Alt-Right leaders Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch were protesting against Donald Trump firing missiles at the Shayrat air base in Syria. They allege that Trump is going to start another war in the Middle-East. If that is true, Trump certainly should be condemned, but I am fairly certain these Alt-Right figures don’t have all of the facts, nor do they really care about them. These wannabe politicians are just doing it for the attention.
Another interesting thing is that Richard Spencer was supposedly attacked and beat up by Antifa after his protest. So basically the Alt-Right “Neo-Nazis” are protesting against war, whereas the Antifa Communists are supporting wars of the American imperium. None of this makes any sense. I am glad though to see my enemies fight against each other, since it is difficult to say which I despise more, the Alt-Right (especially Spencer’s and Enoch’s faction of it), or Antifa. However, since Spencer and Enoch have a name and face I can hate, and Antifa is just an amorphous blob of faceless Commie thugs, I have to go with the Alt-Right.
If the Alt-Right, that now seems to be denouncing Donald Trump, truly had ever supported him, they would not turn their backs on Trump simply based on this one incident. This is proof enough that Spencer and his cohorts were all “Hail Trump”, because it was politically beneficial for them to do so at the time. Now a new wind is blowing, and these opportunists with no backbone are changing direction.
I don’t want to defend Trump, however, on his decision to attack the Syrian air base. The alleged gas attack sounds like it was a lie, or a false flag. At least I haven’t seen any actual evidence of it happening, so why would Trump retaliate against Syria based on such a flimsy accusation? Does he really want to start another was like in Iraq or Libya? I hope not, but I don’t know. Nobody who is not an insider knows what motivated him. I do think there is something else going on in the background, but I don’t want to speculate what. I certainly do not trust any of the narratives that are going on in the main stream media, and I’ve seen plenty people on the internet trying to push an anti-Trump narrative. On top of it all, I do not ever want to be on the same side with Richard Spencer as he’d likely stab me in the butt, so I’m going to assume Trump knows what he is doing. I don’t like it, and I’ve said before I think Trump is a con man, but in a den full of rapists, murderers, pedophiles, usurers and Satanists, a liar might be your best friend.
Let’s see after a few days or weeks what has happened. Has the conflict escalated to a US-backed war against Assad, are they heading toward an all out war between US and Russia, or will things cool down after this one missile incident? If Trump really does plan to invade, rape and destroy Syria as his predecessors have done to several other Middle-Eastern countries, Trump does not deserve anyone’s support. Spencer and Enoch though are not demonstrating against Trump because they are so concerned about the well-being of people. This is just another publicity stunt.
Around a week ago Greg “Grindr Greggie” Johnson was interviewed by Henrik Palmgren at Red Ice TV. I was intrigued enough to listen to the interview since they discussed the Mike Enoch doxing incident. I was wondering whether Red Ice will take a stand or even comment on the issue. Turns out not really.
In the beginning of the interview Henrik Palmgren says the hasn’t looked much into the Mike Enoch incident, so he cannot say much about it, instead he’s going to let Grindr Greggie explain his view on it. Fair enough, except not really. The interview happened a week ago, Mr. Red Ice should have had enough time to look into it by now, but I haven’t seen any “official policy” from Red Ice on the Mike Enoch thing. Unless there is a video or an article on their website that I just happened to miss, I can only deduce that either Henrik continues to support Mike Enoch and they’re choosing to ignore this issue in hopes that it will blow over, or that he disapproves of Mike Enoch’s Jewey wife, but is too much of a pussy to speak out against it. I can understand if he wants to avoid in-fighting in their movement, but there is difference between in-fighting and calling out traitors and liabilities.
Greg Johnson doesn’t seem to say much about Mike Enoch in the interview. He mostly repeats the stuff he wrote about in his article Why I support Mike Enoch. Unsurprisingly, he supports Mike Enoch. He does admit that he knew about Mike Jew-wife already back in 2014, and many of the inner circle in Alt-Right knew about it as well. Henrik Palmgren says in the interview that he didn’t, and he had met Mike Enoch only twice in person. I suppose I’ll believe him on this. Johnson also admits in his article that Enoch’s wife is 1/2 Jewish, although in truth she might be more than that, but half-Jewish is still Jewish. The fact that she is also a faghag who hangs around with trannies is conspicuously absent from the article. Grindr Greggie makes some false claims about Enoch’s wife, Ames Friedman: “she does not have a strong sense of Jewish identity and ethnocentrism”.
