Tag Archives: Bureau of False Flags

Is this the organization that has contrived the terror attacks in Europe?

The Bureau of False Flags might have been found, although it seems more like a private corporation than a governmental bureau. In his interview with SGT Report Ole Dammegard mentioned a website he found: Crisis Solutions, or Crisis Cloud. This organization seems to be involved in staging crisis simulations.

 

Can it really be this obvious? “The clue is in the name”. The logo sort of looks like 666 and tentacles like Ole Dammegard pointed out.

 

The Company

The website of Crisis Solutions says they are “Europe’s leading crisis simulation company” and they’ve been doing this since 2000. Their managing director is Richard Whitby. According to his LinkedIn he’s been in that role since 2003. Whitby brag’s in his message on the website that:

“Crisis Solutions delivered the very first ‘Market-Wide Exercise’, involving more than 100 organisations and thousands of participants in a day-long simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector. We were also a key part of the UK Government’s preparations to provide resilience against cyber attacks during the London Olympics.”

Could this “simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector refer to the 7/7 attack in London in 2005?

One interesting point is that Crisis Solutions was started already in 2000, that was before 9/11. I guess they had the lobes for business or something since they predicted that terrorism and counter-terrorism will be big business in the years to follow.

 

What They Do

Here’s a bit more on what they do:

“Crisis Solutions specialises in getting organisations crisis ready: we set about this by running crisis simulation exercises and crisis workshops.”

“We plan and deploy crisis simulation exercises that feel REAL.”

They have also developed a “secure exercise web portal” called Crisis Cloud: “This includes simulated news videos, news stores [sic] that are updated as the exercise progresses, together with social media activity and interactive web pages where you can post internal and external statements.”

They make crisis exercises that are believable, and they have a computer program, Crisis Cloud, that I suppose mimicks real media and social media in reporting on the development of the situation. Now what I’m thinking is whether sometimes, or all times, this simulated media environment is actually connected to the real world? In other words, simulated terrorist attacks are reported in simulated media, but are shown to the public as if it was real. That is a possibility.

Another section “CRISIS CLOUD – YOUR SCENARIO, OUR REALISM” states the following:

“Crisis Cloud is tailored to your specific exercise requirements, but a typical example will include:

  • News stories based on the scenario. Stories are updated as the crisis exercise progresses
  • News videos to bring the immediacy of media scrutiny
  • Client pages for internal and external statements
  • A Twitter inspired social media page that is accessible to players and updated in real time”

They admit they make fake news based on their fake scenarios. They also have fake social media accounts doing this. The question then, once again is, do they pass off these fake stories to the general public as real news, or are they truly confined to the people involved with the simulation?

 

“Fighting” Terrorism

There’s a “Current Threats” section on the website. One of the pages is about terrorism. It says the following:

“Britain is currently on its second highest alert level of ‘severe’, as a terrorist attack is considered highly likely. This is hardly surprising given the recent devastating terrorist attacks on mainland Europe.

On 7th January 2015 two armed men forced their way into the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo where they killed 12 and injured 11 others.

Then on the 13th November 2015 Paris was subjected to a series of coordinated terrorist attacks with suicide bomb outside the Stade de France, several shootings, and a suicide bombing, at cafés and restaurants, and the mass shooting at a rock concert in the Bataclan theatre. 130 people were killed; 89 at the Bataclan theatre, and another 368 injured.

On the morning of 22 March 2016, three coordinated suicide bombings occurred in Belgium, killing 32 members of the public and three terrorists, and injuring more than 300.”

It appears as if it was written back in 2016, or possibly early 2017, since it mentions terror attacks in France and Belgium, but merely suggests at the possibility of such attacks in Britain. The people who wrote this must be Nostradamus, since they guessed correctly that there will be terror attacks in Britain. Or alternatively, I’m wondering if this is an indirect way of admitting/bragging that Crisis Solutions orchestrated these attacks/simulations/hoaxes, and the reference to Britain being on high security alert is an advert that they will strike there next?

