Tag Archives: bible

The LORD, God and the Book of Job

I was watching Rob Skiba’s latest video, and in it he mentioned a passage from the Bible how there are supposedly “storehouses of snow” (Job 38:22). Skiba suggested the possibility that this should be interpreted literally. I had a look of it, although I had no great insight on its meaning. I did notice something else that is quite interesting in the Book of Job though.

Before I get to it though, I should point out something else. In the Old Testament God is referred to by a few different names. Sometimes it’s God, or Elohim in Hebrew, other times it’s LORD, Yehovah in Hebrew. I think sometimes it’s also LORD God, Yehovah Elohim. The word Elohim is plural, which has led some to interpret it to mean a multitude of gods, or perhaps a pantheon. This may or may not be accurate. Another possible interpretation is that God/Elohim and LORD/Yehovah refer to two different characters.

In Genesis 1, the word for God is always Elohim, and it continues until the beginning of Genesis 2. This starts with God creating the world and ends with him resting on the seventh day. After that starts the story of Eden with Adam and Eve. From then on God is called LORD God, Yehovah Elohim. Possibly these two Gods are two different characters.

Let’s jump to the Book of Job. The story should be familiar, but I’ll recount it quickly. Satan and the sons of God (presumably the same ones that had offspring with the daughters of men in Genesis) came to God, or rather the LORD (Yehovah). Job was a wealthy and happy man with a big family who was righteous, praised God and all that. Satan said to the LORD then that Job only praises God because he is so well off. The LORD granted Satan the power to take away Job’s wealth and eventually even to give him hideous boils. Job lost almost everything and got terribly ill. After a while his friends come to see him. They discuss the reason for Job’s predicament, and Job laments him state, and basically says it’s unfair what has happened to him. He claims to be sinless. Eventually the LORD comes to talk to him as well.

The Book of Job sometimes refers to God as Elohim, and sometimes as LORD or Yehovah. When Satan and LORD have discussions together, the discussion is always with the LORD, not God. Job 1:20-22 says as follows:

Job 1:20 Then Job arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground, and worshipped,
Job 1:21 And said, Naked came I out of my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.
Job 1:22 In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly.

 

Here it would seem that LORD and God are synonymous. However, when Job refers to God, he says LORD, but when the narrator of the Bible refers to God, he says God. Maybe Elohim and Yehovah are two different beings, but Job doesn’t know it. I’ll get back to that later.

Job 19:21 recounts Job lament his condition:

“Have pity upon me, have pity upon me, O ye my friends; for the hand of God hath touched me. ”

According to the Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary that is in the e-Sword Bible software that I am using, the word which has been translated “touched” is “naga”, and can also mean “to strike”, i.e. “hand of God hath struck me”. However, more interesting is the notion of hand of God. The word for God here is not Elohim, nor even Yehovah, but “eloahh”. According to the above-mentioned dictionary it has two meanings:

1) God

2) false god

Was Job struck by a false god or God? Or perhaps the phrase “hand of God” refers to a person, like in the Game of Thrones there is a person with a high rank known as the Hand of the King, or King’s Hand. He is sort of like Prime Minister who takes care of important affairs of the king. Might the LORD or Yehovah be a powerful angel who takes care of affairs for God such as Lucifer or Metatron?

The LORD arrives on the scene in Job 38. It is said he “answered Job out of the whirlwind”. First of all, I find this entrance curious. Why would God need a whirlwind or a hurricane to travel? Moreover Ephesians 2:2 says that Satan, or another malevolent character, is “prince of the power of the air”. Using whirlwinds to travel around, power of air…

After that the LORD starts exclaiming how dare Job claim he has been treated unfairly, and the LORD brags about the various feats he can do far beyond the scope of mortals. This goes on for a while. It sounds very prideful to be frank. Now what was Lucifer’s sin, I wonder?

Job 38:6  says:

“Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;”

Isn’t cornerstone something the Freemasons are harping on about? This LORD sounds like the Grand Architect or the Demi-Urge of the world, not the real God.

Let’s continue to Job 38:7:

“When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?”

Morning stars, many Lucifers? The LORD seems to have impressed the sons of God, who are, according to my understanding, the angels who rebelled against God.

Another interesting, although somewhat unrelated piece of information I found was in Job 38:32:

“Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?”

According to e-Sword dictionary Mazzaroth refers to the 12 signs of the Zodiac. Christians tend to think that astrology is of the devil. Maybe they are right, and the LORD is the devil, or if the LORD is actually God, he seems to be proud of the Zodiac.