Ames Friedman had uploaded this video on her Youtube account (but she has deleted since the doxing, I believe):
It’s about a tranny and two (gay?) Jews dancing around and singing “This is how we Jew it”. In the comment below we can see Ames saying she’s Jewish. She admits she’s Jewish, she enjoys depraved music acts with trannies and gays promoting Jewish ethnonationalism, so I’m just going to say that Greg Johnson is full of shit.
Naturally, Grindr Greggie would have no problem with LGBT-shows like these since he is a known sodomite. Speaking of sodomites, Henrik Palmgren and Johnson spent the first half of the interview speaking about the Alt-Right Youtuber, Millenial Woes, another known sodomite. He had been doxed much earlier, maybe a couple of months ago, and apparently went into hiding, but now he’s come back, since Red Ice has another article promoting Millenial Woes’ return. It states: “After a brief hiatus, Millennial Woes is back at it. In his most recent video, he outlines the recent media attacks against him. If you support Woes, please consider sending a few e-shekels his way.” Yes, keep sending those shekels to the phoneys.
I discovered Millenial Woes’s channel a year, or year and a-half ago, and initially liked it. He has a flair for the dramatic and watching his videos makes you feel like it’s a video blog from a survivor in zombie apocalypse. But after a while I realized, that’s all his videos are: entertaining. They hold little of actual informational content, no great philosophical insight, no practical advice. It’s all about his feelings.
Anyway, I went on this tangent to make a point, which is that these are the priorities of Red Ice. They are promoting sodomites and “intellectuals” who are full of hot air like Greg Johnson and Millennial Woes, but ignore significant issues such as Mike Enoch having a LGBT-promoting Marxist Jew-wife. At the end of the Grindr Greg interview Henrik even tries to defend his wife Lana interviewing Reactionary Jew last year. He’s calling out people who have problems with is as “paranoid”. He says something about people being obsessed with someone having 0.001% Jewish DNA being excessive. I agree, but Mike Enoch’s wife has at least 50% Jewish DNA, or if Henrik’s not talking about her, what is he rambling on about?
The problem with the Reactionary Jew interview is not that they had the audacity to talk to him, but that they are sort of throwing the idea out there to see if someone is willing to bite that the Alt-Right might co-operate with Zionist Jews. Now after the backlash they got, I expect Red Ice to tone down this pro-Jew propaganda for a while. When the Alt-Right emerged I thought their two main issues were nationalism and exposing the Jewish Zionist influence in the world, which is why I liked them at first. Co-operating with Jewish Zionists goes against both of these principles, since Zionists want ethno-nationalism only for the Jews, and are responsible for much of the third-world immigration that is flooding into Europe. I don’t think that the leaders in the Alt-Right are so dumb as not to realize it. Either they are wittingly working for the Jews, or they just don’t care about Jews either way but figure that co-operating with Jews will help themselves personally. The whole of Alt-Right is a scam, and seems like it has been from the get-go.
Just to make a friendly reminder, Richard Spencer, the apparent leader of the Alt-Right, has been caught trying to rub elbows with Zionists again. January 16th, the Forward website published an article of an interview between Spencer and a Jewish rabbi. I think these couple of sentences say all that needs to be said about it: “Spencer says his dream of building a ‘white ethno-state’ is ‘very similar to how Jews conceive of Israel.’ He even describes his vision as something like ‘white Zionism.'”
A couple of years ago when Red Ice started exposing the Holohoax and talking about Jews, I thought it was great. Now it seems it was all more like an advertisement campaign: see how the Jews are controlling everything and screwing us over. First they tried to fight against the Jews, but eventually they decided it’s too hard so according to the beta male maxim: “If you can’t beat them, join them.” Now the Alt-Right Whites want to become the new Jews. The Talmudic Aryans, the White Zionists.
Red Ice has shown how irrelevant they are becoming. They won’t even address the important Mike Enoch issue. Instead of Red Ice, Red Slush would be a better name for them. Cuck Ice Radio.
Henrik Palmgren tries to defend the Reactionary Jew interview by pointing out how they’ve interviewed other Jews in the past, such as Gilad Atzmon, who criticizes the Jewish establishment, and David Cole, a Holocaust revisionist. That’s the point exactly. Has interviewing those people created controversy, have they gotten a huge backlash from their audience? I don’t think so because people understand that those Jews are at least to some degree on the same side. A Zionist Jew is not.
I wrote a year ago how the taking the red pill is another false choice like the blue pill. Stay clear of drugs. Recently it’s become even more obvious to me how right I was.