There’s one section on the website saying how social media is an important part of crisis management: “Social media is the perfect platform to disseminate messages to as wide an audience as possible.”

They also says that “Social media, digital media, the new media, call it what you will, has the unique ability to break and make stories.” Clearly this company is interested in creating believable stories, i.e. and not so interested in helping security services strengthen themselves to prevent further crises.

 

What I think about it

There’s probably more interesting tidbits on the website to go into, but I want to discuss the implications of this website. Is it real, a red herring, or a hoax? At least I’m pretty sure it’s not just a hoax by a troll. The company seems real, the LinkedIn account of the manager seems real, and I found their webpage back in Wayback Machine going back to 2001. The website appears to have existed over 15 years.

Then again, when you look at the website it seems a bit too obvious that Crisis Solutions is all about managing false flags and crisis actors. This might be some sort of red herring to direct conspiracy researchers away from the truth. For all I know the website was made a month ago, and all of the alleged history of the company, including the Wayback Machine snapshots and LinkedIn profile have been faked. People who are capable to managing false flags and hoaxes across the world would surely be capable of faking the history of such a company.

But maybe it is real. If Crisis Solutions is behind manufactoring false flags, then maybe the globalist conspirators behind it don’t really care should a handful of conspiracy nuts know about it. After all, what can we do about it? That’s the heart of the question: what can we do with this information? Crisis Solutions exists, can we somehow prove it has orchestrated false flags in the past? Can we somehow force the police to investigate the company? Can we expose them somehow? I don’t know if there is anything we can do, but maybe someone else has a better idea.

 

Links:

Ole Dammegard with SGT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNntN-RbAfw

Crisis Solutions: http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Richard Whitby LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-whitby-185322b/?ppe=1

Crisis Solutions on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20170601000000*/http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Ariana Grande concert bombing: Where’s the blood and the bodies?

The Bureau of False Flags strikes again. Probably. Last night a suicide bomber allegedly blew himself up, and at least 22 other people, in an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England. So far I haven’t seen much evidence of dead people nor of any explosion.

 

The Evidence

These couple of images are the most evidence I’ve seen so far of any explosion. The first one’s been shared by several media outlets. There’s a girl with ripped jeans and a bandage on her knee being escorted by police officers. The girl though doesn’t look injured. There’s no wounds on her legs. There’s some blood on her arm, which I initially missed. But I don’t even see dust or dirt on her. How do her jeans just rip from an explosion and leave her intact? I’ve seen similar questionable physics in other terrorist attacks.

 

I saw this picture on the CNN website. It has a middle-aged man being escorted by another man. He has bandages on both of his legs, and tge bandage on his right leg is a bit bloody. This at least looks somewhat real, so it actually might be real. Although this guy looks pretty clean otherwise. If he was caught in the explosion, he was probably on the fringes of the blast area. Still, I’d expect to see some dust or blood from other victims on his clothes. Unless he changed his clothes to look good in the photoshoot.

 

There are videos of people escaping from the venue and screaming in panic. They’re holding pink balloons. I assume they got them at the concert. I’ve heard testimonies of people claiming there was an explosion, but so far the only evidence of an explosion is a video from outside the concert venue from a car’s dashcam. You can hear a boom and see a bright flash. The guy in the car shouts “No!” a few seconds after the explosion. He sounds like he is sleeping and having a nightmare, or something. It sounds weird, off and delayed.

I do think there was a loud boom, and probably a bright flash, but I still aren’t convinced there was an actual explosion. The audience may simply have been deceive to think there was an actual explosion.

And if there was a real bomb and an explosion, how did the bomber get his bomb through security? Western nations have been beefing up their security measures year by year ever since 9/11, but they never yield results. The only terrorist attacks the authorities have managed to curb before they happen, are ones that have been orchestrated by the authorities themselves, such as the FBI has done in the US.

