Petty thought and emotion

There are a two kinds of thought and emotions that people have, at least I do, and it seems most others do as well; petty thoughts and emotions and “proper” thoughts and emotions. When you actually think you stretch your understanding further to gain more understanding. When you feel something, you feel if it’s right or not, worth your time or not. Emotion gives you a purpose. Then there are a petty versions of them. Petty thoughts are just words or a voice on in your head going on and on about the same stuff you already know, but it’s trying to make you think like it’s new and relevant information. Petty emotions tell you you’re bored, scared or stressed and you have to satisfy it’s next whim to feel good, yet if you do so it won’t make you feel better. Perhaps petty thoughts and emotions come from the ego, whereas the real ones come from you.

Petty thoughts have to use words, proper thoughts don’t necessarily need them. You just think in images, symbols and ideas. You understand what you mean without needing to explain it. The petty thoughts try to make you think you need explanation and analysis. Thoughts are merely a direct connection between your will and understanding of it. I’m not talking about any mystical thing here. Petty thoughts hinder that connection.

Petty emotions are emotions tied to your lower instincts. They tell you you want chocolate, watch one more Youtube video, stay in bed 5 more minutes, even though if you follow their direction it will not make you feel any better. Quite the contrary. Proper emotions rarely focus on insignificant items like a video or a snack. They tell you to follow your dreams and do what is right. They give a motivation to live. Work on what feels right, write that book, talk to the girl you really like (not someone who only looks pretty), speak the truth even though society (and petty emotions) say you’ll get punished for it. This is sort of as David Icke says that people feel with their stomach instead of the heart.

One example from my life that I experience all too often is I wake up in the morning, I have to go to school, the petty thoughts tell me I wanna still lie in bed, even though it’s useless since I’m gonna go to school anyway. The petty thoughts try run the scenario of going to school in my head, what I have to do before that: shower, eat breakfast, get dressed, etc. That too is pointless because I know how to do it, I have done it countless of times in this life, yet the petty thoughts pretend like they are helping me by preparing for something new. Waking up 7:30 in the morning to go to Korean class hour and half later is far from my wildest dreams, yet I have chosen to do so for the next few months even though it is tedious. However the petty thoughts and emotions are not helping, they are merely making it worse. They serve no purpose. What I should do in the morning when I wake up is get up, go shower, eat breakfast, fiddle with the computer, get dressed and go to class. I know I’m gonna do it anyway, so why pretend I’m torn about it? Excess thoughts and emotions do no good in this case.

Why do I have these petty things bothering me then? The best I can guess is, they are sort of feces of proper thoughts and emotions that I have difficulty ejecting from my body. Thought and emotion require energy, so they have to release exhaust at times one could surmise. It is the same with society, everything we buy creates vast amounts of garbage. Almost any item you buy, from food, to electronics, to books, comes with a plastic wrapper you throw away. Eventually you’re swimming in garbage unless you waste of lot of time and energy getting rid of the waste.

Advertisements

Kaiken takana on nainen

Over the last few millennia the human race has been dominated by very masculine values. The one with the biggest army, sharpest weapons, strongest muscles, loudest shout rules over the weaker ones. They in turn gladly accept the dominance of a stronger individual, group, race or empire. However, the most masculine people and energies may rule over others, they are not in control. The feminine always controls the masculine. In fact the masculine energy seems incapable of creating meaning, which is something the feminine does effortlessly. A big macho man may kill the enemies and win the game to become the king, but what then? The masculine is incapable of handling the question. It turns to the feminine. When you ask a man who just won the war or gold medal, why did he do it, he’ll answer it was for king and country, God or his family. The masculine lives for the sake of something more feminine. It wants the feminine, something intangible and mysterious, to tell him what to live for.

Even if the strong warriors are the rules, we must ask who stands behind the warrior? Who creates his reality? For the power behind the throne is more powerful than the throne, most of the time.

It should go without saying that a biological man does not equal the masculine, nor does the feminine refer simply to women. Men can be more feminine, and women more masculine. No-one is 100% masculine/ feminine. You know Ying and Yang stuff.

