Category Archives: Society

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.

Locusts in our midst, and the 322 London Attack

Yesterday there was an alleged terrorist attack in London. The date was March 22nd, i.e. 322, the number best known from Skull and Bones. This along with other facts had led people to think it was a false flag attack. It probably was, but I’ll wait for more facts to appear before making a judgement. Rather, I’ll comment on the reactions of people to this attack, people who unquestionably believe the official story.

Twitter is flooded with #PrayForLondon. Just this by itself is evidence of Orwellian Newspeak where words lose their meaning. I remember once, in the long long time ago era, when the word “pray” meant trying to commune with God, or ask God for help. Nowadays it doesn’t really mean anything. It is a copula word used to link a city to a terrorist event and the grieving that ensues. A copula is a word used in linguistics used to link subject and predicate, for example in “London is a city”, the word “is” is a copula. It does not mean anything by itself, but it used to form a coherent sentence.  I’d wager that most people who use hashtags such as #PrayForLondon are atheists, and therefore would never pray. In fact, I don’t think they know what the word means. They probably think it means “I’m sad because of”, so it would be #I’mSadBecauseOfLondon. Why does London make them sad? Because the media told them to feel so.

Twitter seems also full of locust liberals who think the attack was perpetrated by Muslims, and they want to excuse their behaviour because they were Muslims. These people are almost literal Golems as their ways of thinking is very Talmudic. Actions and their moral repercussions are based on identity politics, instead of a logically consistent moral code. If the attackers had been White Christians, they would condemn all White Christians, but since they are allegedly Muslims, the liberals defend them. I wonder how they would react if the attackers were Japanese Buddhists?

 

I myself am not sure whether the attackers were Muslims, MI5, Mossad or what, or if the attack actually occurred or was a hoax, but these Twitter people seem to believe it was Muslims.

The reason these locust liberals excuse it is, as I wrote yesterday in my rant how the modern left does not challenge social norms, they want everything destroyed. They excuse alleged violent Muslim behaviour because deep-down they believe it will bring forth more destruction. Their only value and purpose in life is to bring more confusion and destruction. They will rationalize anything that happens with this underlying thought.

The mindscape of the modern liberal is not human. They do not understand reason nor logic, nor do they have moral principles. Otherwise they would not excuse these alleged violent actions perpetrated by a potentially hostile outside force.

 

 

The Left is no longer interested in challenging Social Norms

When I was younger I considered myself a leftist, and I was all for challenging traditional gender roles, the traditional family, religion and so on. Now, years later, however I consider those things challenged and the traditional values came on top the challenge against ideologies of the modern world. The traditional way may not be optimal way of doing things, but so far the alternatives I’ve seen have been inferior the fruits that they yield. The modern, Social Justice Warrior-dominated left on the other hand is not interested in challenging the old ways, they’re only interested in destruction.

Let’s illustrate how challenging something or someone works; Hulk Hogan is the heavyweight champion, but Andre the Giant thinks he is stronger than Hogan so he challenges him for the title. They have a match and the stronger one, or better fighter, wins. (I am aware that wrestling is scripted.) It’s a simple as that. Maybe I think that Andre the Giant will win since he is bigger than Hogan, but after seeing the match I must concede that Hogan is a better wrestler despite this. The Social Justice Warrior, however, is not interested in challenging their opponent. They instead hide in their safe spaces, and avoid direct challenges with their opposition. When they do fight their opponents, they tend to do it in very underhanded ways. Let’s say that the Social Justice Warriors decide, arbitrarily, like they make most of their decisions, that Andre the Giant is a better wrestler. They do not wish to see him and Hogan fight it out in a ring. Instead they would do something like poison Hulk Hogan one day prior to the match so he cannot attend, therefore Andre is declared the new champion. This reveals the lack of faith of the modern left in their own ideologies. In the end, they only want to see that which they despise the most destroyed, since there is nothing they truly love.

