Category Archives: Psychology

Locusts in our midst, and the 322 London Attack

Yesterday there was an alleged terrorist attack in London. The date was March 22nd, i.e. 322, the number best known from Skull and Bones. This along with other facts had led people to think it was a false flag attack. It probably was, but I’ll wait for more facts to appear before making a judgement. Rather, I’ll comment on the reactions of people to this attack, people who unquestionably believe the official story.

Twitter is flooded with #PrayForLondon. Just this by itself is evidence of Orwellian Newspeak where words lose their meaning. I remember once, in the long long time ago era, when the word “pray” meant trying to commune with God, or ask God for help. Nowadays it doesn’t really mean anything. It is a copula word used to link a city to a terrorist event and the grieving that ensues. A copula is a word used in linguistics used to link subject and predicate, for example in “London is a city”, the word “is” is a copula. It does not mean anything by itself, but it used to form a coherent sentence.  I’d wager that most people who use hashtags such as #PrayForLondon are atheists, and therefore would never pray. In fact, I don’t think they know what the word means. They probably think it means “I’m sad because of”, so it would be #I’mSadBecauseOfLondon. Why does London make them sad? Because the media told them to feel so.

Twitter seems also full of locust liberals who think the attack was perpetrated by Muslims, and they want to excuse their behaviour because they were Muslims. These people are almost literal Golems as their ways of thinking is very Talmudic. Actions and their moral repercussions are based on identity politics, instead of a logically consistent moral code. If the attackers had been White Christians, they would condemn all White Christians, but since they are allegedly Muslims, the liberals defend them. I wonder how they would react if the attackers were Japanese Buddhists?

 

I myself am not sure whether the attackers were Muslims, MI5, Mossad or what, or if the attack actually occurred or was a hoax, but these Twitter people seem to believe it was Muslims.

The reason these locust liberals excuse it is, as I wrote yesterday in my rant how the modern left does not challenge social norms, they want everything destroyed. They excuse alleged violent Muslim behaviour because deep-down they believe it will bring forth more destruction. Their only value and purpose in life is to bring more confusion and destruction. They will rationalize anything that happens with this underlying thought.

The mindscape of the modern liberal is not human. They do not understand reason nor logic, nor do they have moral principles. Otherwise they would not excuse these alleged violent actions perpetrated by a potentially hostile outside force.

 

 

The Left is no longer interested in challenging Social Norms

When I was younger I considered myself a leftist, and I was all for challenging traditional gender roles, the traditional family, religion and so on. Now, years later, however I consider those things challenged and the traditional values came on top the challenge against ideologies of the modern world. The traditional way may not be optimal way of doing things, but so far the alternatives I’ve seen have been inferior the fruits that they yield. The modern, Social Justice Warrior-dominated left on the other hand is not interested in challenging the old ways, they’re only interested in destruction.

Let’s illustrate how challenging something or someone works; Hulk Hogan is the heavyweight champion, but Andre the Giant thinks he is stronger than Hogan so he challenges him for the title. They have a match and the stronger one, or better fighter, wins. (I am aware that wrestling is scripted.) It’s a simple as that. Maybe I think that Andre the Giant will win since he is bigger than Hogan, but after seeing the match I must concede that Hogan is a better wrestler despite this. The Social Justice Warrior, however, is not interested in challenging their opponent. They instead hide in their safe spaces, and avoid direct challenges with their opposition. When they do fight their opponents, they tend to do it in very underhanded ways. Let’s say that the Social Justice Warriors decide, arbitrarily, like they make most of their decisions, that Andre the Giant is a better wrestler. They do not wish to see him and Hogan fight it out in a ring. Instead they would do something like poison Hulk Hogan one day prior to the match so he cannot attend, therefore Andre is declared the new champion. This reveals the lack of faith of the modern left in their own ideologies. In the end, they only want to see that which they despise the most destroyed, since there is nothing they truly love.