When I listened to the interview of Reactionary Jew on Radio 3Fourteen a few weeks ago, the most annoying thing about the whole interview is how the Reactionary Jew over-used the term red pill. Him, and many other Alt-Righters use it as if once you are “red pilled” you know everything. There is no longer need for you to look into matters further. You don’t need to think or question anymore. You are red pilled.
I can accept people using the term red pilled in the sense that you are red pilled on an issue, such as being red pilled on 9/11. You understand that the official story doesn’t make sense, building 7 fell down even though no plane hit it and so forth, but it does not mean you know everything about 9/11. But this isn’t how most people use the term nowadays.
I’ve been reading people’s comments on the Mike Enoch doxing and his leftist faghag Jew-wife. Some of his fans and supporters try to excuse the fact that this supposed “neo-Nazi” White Nationalist who pretended to hate Jews was married to one since Mike Enoch supposedly red pilled so many people and brought them into the movement? What does red pilling then even mean? Enoch tells his followers about the duplicity of the Jews, turns them against the Jews, but when it’s found out Enoch is literally and figuratively in bed with Jews they say it doesn’t matter? It just means the red pill is worthless. Enoch’s followers learned nothing. All they got is a celebrity to fawn over. Additionally, since the Alt-Righters seem to be only concerned with bringing more people to their movement, instead of making sure they have decent and trustworthy people, it’s a clear sign that they only care about quantity, not quality. The Alt-Right is not a political movement. It is a gentleman’s club where pretentious dilettantes just want to hold glasses of wine in their hand while they discuss their hobbies and other trivial matters. Their precious 14 words, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”, are nothing but a fashion statement. The same as far-left SJWs who sit in Starbucks tweeting on their i-Pads how capitalism is bad.
Enoch’s defenders also say that Enoch “has done so much for the movement”. As someone who is not well-versed in Mike Enoch’s accomplishments I wonder what he has actually done? I’ve seen people claim he has red pilled people, but so far I haven’t seen a single example of any great insight he has had. No philosophical breakthrough or a strategic maneuver that has benefited the White Nationalist cause in a practical way. Maybe he has done some of that, but based on what I’ve seen he has merely entertained people. He’s been witty, funny and pleasant to listen to, for some people. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it hardly makes him an integral part of any actual political movement.
The whole of Alt-Right is just another drug to distract you from the drudgery of everyday life. Some people get fed up with the blue pill of being an ordinary consumer with a 9-to-5 job and believing everything the TV says. This is good of course, but instead of trying to wake up from the drug-induced stupor you get the red adrenaline pill of fighting for a Noble Cause™. I agree that it is more exciting than the blue pill that makes you mellow and obedient, but you’re still drugged and delusional.
It’s certainly not only the Alt-Right that drugged by the red pill. There are various alternatives of the red pilled tailored for your pleasure. There’s the red pill of the left when you discover how the world is ruled by the evil White cis-het male capitalist patriarchy and you have to fight against them. There’s the leftie-environmentalist pill where you have to fight for animal rights, veganism and all that against the oil companies and the nuclear power industry. There’s the red pill of the conspiracy theorist where everything bad that happens is because it was an Illuminati sacrifice, a hoax or a false flag. That is not to say that Illuminati sacrifices, hoaxes and false flags don’t happen, but you have to investigate every event separately to understand what happened. Then there’s the Alt-Right White Nationalist red pill. And I guess you could say the latest pharmaceutical could be called the Sargon-pill when you are so extremely centrist and moderate you try to make sitting on the fence and being lukewarm an artform.
There are some redeeming qualities to all of these red pills, but ultimately they are a ready-made template that will lead you astray.
I don’t think in this day and age any political movement can work. Internet-based movements just aren’t real movements, and organizing a grass-roots movement in meatspace that could actually wield power in the real world sounds like Utopian dream. Most likely they’ll never get of the ground, or they’ll end getting co-opted either by trained operatives or simply by self-serving assholes. Be it the Alt-Right movement, truth movement, Occupy Wallstreet or anything like that. They always seem to fail. This is not me being black-pilled, but realistic. The only thing we can really do is to try to pursue the truth where it leads and stick with whatever principles we have. Don’t go along with any movement that changes its principles on a whim or based on what sounds convenient.
To finish this off, I’d like to share some screencaps from Daily Stormer of people excusing Mike Enoch’s duplicity. Many on the website don’t and call him out on it, but there are plenty fanboys out there as well.
It’s nice to see you stick with your principles.
How did he actually contribute to the cause? By lying a deceiving all you idiots who fawned over him?
Such mental chicanery. I guess he refuses to look into it further to find out that Mike’s wife is a faghag diversity officer as well.