The left, as it is now, are like locusts that exist only to annihilate. There is no worker’s paradise they seek. It is an excuse to destroy what they hate; anything that is healthy and wholesome. That is why they ally themselves with the destructive elements of Islam, and are ultimately ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to challenge the prevailing social order. In fact, anyone who despises the Current Year social norms of globalism, feminism, political correctness and all the rest, is challenging prevailing social norms: this far-left insanity. It is now the traditionalists, conservatives and right-wingers who are challenging social norms, and usually coming on top. This is not a very unique insight. Rather, I’ve been wondering why my views on certain social issues have changed, and how. Perhaps I haven’t changed that much since my youth, but the world has.

 

A Few Case Studies on being Jewish

I have gathered up a few examples of Jews and how Jewishness affects them. The people in question are a Hungarian politician, Csanád Szegedi, a Sicilian man (and his grandmother), Christopher Columbus, and David Seaman, a controversial Pizzagate researcher.

Perhaps a title that says a few examples on being Jewish would be more accurate, but case studies sounds much nicer.

 

The Hungarian Politician

Csanád Szegedi was a Hungarian nationalist politician known for his “anti-Semitic” remarks. However, he eventually he discovered he himself is a Jew. The NPR website states the following:

“[I]n 2010 a prisoner confronted him with evidence that he had Jewish roots. According to the AP, Szegedi tried to bribe the prisoner to keep him quiet, but rumors and innuendo reached a fever pitch by late last year and in June, Szegedi conceded that his mother was a Jew. According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.”

Szegedi’s eventual reaction to this was to become a Jew. In fact, he appears to be making aliya, i.e. immigrating to Israel. Or maybe he already did it. Prior to these revelations Szegedi has accused Jews of “‘buying up’ the country” and he “railed about the ‘Jewishness’ of the political elite and claimed Jews were desecrating national symbols”, according to The Star.

What makes this interesting is that Szegedi changed his critical stance on Jews after finding out that he is a Jew, instead of fighting the Jewish elite and continuing to promote Hungarian nationalism. He embraced his Jewishness. There are two different viewpoints on what makes a person a Jew, is it genetic or a cultural/religious thing. If Jewishness is genetic in a way that it makes Jews behave differently, then shouldn’t he have been pro-Jewish to begin with? Instead this case might support the argument that Jews behave in a Jewey way because they are raised in a certain way.

Then again maybe Szegedi knew he was a Jew to begin with, but hid his identity from others, but after he was outed, he forsook Hungarian nationalism as people wouldn’t trust him anymore. Alternatively, perhaps he was intrigued by Jews to begin with because of his Jewish genetics, but only after Szegedi learned he is Jewish he understood his interest in Jews.

Another interesting tidbit is how NPR described his mother being a Jew: “According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.” Are you Jews somehow spiritual affected by this law that force them to behave a certain way?

 

Jews in Sicily

An article in The Economist titled “Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring” describes one Jewish man, Gabriele Spagna, who grew up as normal Sicilian, presumably a Catholic, but his grandmother on her deathbed had confided to him that she was had been Jewish all along, while pretending to be something else. Apparently this revelation also turned Spagna into a practising Jew as well. He seems beholden to Jewish law as well.

 

Columbus a crypto-Jew?

I had heard of conspiracy theories before alleging that Christopher Columbus had been a crypto-Jew, a Jew who pretends to be Christian while practicing in secret, but I found an article on Daily Mail saying that some (main stream?) historian are claiming the same thing. According to these historians Columbus had been a “Marrano”, crypto-Jew, and he had been looking for a safe haven for Jews in his voyages.

All of these three accounts, Szegedi, Spagna and Columbus, seem to suggest that Jews are never really Christians or Europeans, instead they owe allegiance to their Jewishness.

 

David Seaman

David Seaman is a main stream journalist who became well-known for his coverage of Pizzagate on his Youtube channel, but a rather intriguing controversy has arisen around him in the last week.

I discovered his Youtube channel around the time that Pizzagate started trending around the internet. I was a bit skeptical of Seaman at first, since he said he had worked for Huffington Post, yet his coverage of Pizzagate was reasonable, and I was happy to see a main stream journalist promote the topic so I followed him for a few months. Eventually though I stopped following him for a few different factors: he didn’t seem to be bringing much new research on Pizzagate, I began to suspect he was more interested in getting donations, and he looked Jewish and his name sounds Jewish as well. Once or twice Seaman even said something like grown people had gotten physically sick and vomited due to their research on Pizzagate, which I found a bit excessive. It sounds more like a character in a movie might say, instead of something that actually happens, so it got my alarm bells ringing. I stopped following him maybe a month ago, and did not pay more attention to him until now.