The left, as it is now, are like locusts that exist only to annihilate. There is no worker’s paradise they seek. It is an excuse to destroy what they hate; anything that is healthy and wholesome. That is why they ally themselves with the destructive elements of Islam, and are ultimately ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to challenge the prevailing social order. In fact, anyone who despises the Current Year social norms of globalism, feminism, political correctness and all the rest, is challenging prevailing social norms: this far-left insanity. It is now the traditionalists, conservatives and right-wingers who are challenging social norms, and usually coming on top. This is not a very unique insight. Rather, I’ve been wondering why my views on certain social issues have changed, and how. Perhaps I haven’t changed that much since my youth, but the world has.

 

People love a good Con Man

There’s a decent Japanese anime called Mob Psycho 100. It’s a satirical story of a teenage boy with powerful psychic abilities. He is able to exorcise spirits and he’s stronger than any other person with psychic abilities. (The series is sort similar in tone to One Punch Man for those interested in anime.) Yet this isn’t about anime, but about human nature and how well Mod Psycho 100 presents it.

Warning spoilers! If you’re intending on watching the anime and do not wish to learn what happens, I suggest you don’t read this yet.

The main character, Mob, has a mentor or master, Arataka Reigen, whom Mob looks up to. The master is con man, but he has fooled Mob into thinking he is a psychic as well. Reigen has an agency for helping people who are being pestered by evil spirits. Sometimes his clients aren’t actually being affected by spirits, and Reigen pretends they are, and he performs some sort of fake ritual to exorcise the spirits, performs a massage on them, or does other nice things to them. When there is an actual spirit affecting them, he asks Mob to exorcise them for him. Naturally Reigen charges money for his services. Despite being a con man, Reigen usually does make his clients feel better, whether or not there is a spirit involved. He cons people, yet he also helps them.

In the final episode of Mob Psycho 100, Mob and his friends have infiltrated the compound of the Japanese branch of a nefarious secret society, Claw, ruled by powerful psychics who want to take over the world. The logo of Claw even resembles the Illuminati all-seeing-eye. In the final episode there is naturally a confrontation between Mob and his friends between the leaders of Claw. Mob’s friends advice him to use his powers to vanquish their enemies, but when his master Reigen arrives on the scene, he tells Mob he shouldn’t hurt people and advices him to run away instead. However, they are unable to escape and Reigen ends up saving the day.

Reigen ends up beating the boss of Claw and his minions of the Japanese branch. He is able to do that because Mob inadvertently lends his powers to Reigen. So in the end the con man saves the day. Whenever Mob goes all out in using his powers, he goes into some sort of berserk mode that can end up being harmful for himself and others, so by Reigen using Mob’s powers he is in fact saving Mob from doing something harmful, i.e. while Mob may have been able to defeat their enemies with his powers, but it might have cost him dearly.

This reminds me of Donald Trump in some way. While I do think Trump is a con man in some sense, he did do a great favour to all us by defeating Hillary Clinton in the election. Like Timothy Alberino put it before the election, that Trump is a knight in slimy armour, and the only one who can defeat the dragon that is Hillary. Perhaps, Mob somehow represents the people of earth who saw what a disaster Hillary would be as a president, and we loaned our powers to Trump to defeat her. Had we done it ourselves, it might have cost us as well. Like Nietzsche said: “He who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself“.

Now that Trump has done what we wanted him to do, we should not expect too much from him, since he is a con man. He did defeat the dragon, but if we delude ourselves to think he is truly a magnificent hero, it won’t end well. Perhaps we needed a con man, someone who tells us half-truths to get the job done, since I don’t think that humanity is prepared to face the truth. We always need a good lie to get us going. This includes us “truthers” as much as the average “sheeple”.

I think all goes back to the garden of Eden when Adam and Eve were too willing to buy the lie sold by the serpent that they’d be as gods. There is something in our make-up that we prefer a lie, and a liar, to someone who tells the absolute truth. Had Trump been a paragon of virtue, we wouldn’t have given him the time of day. If and when Trump’s lies start to cause damage, then maybe we’ll just conjure up another con man to save us from him.