Mike brought a lot of people to the movement. “Mine more souls!” Only quantity matters. And he chooses to assume the best about Enoch’s intentions. “I have no doubt if…”, “I can’t imagine how…” These comments just reveal you are clueless, and nothing about Enoch’s benevolence.
This post might be a troll. Even the poster’s name is Pakis4Anglin, which doesn’t sound very White Nationalist. However, if this is genuine, it wins the award on mental chicanery to excuse Mike Enoch’s duplicitous actions.
Sure, I used to watch the Nanny with Fran Drescher when I was a teenager. It still doesn’t mean I married a Jew, and I’m not a White Nationalist who has built his career around hating Jews.
Mike clerly did not wear pants since he allowed his wife to be a faghag with LGBT drag queens.
Maybe I’m missing out on something since I am not a White Nationalist, but I don’t think the number of bedrooms is an important issue in White Nationalism. It is not a bedroom or furniture compairing club, it is supposedly a political movement based around race and nationalism. Race-mixing is an anathema to them, especially race-mixing with Jews.
Let’s end this with this week’s “Common Filth was right again” -comment. Saying that this controversy “is sending a shockwave through the pro-white community” just sounds gay as hell. You replace “pro-white” with “LGBT” when talking about any event that the gays don’t like and say “[this event] is sending a shockwave through the LGBT community”.
A couple of months ago the Economist published the magazine cover with a prediction for 2017 in the form of 8 tarot cards. It would seem like some of the predictions are already becoming true.
In recent weeks many of the members of the Alt-Right website The Right Stuff (TRS) have been doxed (or doxxed if you prefer, but my favourite is doxxxed), i.e. their personal information has been leaked to the public. For most of them perhaps there have been some embarrassing revelations, but no major upsets, except perhaps for the person getting doxed. But a couple of days ago Mike Enoch, the owner of TRS, (or as he known now, Kike Enoch) was doxed by the far-left organization, Antifa. It has been revealed that Enoch wife is a Jew, not even a “Red-Pilled” right-wing Jew, but a faghag and active member in the LGBT community.
This is naturally a great upset since the TRS and Alt-Right in general are White Nationalists who are against race-mixing, especially with Jews. There is no doubt that Mike Enoch had wittingly lied and deceived his followers. The only question is, did he do it just for the money, was this some sort of alphabet agenda psy-op, or was it a joke gotten out of hand? My money’s on it being a government psy-op, as I’ve written disparagingly about Richard Spencer several times, and as Mr. Enoch has proven, it is prudent to distrust those who associate with Spencer who has appeared on Enoch’s Daily Shoah podcast several times, I believe.
As we can see above, Richard Spencer seems to have no problems with this revelation of extreme hypocrisy on the part of Enoch. Naturally he wouldn’t.
The Tower and Upheaval
How is this doxing and marrying of Jews -scandal related to the Economist’s tarot cover then? The first card on the magazine cover is the Tower. In my analysis of the cover I wrote: “The Tower represents upheaval. It may look like an outside force strikes the tower, but it is actually derived from psychological principles. They often result from ‘neglected and mishandled situations’. One example given by [Rachel] Pollack [author of Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom] for the Tower is friends turning against you.”
The revelations of Mike Enoch’s duplicity has naturally created a lot of tension within the Alt-Right and internet far-right in general. Tension has already existed between 8chan’s /pol and TRS for quite some time as /pol is more National Socialist than Alt-Right, in other words /pol is more far-right, or just more genuinely right. Some TRS forum members are complaining about /pol punching to the right when they criticize TRS, especially since certain TRS forum members are attempting to excuse Enoch’s treachery. Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me. Anyway this dissension within the right is clear example of the Tower’s effect of friends of turning against each other.
On the Tower card on the Economist cover both Communists and Christians seem to be protesting against the tower as it is being hit by lightning which also has a Christian cross on it. Now it makes perfect sense. The Communists represent Antifa, which did the doxing of Mike Enoch, whereas the demonstrating Christians are the puristic right-wingers (such as /pol) who do not approve of TRS’s pro-Jewish actions. Both factions, although normally enemies, want to see The Right Stuff fall as the Antifa Communists see them as evil racist Nazis, whereas /pol users see them as being a Jewish honeypot, and it seems they were right.
Of course many people in the Alt-Right and /pol are not Christians, but I do think the cross on the card represents the different factions within the right-wing.