The last chapter of the Book of Job stars as follows:

Job’s Confession and Repentance
Job 42:1  Then Job answered the LORD, and said,
Job 42:2  I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee.
Job 42:3  Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.
Job 42:4  Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.
Job 42:5  I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.
Job 42:6  Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. 
The Lord Rebukes Job’s Friends
Job 42:7  And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath.

The key phrases are: “Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite…”

Does not the LORD here admit he was wrong, and say he abhors (alternative meanings: reject, despise, refuse) himself? Maybe I interpret this wrong, but this is how I see this. Basically the LORD fell for Satan’s trick, and allowed Job to be tortured. After Job complains about it, first the LORD makes a grandiose show of how dare he, but in the end he admits his mistake. This is not the infallible God.

My interpretation is that the LORD, at least in the Book of Job, is a fallen angel, possibly Lucifer or Metatron, who used to be God’s right hand man, but now pretends like he is running the whole show. Job possibly does not know this, and might be under the impression that whatever the LORD does has been sanctioned by God. Satan appears to be a different character than the LORD though, since they have conversations together.

 

 

Links:

The goals of our high altitude weather balloon test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeQJfImIZ3E

Bible vs Christianity, Illuminati Trannies, and 33

Back in 2014 I wrote an article titled “The Fourth Abrahamic Religion”, which referred to atheism or Scientism. I’m going to look back on how I saw the world differently back then compared to now, and discuss where I was correct and incorrect.

First of all I do still think that militant atheism, or Scientism is part of this continuation often called Abrahamic religions. It’s even more obvious now than it was back then with Social Justice Warriors, i.e. Cultural Marxists, becoming more overt with their crazy schemes. While most of them are atheists and anti-religion, many of them are still curiously pro-Islam. Where I think I was wrong though is that Christianity is just one of those harmful, or digital, religions. Or more accurately I don’t think the Bible is part of these man-made delusions. Christianity might be,

 

A Tale of Two Christianities

I’m not claiming that this is a completely unique position, since Alexander Hislop wrote similar sentiments in The Two Babylons in the 19th century. Yet he was basically saying that Catholicism is Mesopotamian mystery religions in disguise, but if I recall correctly he had a positive view of Protestantism. I think that most main stream forms of Christianity, and most people who call themselves Christians, are either wittingly or unwittingly worshipping such mystery religions, or they simply have their man-made religion that coats itself in Biblical imagery.

There are basically two types of Christians: deliberately false ones, and apathetically false ones. The deliberately false Christians are Luciferians, Satanists, Jesuits, or crypto-Jews, that pretend to be Christian to fool others. The apathetic Christians do not really care about the greater questions of life. They merely want to be nice and have a nice life without offending others, and acting superficially Christian of simply part of their culture. They honestly believe that their unbiblical lifestyle is what God and Jesus is all about.

Perhaps you could call me hypocritical, since I do not consider myself Christian, yet I am judging Christians. Maybe I am. In recent years I’ve merely come to the realization that the Bible seems to hold more answers than any other source I’ve seen so far.

 

The Abrahamic Religions

I don’t know if it is accurate or not to call Judaism, Christianity, Islam and atheism Abrahamic religions or not, or if only the people who truly follow the Bible should be called Abrahamic. I don’t want to discuss semantics right now. Perhaps you could say Biblically inspired pagan (man-made) religions vs the religion of the Bible.

Also in my article I was praising animistic and polytheistic religions for exuding life with little evidence to back my claims. Those comments seem silly to me now, and reflect my spiritual bias of the day. It’s not to say that I think that those kind of religions are necessarily bad now either, but I just have very little actual experience with them so I cannot say how they are. I try not to idolize or demonize something I don’t know much about.

 

Trannies, Fallen Angels and the Flat Earth

In just recent months my change in perspective has allowed me to see some conspiracies from a different, and hopefully more accurate, viewpoint. One obvious clue to the relevance of the Bible is the fact that both actual science and the Bible seem to support the fact that the earth does not seem to be curved into a ball, and is not moving. I still do not have all of the facts regarding all of this, but admitting to myself that the earth is probably flat gives a certain inner peace, instead of resisting it out of the fear of sounding silly or going too far against the grain.

For the last few months I’ve been thinking about the idea the movie They Live presents. Every conspiracy nut knows that the basic idea of the movie is true in some sense, but the trick is to figure out how much of an allegory the movie is, or how literal. Are the shadowy elites really aliens, demons, fallen angels, undead spirits of Nephilim trapped on earth, Jesuits, Freemasons, Jews, or what exactly? Are we being controlled by actual non-human entities, humans possessed by such beings, or simply human beings who belong to secret societies?