In Mob Psycho 100 the boss of Claw even says that they think they are special because they have psychic powers, but Reigen says they are not, and people won’t like them just because of that. Reigen says they are basically children who never grew up. This is reminiscent of the Social Justice Warrios who think of themselves as unique snowflakes and more special than everyone else, but everyone despises them. This parallels with Trump defeating political correctness with his victory in the election.

It all comes down to humanity being unwilling to come to terms with reality, and we invent another lie to protect ourselves from an older lie that has become unbearable.

 

Links

Mob Psycho 100: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mob_Psycho_100

 

A Few Case Studies on being Jewish

I have gathered up a few examples of Jews and how Jewishness affects them. The people in question are a Hungarian politician, Csanád Szegedi, a Sicilian man (and his grandmother), Christopher Columbus, and David Seaman, a controversial Pizzagate researcher.

Perhaps a title that says a few examples on being Jewish would be more accurate, but case studies sounds much nicer.

 

The Hungarian Politician

Csanád Szegedi was a Hungarian nationalist politician known for his “anti-Semitic” remarks. However, he eventually he discovered he himself is a Jew. The NPR website states the following:

“[I]n 2010 a prisoner confronted him with evidence that he had Jewish roots. According to the AP, Szegedi tried to bribe the prisoner to keep him quiet, but rumors and innuendo reached a fever pitch by late last year and in June, Szegedi conceded that his mother was a Jew. According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.”

Szegedi’s eventual reaction to this was to become a Jew. In fact, he appears to be making aliya, i.e. immigrating to Israel. Or maybe he already did it. Prior to these revelations Szegedi has accused Jews of “‘buying up’ the country” and he “railed about the ‘Jewishness’ of the political elite and claimed Jews were desecrating national symbols”, according to The Star.

What makes this interesting is that Szegedi changed his critical stance on Jews after finding out that he is a Jew, instead of fighting the Jewish elite and continuing to promote Hungarian nationalism. He embraced his Jewishness. There are two different viewpoints on what makes a person a Jew, is it genetic or a cultural/religious thing. If Jewishness is genetic in a way that it makes Jews behave differently, then shouldn’t he have been pro-Jewish to begin with? Instead this case might support the argument that Jews behave in a Jewey way because they are raised in a certain way.

Then again maybe Szegedi knew he was a Jew to begin with, but hid his identity from others, but after he was outed, he forsook Hungarian nationalism as people wouldn’t trust him anymore. Alternatively, perhaps he was intrigued by Jews to begin with because of his Jewish genetics, but only after Szegedi learned he is Jewish he understood his interest in Jews.

Another interesting tidbit is how NPR described his mother being a Jew: “According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.” Are you Jews somehow spiritual affected by this law that force them to behave a certain way?

 

Jews in Sicily

An article in The Economist titled “Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring” describes one Jewish man, Gabriele Spagna, who grew up as normal Sicilian, presumably a Catholic, but his grandmother on her deathbed had confided to him that she was had been Jewish all along, while pretending to be something else. Apparently this revelation also turned Spagna into a practising Jew as well. He seems beholden to Jewish law as well.

 

Columbus a crypto-Jew?

I had heard of conspiracy theories before alleging that Christopher Columbus had been a crypto-Jew, a Jew who pretends to be Christian while practicing in secret, but I found an article on Daily Mail saying that some (main stream?) historian are claiming the same thing. According to these historians Columbus had been a “Marrano”, crypto-Jew, and he had been looking for a safe haven for Jews in his voyages.

All of these three accounts, Szegedi, Spagna and Columbus, seem to suggest that Jews are never really Christians or Europeans, instead they owe allegiance to their Jewishness.

 

David Seaman

David Seaman is a main stream journalist who became well-known for his coverage of Pizzagate on his Youtube channel, but a rather intriguing controversy has arisen around him in the last week.