A man “always” has to have a cause to live for: sports, games, work, country, God, family, the secret society, resisting the NWO… Whereas women often seem to be more loose in this matter. They have hobbies and interests, but they are rarely devoted to them strongly. Also women seem to see meaning in insignificant details like the colours of the curtains or tablecloth. A man may think blue looks better than pink, but in the end it is the function that matters, not some aesthetic quality. This is because the feminine is able to give meaning to things whereas the masculine can only attach to an already existing meaning and strengthen it. The masses have been kept in ignorance of the power of the feminine for millennia, and thus have been easily controlled by it. They either don’t see it or think it is so weak to matter, they do not even pause to think about it, yet the masses are controlled by it. There’s even a lame old Finnish song called “Kaiken takana on nainen” meaning “There’s a woman behind everything”. Behind every successful man there’s a woman.

The Conspiracy has used the feminine to control humanity which has been forced into one-sided masculinity. Yet the Conspiracy itself is a kind of transsexual female, as it no longer creates any meaning. It has attached itself to its idea of  “New World Order” and hierarchy. It may change its methods and appearance with make-up, but within it is unchanging and artificial. The best expression of the feminine might be a young girl who falls in love with her new point of interest which others have hard time even perceiving. What is she doing and why? All others can see is that she is infatuated by it. Yet it is forgotten by her in a few hours and new meaning is created.

The Purpose of Evil

Expanding on the last article. I do not believe good and evil to be two absolutes in the cosmos. Not very fundamental forces on their own. I don’t believe in any Manichaeistic idea that good and evil are two evenly matched forces. I see good and evil as two opponents like cold and hot, light and dark, pleasure and suffering, big and small. Part of the Yin/Yang duality. It is in our time that the issue of good and evil very important, but in different eras it may not be such an important issue. Evil in our world is so prevalent and overpowered power must be taken from and good must be strengthened. Moral issues, the question of evil have albeit disappeared from the public sphere, the main stream does not see it as an important or valid question. The reason is simply; the world is so saturated with evil many people think it’s normal. The evil ruling our world keeps creating more evil to hide other evil causing the blind masses not to even blink when they see evil.

Evil manifests in our world as wars, ritualistic pedophilia, obsession with money and superficial things at the exclusion of profound things.

In our world evil is everywhere and everybody sees it, yet some refuse to acknowledge it, others choose to pretend it’s not there and thus serve evil. To anyone “awake” this should be obvious, and that we must fight evil, or perhaps rather promote good. However in other times this has not been the case. Good and evil have been more balanced. Probably at some time good was overpowered and evil suppressed. I would say living at such a time it would have been “good” to promote evil and fight against good as it would have felt very oppressive. Imagine living somewhere where everyone always smiled at each other, never told any lies, never did any naughty things, never stole anything. Such a life would be very stagnant and boring. You’d want to do something evil living in such a society. Life is supposed change and flow, not stand still for a long time.

Good and evil are not absolute in the cosmic scheme of things, they are relative. However in the world that we inhabit evil is very real, which why good must become real as well. It’s a cop-out trying to argue about the relativity of evil in issues like pedophilia, yet fortunately pedophilia is hardly one the founding principles of reality. It is however one of the biggest issues of our time, at least in the sense that it should concern everybody, and that many of the powerful (i.e. evil) people engage in it.

The Devil exists for us to Create

I’ve been thinking about the nature of evil, it’s origin and what it actually is. It’s related to the previous demon article. Is evil something external from us or our internal creation? Is the devil sitting on his throne in hell conspiring to corrupt us, or is the devil the result of us corrupting ourselves? Based on the headline of this article, it’s both and neither. The devil exists outside of us, yet we have to create him. There is an external possibility for evil, but we must choose to give it life. Sort of like a virus which is alive only when it’s attached to a living being.

Few weeks ago on Red Ice Creations a guest asked the host, Henrik, to define evil. He said something like forcing others to do something they don’t want. It was better than I could have done on the spot, but I still find it somewhat lacking. However, I don’t even want to define evil. Evil is evil, we cannot see it. We see manifestations of evil. The root of evil, I believe, is in wanting to get something for free. They also discussed this on Red Ice. If you expect to get something without doing something for it is the root of evil, even though the act itself if not evil. It rather leads to evil. This does not merely refer to commerce, i.e. expecting to receive goods without exchanging money or services with it. If you expect your girlfriend to like you without liking them back, if except to have food and a house without doing anything for it, if you except to learn a new skill without working for it, that is the root of evil. The usage of money is a manifestation of this philosophy of trying not to do things. For example, hundreds of years ago majority of people built their own house, or their friends and relatives did it in exchange for camaraderie, or goods and services. Nowadays most people buy their house with money. In effect they don’t do anything to get it. They (the majority of people) work for the money, but there is a difference between the abstract concept of money and work.