I try not to judge people simply on the grounds that they are Jewish yet centuries of European heritage, two Millennia of Christian teachings, and my personal observations have taught me that you should not trust Jews, and it appears it was a sensible course of action.

A week ago a Youtuber by the name of Nathan Stolpman published a video on his channel, Lift the Veil, exposing some dubious facts about Seaman. Shortly after this Seaman deleted all of his videos. It seems Seaman had been “shilling” for (his own words) a company called Goldmoney, owned by an Israeli Jew, and Seaman appeared to be promoting Pizzagate more for attention and money instead truly caring about the issue. Stolpman even found out that Seaman had written a book “Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself” in 2008. The book describes how you can promote yourself and make money by figuring out a topic before it becomes popular if you keep talking about it. If you can make people associate yourself as the guy who discovered it, you can gain a lot of views and clicks. It appears Pizzagate was a topic that allowed him to gain buzz.

Certainly it is normal for anyone with a Youtube channel or a blog like mine to take advantage of buzz and comment on trending topics, since they are issues that people find interesting. Nothing wrong with that as long as you’re being honest and bringing something to the table. However, I don’t think Seaman has been honest about it.

I won’t go into all of the details of what Seaman has said and done, but I suggest looking into what Stolpman has uncovered and drawing your own conclusions. I have. To me Seaman is another example of a Jew that exploits other people for his personal benefit and monetary gain. And yes, he is Jewish, it was stated in an interview Seaman did with some Youtuber whose name I don’t recall.

I was suspicious of him before this, and Stolpman/Lift the Veil confirmed my suspicions. The way Seaman has responded to Stolpman’s revelations is dishonest in my opinion as well. He has not proven them false, instead Seaman has tried to sidestep the issue and make it seem as if he is being attacked for telling the truth about Pizzagate. That is not the case at all, at least not when it comes to the videos on Lift the Veil’s channel. But once again, I suggest you look into it yourself instead of taking my word for it.

 

Conclusions

All of the cases of Jewish behaviour seem to lend credence to the “anti-Semitic” view that Jews do not feel beholden to the morals of the goyim. As the Talmud says, different principles apply to Jews and to goyim. Gypsies are similar in this respect. Stealing from non-Gypsies is allowed, while stealing from other Gypsies is not. Most other people, such as Europeans and East-Asians at least think that stealing and exploiting others is wrong. It matters little whether the person you are stealing from is of your race or religion or an outsider. Of course, there are still many immoral people in every ethnic group, but the initial values that the society promotes differ between Jews and the rest of us.

My reason for pointing this out is simply that you should be aware of how Jews think. Their morals are different than yours. It is foolish to expect them to think like we do.

 

Links:

Leader Of Anti-Semitic Party In Hungary Discovers He’s Jewish: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/08/14/158773637/leader-of-anti-semitic-party-in-hungary-discovers-hes-jewish

Former antisemitic Hungarian MP who discovered Jewish roots to make aliya: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Former-antisemitic-Hungarian-MP-who-discovered-Jewish-roots-to-make-aliya-468386

Leader of anti-Semitic party in Hungary discovers he is Jewish: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2012/08/14/leader_of_antisemitic_party_in_hungary_discovers_he_is_jewish.html

Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring: http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2017/02/jewish-revival-sicily

Was Columbus secretly Jewish? Historians argue explorer’s epic voyage was to establish new homeland for his people as they escaped the Spanish Inquisition: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2147558/Christopher-Columbus-Jewish-looking-new-homeland-discovered-America-historians-say.html

David Seaman, Pizzagate & Goldmoney: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZXDHzZlYzU

altNews: David Seaman’s Open Invitation, Mind Control & Phone Calls | 3.3.2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIgqGn42jcM

Skeptical look at Pizzagate

The alleged pedophile scandal Pizzagate is a controversial issue even among conspiracy-minded people. Some think it is a honeypot or a distraction, whereas as others believe it is a lead to an actual pedophile ring. I’ve seen and heard various claims and quotes from the John Podesta e-mails leaked by Wikileaks, but I decided to take a look at them for myself, and verify the basics.