I discovered his Youtube channel around the time that Pizzagate started trending around the internet. I was a bit skeptical of Seaman at first, since he said he had worked for Huffington Post, yet his coverage of Pizzagate was reasonable, and I was happy to see a main stream journalist promote the topic so I followed him for a few months. Eventually though I stopped following him for a few different factors: he didn’t seem to be bringing much new research on Pizzagate, I began to suspect he was more interested in getting donations, and he looked Jewish and his name sounds Jewish as well. Once or twice Seaman even said something like grown people had gotten physically sick and vomited due to their research on Pizzagate, which I found a bit excessive. It sounds more like a character in a movie might say, instead of something that actually happens, so it got my alarm bells ringing. I stopped following him maybe a month ago, and did not pay more attention to him until now.

I try not to judge people simply on the grounds that they are Jewish yet centuries of European heritage, two Millennia of Christian teachings, and my personal observations have taught me that you should not trust Jews, and it appears it was a sensible course of action.

A week ago a Youtuber by the name of Nathan Stolpman published a video on his channel, Lift the Veil, exposing some dubious facts about Seaman. Shortly after this Seaman deleted all of his videos. It seems Seaman had been “shilling” for (his own words) a company called Goldmoney, owned by an Israeli Jew, and Seaman appeared to be promoting Pizzagate more for attention and money instead truly caring about the issue. Stolpman even found out that Seaman had written a book “Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself” in 2008. The book describes how you can promote yourself and make money by figuring out a topic before it becomes popular if you keep talking about it. If you can make people associate yourself as the guy who discovered it, you can gain a lot of views and clicks. It appears Pizzagate was a topic that allowed him to gain buzz.

Certainly it is normal for anyone with a Youtube channel or a blog like mine to take advantage of buzz and comment on trending topics, since they are issues that people find interesting. Nothing wrong with that as long as you’re being honest and bringing something to the table. However, I don’t think Seaman has been honest about it.

I won’t go into all of the details of what Seaman has said and done, but I suggest looking into what Stolpman has uncovered and drawing your own conclusions. I have. To me Seaman is another example of a Jew that exploits other people for his personal benefit and monetary gain. And yes, he is Jewish, it was stated in an interview Seaman did with some Youtuber whose name I don’t recall.

I was suspicious of him before this, and Stolpman/Lift the Veil confirmed my suspicions. The way Seaman has responded to Stolpman’s revelations is dishonest in my opinion as well. He has not proven them false, instead Seaman has tried to sidestep the issue and make it seem as if he is being attacked for telling the truth about Pizzagate. That is not the case at all, at least not when it comes to the videos on Lift the Veil’s channel. But once again, I suggest you look into it yourself instead of taking my word for it.

 

Conclusions

All of the cases of Jewish behaviour seem to lend credence to the “anti-Semitic” view that Jews do not feel beholden to the morals of the goyim. As the Talmud says, different principles apply to Jews and to goyim. Gypsies are similar in this respect. Stealing from non-Gypsies is allowed, while stealing from other Gypsies is not. Most other people, such as Europeans and East-Asians at least think that stealing and exploiting others is wrong. It matters little whether the person you are stealing from is of your race or religion or an outsider. Of course, there are still many immoral people in every ethnic group, but the initial values that the society promotes differ between Jews and the rest of us.

My reason for pointing this out is simply that you should be aware of how Jews think. Their morals are different than yours. It is foolish to expect them to think like we do.

 

Links:

Leader Of Anti-Semitic Party In Hungary Discovers He’s Jewish: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/08/14/158773637/leader-of-anti-semitic-party-in-hungary-discovers-hes-jewish

Former antisemitic Hungarian MP who discovered Jewish roots to make aliya: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Former-antisemitic-Hungarian-MP-who-discovered-Jewish-roots-to-make-aliya-468386

Leader of anti-Semitic party in Hungary discovers he is Jewish: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2012/08/14/leader_of_antisemitic_party_in_hungary_discovers_he_is_jewish.html

Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring: http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2017/02/jewish-revival-sicily

Was Columbus secretly Jewish? Historians argue explorer’s epic voyage was to establish new homeland for his people as they escaped the Spanish Inquisition: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2147558/Christopher-Columbus-Jewish-looking-new-homeland-discovered-America-historians-say.html

David Seaman, Pizzagate & Goldmoney: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZXDHzZlYzU

altNews: David Seaman’s Open Invitation, Mind Control & Phone Calls | 3.3.2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIgqGn42jcM

NASA claims to have found 7 Exo-Planets: Conjecturing what it actually means

I am doubtful NASA actually engages in any space exploration. Rather I think they are in the entertainment/deception business. They might actually partake in some space exploration, but as most of the information that comes out of them is unreliable, and they’ve been caught lying several times, it is prudent to be skeptical of their claims and intentions. I will explore NASA’s recent claim that they discovered 7 Earth-sized exoplanets in Trappist-1 (star or system?) from this viewpoint.

