Huge meteor in China that resembles the Moon

Last night in China in Yunnan province apparently many people witnessed a bright meteor, or a so-called bolide. A bolide is “a large meteor which explodes in the atmosphere.” What’s interesting is that last night was the Chinese mid-autumn festival, a time when the Chinese gaze at the moon.

The picture below looks like the moon to me, but if it’s not, it’s quite intriguing. It fell down “over the northern parts of China’s Yunnan province, near the northern border of Myanmar”.

 

When I heard about this thing lighting up the sky and falling down, I thought of “And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.” (Luke 10:18) Although that thing doesn’t look like lightning.

I don’t know what it is, but if it’s not a hoax, I don’t think it’s just a meteor. Insert your theory here whether it’s Project Bluebeam, UFO, Nibiru, angel, demon, omen or whatever.

There is video of it, and it does seem to be moving, so I suppose it’s not the moon.

 

Links:

Breaking News- Yunnan, China Superbolide Meteorites Likely 04OCT2017 w/Video : http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.fi/2017/10/breaking-news-yunnan-china-superbolide.html

Video: http://s.weibo.com/weibo/%25E9%259B%25B2%25E5%258D%2597%25E6%25B5%2581%25E6%2598%259F&Refer=STopic_box

 

Advertisements

Curious details of the Las Vegas Harvest shooting

I’ve done some digging on the Las Vegas alleged shooting on internet forums and people have uncovered interesting details.

The shooting took place in the Route 91 Harvest Festival. A harvest of souls, you mean? Sounds rather occult. Please also note that they are “excited” to bring a TSA program to the festival. However, as always, their Orwellian security measures did not make things any more safe.

 

John’s Prediction

There was someone named John who posted this on September 10th on 4chan, I believe. He said there might be some sort of “high incident project” in Las Vegas or Henderson on 9/11, although there wasn’t on that date, something did happen on October 1st. He said “they are trying to create more regulations. you will see laws proposed within the next few years to put more metal detectors and other security devices.” Later on he added: “if their plan is successful state of nevada will pass a law in the future making all casinos have mandatory metal detectors and backscatter machines.” “They” would also put these machines in universities, federal buildings and so on.

John pointed out that OSI systems and Chertoff would be the main producers of the machines. He also said that around 2020 the two companies would merge into a single company.

 

Here is some info on OSI. The CEO is named Deepak Chopra, but apparently it isn’t the famous one.

 

OSI stocks seem to have been rising as of late. Possible due to their involvement in this “high incident project”.

 

OSI’s stocks rating went down on October 1st.

 

Yet less than 24 hours after that, and after the shooting presumably they went up again.

 

After the alleged shooting somebody tweeted that they need to install metal detectors “at every Las Vegas hotel”, which lends credence to the claims that John made in September.

 

The Chertoff that John referred to presumably means Chertoff Group formed by formed US Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff. Wikipedia says: “He formed The Chertoff Group (TCG) on February 2, 2009 to work on crisis and risk management.”

Crisis and risk management? You mean crisis actor management?

There was apparently an ad for “Fun, Engaging Acting Work in Las Vegas” on Craigslist. Possibly referring to crisis acting.

 

The Alleged Shooter

Stephen Paddock, the alleged shooter, was working for the Israeli terrorist group, ISIS, according to said terrorist group, although the police confirmed he had no ties to such a group. I do belive that he was the patsy. I have seen people spin narratives that Paddock was radicalized Muslim Antifa babyboomer who went on a killing spree, but I have not seen any convincing evidence that anyone has actually died in the alleged shooting, so I have a hard time accepting this narrative. Nor do I find it credible that he alone, a 64 year old man, managed to kill 59 people, including himself, and wounded over 500 people, which seems incredible. I can understand that not everybody has to be hit by a bullet in a large crowd as the ensuing stampede is bound to cause damages as well, but so far I have not been convinced there were any bullets. Naturally, the shooter had “committed suicide” before the cops got to him.

According to the official narrative Paddock took shots from the 32nd floor. This floor might have been chosen for occult purposes. Yet in fact it is unlikely he or anyone actually took shots from that floor. There is video showing a muzzle flash coming from the 6th or 7th floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel, but I have not seen any footage of gunfire from the 32nd.

 

Whether the muzzle flash is actually of a gun that is firing bullets, or is merely a simulated muzzle flash is another thing.

Somebody by the moniker AZ Flyguy posted the following picture on Google maps back in 2015. It depicts the location where Paddock allegedly took his shots toward the Route 91 festival. If the date of this picture is correct, it would suggest they were planning this incident already back in 2015.

 

Forum researchers have noted that Stephen Paddock purchased a house two days before this photo was taken. If this is relevant somehow, it might suggest he agreed to take part in the operation and paid for the house with the money he received from it.

 

There are also reports of multiple shooters, as is usual in dubious event such as this, contradicting the “lone wolf” story.

