Category Archives: Society

President Trump talks with Astronauts aboard the International Space Station

I just finished watching a discussion between Donald Trump, his daughter Ivanka and some astronauts, two of whom were allegedly aboard the International Space Station (ISS). It’s just that I don’t think the ISS exists, or if it does the supposed videos showing astronauts aboard it are fake, if nothing else. There are several videos on Youtube showing the dubious nature of the videos allegedly shot aboard the space station, and I recommend taking a look at them if the claim that the ISS is a hoax seems far-fetched to you.

 

Trump and Space

Trump must be in on the scam if he is doing an interview with these hoaxters. I don’t think he’s dumb enough to fall for it. Ever since Trump won the election there have been articles saying he will strengthen the space program by sending people to Mars, Jupiter’s moon Europa or where-ever. Peter Thiel has supposedly been pushing Trump to use private space companies. Trump has been working with SpaceX’s Elon Musk as well. Now he was chatting with astronauts “out in space” and saying he wants to put man on Mars.

A couple of months ago Trump signed two laws to promote women going into STEM fields and NASA. Many people criticized him for that, since he is caving into the pressure by feminists. Sure, it would have been nice to hear Trump tell them to go screw themselves, but I don’t think it’s going to make a big difference who goes to NASA to perpetuate their lies, since the agency has little to do with any science anyway. In fact, I welcome the dumb feminists taking over NASA, perhaps they would accidentally reveal some of the frauds that NASA has been perpetrating over the years. Trump’s interview with two astronauts allegedly aboard the ISS referred to the signing of these laws as well.

 

The Interview

The interview though was the usual stuff from the ISS, not credible at all. The astronauts, Peggy Whitson and Jack Fischer, and  are laughing and smiling like they’re in an amusement park, instead of in the most hostile environment known to man. This is how astronauts behave in pretty much every video clip I’ve seen from the ISS. They do not feel at all like professionals doing a dangerous job. They are lousy actors who cannot stop smiling, or that they know how feeble the lie is, so they try to lull the audience into a soft, child-like state by their overly friendly antics.

Peggy Whitson had supposedly broken some records and there’s even a banner in the background saying: “Congrats Peggy!! New U.S. High-Time Space Ninja”. They’re not even trying to be serious. Jack Fischer keeps using the word “amazing” to fool the audience into thinking it is so. No, it’s not amazing. It’s badly done boring sci-fi.

 

Conclusion

I’m not quite sure what the underlying agenda with pushing these fake space programs is. Maybe Trump really believes in it, or the people in his cabinet do, and are pushing it for that reason. Maybe it’s just expensive bread and circuses for the masses. Or maybe there is a bigger agenda behind it all. They could be laying the groundwork for an even greater deception.

Or, as wild card alternative, maybe Trump is playing 4D chess and is drawing attention to NASA in order to make people first start following them intently, and then he sets them up to fail and reveal their false nature. I still don’t what Trump’s agenda, or who his masters are. I don’t think he’s just another Neo-Con. I do think he represents change, but I don’t quite know change to what direction.

I’ve had this analogy in my head for a while about Trump, so I might as well share it. He was memed to be the God-Emperor from the fictional Warhammer 40,000 universe by people who worship a chaotic frog god, Kek. In the Warhammer universe there are four different evil chaos gods: Khorne, god of blood and war, Nurgle, the god of disease, Slaanesh, the god of debauchery, and Tzeentch, the god of magic and change. Let’s say that George W. Bush represented Khorne as he started a bunch of wars. Obama then might represent both Nurgle and Slaanesh as he brought weakness, sickness and hedonism to his country and the world. Trump then could be a herald of Tzeentch. Meme magics have been allegedly at work for a long time now, and Trump might actually change some things, although not necessarily for the better or for worse.

Another, a more optimistic way to see Trump, if we don’t want to discard the notion that he might be the next King Cyrus, a profane man who God used to do good, is that regardless of what Trump’s intentions are, he might be used by benevolent forces. Let’s take a pseudo-biblical analogy this time. Satan is the ruler of the world, but God wants to change this. There are lesser demons as well who want to change it, since they hate Satan and envy his position. They want to rule the earth instead of Satan. God then gives a lesser demon a slight push or encouragement to fight Satan, and in the end both Satan and the lesser demon end up destroying each other, and freeing the world from their demonic grasp. Perhaps Trump is a puppet of such a lesser demon.