The star Trappist-1 is, according to The Atlantic website, located about 40 light-years from Earth. It’s size is only slightly bigger than Jupiter. The Atlantic states as follows: “The system resembles Jupiter’s moons Ganymede, Europa, and Io”. I doubt these 7 planets actually exist. I rather think it’s some sort of astrological meme-magic they are trying to feed to us. Let’s take a look at the meaning of some of these names.

Trappist refers to a kind of monk from the Trappist order. The name apparently comes from the abbey of La Trappe in France. Among us regular people the word Trappist is best known from certain types of beers, and I think there’s also Trappist milk in Hong Kong at least. According to Wikipedia, Trappists are contemplative order, they do not take vow of silence but refrain from speaking when not necessary. They follow the rule of St. Benedict. I’m not sure what its significance is, but it might mean something that previous pope, Ratzinger’s, papal name was Benedict.

The Trappist Cisterian order was founded by Armand Jean le Bouthillier de Rancé. I don’t know his significance either. Wikipedia says that he was “originally intended for the Knights of Malta”, but became a monk instead, I suppose. Knights of Malta is a secret society that still exists today. I don’t know if any of is significant in relation to NASA’s alleged discovery, but it might be.

It’s curious that Jupiter is connected to this new star system, as Jupiter is not only another persona of Osiris, a deity supposedly important to modern secret societies, but it also allegedly represents a shift in the secret society structures.

Ganymede was a beautiful man abducted by Zeus (Jupiter) to be his cup-bearer. Wikipedia explains this about him: “The myth was a model for the Greek social custom of paiderastía, the socially acceptable erotic relationship between an adult male and an adolescent male. The Latin form of the name was Catamitus (and also ‘Ganymedes’), from which the English word ‘catamite’ is derived.” A man abducted for his beauty by Zeus and associated with pedophilia.

Io was a mortal woman whom Zeus lusted after, and she became his lover. She was turned a heifer at some point. Interestingly Wikipedia says that the “ancients connected Io with the Moon”, and in Aeschylus’ Prometheus Unbound “she refers to herself as ‘the horned virgin’, both bovine and lunar.” This reminds me of the various Virgin Mary icons with her standing on a crescent moon.

marymoon

 

Europa too was a woman abducted by Zeus. The Rape of Europa is a well-known phrase, and unfortunately a well-known event in recent years.

What do these mythological connections mean then? I naturally don’t know, but I have a few interpretations. Ganymede was a beautiful man whom Zeus (Jupiter) took a liking to and was associated with pederasty, and Io and Europa were women whom Zeus liked. All were mortals. This certainly sounds a bit like Genesis 6:2; “That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.” Perhaps Zeus (Jupiter) refers to Nephilim, demons, aliens, or just the occult elite who are going to revel in even more twisted Pizzagate-like debauchery.

Then again, perhaps the connection between Jupiter, Ganymede and Io refers to the trinity of Osiris, Horus and Isis. Zeus took the form of an eagle when he abducted Ganymede, and Horus is a falcon-headed man. Io is associated with the moon and horns as is Isis. Though I’m not sure where Europa fits in with this. I’m also not sure what is the significance of Trappist monks with this. Maybe the word Trappist should be interpreted literally, as in people who make traps. Are the secret society occultists setting some sort of trap?

Many conspiracy researchers claim that the elites worship Saturn. Saturn is the father of Jupiter. Jupiter killed him and became the chief deity. These 7 exoplanets might be Jupiter’s army that heralds the dawn of a new era, Saturn getting replaced with Jupiter. Whether this would make things better or worse, I cannot say.