A couple of Youtubers might have uncovered some important clues to this question: MrE (nothing to do with Rocking MrE) and Russianvids. Both have made videos of the transpocalypse, which refers to the claim that many celebrities, actors, politicians, even royalty, are actually secretly transgender. The claim sounds ridiculous at first, but when you bother to take a look at some of the evidence, it doesn’t sound so silly. MrE claims that basically any actress who has won an Oscar is a transgender. I’m not sure if I would go that far, but there’s something there worth investigating.

Apparently there are some Youtubers who have been discussing these Illuminati trannies, as MrE, calls them for years. I didn’t know until fairly recently that there is allegedly a tranny epidemic among the rich and famous. I did know that Michelle Obama is allegedly a man. I even wrote about it back in 2014. Back then I also heard claims that tennis players Serena and Venus Williams are trannies. Although I wasn’t convinced back then, at least it would make more sense for two men to pretend female in order to excel at sports, but I couldn’t figure out what would be the point in pulling the deception that the First Lady is a man. I wrote about these alleged celebrity trannies a month ago, but back then I was still somewhat unsure what to think of it. Now I have a better view of things.

First of all, if what people like MrE say is correct, that it is basically the religion of many of these elite families to become transgender like Baphomet, and they’ve been doing it for decades, if not centuries, or even millennia, then it’s “normal” for Michelle Obama to be transgender as well. (S)he probably wouldn’t even have been the first tranny First Lady in America. Another thing is that Kerth Barker, who I’ve quoted in the past, said in Angelic Defenders & Demonic Abusers that the generational Satanist families do habitually engage in transvestite activity, i.e. men pretend they are female and vice versa. I don’t recall him saying anything about them actually going through surgery to transition to another gender, but the basic idea is still the same.

Another thing is that if in fact many of these elite families are Satanists or Luciferians, the old idea of the Black Mass is to do what righteous people or the Bible does in reverse. Russianvids also shows a page from a book by Alesteir Crowley (or his translation of Eliphas Levi’s book?) in many of his videos where Crowley describes how you should de everything backwards. These are things I knew of Satanism and the Black Mass even when I was a teenager. I just always thought they sounded silly so I didn’t pay much attention to it. The idea of backmasking in music has been clearly known for decades even among people who are not interested in conspiracies. But if the Satanists really do engage in doing things backwards, reversing one’s gender does not sound like a stretch at all.

MrE says in many of his videos how the Illuminati trannies are “unclean bodies for immortal spirits of Nephilim trapped on earth” or something to that extent. Quite frankly it sounds reasonable to me.

 

Numerology 33

Another thing I’ve learned is some practical numerology from Russianvids. I’ve heard over the course of many years many conspiracy researchers say how the Illuminati or Masons love their numerology and they encode things, but I never really got it. I wasn’t sure are the researchers making it up to sound smart or are they talking about something real. Russianvids is the guy who seems to understand numerology, and make his viewers understand it as well. It comes down to recognizing how the Masons encode the 33 into their fake events. Russianvids has countless videos pointing this out. The latest is from the London Bridge terror attack showing plenty of police cars on the scene with the licence plate adding up to 33.

I also like Russianvids’ explanation of the Masonic 33. Everyone knows how 33 is important to Freemasons, but no-one really knows what it means, but according to Russianvids it refers to the third of the angels that rebelled against God. A simple but reasonable explanation. It also explains why these fallen angels, or their minions, would put their brand on everything.

Russianvids uses a numerology program to decode words. I downloaded the same program a little while ago. First I checked out the name of several people I know. None of them were 33, or any other obvious occult number. So it probably is not simply a co-incidence that these numbers are so frequent among the elites. Then yesterday I found some use for the numerology program. There is a newstory of an artist, Dana Schutz, who painted a picture of dead black teen. Then two other artists, or provocators, started protesting the painting, because a White person is appropriating Black culture, or something. These protestors are Hannah Black and Parker Bright. It just happens that “Hannah Black” is 33 in Chaldean numerology. “Parker” is 33 in Pythagorean numerology. “Bright” sounds like a reference to Lucifer. I do believe that this controversy over the painting is a deliberate stunt by the Masons to divide and conquer people. Whites vs Black. Social Justice Warriors vs normal people.

 

Conclusion

I think most people, even conspiracy minded people, stay away from the “craziest” conspiracy theories because want to bargain with the norms set by society. “9/11 might have been an inside job, but Hollywood actresses are not trannies.” “NASA might have faked the moon landings, but the earth is not flat.” The underlying psychological factor here is that people are trying to run a thin line between reality and acceptability. I will accept this “crazy” but true thing, but I will reject that one, so it evens out. There is always some line people won’t cross to avoid sounding too ridiculous. However the only line you should care about is the line between truth and lies.