Podesta and Pizza

I looked through all of the Podesta e-mails from Wikileaks that mention the word “pizza”. Most of the e-mails simply seem to be talking about regular pizza. At least on the surface there is nothing suspicious about them. When these Democrats hold their fundraisers and meet-ups to scheme to further their political agenda they need to eat, and they seem to like pizza, a lot. I can imagine this political planning to be tedious, so I presume good food makes it much nicer to get started, However, they seem to be somewhat obsessed with pizza (although they mention other foods too) which is a bit weird, but nothing too incriminating.

Then there’s a couple of e-mails that mention pizza in an unusual context. There’s an e-mail that says:

“The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.

I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black) that was left on the kitchen island. Happy to send it via the mail if you let me know where I should send it. I also meant to inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are in the house.”

Odd. I would say. Another one is:

“Mary not free

Would love to get a pizza for an hour? Or come over”

There’s a list going around on the internet, I think it originally appeared on Reddit, that says it’s come for pedophilia stuff such as pizza meaning girl, hotdog referring to boy, and map meaning semen and so on. If indeed this is some sort of pedophile ring, I can see pizza see the code for pizza and hotdog making sense, but it never really made sense to me that map is refers to semen. Especially if the first e-mail says: “The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has semen that seems girl-related. […] They can send it if you want.” Why would they send a semen-filled handkerchief back to John Podesta? Wouldn’t they just dispose of the evidence? Unless if “sending” is code for disposing of it.

The second e-mail talks about getting a pizza for an hour. That’s odd as well. You don’t get pizza for an hour. You usually do an activity for a period time, such as getting a prostitute, play games or something like that. I don’t know who Mary is, is but the context of the e-mail sounds like Mary (a prostitute, a loose woman?) is not free, so let’s get pizza (a girl, prostitute) for an hour.

Yet I am not convinced the source for these alleged pedophile code words is legit. Could these words, pizza and map, be code for something else such as drugs or some occult ritual? Might Mary refer to marijuana, and since Mary is not free, i.e. they cannot get hold of weed, so they go get pizza (another drug?) for an hour. I suppose that might make sense. This seems to like something they do for their enjoyment though, and not referring to some sort of clandestine political language.

There are some mentions of a “pizza oven”. Based on the context it does not sound like an actual pizza oven, but I figured it might be code an altar to Moloch or something like that, since in ancient times people used to sacrifice children to Moloch in fire. One Hillary Clinton e-mail from Wikileaks mentions someone sacrificing a chicken to Moloch, although that might be a joke Yet the context of the e-mails does not indicate that in my opinion. Another possibility I thought of might be that “pizza oven” is a drug lab or something, but once again the context doesn’t seem credible.

But let’s assume for a moment that “pizza” refers to some sort of drug. A map might refer to instructions to a drug cave of some sort, or a cypher to lead you to such a place. In this context sending the handkerchief with a map to Podesta makes more sense.

There’s also a couple of instances where the Democrats’ love of pizza seems a bit excessive. One is:

“A woman recently told the campaign her family skipped a pizza dinner at their favorite place so that they could make a difference in this election. That is the commitment that drives this campaign.”

Is skipping a pizza dinner really such a big deal?

Another is:

“During her [Hillary Clinton] 2008 bid, she teared up at a campaign event in New Hampshire when describing the rigors of campaign life: lack of sleep, an overreliance on pizza and limited ability to exercise.”

“Overreliance on pizza” is a bit off as well. It would make more sense if pizza referred to speed, crack or a drug that gives you more energy.