 

This compilation of videos from Las Vegas shows the millionaire poker player Dan Bilzerian on the scene around the 5:57 marker. He says somebody got shot “in the fucking head”. This comment to me suggests he was in on the hoax or whatever it was, since I am highly doubtful anyone was killed at the festival.

 

Around 11:07 in the same video a woman is being interviewed and she says there was a woman at the concert 45 minutes before the shooting started saying they’re “all going to die tonight”. Then the woman was escorted out by security. This also contradicts the official story of the Paddock acting alone. Clearly this woman knew something, whether she was trying to warn the people or she was in on the scam.

There’s an interview with Stephen Paddocks’s brother. He says that Marilou Danley is Paddock’s girlfriend. He’s “wondering” where Stephen got automatic weapons from, and says “he has no military background or anything like that”. Still, he seems to have been a pretty good shooter for a pensioner with no training…

 

EDIT: Shootings at other Casinos

Some people reported shots fired at other casinos as well such as the Aria and Caesar’s Palace. Both are a bit north of Mandalay Bay.

 

This person heard gunshots 15 minutes after the Mandalay Bay incident.

 

Then there’s this.

 

Assuming that these people are telling the truth, some shooting did occur in Vegas that night, but I think the Route 91/Mandalay Bay shooting was a distraction.

There is also this video from a woman who uploaded it to Facebook. She was at the Bellagio Hotel, and something happened there as well:

https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t42.1790-29/22225678_687983111398143_5599727993443319808_n.mp4?efg=eyJ2ZW5jb2RlX3RhZyI6InNkIn0%3D&oh=778330cf655abe6c57c2b5ddf2ce8902&oe=59D3E105

 

EDIT: Gunfire

I found a video taken by a female taxi driver. On the video you can hear machine gun fire, and it actually sounds like gunfire, unlike the “fireworks” most witnesses heard. Possibly two shooters can be heard as well. More interestingly the taxi driver says that people aren’t running although there’s gunfire. She notes the gunfire seems to emanate from the tenth floor of Mandalay Bay.

Later on the driver even picks up people fleeing the scene of the shooting, one of them allegedly injured. They’re saying there are hundreds or a thousand dead, and blood everywhere. What I think happened is that the taxi driver is a genuine person whereas her passengers are crisis actors. The passengers also want her to take them to a hotel, instead of a hospital or police station.

 

Conclusion

I am fairly certain now that this “terrorist attack” was an operation handled by some sort of governmental or corporate agency. Whether OSI Systems of Chertoff Group were actually involved remains to be seen. I do not think anyone died at the concert site where the shooter allegedly directed his fire, yet there might have been something else going on behind the scenes. Perhaps there was a hidden harvest going on elsewhere, be it the Mandalay Bay hotel or the Luxor pyramid.

This “high incident project” may have had two or more faucets and goals. On one level it’s about creating fear and pushing more Orwellian surveillance that never actually helps prevent violence despite being ubiquitous. On the other there might have been a murder or multiple murders and the unconvincing “fireworks” shooting drew attention away from that.

 

P.S.

When I saw this Tweet by Hillary Clinton yesterday, I knew the shooting was a joke. She is probably enjoying pushing this blatant gun grab propaganda before the alleged bodies are cold.

 

Links:

Michael Chertoff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Chertoff

ISIS claims: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4595752/las-vegas-shooting-isis-claim-responsibility-gun-massacre/

AZ Flyguy: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/143775276/

Paddock’s houses: http://heavy.com/news/2017/10/stephen-paddock-house-homes-mesquite-photos-pictures-northern-nevada/

 

The Las Vegas shooting

There has allegedly been a shooting in Las Vegas with 20 dead and 100 injured, although it looks like another hoax to me. It’s of course too early to say anything for sure.

A couple of eye witnesses, whose accounts do not sound that credible, say that the shots sounded like fireworks. One of them was who was Joe Pitzel was interviewed by CNN. At the end of the interview the reporter seems to be coaching him: “Did you hear the gunshots pause and start up again?” Joe responds: “Yeah, like they were loading clips.”

Eyewitness News interviewed a woman called Christine. She also thought the shots were fireworks. The reporter seems to be coaching her as well around 1:55 in the video about how she said off camera that she tried to help people.

Based on the photos that I’ve seen, there doesn’t seem be much blood or injuries. One photo has a woman lying down with a bloody leg, but you cannot see the injuries that she supposedly has.

Carrying an “injured” person, but where are the injuries?
The only blood I’ve seen so far.

 

Sure, the pictures show confusion at the site, but I am not yet convinced there was an actual shooting.

There were rumours on the internet that the shooter was a man called Stephen Craig Paddock, and he was just named as the official culprit as I finished writing this. He was supposedly accompanied by a woman called Marilou Danley.