And have a gander at the Youtube channels of MrE and Russianvids if you haven’t done so far.

 

Links:

The Fourth Abrahamic Religion: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/the-fourth-abrahamic-religion/

Russianvids: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTrZJrLbsoN171bMFQKN5Xw/featured

MrE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAgVKvt3syB7gV-hL9bMTYw

Is Michelle Obama a man?: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/is-michelle-obama-a-man/

Apparently Hollywood actresses are male: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2017/04/05/apparently-hollywood-actresses-are-male/

Why Dana Schutz Painted Emmett Till: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/why-dana-schutz-painted-emmett-till

 

Cubical Earth Model

I was lying in bed wondering about all things conspiratorial, metaphysical and biblical when I had an alternative interpretation for the shape of the earth pop in my head.

If you want to see the model I am proposing, I suggest you skip down to the My Model paragraph. It’s late, I’m half asleep so I ramble on about stuff that probably isn’t news to most people.

 

Flat Earth confessions and Biblical rambling

I don’t consider myself a flat earther, but I am almost a flat earther. The claims of the “scientific” establishment that the earth is spherical sound flimsy at best. The pictures we have of a spherical earth that is actually shaped like an oblate pearoid from NASA are all photoshopped. Moreover I’ve seen plenty of videos from flat earth researchers with weather balloons high up showing no curvature. I’ve seen people show videos showing a city on the other side of a huge lake although the city should be hidden behind curvature. And of course the behaviour of water, i.e. always trying to find level, makes no sense on a sphere. Out in the real world water never behaves like it does on the NASA pictures of the “blue marble” where water curves around the ball. Therefore I don’t think there is curvature.

I also do not think the earth is moving. I reject the heliocentric Copernican model, like most flat earthers. Yet why I don’t consider myself a flat earther is that I don’t subscribe to any particular flat earth model. I don’t necessarily think the earth is flat. Currently though based on what I’ve seen, there seems to be no curvature, i.e. the earth seems flat, but the keyword is “seems”. It is possible we are missing a key piece in puzzle that would turn everything upside down. It is possible (although I don’t think so, yet it is possible) that much of the evidence for flat earth has been faked somehow. So I don’t like to call myself a flat earther. You might think this is an insignificant semantic difference, but it is very significant to me.

What I do believe, however, is that the Bible is the most reliable source of information when it comes to the nature of earth. I don’t consider myself Christian. I do not think that the Bible is necessarily the infallible word of God. I have not found Jesus. I consider myself a skeptic when it comes to most things. This means I tend to resist believing in anything until I have to admit to myself the weight of evidence forces me to believe in what is in front of me. Over the course of many years and theoretical ruminations I have been forced to admit to myself that the Bible usually knows better than all of modernity. Whether its me coming to understand how atheism is deluded cult, or that the Theory of Evolution is a lie or a delusion. I came to understand these things based on reason and observation, which eventually lead me to pay more attention to the Bible.

I don’t know if the Bible is perfect or not, or if it’s been altered or not, or if some sections of it have been cut out. I don’t quite know who or what Jesus is, but as the rulers of this world seem to despise him, there must be something significant about him.

The Bible then is probably the most reliable source when it comes to the shape of the earth (there might be other ancient texts like that, but I don’t know about them). Let’s see some of the basic ideas that flat earther’s usually mention:

1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”

Psalm 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm …”

Psalm 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable …”

Psalm 104:5: “Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.”

Isaiah 45:18: “…who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast…”

Clearly according to the Bible the earth is unmovable. Very different to the “everything is spinning” -model of Copernicus. The earth is also apparently set on pillars.

1 Samuel 2:8 “For the pillars of the earth are the LORD’s, and on them he has set the world.”

This however opens more questions, such as what are the pillars set on? The Bible also refers to “four corners” of the earth:

Ezekiel 7:2 “An end, the end is come upon the four corners of the land.”

This might mean the earth has four corners, or it might simply be a metaphorical expression.

Genesis 1: 6-7 “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.”

I’ve found the notion of the Firmament fascinating even before I really understood what it is. It is some sort of solid substance, like a brass mirror that separates the waters above (outer space in modern parlance) from the waters below on earth. This is usually conceived as some kind of dome, like that of a snow globe.

I believe the Firmament exists, although I don’t know it for a fact. It is not necessarily though shaped like a dome though. As far as I know, the Bible does not describe its exact shape.