Pizza Attachments

Two e-mails have an attachment with a pizza-related picture. The first one has two women and a child eating pizza.

pizza
Laura Ling and Euna Lee

It was sent supposedly by Doug Band and among the recipients are John and Tony Podesta and Huma Abedin. Doug only says:

“As John said, it doesn’t get any better than this”

The two women are reporters Laura Ling and Euna Lee. The child is Euna Lee’s daughter. They were investigating human trafficking along the border of China and North Korea back in 2009, but they crossed over to North Korea and were arrested. Bill Clinton flew to North Korea and got them released. The e-mail with the picture was sent soon after they got back home. I’ll get back to the two reporters later.

The second e-mail appears to be originally from James Alefantis of Comet Ping Pong pizzeria to John Podesta. It says:

“My graphics guy sent this Do not forward :)”

It was shared by Tony Podesta to his brother John. Tony’s comment is:

“Our pizza logo

Are you around this sunday”

ourlogo

It is Hillary Clinton’s logo with a pizza on it and Comet Ping Pong green comet. The comment from from Alefantis and Tony Podesta seem to suggest that pizza certainly seems be some sort of inside joke among this group of people, and they don’t want others to know about it. What could that meaning be? It might refer to pedophilia as has been suggested, or drugs, or perhaps this:

illuminatipizza

A pizza slice is shaped like a triangle like the capstone of the pyramid on the dollar bill with the all-seeing eye. If all of the pizza stuff refers to the all-seeing eye, the Illuminati or other occult forces the “overreliance on pizza” might mean possession by spirits. I know this is a long-shot, but there are a few videos of Hillary Clinton where she does appear possessed.

Whatever the meaning of pizza is for these people, I do think it has a significance other than normal food.

Comet Ping Pong on Social Media

The Podesta e-mails clearly establish a connection between Comet Ping Pong and John Podesta. Comet Ping Pong’s Facebook page says the place is a “Family style restaurant in Washington, District of Columbia”. Is that so? Many pictures have been shared from James Alefantis’, and other people connected with place, Instagram accounts’ that portray dubious values. I’ll take a look at only a few of them.

This picture was shared by jimmycomet, i.e. Alefantis. It shows a child being taped to a table. Although it does not necessarily suggest child trafficking or anything so sinister, would you want your “family” restaurant being associated with such things?

bound-child

Another picture shows with a half-naked woman  holding a pizza slice in front of her private area. It was shared by joshuaryanv, or Joshua Ryan Vogelsong, who supposedly works for Comet Ping Pong.

womanwithpizza

Based on Vogelsong’s Facebook page he appears to be a blatant transvestite of some sort. Is this suitable behaviour for someone working for a family restaurant?

vogelsongtranny

One picture was shared by pizzaboyzz. In it a woman appears to be gang banged or gang raped by pizza, and she has a third eye. It has been tagged by joshuaryanv with the words cometpingpong.

pizzarape

These people do seem to equate pizza with something sexual. These people who work in a family restaurant. I think it’s safe to say these people are creepy perverts at least, even if this does not prove they are involved in a pedophile ring.

The picture with the third eye reminds me of a statue of Moloch I saw on Wikipedia. The statue has a third on its forehead, and an eye in the chest as well.

Inauguré en 2000, le musée du cinéma est devenu le plus fréquenté des musées de la ville de Turin, avec 2,5 millions de visiteurs. Il est le plus grand d'Europe avec ses 3 200 m2, le plus riche grâce à l'immense collection que Maria Adriana Prolo a léguée à la commune en 1991, et le plus original par sa muséographie intégrée à la môle Antonelliana. http://www.museocinema.it/en/

The statue of the other hand reminds me of one of the antagonists of He-Man, Merman, but maybe it’s just me.

merman

James Alefantis’ Instagram profile picture features a classical Greco-Roman statue. It just appears that the person depicted in the statue is Antinous. He was the homosexual lover of the Roman emperor Hadrian, and is supposedly some sort of symbol for pedophilia.

antinous

The subjects I’ve discussed so far do not offer unquestionable proof that the Podestas, Clintons or staff of Comet Ping Pong are involved in child trafficking. However, what I do think they establish is that the word pizza does seem to have a special, hidden meaning for this Democratic cabal, and at least the staff of Comet Ping Pong seem to associate pizza with something sexual and that they are creepy perverts.