The shooting happened during the concert of Jason Aldean whose name happens to be 33 in Pythagorean numerology. The alleged shooting also happened opposite to the Luxor hotel, which is a pyramid.

It’s too early to say anything for sure, but this event seems highly dubious.

 

EDIT:

This might just be a weird timestamp thing, but according to Google an article on Marilou Danley that mentions her connection to the shooter and it was created 9 hours ago on tagaloglang.com. The shooting happened around 10 p.m Pacific time on October 1st. It’s now 4 p.m., so the shooting should have happened 6 hours ago, so the webpage was created  3 hours before the event. I suppose the article might have been created beforehand on Danley, if she was a celebrity of some sort in the Philippines, and changed afterwards to mention her connection to the shooter.

https://www.tagaloglang.com/marilou-danley/

 

I checked Google cache of the article. This snapshot was taken 2 Oct 2017 08:42 GMT. This would be 1:42 a.m. Pacific time. I wonder if that is also when the article was created? If so, why does Google say it’s older? It might just be a weird glitch. The Wayback Machine didn’t have a snapshot of the article.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ilVhaCUtWeUJ:https://www.tagaloglang.com/marilou-danley/+&cd=24&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fi&client=firefox-b

 

The page has been updated from the Google cache version to include a photo of her posing. Maybe this webpage is part of her crisis actor portfolio?

 

Links

CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/02/us/las-vegas-shooting-live/index.html

Vegas shooting ‘sounded like fireworks’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6gzJllE-Ps

Was Genghis Khan the first Communist?

Fine, I must concede the title is bit click-baity, however I do find many accounts of the alleged accomplishments of Genghis Khan and the Mongol empire somewhat questionable. On top of that there seems to be sort of modern attempt to paint Genghis Khan as some sort of progressive good guy. Let’s dig in.

First I should explain some of the background of where I’m coming from. I’ve written in the past how I don’t think that Marco Polo went to China, but to Cathay which was another kingdom. I’ve also expressed criticism of the official history of the Great Wall of China, which may or may not be relevant to this article. I’ve also discussed the theory put forward by others that the name Mongol did not used to refer to the people we we think of as Mongols today, but to another race of people. I’ll add links below.

I should also point out that we cannot know much of what truly happened in ancient history. What we think of history is always based on interpretation, which may be liable to corruption due to lack of evidence as well as political and ideological bias. How do we know, for example, that Julius Ceasar existed, or the very least, the did the things attributed to him such as being a proficient military commander in conquering barbarian tribes in Europe and then falling victim to the conspiring senate? There are some old coins that supposedly depict Julius Caesar, a caesar of that name probably did exist, but can we know the stories we associate with him actually took place? How do we know that the character wasn’t invented by Shakespeare, for instance? As Napolean infamously said “History is a set of lies agreed upon.

 

Primary Sources

There are loads accounts in books and on the internet depicting the achievements the Mongol Empire, but most of them are simply people repeating what the experts have said. To glean any actual clues to the veracity of the claims you have to go to the primary sources, which would be texts written around the time of the historical events or artifacts from that period.

As an example of shoddy evidence for the historicity of Genghis Khan we need look no further than Wikipedia. The article on the Khan states how he conquered China, Korea and Central Asia. After that the article states: “Many of these invasions repeated the earlier large-scale slaughters of local populations. As a result, Genghis Khan and his empire have a fearsome reputation in local histories.” After this sentence there is a link to a book titled Mongolia: a guide to economic and political developments by Ian Jeffries. The title does did not fill me with confidence as it sounds like the book discussed Mongolia in a more modern context. I did, however, manage to find it on the internet and checked out pages 5-7 that supposedly explain Wikipedia’s claims.

On page 5 it says “Mongolia built the world’s largest contiguous empire in the thirteenth century under Genghis Khan”. So apparently it was bigger than Alexander the Great’s, the Roman Empire or the British Empire. Quite an achivement for a bunch of horseriding nomads. What sort of technology or bureaucratic system did they have to manage that? Apparently by landmass the British Empire was larger, but Mongols supposedly had the largest continous empire. It also said the Mongols managed to kill “30 to 60 million people across Asia and Europe”.

Page 6 states that Korean and Mongolian elites engaged in considerable intermarriage in the thirteenth century and Koreans believe their ancestors come from Mongolia. That is the only evidence of “large-scale slaughters of local populations” and “fearsome reputation in local histories” that were on pages 5-7 of Jeffries’ book. However, ultimately this only proves that Wikipedia is an untrustworthy source for information, which is not news.