 

Links:

President Trump Has a Video Conference with NASA Astronauts Aboard the International Space Station: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_D4i3CLNqU

Peter Thiel is pushing Donald Trump to use private space companies at NASA: https://qz.com/869105/peter-thiel-is-pushing-donald-trump-use-private-space-companies-like-spacex-at-nasa/

Elon Musk Is Sticking With Trump For SpaceX Contracts: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elon-musk-is-sticking-with-trump-for-spacex-contracts_us_58b5b12ce4b0658fc20f9a72

Trump signs laws to promote women in STEM: https://www.cnet.com/news/trump-women-in-stem-tech-laws/

Another False Flag in Paris or Mandela Effect?

Seems like Bureau of False Flags is at it again. A gunman killed a police officer in Paris, France, near Champs Elysees. Two others were apparently injured, and the gunman died as well. According to the media at least. Except last night when I saw this news story before going to sleep, the RT article I read said there were two attackers. Today when I woke up, all of the media sources I’ve seen are saying there was only one, including the same RT article. This must be Mandela Effect, right?

 

The Second Gunman already forgotten

No. I found a website, News Sniffer, that records the changes that news articles undergo as they’re updated. Every instance of the article is recorded. The RT article did originally say:

“The assault was “very probably” a “terrorist act,” with two attackers apparently involved, Reuters reported, citing police source. Howver, there is no official confirmation of that so far.”

Now there is no reference to this second attacker. I’ve heard the same story so many times I’ve forgotten most of them. A terrorist attack occurs or a crazy gunman goes on a rampage, initially there are reports of two or more assailants, but eventually it’s reduced to a lone nut. Sometimes the media at least has the decency to state that there were reports of two attackers, but they were mistaken, however this time it has been brushed aside entirely.

A couple of examples of two attackers in a shooting where one of them is discarded from the official story are the Utøya massacre in Norway in 2011, when Anders Breivik allegedly shot nearly a 100 people, and in 2012, James Holmes allegedly shot up a movie theater showing a Batman movie. Certain eye witnesses claimed he had had an accomplice, but he’s been erased from history as well.

Then there’s a little event you might have heard of, the JFK assassination.

 

The Election

The timing of this attack is convenient as the French presidential election is only a few days away. Some people are already saying this attack has confirmed the victory for Marine Le Pen. News articles on the terrorist attack have a similar structure to them. RT reports on the attack, and then posts the Twitter responses of candidates Marine Le Pen and François Fillon. BBC reports on the attack and asks “Could the attack influence the elections?”. CNN reports on the attack and has a big sub-headline “Elections on Sunday”.

Clearly they want you to be thinking of this incident when the French go vote. So was this a false flag to make Le Pen win? Possibly, maybe not. Last year in Britain before the Brexit vote, a remainer MP, Jo Cox, was killed by a right-wing Lone Nut™. Despite this Brexit happened. Perhaps the global conspirators want the French to feel the need for Le Pen, but they will fix the election in favour of Fillon to make the French feel even more desperate to possibly cause a civil war, or a new French Revolution.

Then again, the psy-op may have simply shifted from left to right. I was happy that Brexit happened, I was relieved when Trump won the presidency and I hope Le Pen wins as well. Yet I suggest to remain vigilant. The entity or entities behind these false flags, wars and everything else might simply be manipulating us into another cul-de-sac. I certainly am not clear to what extent the anti-globalist sentiment that has arisen in recent years is a genuine threat to their establishment, or simply another red herring.

 

Links:

Police officer killed, 2 seriously injured in Paris Champs Elysees attack of ‘terrorist nature’: https://www.rt.com/news/385468-officer-killed-shooting-paris/

Different versions of the RT article: https://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/1365820/diff/1/2

Paris shooting: Gunman was ‘focus of anti-terror’ probe: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39663300

Paris gunman who killed police officer known to security forces, source says: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/20/europe/champs-elyses-in-paris-closed/index.html

Norway attacks: the unanswered questions: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/24/norway-attacks-unaswered-questions

Eyewitness Account: James Holmes Possible Second Shooter in tragic Batman Denver Shooting: https://www.infowars.com/james-holmes-possible-second-shooter-in-tragic-batman-denver-shooting-eyewitness-account/

Cleveland Facebook Killer Claptrap

A 37-year old man, Steve Stephens, is allegedly going around Cleveland, Ohio, killing people and he even uploaded a video of it on Facebook. The police still haven’t caught him. I find this story unbelievable for several reasons.

First of all, in the contemporary West surveillance is everywhere. There are CCTV cameras, they can locate your cellphone and who knows what they can do to turn your own devices against you. Yet the police cannot find a man who advertised his crimes on Facebook. The ever-present surveillance never seems to help with any kind of terrorism or other extremely violent crimes. Curious, isn’t it?

I don’t think the police want to find him. This could be for various reasons. One is that the perpetrator is Black, and the liberal establishment does not want to demonize Blacks, so they aren’t really trying. I don’t think this is the case, but it’s possible. Another reason might that the authorities want to cause havoc for whatever reason, such as invoking martial law in Cleveland.