I don’t know to what all of this refers, but I certainly don’t believe any of NASA’s claims at face value. I find a symbolical or occult explanation for these alleged discoveries a much more reasonable one. NASA comes up with a new discovery or accomplishment every couple of years ago that gets science-geeks excited for a few weeks and then it blows over. People forget, and in the end nothing concrete gets done. Science does not actually advance. No new technologies are developed. Whether it’s the alleged trip to Mars that people are supposedly planning, a new discovery, or even the supposed discovery of the Higgs-Boson God particle a few years ago. I know that wasn’t NASA, but it’s still part of the same scientism-industry. All of this is still just a more sophisticated form of celebrity gossip. It’s there just to distract you, or to somehow psychically manipulate you.

Pedophilia has certainly been in the headlines recently. There was, and hopefully still is Pizzagate, just a few days ago Milo Yiannopoulos was kicked from CPAC for supposed pedophiliac comments, and George Takei seems to be undergoing a similar scandal. Ganymede seems to refer to the same thing, but I’m sure what it all means. I hope it simply means that the crimes of these pederasts will be exposed and they will get judged.

 

Links:

Seven Earth-Sized Planets Have Been Spotted Around a Nearby Star: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/seven-exoplanets/517446/

Trappists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trappists

Armand Jean le Bouthillier de Rancé: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_Jean_le_Bouthillier_de_Ranc%C3%A9

Ganymede: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganymede_(mythology)

 

My stuff on Jupiter:

Jupiter Ascending symbolism and messages: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/jupiter-ascending/

Trump’s Victory suggests a shift in the Power Structure of the Secret Societies: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/11/14/trump-victory-secret-society/

A Few Examples of Jewish Tricks

When discussing the influence that Jews wield in the media, economics and other aspects of modern society, influential people like George Soros and Henry Kissinger are usually brought up. Some see their Jewishness as merely co-incidental, bearing little significance in the role they play, whereas others, myself included, see their Jewishness as one of the most significant details in their character and background. While these elite class Jews are highlighted, Judaism itself is often excused from criticism saying that only the Zionists, or members of the Jewish cabal, are bad, but regular Jews are not like that. There are some people though, who say that there are no good Jews.

I am not quite certain what to think, so I’ll just share a few examples of Jewish behaviour. I saw these on /pol a few weeks ago.

My first piece of evidence is this video of a man holding up a sign saying one side: “Repent! Trump is God’s punishment on America”. On the other it says: “White men against Trump”. The person taking the video, however, calls out the man as a Jew. The Jew not only admits that he is Jewish, but the video guy says Jews aren’t White to which a woman on the side says [being White or being Jewish] “is the same thing”, the video guy says he read on the forum that Jews aren’t White, and the Jew says: “That’s true.”

Link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyOqafHBiJE

EDIT: The original video had been up on Youtube for a few weeks, but soon after I embedded it here, it was shut down for “harassment and bullying”. I found another channel that has the video though.

 

Basically in the video a Jew is pretending to be a White man to persuade “other” White people to be anti-Trump, although he himself does not think of himself as White.

There’s also a few Tweets I’ve seen with similar behaviour of Jews being White one time, and Jewish another.

In the first picture is one guy saying “as a white guy…” and in the next “As a Jew…” Which one is it? White or Jewish? There’s only 1-2 weeks between these Tweets so I doubt he had a drastic change of identity in that time (and the Jew-Tweet happened first).

tweet1

The next one is from a Jewish woman complaining about White Privilege™, and saying “My fellow white people”, i.e. she is allegedly identifies as White, and wants to share her racial guilt with others. In the next picture, she says she has a Jewish family. So maybe she isn’t Jewish herself, but her family is? The Jew-Tweet was from 2009 and the White Privilege one was from 2016, so a change of ideology is more reasonable possibility in this case.