There is a book known nowadays best by the name The Secret History of the Mongols. It was supposedly written back in the 13th or 14th century, and the introduction describes it as follows:

“This book, known to Mongols as the Tobchi’an [Tobcha’an]
or ‘History’, has appeared under a variety of names,
including The Secret History of the Mongols, The Life of
Chinggis Qahan, The True Record of Chinggis Qahan, and
The Secret History of the Yuan Dynasty. It has been
translated into many languages, including English,
Japanese, French, German, Chinese, Russian, Hungarian,
and Polish. Like Chinggis himself, the book is highly
controversial. We cannot be sure when it was written or
who wrote it. I myself argue below that it was written in
1228, but other scholars date it to 1240 or 1323. Whatever
the case, the book is unique, as the only available account
of the life of Chinggis Qahan [Genghis Khan].”

It is not known who wrote it and when, and it is the only account of the life of Genghis Khan. Sounds dubious to me. It might as well been written as a fiction, or a deliberate deception.

The Secret History of the Mongols mentions two other so-called primary cources. The first one is this:

“The War Record of the Holy Hero (Chinggis Qahan), by
Qoriqosun, 1266–1273.48 This book was published by the
Institute of National History established by Qubilai Qahan
at Daidü in 1264. For details, see The War Record of the
Holy Hero, p. 4. Qoriqosun was a chairman of the Institute
of National History after 1264. He was not only a Mongol
scholar but a court painter who painted the portrait of
Chinggis Qahan and other Qahans in 1278–1279.”

I could find no record of this book existing on the internet at least. Maybe it exists only in another language such as Mongolian or Chinese. However, I do not find this a credible source either, since if it provided important evidence on the Mongols, you’d think it had been translated.

The third one is even less credible:

“The Real History of the Mongol Qahans, published by
the Institute of National History in 1303–1304 in Mongol
and Chinese by an anonymous author. Unfortunately, this
work has not been found.”

The work has not been found? What does this mean? How can they claim this book is a source of any kind? Maybe the book never existed to begin with.

How about the physical evidence then? If the Mongols had this vast militaristic empire shouldn’t there be Mongol forts or other structures littered about in their former territory like central Asia or Russia? I couldn’t find any. There should plenty of Mongol artifacts such as weapons and armour littered about in their former territory. I managed to find a few pictures of these on the internet, but very few, and most pictures seem to be of later Mongol equipment, or simply replicas. I’ll take a look at the Mongol armour in more detail later on.

I must point out that I am an amateur when it comes to history, and specifically Mongol history, so the lack of primary evidence may speak more of my own lack of ability and access to resources than the existence of those resources, so I am not going to make any definitive statement to the existence or non-existence of Genghis Khan or the Mongol Empire. Yet were all of the claims of this vast empire self-evident fact, I would expect the evidence to be abundant, which it does not seem to be. If someone can point me to some sort of primary evidence that I can verify for myself, I’d appreciate it.

 

The Progressive Khan

Jeffries’ Mongolia: A Guide to Economic and Political Developments has a quote from The Times on page 5 stating that “The Mongol empire was the first to know religious tolerance. In the capital, Karakorum, churches, mosques and temples stood side by side. In his empire women had equal rights with men, even among subject peoples.”

First of all, The Times is not a credible source when it comes to history. And the two statements made by them are ridiculous. What does it mean that the Mongols were “the first to know religious tolerance”? It’s a nonsensical blanket statement. Do they mean that no society in history had any sense of religious tolerance before the Mongols? How about the Religion of Peace, Islam? At least according to liberals, it used to be so tolerant. If they had said “compared to earlier empires in history, the Mongol Empire showed a much greater deal of tolerance of religion” I could take it with some degree of seriousness.

Women having “equal rights with men” sounds like utter nonsense. Surely they did not have equal rights with men in any sense that the modern West conceives of the idea? Did the women fight alongside men in battle? Did they play an equal part in slaughtering 30-60 million people? Perhaps the position of women was good among Mongols when compared to Christian, Muslims or the Chinese, but once again the article did not say that. Nor is there any evidence to qualify the statement.

The Times is not the only outlet to make Genghis Khan sound like a progressive warlord. Dr. Timothy May of North Georgia College and State University wrote in his article that there was religious tolerance “throughout the empire”. If I think about what it means, I suppose the Mongols might have been fairly callous when it came to religion. If they conquered Christians, Muslims or Buddhists, they only wanted obedience and did not care what gods their subjects adhere to. However, I would call it disinterest rather than tolerance, if that was the case. At least the writers should qualify this alleged tolerance with some details.

An article in The Spectator says: “the same man who is said to be responsible for the deaths of a world record 40 million is also noted — admittedly less widely — for his religious tolerance, enlightened diplomacy and championing of women’s rights.” Same propaganda of Genghis Khan having been a progressive conqueror.