It’s of course too early to say what this event was: a false flag, a hoax, or a “genuine” terrorist attack. You might argue, what’s the point of faking such an attack? Wouldn’t it just be easier to set the bomb and blow up a bunch of people? The people behind these attacks clearly have very low scruples. If they have no qualms about pretending to kill people indiscriminately, why would they mind killing people either? Perhaps it is an issue of legality. The people working for the hypothetical Bureau of False Flags might be have certain criteria they have to follow, such as not killing people, i.e. damaging the property of the state. These people could be engaged in developing highly advanced propaganda, but that’s all they are allowed to do: use smoke and mirrors. In this sense it’s basically your fault if you believe the story they told, the same as if you go see a Hollywood movie and think it’s real. These people are only doing performance art.

Wasn’t there a law signed in the US around the time of Sandy Hook that allows the media to legally lie to you? This Ariana Grande concert was in the UK, so the same law shouldn’t apply, but there might be similar laws in the UK.

 

Pushing Propaganda

I first heard about this alleged terrorist attack this morning as I woke up and switched on Youtube on my phone. There was video by Stefan Molyneux discussing this incident. I usually don’t watch his videos, but since it seemed there was a new terrorist attack I was curious.

Naturally, as you might expect from Molyneux, his video had little in the terms of relevant content and was mostly emotionally manipulative. He was describing graphic images of people running from the concert hall with blood and body parts all over them. So far, I’ve seen nothing like it. Very little blood, no detached body parts. I’d like to see the videos he’s seen of the attack.

Molyneux was also indirectly but obviously suggesting that it was another terrorist attack by Muslims. This is probably true, but so far the identity of the alleged attacker hasn’t been revealed. Yet, Molyneux is spinning his usual emotionally manipulative narrative. He ends the video by saying: “Do you wanna be popular, or do you want to live?”

He’s pushing the Dark Hero narrative that I’ve seen in the movies, video games and the Alt-Right media over the years: to survive and fight the monsters, you have to become worse than the monsters. This is once again like Albert Pike described in his alleged letter to Giuseppe Mazzini about goading the regular people to rise up to exterminate the Nihilist and atheist revolutionaries, and end up dooming themselves.

Naturally I do oppose the Islamization of Europe. It’s is a real threat whether or not terrorist attacks like these have been perpetrated by Muslims or intelligence agencies as false flags. Yet people like Molyneux and many others who point their fingers only at Muslims and other superficial troublemakers like Liberal elites, are behaving like if in the Lord of the Rings you were warning the Free Peoples against orc armies, but ignoring the existence of Sauron and the Ring Wraiths.

As a philosopher, Molyneux is a complete fraud. Either he is too dumb to see this, or he is working for the wrong side.

 

Occult Stuff

I found an article on the Illuminati Watcher website from 2013 discussing how Ariana Grande is fascinated by demons and magic. Perhaps this attack was some sort of occult ritual. I wonder what song Ariana Grande sang just prior to the alleged explosion?

She’s also worked for Nickelodeon and like most other pop stars is probably under MK Ultra mind control. Last year there was even some incident of her licking donuts in a donut shop.

 

Conclusion

It’s still too early to say what this event was, but using Occam’s Razor the most logical explanation is that it’s false flag or a hoax some sort, since that’s how most terrorist attacks turn out to be. Moreover, the most widely circulated picture of the attack looks hokey as heck. But I’ll have to wait and see what sort of evidence turns up.

 

EDIT:

I found an intriguing interview on Fox News regarding this terrorist attack. They are interviewing “crisis management expert” Eric Schiffer. He is the CEO of Patriarch Equity.

The interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

The reason, I suppose, for this interview is to tell you how to feel, and how to passively accept terrorism.  Since as far as I know, Eric Schiffer wasn’t at the concert. He doesn’t have any special information on the incident. He does mention, however, he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.” This is interesting, since the Illuminati Watcher article quotes Ariana saying:

“My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.”

So she works for the military-industrial complex. I wonder if Eric Schiffer’s Patriarch also co-operates with them. At the very least, it seems Ariana Grande’s family and Schiffer seem to belong to the same elite circles.