The Two Reporters

Now let’s take a look at the two reporters who were arrested in North Korea. Laura Ling is Chinese-American, and Euna Lee is Korean-American. They “were stopped on March 17 [2009] by soldiers near North Korea’s border with China while researching a report about women and human trafficking. They faced years of imprisonment in the gulag-like confines of a North Korean prison camp”, according to New York Times.

In August of the same year, Bill Clinton, flew to North Korea and managed to negotiate their freedom. To me this suggests that these women were important to the Clintons and the Democratic Cabal somehow. I do not think Bill Clinton did it just out of the kindness of his heart, nor do I think he simply went to Pyongyang asked Kim Jong-il nicely who then obliged. He probably had to give something valuable to Kim.

The two women were apparently filming refugees fleeing from North Korea to China. However, they had been harshly criticized in South Korea for their behaviour. New York Times quoted South Korean pastor Lee Chan-woo:

“The reporters visited our place with a noble cause,” he added. “I did my best to help them. But I wonder how they could be so careless in handling their tapes and notebooks. They should have known that if they were caught, they would suffer for sure, but also many others would be hurt because of them.”

It appears they screwed up the refugee helping operation by exposing it by their alleged incompetence. The details on what they were actually investigating are a bit contradictory, since according to some claims they were investigating “women and human trafficking”, and according to others they were filming refugees. Smuggling refugees out of a country might constitute as human trafficking, yet it’s not clear whether they were investigating people who were trafficked for sex trade, or they were simply reporting on the North Korean refugees who were fleeing to China. These things might be related, but sounds like it’s two different aspects of the same thing at least.

Then there’s the photo of Laura Ling and Euna Lee eating pizza with Lee’s daughter, and Doug Band saying: “As John said, it doesn’t get any better than this”. Sure, you might just think these Democrats are celebrating after the Bill Clinton managed to rescue them from the clutches of Kim Jong-il. If the picture simply showed the women safe and sound I might buy it, but they’re eating pizza, and look grossly elated, and the background is ominously dark as well. I think something else is going on.

The three possible scenarios that I can think of for this curious incident are:

  1. The reporters were investigating refugees and whatnot, screwed up and were rescued by Bill Clinton, since he’s such a nice guy.
  2. The reporters were investigating a human trafficking ring that the Democratic cabal is somehow involved with. The reason Bill Clinton got them out of North Korea is to silence them. Had they remained in North Korea, their results of their investigation might have leaked outside. Bill Clinton probably bought Kim Jong-il’s silence along with the two women, in exchange for something. The picture of them eating pizza is a kind of blackmail picture, or proof of iniationg into their cabal. As long as the reporters keep quiet nothing happens to them, but if they don’t horrible things will ensue.
  3. There is a human trafficking operation between China and North Korea that the Democratic cabal is involved with. The two women already worked for the cabal (I saw claims they worked for Al Gore) and were there to ruin the affairs of human rights activists who were helping people get away from the human trafficking ring. The two women were basically agents posing as reporters. The picture of them eating pizza means they truly are celebrating after a job well done. Then again, maybe North Korean government had heard about these two agents and managed to arrest them, but Bill Clinton made Kim Jong-il an offer he couldn’t refuse.

I don’t find scenario 1. credible, so I think it has to be 2. or 3. However there might be other explanations as well, but these were the ones that made sense to me.

I’ll post pictures of the two reporters along with the picture of them eating pizza to make sure that they are indeed the same people.

pizza

Laura Ling
Euna Lee with her daughter and husband

The people in the pictures seem to match.

Conclusion

This post is long enough already. Very little of this should be new to people who have been paying close attention to Pizzagate. I cannot confirm with 100% accuracy that there is a pedophile ring in Democratic party, but I absolutely think this warrants investigation. People should be concerned with this issue. When there’s smoke, there’s fire. It might be that Pizzagate, or Comet Ping Pong, is some sort of distraction, but if it is, it distracts from an even bigger issue.

My look on Pizzagate is still fairly superficial, and many people on 8chan’s /pol, Voat and where-ever have done a great deal more research on it. Yet I wanted to check the facts for myself instead of relying on others. I am annoyed by the ostriches who stick their head in the sand on Pizzagate. Don’t be an ostritch, yet being skeptical of each and every Pizzagate claim is prudent.