Another blog on WordPress, Course Correction: An Insider’s Look at Mormon Culture, at least tries to clarify these progressive tendensies of Genghis Khan in some way:

“Although they adopted literacy, arts, and sciences from other countries and tolerated Taoism, Islam, Buddhism, and Christianity, Mongols kept their own culture—including an active role of women in their social and political life. Mongol society lacked the belief that female sexual purity was a value to be defended at all costs—including defense of and seclusion of women. When one tribe was ambushed by another, the men fled on horses so they could live to fight another day. Captured women were taken as wives by the conquering warriors. If the men escaped, they attacked and recaptured the women. A recaptured wife might be pregnant with her captor’s child, but the child was raised by her husband as his own.

While the warriors were off sacking and looting—sometimes for more than a year at a stretch— Mongol women ran the country. Mongolian girls as well as boys were educated when schools were established. Both Genghis Khan’s wife and mother influenced his governing decisions.

True, Mongolian women did not have total equality, and prosperous Mongols could take more than one wife. Yet, compared to women in 13th century Europe, China, Persia, and the Arab world, Mongolian women had a good deal.”

I do not know how accurate these statements are, but at least they are sensible.

I do however get the impression that there is some sort of liberal agenda at play in promoting, this idea of the progressive Khan. In fact, I have two different scenarios: Genghis Khan was the first Communist leader of powerful nation, or this is just another Marxist ploy in attempting to downplay the achievements of Europe by praising non-Europeans.

Perhaps, there had been a proto-Communist cabal that put Genghis Khan into power. After all, if main stream history is accurate, Genghis Khan did what Communists tend to do; wage war and kill a lot of people. Mao supposedly killed 45 million in four years during the great leap forward. Stalin had 60 million killed according to some estimates. So according to history, the Mongols caused more deaths than Mao, and equally the death’s of Stalin. Of course the 20th century Communists achieved their deaths in a shorter time-span, as the Mongols took a century or two (and several Khans) to do it, but they did not have access to modern technology so I think it evens out. At least according to the presumed liberals who are praising Genghis Khan, he was similar to modern Communist leaders; the was a violent conqueror who caused millions of deaths, but later on he is being hailed as a progressive hero. Of course there is the difference that Genghis Khan probably didn’t spend as much effort on killing his own people as Commies tend to do.

I think the second scenario is more likely that liberals who hate Europe and everything related to it, find any excuse ignore the achievements of Europe, and praise the achievements of non-Europeans peoples, be their achievements factual or fictional. I am not of the camp that thinks that Europeans excell in everything and should be praised for everything, I simply think credit should be given when it is due, and not given when it is not due.

 

Feats of the Empire

Let’s get back to the Mongols and their alleged feats. The Secret History of the Mongols states that “just two million Mongols, with 129,000 cavalrymen, could establish the largest land empire in world history.” Two million people with a bit more than 100,000 cavalrymen were able to conquer the largest land empire in history, and butcher up to 60 million people? I don’t find it credible, although possibly this two million refers only to the Mongols who were alive during the time of Genghis Khan, and during his day they hadn’t killed all of those millions yet. They had no access to modern weaponry or transport, they did have even the telegraph, nothing like that. I might believe this if the people they conquered had been weak pacifists who were unwilling or unable to fight back, but they weren’t.

I think something doesn’t add up, yet I don’t claim to know what the truth is. Perhaps it lies somewhere in the middle. Maybe the Mongols did manage to conquer some places like China and Korea, but it doesn’t sounds credible they’d be able to do all that they supposedly did. Or maybe the Mongol Empire is a fabrication to begin with, possibly to cover-up the existence of another race of people or empire, or a coalition of races.

I don’t know the truth, but I still have more to speculate about the Mongols and the possible Mongol deception, but I’ll do that at a later date.

 

 

Links:

Marco Polo did not go to China: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/marco-polo-did-not-go-to-china/

By whom, when and why was Great Wall of China built?: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2017/05/08/by-whom-when-and-why-was-great-wall-of-china-built/

Genghis Khan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan

Mongolia: A Guide to economic and political developments: https://books.google.fi/books?hl=en&lr=&id=xxB9AgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Mongolia:+A+Guide+to+Economic+and+Political+Developments&ots=5OIy5iR-0Z&sig=PnZ2WZHCm7efX95t4aFpKD_aOgM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Genghis Khan (1165-1127): https://web.archive.org/web/20100306053246/http://www.accd.edu/sac/history/keller/mongols/empsub1.html

Genghis Khan was tolerant, kind to women – and a record-breaking mass-murderer: https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/07/the-mongol-empire-by-john-man-review/

Genghis Khan was tolerant, kind to women – and a record-breaking mass-murderer: https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/07/the-mongol-empire-by-john-man-review/

Genghis Khan and Women’s Rights :https://annmjohnson.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/genghis-khan-and-womens-rights/

Warm underground caves found in Antarctica?

It was reported in the media a bit over a week ago that researchers found a “secret, warm oasis beneath Antarctica’s ice” and that there could be undiscovered animal species there. Apparently these warm caves are 20-25 degrees Celsius, and you can wear a T-shirt there, despite being surrounded by snow and ice. The heat, and possibly light, supposedly originate from an active volcano.