The earth seems be a circle of some kind, or there is a circle on the earth:

Proverbs 8:27 “When he established the heavens, I was there; when he drew a circle on the face of the deep,”

Now this passage varies significantly in different translations:

King James: “When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:

New Living Translation: “I was there when he established the heavens, when he drew the horizon on the oceans.”

According to my understanding “circle” is the most accurate translation. King James’ “compass” reminds me of the Masonic square and compass. Living Translation’s replacement of “circle” with “horizon” is weird, and seems like deliberate disinformation to me.

Let’s get on with the show. My point is that the Bible does not make clear what the exact shape of the Earth is, but it does mention certain distinctive attributes such as the Firmament and lack of movement. Many flat earthers say the Bible is a flat earth book. I wouldn’t go that far, but certainly the Bible is more a flat earth book than heliocentric spinning ball book.

 

My Model

It’s late, half of my brain is half asleep and finally I can get on with showing the model I came up with. I’ve heard some people mention before that maybe the earth is a cube, but I hadn’t really seen a proper model of it. Anyway, here is the model I envisioned:

The circle of the earth is on the bottom of this cube. The Firmament is the top of the cube, or its “lid”. The cube has walls, probably of some solid material. The reason we don’t see the walls even from a high mountaintop or an airplane is that the earth is so huge, the walls are far, far away. So basically the proportions on the picture are wrong. The circle in the center should be smaller, or the cube around it should be bigger, but you should get the point.

If the earth has pillars, they would probably be under the box, or perhaps they are on the four corners of the box. The blue/green area in the middle would probably be something like the commonly used flat earth map:

 

Perhaps around the edges are the ice walls that many theorize about, or something else. There might be hundreds of thousands of kilometres, maybe even millions, from the edge of the ice wall to the walls of the box.

The box picture above is basically what I imagined. However as I was googling for a suitable cube, I found this crop circle image:

 

It supposedly appeared in 2012 on a field in Britain, I believe. Perhaps that is actually the shape of the earth. On the outside is the circle of the earth, and within the circle is the box. And we are within the box.

One interesting bit I noticed is that if you put “circle inside a cube” into Google image search, you don’t really find any circles inside a cube, but you get pictures of a sphere inside a cube. Were those pictures made by spherical earth Creationists?

I also had an interpretation of outer space, or the blackness we see at night with stars twinkling up there. It might actually be a reflection of hell. Maybe it’s a mirage, an upside down image of hell that is below us. The stars are fallen angels trapped in hell cajoling us with their light. This could be what “as above, so below” means. We don’t see hell from the box, but we see a reflection of it at night. During the day, perhaps we see heaven. This is just an idea though.

I don’t believe in this cube model myself either. Yet the idea popped into my head so I thought I should share it. Maybe someone else has already come up with a similar model, but I haven’t seen it yet.

 

Links:

Thinking outside the box: ‘Crop cube’ that looks like a 250ft 3D block appears in field of wheat: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2209554/Crop-cube-looks-like-250ft-3D-block-appears-field-wheat.html

Symbolism of the Chariot

Nowadays the chariot seems like an archaic and fairly useless piece of equipment, since we have trains, planes and automobiles. Yet apparently it has represented power in the ancient world in various cultures. Sometimes it may have represented secular power, but often also spiritual ability.

 

Biblical Chariot

There are several mentions of chariots in the Bible, but I’ll discuss only three of them here. First is the vision of Ezekiel of wheels inside wheels, which has been interpreted by UFOlogists to refer to a UFO. 2 Kings 2:11 also refers to similar mystical chariot: “And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.” It does sound like some sort of flying craft.

Judges 1:19 has a different kind of chariot: “And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.” Although God was there, they could not beat the enemies with chariots. Must have been quite the vehicle.

Then there’s the concept of the Merkabah, that is some sort of spiritual chariot that some New Agers talk about, although it originates from the Bible or Jewish mysticism. Quite frankly I don’t understand what the Merkabah is, or what we should do with it to hasten our spiritual growth.

 

Eastern Chariot

The chariot is also a central symbol in India. The symbol of Buddhism is a chariot wheel, although no-one quite seems to know what the symbol actually means. On top of that there are two major branches of Buddhism, Mahayana and Hinayana, the great vehicle or cart and the small one.

The Hindu vedas have the concept of the Vimana, a flying palace or chariot, that many alternative historians use as evidence that there used to be an advanced civilization in India thousands of years ago that even had flying vehicles.