My Two Cents
I’m going to share my take on this TRS scandal whether you like it or not. First of all, I must I say I am not a fan doxing, and generally see it as a bad thing. But I could say the same thing about murder, it’s generally bad, but if there is a pedophile in your neighbourhood molesting children then it doesn’t sound too bad. In this case there was a person who is allied with Jews pretending to be anti-Jew, and a bunch of anti-Jew White men became his followers. I think this says tons about not only Jews, that they seem to thrive on anti-Semitism so they perpetuate it themselves, but also about the goy who seem to be so willing to give their money and support to dishonest Jews. (I am also guilty of this, not in relation to TRS, but to 108morris108.)
I’ve listened to a few Daily Shoah podcasts maybe a year ago or so. I thought they were sort funny with a good attitude, but ultimately found them too low brow and simplistic. What ultimately made me dismiss them as pointless, I think, was that some of the people on it said disparaging about investigating conspiracy theories. Recently I saw a tweet by Mike Enoch saying this:
“The Jews did 9/11 conspiracy theory is retarded. Sorry. It’s embarrassing.” Anyone who says this is either retarded, scared of being called a conspiracy theorist or anti-Semitic, or is simply dishonest. I don’t know into which category Mike Enoch falls, but if I had to bet, based on recent revelations I’d say he wants to make you think Jews are just some greedy comical merchants. Although “Jews did 9/11” is a simplistic way of putting it. I would rather say Israel/Mossad was heavily involved in 9/11.
Anyway, based on failing the litmus test that is 9/11, and being married to a LGBT-loving faghag Jews while pretending to be some sort of Nazi leader, i.e. a complete fraud, I do think it was a good thing that Mike Enoch was doxed. The truth came out. Although after having seem pictures of Mike Enoch I can’t really hate him. He looks like a scruffy sad bear or something. I won’t show his picture or mention his real name since I don’t wanna be part in doxing him (I know I’m a hypocrite). I don’t wish Enoch any more ill will than he has already gotten, but naturally his political career should be demolished and his lies exposed.
As I was finishing this I checked /pol and it seems Mike Enoch mother is Jewish too, which would make him a Jew.
Lana Lokteff interviewed a person identified as the Reactionary Jew, a “Red Pilled” Alt-Right Jew, on Radio 3Fourteen the other day, which part of the Red Ice radio or TV network. The interview begins with Lana mentioning she met Reactionary Jew at the NPI conference where Richard Spencer made the infamous “Hail Trump” -salute, and she asks “Is it possible to create a bridge between Jewish nationalists and European nationalists?” If by “European nationalists” Lana Lokteff means the Alt-Right, then the answer is yes, although on the surface it may seem very contradictory.
When the Alt-Right emerged a couple of years ago and Red Ice converted to their ideology, I thought the main purpose of the Alt-Right was to expose the Jewish and/or Zionist control over many aspects of the world and topple it. The Jews were supposedly the eternal enemy of the Alt-Right. I’ve since come to realize that’s not the case. The Alt-Right is basically about worship of one’s race, or worship of oneself. It’s basically Talmudic Judaism for the goyim, or just Satanism. I’ve written about this phenomenon that I name Talmudic Aryanism before.
Reactionary Jew interview
Yet I question how viable an honest alliance between the Alt-Right and conservative Jews would be? In the interview Lana let’s Reactionary Jew do most of the talking without challenging him on issues such as the Holocaust. Reactionary Jew seems to believe in official narrative of the Holocaust even if he does not wish to obsess over it as much as main stream Jews. Both Red Ice and Radio 3Fourteen have done various programs on exposing the falsehoods in the Holocaust narrative. What if she were to challenge Reactionary Jew on the issue? Would they still engage in friendly banter? Is there anything else except their hatred of multiculturalist liberals and the threat of Islam holding them together? Both groups hold similar Talmudic views of being the chosen race, but this does not ultimately unify Jews and the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right envies the powerful position the Jews currently hold and ultimately wishes to usurp it, but I suppose currently they feel weak enough pretend being friendly. I suddenly got a flashback to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Then there’s the Israel question. Reactionary Jew just seems to assume that Jews have the right to live in Israel, and Lana Lokteff does not contest this. Presumably it’s based on the narrative in the Old Testament. Even if the ancestors of modern Jews did inhabit that land over 2000 years ago, does it still grant them the right to do so now? What if the proto-Finns lived in the area that is now known as Bulgaria 3000 years ago, for example, does it give me the right to kick out Bulgarians out of their homes and settle on their land? The historical accuracy of the Jewish diaspora narrative is in question, and has been studied people such as Shlomo Sand. And even if the Israelites did live in the so-called holy land and were exiled from it, and have a right to return there, can the modern Jews prove they are the descendants of those Israelites?