Assuming that this is all true, it is likely to fuel speculation about Hollow Earth, or perhaps an underground sun that heats the place up. Or maybe the Nazis found these caves back in the 30s or 40s when they founded their alleged Neuschwabenland base there with flying saucers and all. It is quite extraordinary if this discovery is true. Warm, habitable caves in the coldest place on earth (since Antarctica is supposedly too cold for planes to fly over), and you just have to wonder how far the caves stretch.

Yet I won’t buy this news at face value. It might very well be a distraction or deception of some sort. Let’s say that flat earth researchers are onto something with their claims of a round ice wall surrounding the round disc of the earth. Maybe this discovery is supposed to draw attention away from the possible fact that the very shape of Antarctica is different than we’ve been told. Maybe they want us to be imagining what is underneath Antarctica instead of what is beyond it, such as the Firmament.

Or maybe this cave discovery is laying the groundwork for a Project Bluebeam-type of deception. Some time ago an alleged fake tweet by Buzz Aldrin emerged showing a pyramid-like mountain in the antarctic with the text: “We are all in danger. It is evil itself.”

 

Maybe the powers that be want us to believe at some point that scientists discover a frozen alien civilization under the ice, and when they are defrosted, they turn against us, and we need another, benign alien race to save us. It’s just one example of a possible silly psy-op they might be pulling on us.

There have been some important visitors to Antarctica as of late. US Secretary of State, John Kerry, visited it last year. So did the russian patriarch Kirill a week after meeting with pope Francis. There are also rumours that Obama visited the alleged continent last year during his trip to Argentina.

Could there have been some sort of discovery in Antarctica yet to be announced to the public? Did they manage to make a dent in the Firmament? Is it all a psy-op of some sort? Why this focus on Antarctica as of late? Is the discovery of the “oasis caves” related to these political visits?

I don’t have any of the answers, except that I don’t buy the story of underground caves heated by an active volcano. Maybe the caves exist, maybe they’re warm, but the claim that they are heated by a volcano sounds dubious. Then again maybe the whole story is fiction. The caves are supposedly located “around and beneath” mount Erebus. Interesting name. Erebus is a primordial deity from Greek mythology associated with darkness and born of chaos. The description reminds me of the Egyptian chaotic frog god, Kek, who is revered by many in the far-right nowadays. I cannot say what the ultimate significance of Mt Erebus here is, except this cave business along with Erebus sounds like a manufactured narrative to me, instead of a spontaneous discovery.

 

P. S.

I thought I should add this “confession” I found on a discussion forum a while ago, about supposed discoveries in the antarctic and how Masons are involved. It’s probably fiction, but at least it’s interesting fiction.

 

Links:

Researchers find secret, warm oasis beneath Antarctica’s ice that could be home to undiscovered species: http://nationalpost.com/news/world/researchers-find-secret-warm-oasis-beneath-antarcticas-ice-that-could-be-home-to-undiscovered-species

Antarctica’s ice caves could be hiding undiscovered species of plants and animals: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-08/antarctica-ice-caves-research-new-species-of-plants-and-animals/8884508

Kerry to become highest-ranking US official to visit Antarctica: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/304401-kerry-to-become-highest-ranking-us-official-to-visit-antarctica

Patriarch Kirill meets penguins at Russian base as he becomes first Orthodox leader to visit Antarctica: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/12162705/Patriarch-Kirill-meets-penguins-in-Antarctica.html

Antarctica – Which Conspiracy Theory Explains all the Celebrity Visits in 2016?: https://endtimesand2019.wordpress.com/2016/12/19/antarctica-which-conspiracy-theory-explains-all-the-celebrity-visits-in-2016/

Erebus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erebus

Curious Death of the Son of Finnish Prime Minister Sipilä

Back in 2015 around the time of the parliamental election in Finland, the son of Juha Sipilä, Tuomo Sipilä, died due to supposed complications of a routine surgery operation. After the election Juha Sipilä and his political Center party won, and he became prime minister.

I didn’t know about the death of Tuomo Sipilä back when it happened in 2015. I heard about it a few months ago and found it suspicious. Based what I’ve read from the media he was a healthy 22-year old man, living a full life. He had a girlfriend. Tuomo had went through a no-risk operation in a hospital in the city of Oulu, although I’m not sure what sort of operation it actually was. He woke up a few hours after the operation and was going to the bathroom while being escorted by a nurse. He slumped on the floor on the way. They started trying to resuscitate him immediately, but 45 minutes later the doctors said there was nothing they could do.

The cause of death was “a complete mystery” even to the doctors, an Iltalehti newspaper article from March 2015 stated. Tuomo Sipilä died February 17, 2015. I couldn’t find any source even now in September 2017 stating what the cause of death was. Maybe it’s out there somewhere, but the media does not seem to have been concerned with it, at least.

