i-Pads how capitalism is bad.

Enoch’s defenders also say that Enoch “has done so much for the movement”. As someone who is not well-versed in Mike Enoch’s accomplishments I wonder what he has actually done? I’ve seen people claim he has red pilled people, but so far I haven’t seen a single example of any great insight he has had. No philosophical breakthrough or a strategic maneuver that has benefited the White Nationalist cause in a practical way. Maybe he has done some of that, but based on what I’ve seen he has merely entertained people. He’s been witty, funny and pleasant to listen to, for some people. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it hardly makes him an integral part of any actual political movement.

The whole of Alt-Right is just another drug to distract you from the drudgery of everyday life. Some people get fed up with the blue pill of being an ordinary consumer with a 9-to-5 job and believing everything the TV says. This is good of course, but instead of trying to wake up from the drug-induced stupor you get the red adrenaline pill of fighting for a Noble Cause™. I agree that it is more exciting than the blue pill that makes you mellow and obedient, but you’re still drugged and delusional.

It’s certainly not only the Alt-Right that drugged by the red pill. There are various alternatives of the red pilled tailored for your pleasure. There’s the red pill of the left when you discover how the world is ruled by the evil White cis-het male capitalist patriarchy and you have to fight against them. There’s the leftie-environmentalist pill where you have to fight for animal rights, veganism and all that against the oil companies and the nuclear power industry. There’s the red pill of the conspiracy theorist where everything bad that happens is because it was an Illuminati sacrifice, a hoax or a false flag. That is not to say that Illuminati sacrifices, hoaxes and false flags don’t happen, but you have to investigate every event separately to understand what happened. Then there’s the Alt-Right White Nationalist red pill. And I guess you could say the latest pharmaceutical could be called the Sargon-pill when you are so extremely centrist and moderate you try to make sitting on the fence and being lukewarm an artform.

There are some redeeming qualities to all of these red pills, but ultimately they are a ready-made template that will lead you astray.

I don’t think in this day and age any political movement can work. Internet-based movements just aren’t real movements, and organizing a grass-roots movement in meatspace that could actually wield power in the real world sounds like Utopian dream. Most likely they’ll never get of the ground, or they’ll end getting co-opted either by trained operatives or simply by self-serving assholes. Be it the Alt-Right movement, truth movement, Occupy Wallstreet or anything like that. They always seem to fail. This is not me being black-pilled, but realistic. The only thing we can really do is to try to pursue the truth where it leads and stick with whatever principles we have. Don’t go along with any movement that changes its principles on a whim or based on what sounds convenient.

To finish this off, I’d like to share some screencaps from Daily Stormer of people excusing Mike Enoch’s duplicity. Many on the website don’t and call him out on it, but there are plenty fanboys out there as well.

 

mikepass

It’s nice to see you stick with your principles.

 

contribution

How did he actually contribute to the cause? By lying a deceiving all you idiots who fawned over him?

 

complicated

Such mental chicanery. I guess he refuses to look into it further to find out that Mike’s wife is a faghag diversity officer as well.

 

married-for-10-years

Mike brought a lot of people to the movement. “Mine more souls!” Only quantity matters. And he chooses to assume the best about Enoch’s intentions. “I have no doubt if…”, “I can’t imagine how…” These comments just reveal you are clueless, and nothing about Enoch’s benevolence.

 

mikespants

This post might be a troll. Even the poster’s name is Pakis4Anglin, which doesn’t sound very White Nationalist. However, if this is genuine, it wins the award on mental chicanery to excuse Mike Enoch’s duplicitous actions.

  1. Sure, I used to watch the Nanny with Fran Drescher when I was a teenager. It still doesn’t mean I married a Jew, and I’m not a White Nationalist who has built his career around hating Jews.
  2. Mike clerly did not wear pants since he allowed his wife to be a faghag with LGBT drag queens.
  3. Maybe I’m missing out on something since I am not a White Nationalist, but I don’t think the number of bedrooms is an important issue in White Nationalism. It is not a bedroom or furniture compairing club, it is supposedly a political movement based around race and nationalism. Race-mixing is an anathema to them, especially race-mixing with Jews.