I don’t want to comment too much on the details of the conversation between Reactionary Jew and Lana Lokteff, but there was one interesting bit where the Jew said that light-skinned Jews are more likely to be liberals than darker skinned ones, and Lana agreed that White people tend to be the most left-leaning race out there. This lends credence to Common Filth’s theory that there is a genetic component to White man’s deviancy. If Lana really cares about the well-being of her race I hope she reflects on the implications of her own words. Maybe her race isn’t supposedly facing extinction because of an outside threat, but by an inner one.
I suppose the ultimate purpose why Reactionary Jew was chosen for an interview with Radio 3Fourteen was because of Richard Spencer. The Jew was at Spencer’s NPI conference and he said he would vote Spencer for president. For whatever reason Red Ice has allowed Richard Spencer to become their lord and saviour and are promoting him. Reactionary Jew, while he seems intelligent and well-versed in many political issues related to Israel, by his own admission does not know what the rich and powerful globalist Jews think, and cannot influence them.
Richard Spencer on the Jews
Early December, Richard Spencer was interviewed by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. He is quoted as saying: “I think it’s clear that Jews underwent tremendous suffering during World War II. I don’t deny the Holocaust”. Why exactly is Red Ice promoting this guy? I don’t agree with most of the stuff that Red Ice does these days, but at least I agree that the official Holocaust narrative is bullshit.
The Haaretz also refers to an article Spencer wrote on his Radix Journal website back in 2010 titled “An Alliance with the Jews”. In it Spencer suggests the following: “Who knows? Israeli nationalists might want to help finance the far Right in Europe and North America.” Spencer has been hoping for a long time that Israel would become his sugar daddy.
Spencer was also interviewed by the self-titled human rights advocate David Duke the other day. In the interview Spencer does seem to indirectly agree with Duke that media is controlled by Jews, and they want to destroy White people. Spencer contrasts the gray areas of today with the Bolshevic revolution in Russia. Back then it was supposedly more black and white, when “we” were facing destruction. You’re not Russian, Dick. I suppose the implication is that the communist Jews were genociding White people in Russia, but nowadays it’s more complicated and you cannot just blame Jews for it. Or maybe not. This is classic Richard Spencer; never being clear on what you say to have plausible deniability, and allowing people to draw the conclusions they want. If you are Red Pilled on Jews™, you assume he’s exposing the Jew. If you don’t want be associated with anti-Semites he can say that he didn’t say anything about Jews. Another reason for avoiding blaming Jews is that he still wants that Israeli funding.
Quite interestingly at some point Spencer says you shouldn’t be nice to the main stream media, which is actually something I agree with. Then he comments on some misguided Alt-Right people: “They’re living this delusion if only we’re nice to the media, if only we’re nice to our enemies, they’ll be nice back.” It’s refreshing to hear such honesty from Richard Spencer. He admits he’s delusional. In his weak and effeminate way he seems to agree with Duke that Jews are their enemies, yet he wants to be nice to the Jews to get their money. At least Spencer gives the impression that he doesn’t like Jews. He even says one rabbi’s stupidity makes him question the alleged high IQ of the Askernazis. Maybe this sucking up to Jews is a next level play of pretending to be their friend to steal their money, and when he has it he uses it against them?
David Duke starts a new meme in the interview. Since Spencer orignates from Whitefish, Montana, Duke calls him Whitefish. A more accurate description though when it comes to Richard Spencer would be of course Gayfish. Spencer has adopted the mantle of Gayfish from Kanye West. All hail Richard Spencer, Gayfish of Alt-Right, or Aut-Kike or whatever you call it.
Red Ice, which is a mouthpiece for the Alt-Right, is promoting an alliance with their enemy, the Zionist Jews. Richard Spencer already did so 6 years ago, and it doesn’t seem like he has changed direction. While making one interview asking the question whether Zionist Jews and “European nationalists”, or should it be (((European nationalists)))?, can be friends does not imply it’s the absolute opinion of Red Ice, discussing this topic is itself a promotion of the idea. As far as I know, Red Ice has not made a single program discussing the Flat Earth debate, for example, since clearly they don’t want anything to do with the issue. They do appear to want to become closer friends with Zionists though. As long as they’re pro-White, and Spencer is the one to determine what things are good for the White man.