When I heard about this, I immediately found the whole affair fishy. A young, healthy man dies after a simple operation. The doctors don’t know the cause of death either. Now, over two years after the fact the cause of death is still not told to us. There was a sob-story article written about Tuomo’s death as recently as May 2017, yet it does not mention the cause of death, and the surgical operation is described as being low-risk, i.e. no actual description of what sort of operation it was. The article does describe something I find a bit creepy though: prime minister Juha Sipilä and his surviving sons made a casket shaped like a boat for Tuomo, and then Tuomo’s mother made the final resting place for him with lace sheets she got as a wedding present. A boat shaped casket, are they vikings or something?

What I think happened, and this is just my crazy conspiracy theorist opinion, is that Juha Sipilä sacrificed his son to be allowed to become the prime minister. It was probably required as proof that he is willing to bend-over backwards for whoever is the actual power behind the throne in Finland. Whenever some sort of celebrity dies, there’s someone always saying it was an Illuminati sacrifice. I don’t know if the Illuminati was involved, or if it actually exists or not, but I do suspect the death of Tuomo Sipilä was a sacrifice. Possibly he was poisoned.

I do not know whether Juha Sipilä is a Freemason or a member of any other secret society like that. On the vauva.fi forum someone did claim that he is a Freemason, but that is hardly a reliable source. Sipilä is a member of the Rauhan Sana (Word of Peace) movement which is part of the Laestadianism Christian revival movement. I don’t know anything about this Rauhan Sana sect, but Laestadianists I have had dealings with. In my experience they’re mostly harmless but annoying. However I don’t know about the inner workings of their cult.

 

 

Links:

Uutuuskirja kertoo Juha Sipilän Tuomo-pojan traagisesta kuolemasta: ”Sipilä purskahti itkuun, kun hän näki kaiken tämän”: http://www.is.fi/kotimaa/art-2000000902121.html

Juha Sipilä Tuomo-poikansa kuolemasta: ”Olisiko leikkaus pitänyt jättää väliin?”: http://www.menaiset.fi/artikkeli/ajankohtaista/ihmiset/juha_sipila_tuomo_poikansa_kuolemasta_olisiko_leikkaus_pitanyt

Juha Sipilä avautuu poikansa traagisesta kuolemasta: “Tuomon kuolema herättää kysymyksiä”: http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2015033119450456_uu.shtml

Juha Sipilän vaimo Minna-Maaria Kotiliedessä poikansa kuolemasta: ”En tiennyt, että se olisi viimeinen kerta, kun halaamme”: https://anna.fi/ihmiset-ja-suhteet/julkkikset/juha-sipilan-vaimo-minna-maaria-kotiliedessa-poikansa-kuolemasta-en-tiennyt-etta-se-olisi-viimeinen-kerta-kun-halaamme/

Juha Sipilän Arvomaailma: http://www.vauva.fi/keskustelu/4443691/ketju/juha_sipilan_arvomaailma

Laestadianism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laestadianism

Rauhansanalaisuus: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rauhansanalaisuus

How about DNA, is it another occult hoax?

Previously I wrote about the occult connections of the Copernican heliocentric model and the Big Bang. I’ve seen and heard others discuss them previously, but there’s one thing I haven’t seen questioned, at least not much, that is DNA.  We’ve all seen cartoon images of the double helix of DNA, or as the U.S. National Library of Medicine website writes: “The double helix has not only reshaped biology, it has become a cultural icon, represented in sculpture, visual art, jewelry, and toys.”

It’s commonly understood that the DNA double helix resembles the ancient symbol of the Caduceus with intertwined twin serpents around a pole with wings. The symbol is called the staff of Hermes, the Greek god. It is associated with astrology and alchemy. It is also associated with medicine, but according to Wikipedia that is an incorrect use. The Rod of Asclepius, a Greek god of healing, has only one serpent around a pole and no wings, is what they should be using.

 

This obvious similarity between the DNA and the Caduceus suggests one of three things: it’s a co-incidence, the ancients somehow knew about DNA, or modern science purposefully inserted this occult symbol of a pagan god into our minds as being part of our very flesh. I don’t think it is a co-incidence.

 

Discovery of DNA

James Watson and Francis Crick “discovered” the DNA in the fifties. The U.S. National Library of Medicine website, interestingly, writes as follows:

“Drawing on the experimental results of others (they conducted no DNA experiments of their own), taking advantage of their complementary scientific backgrounds in physics and X-ray crystallography (Crick) and viral and bacterial genetics (Watson), and relying on their brilliant intuition, persistence, and luck, the two showed that DNA had a structure sufficiently complex and yet elegantly simple enough to be the master molecule of life.”