 

pro-white-community

Let’s end this with this week’s “Common Filth was right again” -comment. Saying that this controversy “is sending a shockwave through the pro-white community” just sounds gay as hell. You replace “pro-white” with “LGBT” when talking about any event that the gays don’t like and say “[this event] is sending a shockwave through the LGBT community”.

 

 

Links:

Maybe you shouldn’t take the Red Pill either: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/maybe-you-shouldnt-take-the-red-pill-either/

What does the Monarch stand for in Monarch Mind Control?

One aspect of MK Ultra mind control is called Monarch Mind Control. The word monarch has perplexed me for a long time why is it used here?

The word monarch has two basic meanings; a type of butterfly and “one who rules alone”, basically a king or a queen. The monarch butterfly is often used to symbolize mind control, but how it is the connection here? One explanation I’ve heard is that the mind control victim experiences a kind of chrysalis and emerges as a new person, or alter, from the cocoon after being subjected to various types of torture and conditioning. Fritz Springmeier also said in his interview with Chuck and Kim Ochelli in 2015 something to the extent that some genes are inherited in the same way as monarch butterflies’, but I don’t remember exactly what he said.

My personal theory on the matter of the monarch is related to genes and the second meaning for the word, ruler, i.e. royalty. Many conspiracy researchers, including Fritz Springmeier, have discussed the notion of the 13 Illuminati bloodlines that rule the world. While I do not know if there are exactly 13 of these bloodlines and whether they call themselves Illuminati or not, it is well documented that a kind of royal bloodline is still ruling over most of the world. The vast majority of US presidents have been related to each other and European royalty. Even former vice-president Dick Cheney is related to Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton is related to the Bush family. And so on.

There clearly is some sort of “noble” family ruling the world. Most conspiracy researchers who discuss this issue describe this bloodline as somehow wicked, and seem to suggest that the idea that they rule over the masses is somehow immoral. While it is certainly true that this ruling family, or community of interconnected bloodlines, has acted fiendishly in recent centuries to say the least, but I theorize that the bloodline itself may not be wicked.

It is called Monarch Mind Control; the monarchs are being mind controlled. Perhaps the monarchs themselves are not wicked, but the ones controlling them are. I theorize that the purpose of this bloodline is to rule over people, and they are the only ones that can. Without this bloodline society would descend into chaos. The reason that the vast majority of the masses who see George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or whoever of the blood, on a podium talking are inclined to put their faith in the speaker, no matter what that person is saying. They have a certain unique attribute that makes the listener compliant on a genetic level. You can, of course, resist the effect if you are conscious of it, or of the vile actions of the speaker, but if you are unaware, then you are bound to be affected.

If my theory is correct (and I don’t mean this theory necessarily entirely my unique invention as I’ve read and listened to countless researchers over the years and may have gathered bits and pieces from different people) then the way to fix the world’s problems is not to overthrow the ruling elite, but to release them of the mind control. If a regular guy like or you who probably do not possess the mystical genetic marker try to run a huge nation, it would probably fail despite our good intentions or intelligence. We just don’t have the genetic component that is required to sway the masses.

The Rh negative blood type probably has something to do with all of this as well, but I don’t know about it in great detail.

That’s basically my theory. Too often I hear this fairly Marxist idea in conspiracy research that the world is so messed up because we are ruled over by these evil oligarchs and if we just get rid of them everything will be fine. The oligarchs we have now are indeed evil, but are downtrodden masses genuinely any better? There is the old saying that a country gets the kind of leader it deserves. If we just fetched our guillotines and executed the ruling class, soon after we’d just have more of the same. Perhaps the world wouldn’t be as centralized, but we’d just have local thugs oppressing us. I’m not saying we should be happy with the status quo, but that we need to look for alternative explanations on what is going on, and how to fix things.

When I look at someone like Hillary Clinton I despise what she has done, but when I see all of these weird seizures she has I can’t help but feel sorry for her. It’s like this poor woman is possessed by an evil entity. I think we should help her if we can. The human inside this husk for the globalist Luciferian agenda may simply be another victim.

 

Links:

Jaded Chuck and Kim Interview Fritz Springmeier 6 20 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXnCe3KtZZE