Nevertheless, this is still evidence of this Jewish racial double-think even if we cannot be sure whether this woman is Jewish or not, and there are several years between these Tweets.

tweet2

 

The third picture is of a Jewish woman who in the first Tweet complains about “my fellow white people” having been raised to behave like sociopaths. In the second Tweet she says she was “raised orthodox Jewish”. Although the date isn’t shown on the picture, I checked her Twitter and both Tweets are from 2016.

This is a clear example of Jewish racial duplicity. Moreover it’s interesting that in both Tweets she is referring to how she (as a White person) has been raised, first how to be a sociopath and in the second she has been raised to be an Orthodox Jew. Perhaps her mind is somewhat split on the issue, and she was raised to be a sociopath by her Orthodox Jewish upbringing.

tweet3

 

There’s also an opinion piece from Jewish Journal and a blog from The Times of Israel both saying that Jews aren’t White. The first article praises that “Jews will always believe Black Lives matter because Jews do not think of themselves as ‘White People.'” In Tel Aviv there are Jews from various races. The blog post from The Times of Israel takes another approach and states that Ashkenazi Jews are not White.

jewishjournal

ashkenaziwhite

 

While you could just take the easy way out and say that different Jews have different views on race and Jewishness, but that’s not really what I see. What I see is that a Jew is White when he or she wants to berate White people for their real and imagined sins, but when a Jew wants sympathy for being oppressed, praise for being progressive or simply wants to celebrate their culture, the Jew becomes a Jew. Basically a Jew is White only to attack White culture and identity, and even then the Jew presents him or herself as more noble than “other Whites” who do not understand their privilege as well as the Jew does.

My point is not that Jews should not criticize White people, but when Jews do it, they do it from a highly dishonest position. People of all races have certainly done reprehensible acts in the history of the world, but there difference with Jews and all other races seem to be that the Jew is unwilling to assume responsibility for their sins, and try to blame others instead.

The whole worldview of the Jew seems highly relativistic. You are one thing when it suits you, and another when it ceases to work for you. The only consistent aspect of a Jew is that they are a Jew. When trying to identify the specifics of what makes a Jew, sooner or later you will encounter a dead-end. Sometimes Jews are race, other times they are a religion, but there are plenty of atheist Jews so they might be a culture. Trying to chase that trail will just leave your head spinning. The Jew is a Jew.

Certainly the video and few quotes presented here are merely anecdotal evidence, yet based on what I’ve seen from the behaviour of Jews, they seem fairly representative. One thing that I wonder about is do the Jews do the “racial shift” from Jew to White and back again consciously or unconsciously? The Jew in the video with the anti-Trump sign certainly seems to be acting wittingly, but I am not so sure about the Tweets. The mind of the average Jew might be schizophrenic in some sense, and they themselves do not realize what they are doing. They are acting subversively because it is in their nature to do so.

Anyway, before I finish I’d just like to add I am not writing this to say that we should start rounding up Jews and gassing them or anything like that. I am merely pointing out this intriguing, yet possibly harmful characteristic in Jews, in the hope that you take heed of this.

 

P.S.

Thinking of the nature of the Jew has made recall a book I read a few years ago, Dispelling Wetiko by Paul Levy. It describes this parasitic mind virus that affects the humanity. It doesn’t exist in the absolute sense, yet it does exist as you can see it’s influence in the world and in the behaviour of the people. Pinpointing the Wetiko virus is difficult as if you point at one thing and say it is Wetiko, then the virus is deluding, you but also if you say it doesn’t exist you are getting deluded. It is much like the nature of the Jew. More interestingly I think the author, Paul Levy, might be a Jew. His name certainly sounds like it.

 

Revisiting the Jewish Question

I’ve written countless times about Jews and their role in the problems that the world is facing. I’m still not sure what actually makes a Jew a Jew, what is the essence of Jewry and what causes their tendency for subversive behaviour. Are they a race or a religion, are their actions motivated by their genetics, culture or some metaphysical component? All I can say is that they are Jews, and apparently being a Jew makes one act Jewish. Trying to pinpoint the particulars of Jewish characteristics only leads you down an endless rabbit hole as Jews can claim to be a unique when it suits them, but the next moment they are a religion. Sometimes they’re white, other times they are Jewish.