Finding what Patriarch Equity does is not so easy. First of all there are a few different companies that use some variation of the name Patriarch. But I think the one that Schiffer leads is this one: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

They deal with developing and improving “businesses in the digital industry”. It doesn’t seem like “crisis management” company though. Yet Patriarch seems very shadowy to me. The About Us section does not even mention any names of the employees. It doesn’t mention Eric Schiffer as the CEO. I did find Eric Schiffer’s website though: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

It mentions he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants. Most of all he enjoys his charity work on behalf of the Clinton Health Access Initiative and Benevolent.net.” He worked with the Clintons? Interesting.

Schiffer’s website also says: “Eric Schiffer is a best-selling author, and a successful entrepreneur.” He’s written some books, and apparently he’s an entrepreneur. It doesn’t mention here either that he’s a “crisis management expert”. Perhaps he’s a “crisis actor management expert”. He does seem to be a man of many talents as I found a couple of other interviews with him on Youtube:

In this Newsmax TV clip from 2014 he’s on as an economist or something talking about gas prices and Iraq: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip from 2016 has Schiffer on as “tech expert”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

I’m not sure if he’s an actor or some sort of conspirator mastermind. I have a hunch that Patriarch Equity might be somehow tied to the hypothetical Bureau of False Flags. Patriarch might have been somehow involved in this attack. So far, these are only hunches, though. This guy seems suspicious though.

Maybe the Feminists were right all along: there might be a patriarchy controlling us.

 

 

Links:

Fans evacuate Ariana Grande concert arena after blast :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jnL_e6RCQI

Dashcam captures moment of the explosion: http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/05/23/explosion-dashcam-video-sg-mobile-orig.cnn

What Pisses Me Off About The Ariana Grande Terrorist Attack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzAQwATXZ4o

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

How Albert Pike’s letter can aid us in the Nationalist Revival: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/pikes-letter/

ARIANA GRANDE NAMED IN DNC LEAK?!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gWMDYAwtM4

Another False Flag in Paris or Mandela Effect?

Seems like Bureau of False Flags is at it again. A gunman killed a police officer in Paris, France, near Champs Elysees. Two others were apparently injured, and the gunman died as well. According to the media at least. Except last night when I saw this news story before going to sleep, the RT article I read said there were two attackers. Today when I woke up, all of the media sources I’ve seen are saying there was only one, including the same RT article. This must be Mandela Effect, right?

 

The Second Gunman already forgotten

No. I found a website, News Sniffer, that records the changes that news articles undergo as they’re updated. Every instance of the article is recorded. The RT article did originally say:

“The assault was “very probably” a “terrorist act,” with two attackers apparently involved, Reuters reported, citing police source. Howver, there is no official confirmation of that so far.”

Now there is no reference to this second attacker. I’ve heard the same story so many times I’ve forgotten most of them. A terrorist attack occurs or a crazy gunman goes on a rampage, initially there are reports of two or more assailants, but eventually it’s reduced to a lone nut. Sometimes the media at least has the decency to state that there were reports of two attackers, but they were mistaken, however this time it has been brushed aside entirely.

A couple of examples of two attackers in a shooting where one of them is discarded from the official story are the Utøya massacre in Norway in 2011, when Anders Breivik allegedly shot nearly a 100 people, and in 2012, James Holmes allegedly shot up a movie theater showing a Batman movie. Certain eye witnesses claimed he had had an accomplice, but he’s been erased from history as well.

Then there’s a little event you might have heard of, the JFK assassination.

 

The Election

The timing of this attack is convenient as the French presidential election is only a few days away. Some people are already saying this attack has confirmed the victory for Marine Le Pen. News articles on the terrorist attack have a similar structure to them. RT reports on the attack, and then posts the Twitter responses of candidates Marine Le Pen and François Fillon. BBC reports on the attack and asks “Could the attack influence the elections?”. CNN reports on the attack and has a big sub-headline “Elections on Sunday”.