Then again, I’m not convinced he has actually killed anyone. If there have been these 14 murders Stephens alludes to, he may be a (willing?) patsy, or maybe no-one died. There’s a video where Stephens appears to be driving, and very calmly he says he just snapped and killed some people. I think he’s acting. At some point he appears to even be looking at his dashboard as if reading his lines. I don’t find his performance credible at all. Moreover, he is holding a phone he is talking to with one hand, and he is supposedly holding another phone with the other and he is driving with the same hand. It’s not impossible to do so, I suppose, but I don’t find it credible either.

It seems most likely that this event is going to be used to push for some sort of agenda. Might be gun control, heavier surveillance such as microchipping of cars or people, or something else. There have been a few “trucks of peace” in Europe in recent months, and a car is involved here as well as the cops supposedly cannot find it, so maybe the globalists are going to push for some sort of “smart” cars that can be tracked and remote-controlled somehow to prevent terrorism and other crimes. But that is just speculation.

I didn’t go looking into this event assuming it’s some sort of false flag or a hoax. I honestly took it at face value when I heard there’s some Black guy killing people and uploading it on Facebook. However, today when I heard that the police still haven’t caught him it raised a red flag. Then I saw the video of Stephens admitting to killing 13, and planning to kill another person, I just found it fake. I’m really beginning to think I was correct when I said that there is some sort of Bureau of False Flags a month ago, which is why we keep getting these half-assed hoaxes and false flags. They’ve got job to do, and gotta fill that quota of at least one event per month.

 

 

Links:

Accused Facebook killer Steve Stephens faced multiple evictions, financial trouble: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/18/accused-facebook-killer-steve-stephens-faced-multiple-evictions-financial-trouble.html

altNews: Cleveland Facebook Live Killer (Hoax): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrmU-ajkmxM

Alt-Right protests against Donald Trump’s new alleged War

Alt-Right leaders Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch were protesting against Donald Trump firing missiles at the Shayrat air base in Syria. They allege that Trump is going to start another war in the Middle-East. If that is true, Trump certainly should be condemned, but I am fairly certain these Alt-Right figures don’t have all of the facts, nor do they really care about them. These wannabe politicians are just doing it for the attention.

Another interesting thing is that Richard Spencer was supposedly attacked and beat up by Antifa after his protest. So basically the Alt-Right “Neo-Nazis” are protesting against war, whereas the Antifa Communists are supporting wars of the American imperium. None of this makes any sense. I am glad though to see my enemies fight against each other, since it is difficult to say which I despise more, the Alt-Right (especially Spencer’s and Enoch’s faction of it), or Antifa. However, since Spencer and Enoch have a name and face I can hate, and Antifa is just an amorphous blob of faceless Commie thugs, I have to go with the Alt-Right.

 

If the Alt-Right, that now seems to be denouncing Donald Trump, truly had ever supported him, they would not turn their backs on Trump simply based on this one incident. This is proof enough that Spencer and his cohorts were all “Hail Trump”, because it was politically beneficial for them to do so at the time. Now a new wind is blowing, and these opportunists with no backbone are changing direction.

I don’t want to defend Trump, however, on his decision to attack the Syrian air base. The alleged gas attack sounds like it was a lie, or a false flag. At least I haven’t seen any actual evidence of it happening, so why would Trump retaliate against Syria based on such a flimsy accusation? Does he really want to start another was like in Iraq or Libya? I hope not, but I don’t know. Nobody who is not an insider knows what motivated him. I do think there is something else going on in the background, but I don’t want to speculate what. I certainly do not trust any of the narratives that are going on in the main stream media, and I’ve seen plenty people on the internet trying to push an anti-Trump narrative. On top of it all, I do not ever want to be on the same side with Richard Spencer as he’d likely stab me in the butt, so I’m going to assume Trump knows what he is doing. I don’t like it, and I’ve said before I think Trump is a con man, but in a den full of rapists, murderers, pedophiles, usurers and Satanists, a liar might be your best friend.

Let’s see after a few days or weeks what has happened. Has the conflict escalated to a US-backed war against Assad, are they heading toward an all out war between US and Russia, or will things cool down after this one missile incident? If Trump really does plan to invade, rape and destroy Syria as his predecessors have done to several other Middle-Eastern countries, Trump does not deserve anyone’s support. Spencer and Enoch though are not demonstrating against Trump because they are so concerned about the well-being of people. This is just another publicity stunt.