The whole Mike Enoch fiasco has made me re-organize my thoughts on the whole Jewish Question. For those who do not know, Mike Enoch is a host on the Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah, and the owner, I suppose, of The Right Stuff-website. It was revealed a week ago that Mike Enoch’s, who used to joke about gassing the Jews and whatnot, wife is a Jew, and not just any Jew, but a Jew who is into transvestites and promotes the LBGT-agenda. There are also some audio clips out there where Mike Enoch more or less admits that he is a Jew as well. I don’t know if it is true, since Enoch has proven himself to be a very shifty character, but he at least seems to think of himself as a Jew.

When I first discussed this issue I wrote: “I don’t wish Enoch any more ill will than he has already gotten, but naturally his political career should be demolished and his lies exposed.” That was when I thought that Mike Enoch is just going to give up on The Right Stuff and skulk back into the shadows. Now it seems he has the chutzpah to continue on with his Alt-Right podcast as if nothing had happened. Mike Enoch is in essence a caricature of the Eternal Jew, a con man who is willing to do anything for money and attention and has no sense of shame. I no longer have any sympathy for him.

Enoch is also an obvious case study of how the Jew seems to thrive on so-called anti-Semitism. This isn’t the first time that a White Nationalist or “neo-Nazi” leader turns out to be a Jew. There have been cases where a swastika or other symbol of a “hate crime” is found in public, the media blames neo-Nazis, but it turns out the person behind the incident was actually a Jew. Jews seem to want people to hate them. Or on the other hand, they want to be worshiped by the Goyim, such as when Benjamin Netanyahu gets a standing ovation from the US congress, or that we have to remember the Jews who died in the alleged Holocaust, but never mind the millions of other people who died in WWII. Perhaps the worst thing for Jews is to be ignored.

Another important lesson to be learned from Mike Enoch is how easy it is for the Jew to find a bunch of gentiles to fool. He had plenty of fans prior to the scandal, most shockingly, even after his duplicity and Jewishness was revealed many people were still defending him. Unless all of the supportive comments I’ve seen on the internet are from a bunch of sock puppet accounts run by five people, but I doubt it. It’s like Corneliu Zelea Codreanu said:

mosquitojew

 

Europeans have understood the subversive nature of Jews for centuries, yet we’ve allowed them in and put them on a pedestal. A great deal of responsibility on the problems created by Jews fall on us. We’ve allowed them to do what is in their nature. Yet I am not convinced by the Common Filth argument either that Jews are purely reactive. That they are behind a lot of the LGBT-agenda, feminism, pornography only because the Goyim are a willing audience for it. Common Filth claims Jews basically promote these harmful things because there is profit in it. No, I don’t think so. They seek to subvert other people to make them a willing audience for their filth. My view is that the responsibility in all of this more like 50/50. It’s as much our fault as theirs.

I am not in favour of any solution to this problem such as “gassing the kikes”. One reason is simply because of basic humanitarian reasons, but also because I don’t think it would work. I’ve suggested a couple of years ago that the Jews have the Mark of Cain, or something similar to it. If we actively hurt them, the punishment will come back to us sevenfold. I believe Jews were sent to us either by god or the devil to punish us. We have learn to deal with them from a higher perspective than mere violence and coercion. Indentify the Jew and say no more. And stop falling for their tricks.

Before I finish, I’d like to dispel some myths. You don’t have to a White Nationalist, a neo-Nazi or anything like that to be aware of the nature of the Jew. It is one of these premade templates that the media pushes, a skinhead or a guy with a buzzcut who hates Jews because it’s basically their hobby. I don’t hate the Jew. I am more angry at the rest of us for always falling for Jewish tricks. Moreover the Jew wants you to hate him. You cannot blame a fox for eating your chickens if you make him guard the henhouse. The reason I have a problem with Jews is simply because I’m a truthseeker. An open mind and honest observation of the world leads you to notice the Jewish influence in economics, the media and so on. Even Milo Yiannopoulos, a homosexual Jew, admitted it in one video. But I suppose you’re just supposed to brush it off since he said in a humoristic tone.