A few interesting bits of information are that the Aryan may have brought the chariot into India, which might explain its religious significance. Invention of the chariot is attributed to the Sintashta culture, who may have been Aryans. Then again at least Wikipedia is confusing on this issue, since in the article on the Indo-Aryan migration theory they mention that “The theory proposes migrations originating from the Sintashta culture, which moved through the Bactria-Margiana area, into the northern part of the Indian subcontinent (modern India, Pakistan and Nepal).” This suggests the Sintashta were Aryan, but the article on the Sintashta culture says no such thing. It says that there is “linguistic evidence of a list of common vocabulary between Finno-Ugric and Indo-Iranian languages” in Sintashta. Finns are not Indo-Aryan.

Anyway this doesn’t have much to do with the chariot. Let’s get back on track.

 

Conclusion

Chariot in myth and symbolism seems to have these two aspects to it: spiritual power and it is a flying vehicle. At first they seem somewhat contradictory, especially with the chariots of iron that just sounds like a warmachine, but perhaps the chariot, the vimana, is not a vulgar technological construct like a car or an airplane, but spiritual technology. Our culture is unable to create them since we lack the deep spiritual understanding of reality that the ancients possessed. Our vehicles are just pale simulacra of the mythical chariot, whereas the vimana was some sort of external manifestation of the spiritual prowess of the ancients. Or at least this is how I theorize this disjointed information to suggest.

 

Links:

Ezekiel 1:4-28: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+1%3A4-28&version=ERV

2 Kings 2:11: http://biblehub.com/2_kings/2-11.htm

Judges 1:19: http://biblehub.com/judges/1-19.htm

Merkabah Mysticism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkabah_mysticism

The Dharma Wheel: http://buddhism.about.com/od/eightauspicioussymbols/a/The-Dharma-Wheel.htm

Vimana: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vimana

Indo-Aryan migration theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration_theory

Sintashta culture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sintashta_culture

The Arch of our Terrestrial Holodeck

I’ve been reading through the book Cryptoterrestrials by the abruptly deceased Mac Tonnes. He presents the hypothesis that the UFO phenomenon does not originate from outer space, but there is a hidden humanoid species on Earth. Tonnes also suggests that the cryptoterrestrial race might have difficulty manifesting in the physical world, and for that reason they are trying to capture our imaginations by using psychedelic methods to allow themselves into our reality.

That got me thinking about the power of the mind, and to what extent thought might actually be able to influence reality. For some reason it got me thinking about the firmament that according to the Bible is holding up the sky. While these things may seem very much unrelated, but I figured maybe they aren’t. Perhaps the firmament is a kind of amplifier for thoughts, that can make thought into reality.

Needless to say, but this is all very far-fetched and hypothetical. It might just mean that I have a hyper-active imagination, but I want to put this idea out nonetheless.

In Star Trek: The Next Generation there’s the computer generated environment in the Holodeck. The Holodeck is controlled by the Arch. Perhaps this Arch is somehow symbolical of the firmament.

Galaxy_class_holodeck_arch

Another name of the firmament is the vault of heaven. A vault is basically a kind of arch. Arches are a fairly commonly used symbol with possibly an esoteric meaning. There are famous sites like Arc de Triomphe in Paris, the golden arches of McDonalds and Royal Arch Freemasonry. I suggest that the meaning of the arch may be a very significant one; it creates physical reality.

Let’s take a look at Genesis 1:

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

At first God creates and heaven and earth, there already is water in the world, and then he creates light and divides it from the darkness. Note that the sun and the moon are created later. Light exists before the sun.

I interpret the creation of heaven and earth to mean the creation of the concept of spiritual and profane. Division of light from darkness is creation of Yin and Yang or 0 and 1. There are only abstract concepts and no physical objects. Although water is a physical thing, but perhaps it is a conduit between the spiritual and the physical. I take the firmament to be the first physical object to exist. It divides the (salt?) waters from the (sweet?) waters. Then God creates land and plants and the rest.

Perhaps God him/her/itself made the firmament as a tool to create the physical world we live in. Psalms 19 says:
1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

Perhaps “the heavens” are analogous to a computer CPU, and the firmament is like a 3D printer. God inputs a program into the computer, pushes start and the firmament prints out the physical additions to the world.