To clarify my personal position on Jews is that while I do not wish to “gas all of the kikes” I’ve been aware of the globalist Jewish elites influence for a long time, yet I do not think they are on top of the pyramid either. This means I am distrustful of anyone I know to be a Jew, but certainly some Jews do stand up from the crowd as positive examples, such as David Cole. He’s a Holocaust revisionist, and his life was threatened for his views. He had to change his name and live for a pseudonym for several years. Cole was interviewed by Radio 3Fourteen a year or two ago. The difference between Reactionary Jew and David Cole, and why I’m ambivalent toward one and somewhat favorable toward the other, is that Reactionary Jew simply espouses certain political views that the Alt-Righters agree with. David Cole on the other hand has done actual research. The facts that he has brought forward speak for themselves, not his identity or mere opinions.
Richard Spencer is the person who supposedly coined the term Alt-Right, a leader in the Alt-Right, and one of the main reasons I’m suspicious of the Alt-Right even though I have common ground with some of their ideas. Back in 2014 he was arrested in Hungary for hosting a White nationalist conference there, and this apparently resulted in him being banned in 25 other European countries. This summer he was also banned from the United Kingdom. The question is why?
Banned from UK
In his interview with Red Ice Radio last month, Spencer gives the impression that he was banned for his extreme White nationalist views, although I find his assertion somewhat vague. He says he received a letter from Prime Minister Theresa May describing the ban. The letter allegedly cites some dangerous things Spencer has said in the past, such as him praising Theodor Herzl, the father of Zionism. I get the impression from the interview that Spencer is leaving something out from the letter. I find it hard to believe that the European political establishment would view Richard Spencer as such a great threat. I don’t think that the average person has any idea who he even is.
In fact someone called Francis Soulie wrote about Richard Spencer’s UK ban on The Right Stuff website. The writer calls “Banning Spencer from the UK is also tactically ineffective”, since he’s gained most of his audience through the internet, instead of talking in conference halls. Soulie also points out that the ban “will pseudo-martyr Spencer’s ideas and cause many to seriously wonder if they might actually be correct.”
Could the reason behind Spencer getting the ban hammer be a subtle form of promotion of his ideas by the globalist establishment? Possible, yet I am not convinced. I am more inclined to believe there’s much more to Richard Spencer than meets the eye. Much more.
A couple of months ago certain documents were leaked to the public that showed that Richard Spencer has been running some sort of Alt-Right secret society called Phalanx. One can only guess what goes on in meetings of the society, but there have been suggestions of gay orgies, and Phalanx itself has been described as resembling a pyramid scheme. From an outside perspective these assessments sound plausible based on what I know about Richard Spencer, but it is speculation, of course.
In addition to Phalanx, whose name has probably been changed by now, Spencer admits to some sort of covert Alt-Right meeting in Detroit in the Red Ice interview. Spencer is clearly used to this sort of cloak and dagger way of promoting him political movement. The question is then, if they have these secret gatherings, what do they do there, especially since listening to Spencer’s interviews he rarely states any concrete goals for his movement, and most of the time says a lot of things that sound sophisticated yet have little content?
Perhaps these Alt-Right meetings are simply gatherings for urban diletantes who enjoy hanging out with like-minded people. Or they might be actually doing something that the Hungarian government found disturbing two years ago, and the same would apply to the British government today. It might be some sort of political subversive plotting, but I doubt it. Richard Spencer comes off as someone who only cares about the image and the atmosphere, not concrete issues, and he probably attracts similar people around him. I think the secret meetings are grand parties masked in pseudo-intellectual posturing, Alt-Right politics and some sort of debauchery. The governments of European countries might know of this, and do not wish it to occur on their soil.
However, I do not know what occurs Phalanx meetings and secret Alt-Right gatherings, but one thing is sure: Richard Spencer is used to working in secret, and it appears he is hiding something. If you are a supporter of him, I’d advice you of consider what is it exactly that he’s not telling.
Spencer’s Agenda and Red Ice
I’ve written about this before so I’ll be brief. He rarely says any concrete policies that he supports, but in the Red Ice interview he says several times, as he’s said in the past, he wants a “New Order”. He also suppors attacking the right, or conservatives, whereas advices the Alt-Right not to attack the left. What this tells me is that he is a revolutionary who wants to crash the current system, and bring about his New Order. To be sure, the current globalist system should be brought down, but I doubt Spencer’s new system would be any better.
I sometimes wonder, why do I even care what Richard Spencer does, since I am not Alt-Right myself, but I guess it comes down to his influence of Red Ice. Red Ice Creations used to be one of the best alternative media and conspiracy research sites on the internet, but since they turned Alt-Right a year or two ago, their objectivity has been compromised. I blame Richard Spencer as one of the main catalysts for this conversion, although I don’t know the actual thought processes that went through the heads of the Red Ice crew and who influenced them in what way.