 

P.S.

Just as I uploaded this my internet connection stoppd working. Obviously it’s working now, but I find this a curious co-incidence.

 

Links:

Moloch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch

Antinous: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinous

A Few Examples of Jewish Tricks

When discussing the influence that Jews wield in the media, economics and other aspects of modern society, influential people like George Soros and Henry Kissinger are usually brought up. Some see their Jewishness as merely co-incidental, bearing little significance in the role they play, whereas others, myself included, see their Jewishness as one of the most significant details in their character and background. While these elite class Jews are highlighted, Judaism itself is often excused from criticism saying that only the Zionists, or members of the Jewish cabal, are bad, but regular Jews are not like that. There are some people though, who say that there are no good Jews.

I am not quite certain what to think, so I’ll just share a few examples of Jewish behaviour. I saw these on /pol a few weeks ago.

My first piece of evidence is this video of a man holding up a sign saying one side: “Repent! Trump is God’s punishment on America”. On the other it says: “White men against Trump”. The person taking the video, however, calls out the man as a Jew. The Jew not only admits that he is Jewish, but the video guy says Jews aren’t White to which a woman on the side says [being White or being Jewish] “is the same thing”, the video guy says he read on the forum that Jews aren’t White, and the Jew says: “That’s true.”

Link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyOqafHBiJE

EDIT: The original video had been up on Youtube for a few weeks, but soon after I embedded it here, it was shut down for “harassment and bullying”. I found another channel that has the video though.

 

Basically in the video a Jew is pretending to be a White man to persuade “other” White people to be anti-Trump, although he himself does not think of himself as White.

There’s also a few Tweets I’ve seen with similar behaviour of Jews being White one time, and Jewish another.

In the first picture is one guy saying “as a white guy…” and in the next “As a Jew…” Which one is it? White or Jewish? There’s only 1-2 weeks between these Tweets so I doubt he had a drastic change of identity in that time (and the Jew-Tweet happened first).

tweet1

The next one is from a Jewish woman complaining about White Privilege™, and saying “My fellow white people”, i.e. she is allegedly identifies as White, and wants to share her racial guilt with others. In the next picture, she says she has a Jewish family. So maybe she isn’t Jewish herself, but her family is? The Jew-Tweet was from 2009 and the White Privilege one was from 2016, so a change of ideology is more reasonable possibility in this case.

Nevertheless, this is still evidence of this Jewish racial double-think even if we cannot be sure whether this woman is Jewish or not, and there are several years between these Tweets.

tweet2

 

The third picture is of a Jewish woman who in the first Tweet complains about “my fellow white people” having been raised to behave like sociopaths. In the second Tweet she says she was “raised orthodox Jewish”. Although the date isn’t shown on the picture, I checked her Twitter and both Tweets are from 2016.

This is a clear example of Jewish racial duplicity. Moreover it’s interesting that in both Tweets she is referring to how she (as a White person) has been raised, first how to be a sociopath and in the second she has been raised to be an Orthodox Jew. Perhaps her mind is somewhat split on the issue, and she was raised to be a sociopath by her Orthodox Jewish upbringing.

tweet3

 

There’s also an opinion piece from Jewish Journal and a blog from The Times of Israel both saying that Jews aren’t White. The first article praises that “Jews will always believe Black Lives matter because Jews do not think of themselves as ‘White People.'” In Tel Aviv there are Jews from various races. The blog post from The Times of Israel takes another approach and states that Ashkenazi Jews are not White.

jewishjournal

ashkenaziwhite

 

While you could just take the easy way out and say that different Jews have different views on race and Jewishness, but that’s not really what I see. What I see is that a Jew is White when he or she wants to berate White people for their real and imagined sins, but when a Jew wants sympathy for being oppressed, praise for being progressive or simply wants to celebrate their culture, the Jew becomes a Jew. Basically a Jew is White only to attack White culture and identity, and even then the Jew presents him or herself as more noble than “other Whites” who do not understand their privilege as well as the Jew does.