The book of Enoch has the following to say about the firmament:

1 Enoch 18:1. I saw the treasuries of all the winds: I saw how He had furnished with them the whole creation and the firm foundations of the earth. 2. And I saw the corner-stone of the earth: I saw the four winds which bear [ the earth and ] the firmament of the heaven. 3. And I saw how the winds stretch out the vaults of heaven, and have their station between heaven and earth: these are the pillars of the heaven . 4. I saw the winds of heaven which turn and bring the circumference of the sun and all the stars to their setting. 5. I saw the winds on the earth carrying the clouds: I saw the paths of the angels. I saw at the end of the earth the firmament of the heaven above. And I proceeded and saw a place which burns day and night, where there are seven mountains of magnificent stones, three towards the east, and three towards the south. 7. And as for those towards the east, 〈 one 〉 was of coloured stone, and one of pearl, and one of jacinth, and those towards the south of red stone. 8. But the middle one reached to heaven like the throne of God, of alabaster, and the summit of the throne was of sapphire. 9. And I saw a flaming fire. And beyond these mountains 10. is a region the end of the great earth: there the heavens were completed. 11. And I saw a deep abyss, with columns of heavenly fire, and among them I saw columns of fire fall, which were beyond measure alike towards the height and towards the depth. 12. And beyond that abyss I saw a place which had no firmament of the heaven above, and no firmly founded earth beneath it: there was no water upon it, and no birds, but it was a waste and horrible place.

Enoch saw the abyss, “a waste a horrible place”, that didn’t have the firmament above, nor earth beneath it. Perhaps there was nothing there as there was no printer there to create anything.

I know my interpretations of these ancient texts may be a bit too liberal, and I may be making up things that aren’t there. Nevertheless, I thought I should mention my ideas. There is a difference between the Holodeck Arch in Star Trek and my theory of the firmament being a printer as well that the Arch is used to control the Holodeck, and the projectors are elsewhere. The difference between God using the firmament, whether you consider God to be the creator of everything, or some advanced race of aliens, or something else, is that God can fairly effortlessly use the firmament to create things. Humans clearly cannot wield it as effortlessly as Jedis in Star Wars use the Force, or the main character in Dark City uses his tuning powers. Yet I do think that collectively the consciousness of people can have profound effects, as is evidenced by the 100th monkey syndrome.

Links:
ENOCH AND THE STILL FLAT EARTH: http://testingtheglobe.com/enoch.html

The Firmament

The Bible describes a firmament separating earth from the heavens. The firmament seems to be some sort of solid barrier or dome that is around or above the earth. This differs significantly from the modern scientific view according to which the earth is surrounded by the atmosphere with different gases, but nothing solid.

The notion of the firmament has risen in relevance mainly due to the Flat Earth debate that has emerged fairly recently. Although if the firmament actually exists, it does not necessarily imply the earth is flat. A round, bubble-like firmament could encase the earth as well a dome might encase of flat earth. Therefore I won’t be discussing the shape of the earth in this post.

I think I should point out I am not a flat earther, nor a round earther. I am a truth seeker, and I do find the current flat earth debate relevant as there are many questions as to the nature of our world. If you think it is dumb merely to entertain the possibility that the earth might be flat, please forever hold your speech.

 

The Firmament and the Stars

Let’s see what the Bible says about the firmament.

Genesis 1:
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
One interesting point is that according to the Bible there is supposed to be water above the firmament, i.e. in outer space. Is that why in science fiction shows like Star Trek and Star Wars they fly around in space ships and starships, and have a starfleet? Speaking of stars, what is the relation of the firmament to them?
Genesis 1:
14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
The Bible says that the stars and the “two great lights”, presumably the sun and the moon, are in the firmament. The firmament is often depicted something like this (along with the flat earth):
FlatFirmament
There is one detail I do not agree with. The image shows the sun, the moon and the stars beneath the firmament, not inside it. This is my interpretation of the firmament with the sun, moon and the stars within it (and you can clearly recognize my superior artistic ability):

Firmament

According to my understanding of the biblical description, what we call space (with the sun, moon and stars) is the firmament. The firmament is not behind them. Behind the firmament should be water. When we look up at the night sky and see stars and constellations we are seeing inside the firmament.

 

What is the Firmament made of?

The book of Job, which is supposedly the oldest book in the Bible describes the firmament as follows:

Job 37:18 Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?
Other translations of the Bible describe the firmament as ” a mirror of cast bronze” or a “cast metal mirror”. The Hebrew word used here is “raqiya” or “raqia”,  which is an “extended surface, (solid) expanse (as if beaten out”, according to Biblehub. Robert J. Schadewald describes the meaning of “raqia” as follows: “In ancient times, brass objects were either cast in the form required or beaten into shape on an anvil. A good craftsman could beat a lump of cast brass into a thin bowl.” Most of this biblical information is, by the way, from Rob Skiba’s brilliant flat earth research site Testing the Globe.com.
So the firmament that allegedly covers the heavens is a glass-like or metallic expanse. It is reflective like a mirror, or possibly transparent even. Do we have any evidence of such a thing? As far as I know, no-one has flown up there and said they’ve seen the firmament up there, but there is evidence of on the ground of mysterious glass-like debris.
Tektites “are gravel-size bodies composed of black, green, brown or gray natural glass formed from terrestrial debris ejected during extraterrestrial, meteorite impacts.” It is, according to modern science, glass from the skies.
tektites
There is also mysterious glass in the Libyan desert. I’ve heard theories it’s there, because of a nuclear detonation in the ancient world. It’s possible, or it could be from the firmament. I’m by far not the first person to make the suggestion that tektites or the Libyan glass are from the firmament, but I do find it compelling evidence. To be sure, however, we’d have to send a trustworthy explorer or probe up in the stratosphere to be sure whether there actually is glass in the sky or not. NASA or the space agencies are not a trustworthy source.
Although I’m not a Christian and not obliged to believe the Bible, I’ve began to notice in recent times that the Bible seems to be more accurate in describing reality than most of the so-called science in modern times. I do think it is possible that the firmament does exist. If it does not it could explain why NASA has faked their moon landings, and why it’s impossible, or at least even harder than thought before, to go into outer space.
Links:

Raqia: http://biblehub.com/hebrew/7549.htm

Tektites: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tektite

Libyan desert glass: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_desert_glass

Glass sky, Libyan Desert Glass, indeed this could be an answer !! : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-P_oNZPw79o

13,000 Leave from the Finnish Church for Pro-Homosexual Archbishop

I saw a tabloid newspaper headline at the local grocery store saying 13,000 people leave the church for archbishop Mäkinen’s views on homosexuality. I assumed the story was that he’s against gay marriage and all that, and the people are angry at him, but it’s the opposite. Apparently he had posted on Facebook last week that he’s happy the Finnish parliament granted the right for gays to marry, and the people left the church for that.

Hearing this makes me somewhat happy, that there are still people out there who have their own opinions on things. Not everybody is buying into the Cultural Marxist consensus religion. I’m not a Christian, I left the church when I was 15. I’m also not for or against homosexuals being homosexuals. It does not matter what my opinion is if two adults want to live together, or what they do in their bedroom. However all these gay-laws aren’t about that. It’s more about worshipping the bureaucracy and social consensus. Granting gays the same “rights”, or binding them with the same restrictions, as the rest of us. I don’t support gay marriage, although I’m particularly against it either. I don’t know if I even support heterosexual marriage, not at least, if it means binding people with some contract that has to be ratified by the state. And I am against the gross marketing of homosexuality as the new norm that has been going on in the media for the last few years (or even decades).

The last couple of years the media in Finland has made gay marriage the biggest issue, it seems. As if it really matters in the greater scheme of things. Still a lot of people fall for it. They want to express their compassion and tolerance by supporting gay marriage, but they’re just a bunch of brainwashed drones. 50-years ago people with the same level of consciousness were against gay marriage, because it was the thing to do. Now it is the opposite, and they switch sides, because they cannot exist beyond the social Matrix fabricated around them. How about make up your own mind, instead of repeating what everyone around you is saying?

Gladly these brave people stick to their beliefs and forsake the church that does not hold onto Christian beliefs. The Leviticus 20:13 states: “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.” I think it’s a clear condemnation of homosexuality. So if you’re a Christian, you shouldn’t support gay marriage. However, Leviticus seems to imply gays should be killed, which is kind of creepy.

I’m not a Christian, I don’t share their values. It doesn’t really matter to me what the Bible says about homosexuality, but I do sympathize with people being consistent with their beliefs.

Ultimately all this battle for and against gay marriage is a childish distraction, which gives people with the intellectual capacity of an old turnip the semblance of caring about social issues. The majority of the vocal pro-homosexuality people are straight, since there really aren’t that many gays around as the media makes it out to be. So if you love homosexuality that much, be consistent and become gay. Of course they don’t want to do that since it would be selfish to promote something you believe in, but you get a nice plot of land in the social consensus heaven when you die if you crusade for causes you have no personal connection to.

I haven’t seen many homosexuals in the West being forced into mental hospitals or burned at the stake for being gay in recent years. So gay rights aren’t really an issue. They more or less have the same rights as the rest of us, but the rights of everyone are slowly being undermined. But those pro-gay turnips who cannot fathom the big picture keep fighting shadows on the walls.

 

Links:

Archbishop Kari Mäkinen (in Finnish): http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kari_M%C3%A4kinen