 

Links:

Alt-Right Protests Syria War at White House with Richard Spencer: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/85084935853904281

Richard Spencer Just Got His Ass Kicked and Glitter Bombed [VIDEOS]: https://antifascistnews.net/2017/04/09/richard-spencer-just-got-his-ass-kicked-and-glitter-bombed-videos/

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.

Locusts in our midst, and the 322 London Attack

Yesterday there was an alleged terrorist attack in London. The date was March 22nd, i.e. 322, the number best known from Skull and Bones. This along with other facts had led people to think it was a false flag attack. It probably was, but I’ll wait for more facts to appear before making a judgement. Rather, I’ll comment on the reactions of people to this attack, people who unquestionably believe the official story.

Twitter is flooded with #PrayForLondon. Just this by itself is evidence of Orwellian Newspeak where words lose their meaning. I remember once, in the long long time ago era, when the word “pray” meant trying to commune with God, or ask God for help. Nowadays it doesn’t really mean anything. It is a copula word used to link a city to a terrorist event and the grieving that ensues. A copula is a word used in linguistics used to link subject and predicate, for example in “London is a city”, the word “is” is a copula. It does not mean anything by itself, but it used to form a coherent sentence.  I’d wager that most people who use hashtags such as #PrayForLondon are atheists, and therefore would never pray. In fact, I don’t think they know what the word means. They probably think it means “I’m sad because of”, so it would be #I’mSadBecauseOfLondon. Why does London make them sad? Because the media told them to feel so.

Twitter seems also full of locust liberals who think the attack was perpetrated by Muslims, and they want to excuse their behaviour because they were Muslims. These people are almost literal Golems as their ways of thinking is very Talmudic. Actions and their moral repercussions are based on identity politics, instead of a logically consistent moral code. If the attackers had been White Christians, they would condemn all White Christians, but since they are allegedly Muslims, the liberals defend them. I wonder how they would react if the attackers were Japanese Buddhists?

 

I myself am not sure whether the attackers were Muslims, MI5, Mossad or what, or if the attack actually occurred or was a hoax, but these Twitter people seem to believe it was Muslims.

The reason these locust liberals excuse it is, as I wrote yesterday in my rant how the modern left does not challenge social norms, they want everything destroyed. They excuse alleged violent Muslim behaviour because deep-down they believe it will bring forth more destruction. Their only value and purpose in life is to bring more confusion and destruction. They will rationalize anything that happens with this underlying thought.

The mindscape of the modern liberal is not human. They do not understand reason nor logic, nor do they have moral principles. Otherwise they would not excuse these alleged violent actions perpetrated by a potentially hostile outside force.

 

 

The Left is no longer interested in challenging Social Norms

When I was younger I considered myself a leftist, and I was all for challenging traditional gender roles, the traditional family, religion and so on. Now, years later, however I consider those things challenged and the traditional values came on top the challenge against ideologies of the modern world. The traditional way may not be optimal way of doing things, but so far the alternatives I’ve seen have been inferior the fruits that they yield. The modern, Social Justice Warrior-dominated left on the other hand is not interested in challenging the old ways, they’re only interested in destruction.

Let’s illustrate how challenging something or someone works; Hulk Hogan is the heavyweight champion, but Andre the Giant thinks he is stronger than Hogan so he challenges him for the title. They have a match and the stronger one, or better fighter, wins. (I am aware that wrestling is scripted.) It’s a simple as that. Maybe I think that Andre the Giant will win since he is bigger than Hogan, but after seeing the match I must concede that Hogan is a better wrestler despite this. The Social Justice Warrior, however, is not interested in challenging their opponent. They instead hide in their safe spaces, and avoid direct challenges with their opposition. When they do fight their opponents, they tend to do it in very underhanded ways. Let’s say that the Social Justice Warriors decide, arbitrarily, like they make most of their decisions, that Andre the Giant is a better wrestler. They do not wish to see him and Hogan fight it out in a ring. Instead they would do something like poison Hulk Hogan one day prior to the match so he cannot attend, therefore Andre is declared the new champion. This reveals the lack of faith of the modern left in their own ideologies. In the end, they only want to see that which they despise the most destroyed, since there is nothing they truly love.

The left, as it is now, are like locusts that exist only to annihilate. There is no worker’s paradise they seek. It is an excuse to destroy what they hate; anything that is healthy and wholesome. That is why they ally themselves with the destructive elements of Islam, and are ultimately ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to challenge the prevailing social order. In fact, anyone who despises the Current Year social norms of globalism, feminism, political correctness and all the rest, is challenging prevailing social norms: this far-left insanity. It is now the traditionalists, conservatives and right-wingers who are challenging social norms, and usually coming on top. This is not a very unique insight. Rather, I’ve been wondering why my views on certain social issues have changed, and how. Perhaps I haven’t changed that much since my youth, but the world has.