My point here isn’t however, as some might falsely assume, that I’m berating people who don’t like to work for companies to earn money. Quite the opposite. I do advocate people doing whatever they deem meaningful or necessary. However prostituting yourself for a business 5 days a week, 8 hours a day in exchange for money does not have to be necessary. However if you want to have a food, you have to acquire it somehow, if want your room to be clean, someone has to clean it. I recommend the one to do it to be you. The second best option is someone you have a good trusting relationship with, such a friend, husband/wife, or relative. Not a multinational corporation that gives you food only because it gets money from you.

The modern tendency to avoid work, since the most “successful” people in our world don’t work, they play with money to get more money, is in effect a tendency to avoid direct connection with reality. There is always a middle man. Instead of building your own house or growing food you buy it with money, instead of cleaning your house you hire someone to do it, instead of engaging in a romance with a member of the opposite sex you watch a romantic Hollywood movie. The nature of this reality is that you do something, which enables something else to happen. You have to be an active participant. When I say you should do things yourself, I don’t mean everybody should just care about their small own world excluding other people, rather you should have a living connection to all things that you care about. If you want to have a connection with people do it because it feels natural, a connection of friendship or blood, a connection of trust. When people are connected by social constructs like money or their workplace, they cannot be connected by trust. It’s admirable for grandchildren to clean their old grandmother’s house, but not so for a professional cleaning company to do it because they were paid, be it by the grandmother or the social services system run by the government.

Wanting something without cost is like being alive with no life in you. Mind you, the cost does not have to anything unpleasant or troublesome. The cost of being loved by someone is loving them back, for example. Yet sometimes the cost is annoying like learning Korean, you actually have to concentrate on it, which isn’t so much fun, but hopefully the rewards of knowing Korean are. Wanting something for free simply means you want the world to dance for you without yourself dancing with it or playing music. The other side of this is forcing others to dance when they do not want to. If you are disconnected from living reality, you might try to make up for it by forcing others to feign life. Yet a doll is not alive even though you can move it’s arms and legs.

Demons in our Midst

I already mentioned the topic of demons in the book Concordia ab Chao, and my view on them. Even though I don’t necessarily have anything new to add about them, I feel I wanna ruminate about this again. If I remember correctly, previously I was a bit vague about the existence of demons. I said corporations act as if demons, but now I am more convinced they actually are demons. What demons, or evil spirits, actually are is another thing.

Corporations, which includes multinational businesses, churches, governments and organizations like the UN, are demons manifest on earth in physical form. The term corporation originates from Latin corpus or corporare, which means body, to embody, or like the English word corpse. Corporations are artificial persons or entities, yet they seem to have a will of their own. They seek to amass more power and have their own goals. They use people as vehicles to make them accomplish their goals. In effect people who work for corporations are victims of demonic possession. Pretty much every society before the modern construct has believed in demons or evil spirits that possess people and convince them to commit sinful acts. Demons are not physical entities so they must other methods (such as seducing people to work for them) to wreak havoc on earth.

I believe I need not elaborate much on the damage to nature and liberty that corporations have inflicted on the world. It should be fairly self-evident.

Corporations, governments and their like do not exist, yet countless people have killed, lied and died for them for centuries. It is merely a few words on a piece of paper, an agreement among people, and a few buildings that house the possessions and employees of the corporation, but yet the corporation remains non-existent. Still its malicious influence can be felt. It makes sense if an individual sacrifices his life for his family or something real, but instead these abstract notions have goaded people into greater obsession than anything real. Corporations do not gain anything from your sacrifice. Sentient beings feel pain and pleasure, you can make them happy, but if you do something that benefits a corporation, it won’t feel it. An effort wasted at best. It is a sick delusion to work for a corporation. Many ideologies can be included in this too. Whether you do it for personal gain, in belief that serving the corporation also benefits you, you are a pawn. If you really believe in the corporation, you are utterly deluded.

The important question is whether corporations are evil spirits, interdimensional beings of some sort, or merely an insanity in the minds of men. Are demons external entities, or creations of obsession and ignorance, an anomaly in human psychology? I find both arguments convincing yet not completely satisfying.

White Guilt

White Guilt, i.e. people of European background feeling shame for the atrocities and oppression their ancestors have committed on other races, is just a modernized form of feeling of racial superiority. “White people” who are trying to be very politically correct, not to offend people of other races based on a shallow understand of history subconsciously believe they are somehow superior to other race, and feel ashamed for that. Therefore they are trying to apologize for the misbegotten fact that they are better than others. White Guilt is simply an upgraded and softer, yet more insidious, version of White Man’s burden. After all, Europe based “white” man’s culture has conquered almost the whole world. It has “proven” itself to be superior.