Red Ice used to be an independent and objective site that presented all sorts of alternative research. Nowadays they are openly politically aligned toward the Alt-Right, and it shows. It’s natural to have some some degree of bias in some issues, since human beings perceive reality subjectively, but there’s a big difference between wearing one’s bias on their sleeve. I don’t want to go too deep into minor details on what I mean by this, how Red Ice has lost its objectivity by aligning itself with the Alt-Right so I’ll just how these images:
Above is an image of the Links-section on the Red Ice website from 2012. It contains links to people and sites from various walks of life; conspiracy researchers like David Icke, Michael Tsarion, Freeman and the Corbett Report. Alternative historians like Graham Hancock, Joseph P. Farrel and Lloyd Pye. And a bunch names I don’t even recognize.
Nowadays the Links-section is like this:
It’s all Alt-Right or Asatru-sites. I’m not saying all of these sites are necessarily bad, but that their scope is much more narrow to what it used to be. Also, nowadays Red Ice presents itself as being for tradition and roots, but they’ve gotten rid of the In Memoriam-section for dead researchers:
Red Ice seems to have forgotten its own roots. It used to be a part of the “truth movement” or the conspiracy research community, whereas now it wants to distance itself from its past. It’s like a kid in the school yard who hangs around with the freaks and losers because he’s one of them, but when the cool kids show him attention he abandons his friends to join the new crowd. Red Ice Creations changed its name to Red Ice TV some months ago, and the layout of the website changed too. This was more than symbolical.
I first heard of Richard Spencer from a Red Ice, or Radio 3/14, interview a couple of years back. He’s still part of the crowd, being interviewed and promoted by Red Ice. Spencer, and other people like him, are in my opinion Marxists of the Right. Whatever they touch, they corrupt or pervert in some way. The Alt-Right is not about giving an alternative to those who long for a return to more conservative and old-fashioned values. It’s a way of leading those people astray.
Nowadays it’s very popular to blame the Progressive Left, Social Justice Warriors, or Marxists for our problems. And to a certain extent we should, since they have created many of our problems or allowed troublemakers to enter our countries. However, that’s not the whole story.
The Right, whether it’s the Alt-Right, New Right or just the Right, likes to emphasize the role of the Left in the European Immigration Crisis, for example, yet it wasn’t created by the Left but by the Right. Remember something that happened 15 years ago, an event called 9/11? After that the United States, along with the Coalition of the Willing, invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. He bombed Pakistan and Yemen as well. Obama simply continued Bush’s policies in the Middle-East. In fact, he has bombed twice as many countries as Bush did, most notably Libya and Syria. The US has supported the “moderate rebels”, i.e. ISIS, in Syria which is the main excuse for the Immigration Crisis. However, not all of the refugees are from Syria.
Let’s take a look at this chart from BBC. It notes the top 10 countries in 2015 from which people applied for asylum in the EU.
While I’m not saying that chart is completely accurate, and things may be different in 2016, it still gives a rough picture of what is going on. Syria is the top country for asylum seekers understandably, but numbers 2 and 3 are Afghanistan and Iraq, countries that Bush invaded. In fact, every country in the list have been attacked by the US in the last 20 years, except maybe Eritrea, Nigeria and Iran (and I don’t want to check right now).
Bill Clinton bombed Kosovo and Albania in the 90s. Both Bush and Obama have bombed Pakistan. The US has meddled with the internal affairs of Ukraine creating a civil war of sorts. The United States is the one that has created the Immigration Crisis in Europe, not the Progressive Left. Both political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, have contributed to the situation. It is wrong to blame only one side of the political spectrum for it.
It is true that the Leftists in Europe have opened doors for countless invaders, but these invaders would have no excuse call themselves refugees hadn’t the Right-winger Bush started World War III in the Middle-East. The existence of the Left-Right dichotomy in politics is a joke and a distraction at your expense. I had thought that people had gotten wise to it years ago, but apparently that is not the case as is evidenced by the rise of the Alt-Right. People still prefer to play this game with two competing teams simply for the pleasure of beating the opponent and gloating over it, instead of actually fixing problems. As if Trump was any better than Hillary. As if the far Right is any better than the far Left.
The eagle has two wings, both are working against you. The right one is acting all tough and causing trouble. Once you get tired of it, the left one blames you for the destruction caused by the right one, and tells you to repent and open your doors to parasites. Now everyone is getting fed up with the parasites, so they want the right one back. Apparently the West has not learned this lesson in 2016.