They didn’t conduct their own experiments, but they managed to discover the double helix structure? Moreover it’s commonly known that Francis Crick was inspired by LSD to make his great discovery. It sounds more like something an artist or a weird religious person would do, get an epiphany by doing drugs. That’s hardly the scientific method. Cracked.com even mentions that Crick was a fan of Aldous Huxley’s, a well-known or well-alleged transhumanist-globalist mastermind, Doors of Perception.

The phrase double helix in interesting too. Accoring to the Online Etymology Dictionary a helix is “a spiral thing”. It comes from the “Greek helix (genitive helikos), a word used of anything in a spiral shape (an armlet, a curl of hair, the tendril of a vine, a serpent’s coil)”. A serpent’s coil, you say? The DNA resembles the coiled twin serpents of the Caduceus. Notice a pattern yet?

 

The Enmity with the Serpent seed

Things like these make me go, hmm, maybe the Bible was right all along. Genesis 3:15 states:

“And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel.”

Maybe God intended humans to have a single helix DNA, but because of the serpent’s genetic involvement now we have double: seed of the woman and seed of the serpent.

Another thing is that the DNA is sometimes called a ladder, and is associated with Jacob’s ladder. The ladder is also a part of Masonic iconography. Perhaps they knew something, or perhaps they wanted to insert their occult beliefs into our biology.

The person in the center in the picture below is holding a key. The Cracked.com article writes: “LSD. Yes, when not discovering the key to life, and winning the Nobel Prize for it, Crick spent the 50s and 60s throwing all night parties famous for featuring that era’s favorite party favors: LSD and nudity.” DNA is the key to life. Looks like Crick just was pushing Freemasonry for the uninitiated.

 

Referring to the Caduceus, or staff of Hermes, Wikipedia writes: “It is said the wand would wake the sleeping and send the awake to sleep. If applied to the dying, their death was gentle; if applied to the dead, they returned to life”

It basically reverses things. I wonder if the staff could turn men into women and vice versa? Freedom into slavery? Victims into aggressors? If we take the wand to refer to modern science, it has certainly put many rational people to sleep by conving their spiritual beliefs are nonsense, and it has awakened people who lack reason to acknowledge we cannot explain the existence of the world and life itself without some sort of creator to think themselves rational.

 

How does DNA look like?

I suppose I had always assumed that Crick and Watson managed to look at human tissue samples with a powerful microscope and saw DNA, or something to that extent. Now it does not seem like that was the case. I tried to find pictures of DNA on the internet, but much like pictures of outer space from NASA, they are cartoons or CGI images.

For example, Kaspi.tv has this image and a four second video showing the DNA double helix. At first I thought it might be actual video of DNA taken through a microscope, but it says it’s computer generated.

 

The New Scientist website has an article from 2012 titled “DNA imaged with electron microscope for the first time”. So DNA was discovered 60-years ago but that was the first time it was imaged? So all of the scientists and medical students who were taught in universities that DNA is shaped like that were just basically told to take their word for it? Or they were able to see it microscopes themselves, but they just couldn’t take photographs of DNA prior to 2012?

The article has these pictures:

 

The first one resembles the double helix slightly, but certainly is not identical to the images we are used to seeing. The second one looks like CGI to me, and it has two pillars like Jachin and Boaz of Freemasonry. The article seems to suggest though that they are actual images, not CGI: “Now an electron microscope has captured the famous Watson-Crick double helix in all its glory, by imaging threads of DNA resting on a silicon bed of nails.”

The electron microscope capturing the double helix presumable means they took a photo of it.

 

Conclusion

I find the DNA double helix hokey as heck. I am not saying it’s definitely a hoax, but I am highly skeptical. I do think that modern science has a real understanding of genes. I do think GMO manipulation is real, and supposedly DNA tests can reveal whether two people are related and so on. I don’t think that it is all fake. The makeup of the DNA though, looking allegedly like the Caduceus, I think is an occult hoax. Just the lack of pictorial evidence, and these occult themes, drugs, references to Aldous Huxley, around the concept of the DNA suggest that it is not science, but religion.

Much like outer space, it seems that the inner space too is a fabrication of talented scifi-authors masquerading as scientists.

 

I should give credit where it’s due. The reason I wrote these last three articles was partially inspired by videos by Youtube-channel the Truth is stranger than fiction. He has said some of the arguments in his videos I’ve used here, but I cannot link to any specific video since I don’t recall what he said and where. Just check out his channel if you haven’t done so already.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2aFQcGgRoVuEWfx2AM0H-A/videos

 

 

Links:

The Francis Crick Papers: https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/SC/Views/Exhibit/narrative/doublehelix.html

Caduceus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caduceus

The 5 Greatest Things Ever Accomplished While High: http://www.cracked.com/article_16532_the-5-greatest-things-ever-accomplished-while-high.html

DNA strain: http://www.kaspi.tv/files/dna-strain.html

DNA imaged with electron microscope for the first time: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22545-dna-imaged-with-electron-microscope-for-the-first-time/