I do not believe this sentiment in “white” people is in any way a racial thing, that they are somehow racially inclined to feel superior. Rather I’d say it is a cultural thing. Probably partially due to the influence of the Illuminati bloodlines. The idea of the “white” race as somehow unified entity is a construct. Being a Finn I’m “white”, but I do not feel ethnically connected to central Europeans just because we look racially more alike compared to other races, does not mean there is some deeper connection. Culturally we are part of the Greco-Roman philosophical tradition and Christian tradition, like all of Europe. However, that is something external, and also a forced connection to Europe. Internally we are a separate ethnicity. To know how the Spanish feel about the English for example, you really have to ask them. This idea of Europe as a homogeneous entity, of being ethnically European is not real in any organic sense. It is a forced idea, a construct. A lot like the idea of the European Union.

The connection between all Western people is, however, the imperialism and machinic destruction of anything natural that we have been willingly enslaved to. Even today few Westerners fail to see the folly of all of Western civilization. Individual ethnic groups within Europe, such as Germans, English or French (even though they might be divided to smaller groups) are more or less natural entities. However, all the individual groups have been enslaves by the Western culture which is at the end of the day nothing more than a machine set to devour all that is beautiful and natural. Yet only a minority of us see it. People may recognize that imperialism that took place over a hundred years ago was wrong, but they do not recognize the neo-imperialism that takes place under the guise of “free-trade” or “humanitarian wars”, or the Orwellian oppression in our own countries. So instead of having White Guilt, which is actually just a for of racism (even though I hate to use the word, as it is over-used for various minor issues), Westerners should have Western Awareness; being born into this demonic machine should make us recognize the unfortunate fact, rectify the sins of our ancestors and make sure we do not follow them in aiding the machine.

This collaboration of “Europeans” with this machine is not out of any inherent evil in “Europeans”, rather I’d say it is a kind of childish trust. Living in fantasy instead of reality. A child abused by his parents who flees reality into his imagination.

Cause of Anti-Semitism

We in the Western world have been conditioned by the media to accept Jews as somehow different from the rest. It’s worse to kill and hate Jews than it is of other people. Moreover we have been fed lies about the Holohoax and the right of Jews to inhabit Palestine. I’m Finnish and I’ve never met a Finnish Jew. There are some, there are a few Finnish celebrities who are Jewish, and unfortunately they enforce the negative stereotypes. When I was a kid I didn’t really know what Jews are nor cared about, yet through television I had been taught to believe they are somehow different. Unconsciously I accepted that. Then I accepted it’s bad to kill and oppress them, since it makes sense it’s bad to do that to anyone. However later I learned many of the things I had been told about Jews were wrong, and that many bad people in the world are, at least seemingly, Jewish, and use that to shield themselves from criticism. That made me hate Jews.

That is how it is done. Media tells you Jews are different. They tell you Jews are either better than you, or somehow more delicate. Like unicorns and fairies playing in the meadow. They couldn’t do harm. Unfortunately they are people too, and can do good and bad. Going through the experience of disillusionment you realize the humanity of Jews, including the fact that Judaism is used as an excuse to commit many evil acts, yet somehow the feeling of Jews being different, indoctrinated into you by the media, lingers inside of you. After all, now you see the evil committed by Jews, or under the guise of Judaism, and anything Jewish shines like a beacon in the night. You focus on it because you have been taught to focus on the Jews. It is the Zionist media that is the originator of most Anti-Semitism in the world. Both two definitions of it; hatred of Jews, and criticizing Zionism.

I already wrote about this previously, but I’m doing so again after watching Alex Jones trying to evade the “Jewish question” on his show after a caller told him how Jews might join the effort against the NWO if it was pointed out to them how Judaism is used for evil. Jones got very defensive about the issue and babbled something about how the Aztecs and Chinese were able to commit evil massacres even without the presence of Jews. I’m not saying Jones is a total shill or anything, I don’t think so even if half the world does, but I don’t trust him either. I merely disliked his way of evading the topic. Whether he was doing merely out of “civility”, i.e. not talking about too controversial topics, or due to political or financial reasons, I don’t know. Unfortunately Jews are a multifaceted issue in conspiracy theories. A very complicated issue, which should be tackled head on, and not pussyfoot around it because of political correctness.