My point is not that Jews should not criticize White people, but when Jews do it, they do it from a highly dishonest position. People of all races have certainly done reprehensible acts in the history of the world, but there difference with Jews and all other races seem to be that the Jew is unwilling to assume responsibility for their sins, and try to blame others instead.

The whole worldview of the Jew seems highly relativistic. You are one thing when it suits you, and another when it ceases to work for you. The only consistent aspect of a Jew is that they are a Jew. When trying to identify the specifics of what makes a Jew, sooner or later you will encounter a dead-end. Sometimes Jews are race, other times they are a religion, but there are plenty of atheist Jews so they might be a culture. Trying to chase that trail will just leave your head spinning. The Jew is a Jew.

Certainly the video and few quotes presented here are merely anecdotal evidence, yet based on what I’ve seen from the behaviour of Jews, they seem fairly representative. One thing that I wonder about is do the Jews do the “racial shift” from Jew to White and back again consciously or unconsciously? The Jew in the video with the anti-Trump sign certainly seems to be acting wittingly, but I am not so sure about the Tweets. The mind of the average Jew might be schizophrenic in some sense, and they themselves do not realize what they are doing. They are acting subversively because it is in their nature to do so.

Anyway, before I finish I’d just like to add I am not writing this to say that we should start rounding up Jews and gassing them or anything like that. I am merely pointing out this intriguing, yet possibly harmful characteristic in Jews, in the hope that you take heed of this.

 

P.S.

Thinking of the nature of the Jew has made recall a book I read a few years ago, Dispelling Wetiko by Paul Levy. It describes this parasitic mind virus that affects the humanity. It doesn’t exist in the absolute sense, yet it does exist as you can see it’s influence in the world and in the behaviour of the people. Pinpointing the Wetiko virus is difficult as if you point at one thing and say it is Wetiko, then the virus is deluding, you but also if you say it doesn’t exist you are getting deluded. It is much like the nature of the Jew. More interestingly I think the author, Paul Levy, might be a Jew. His name certainly sounds like it.

 

Antifa riots against Milo Yiannopoulos and Gavin McInnes

The other day Antifa (or Anti-Fascists or just Communists) started a riot in Berkeley. As far as I understand the riot erupted because the “conservative” journalist Milo Yiannopoulos was supposed to give a speech there. The speech was cancelled due to the riot. Today another riot erupted in NYU college in New York as another “conservative” Gavin McInnes was supposed to hold a speech there. I didn’t even know who he was prior to the anti-Islamic homosexual kiss between him and Milo last year. That’s a perfect example of how conservative they are.

It is common knowledge that Antifa is funded by George Soros, and it’s just another globalist scheme. However, when it comes to these two conflicts, and I suspect more will arise in the near future, I don’t think only the aggressor is controlled. Both Milo and McInnes are controlled opposition, and I believe the whole scenario of them going there to hold a speech and Antifa causing trouble is a globalist manufactured event. It’s classic problem-reaction-solution. Yet I am not sure what the solution will be. It might simple be an attempt to delegitimize Trump’s presidency, but there might be more to it as well.

Then again it might another attempt to Luciferianize society as more and more people begin to notice how dangerously insane these leftist extremists are. Perhaps the globalists want to provoke both the right, and the people in the middle, to go too far in their response. As Nietzsche said: “He who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself; and if you gaze too long into the abyss, the abyss will gaze into you.”

Or rather like Freemason Albert Pike planned already over a hundred years ago in the letter to Giuseppe Mazzini that I’ve written about before: “We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

Could this be what is happening? Even if this alleged letter is irrelevant, I do think both sides in these riots were put in place like in a chess-game played by a single player.

 

Links:

Berkeley protests of Yiannopoulos caused $100,000 in damage : http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/01/us/milo-yiannopoulos-berkeley/

Conservative comedian Gavin McInnes is PEPPER-SPRAYED outside NYU as violent student protesters throw punches and clash with police ahead of his performance: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4187092/Demonstrators-protest-against-Gavin-McInnes-NYU.html

How Albert Pike’s letter can aid us in the Nationalist Revival: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/tag/giuseppe-mazzini/