Clearly they want you to be thinking of this incident when the French go vote. So was this a false flag to make Le Pen win? Possibly, maybe not. Last year in Britain before the Brexit vote, a remainer MP, Jo Cox, was killed by a right-wing Lone Nut™. Despite this Brexit happened. Perhaps the global conspirators want the French to feel the need for Le Pen, but they will fix the election in favour of Fillon to make the French feel even more desperate to possibly cause a civil war, or a new French Revolution.

Then again, the psy-op may have simply shifted from left to right. I was happy that Brexit happened, I was relieved when Trump won the presidency and I hope Le Pen wins as well. Yet I suggest to remain vigilant. The entity or entities behind these false flags, wars and everything else might simply be manipulating us into another cul-de-sac. I certainly am not clear to what extent the anti-globalist sentiment that has arisen in recent years is a genuine threat to their establishment, or simply another red herring.

 

Links:

Police officer killed, 2 seriously injured in Paris Champs Elysees attack of ‘terrorist nature’: https://www.rt.com/news/385468-officer-killed-shooting-paris/

Different versions of the RT article: https://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/1365820/diff/1/2

Paris shooting: Gunman was ‘focus of anti-terror’ probe: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39663300

Paris gunman who killed police officer known to security forces, source says: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/20/europe/champs-elyses-in-paris-closed/index.html

Norway attacks: the unanswered questions: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/24/norway-attacks-unaswered-questions

Eyewitness Account: James Holmes Possible Second Shooter in tragic Batman Denver Shooting: https://www.infowars.com/james-holmes-possible-second-shooter-in-tragic-batman-denver-shooting-eyewitness-account/

Cleveland Facebook Killer Claptrap

A 37-year old man, Steve Stephens, is allegedly going around Cleveland, Ohio, killing people and he even uploaded a video of it on Facebook. The police still haven’t caught him. I find this story unbelievable for several reasons.

First of all, in the contemporary West surveillance is everywhere. There are CCTV cameras, they can locate your cellphone and who knows what they can do to turn your own devices against you. Yet the police cannot find a man who advertised his crimes on Facebook. The ever-present surveillance never seems to help with any kind of terrorism or other extremely violent crimes. Curious, isn’t it?

I don’t think the police want to find him. This could be for various reasons. One is that the perpetrator is Black, and the liberal establishment does not want to demonize Blacks, so they aren’t really trying. I don’t think this is the case, but it’s possible. Another reason might that the authorities want to cause havoc for whatever reason, such as invoking martial law in Cleveland.

Then again, I’m not convinced he has actually killed anyone. If there have been these 14 murders Stephens alludes to, he may be a (willing?) patsy, or maybe no-one died. There’s a video where Stephens appears to be driving, and very calmly he says he just snapped and killed some people. I think he’s acting. At some point he appears to even be looking at his dashboard as if reading his lines. I don’t find his performance credible at all. Moreover, he is holding a phone he is talking to with one hand, and he is supposedly holding another phone with the other and he is driving with the same hand. It’s not impossible to do so, I suppose, but I don’t find it credible either.

It seems most likely that this event is going to be used to push for some sort of agenda. Might be gun control, heavier surveillance such as microchipping of cars or people, or something else. There have been a few “trucks of peace” in Europe in recent months, and a car is involved here as well as the cops supposedly cannot find it, so maybe the globalists are going to push for some sort of “smart” cars that can be tracked and remote-controlled somehow to prevent terrorism and other crimes. But that is just speculation.

I didn’t go looking into this event assuming it’s some sort of false flag or a hoax. I honestly took it at face value when I heard there’s some Black guy killing people and uploading it on Facebook. However, today when I heard that the police still haven’t caught him it raised a red flag. Then I saw the video of Stephens admitting to killing 13, and planning to kill another person, I just found it fake. I’m really beginning to think I was correct when I said that there is some sort of Bureau of False Flags a month ago, which is why we keep getting these half-assed hoaxes and false flags. They’ve got job to do, and gotta fill that quota of at least one event per month.

 

 

Links:

Accused Facebook killer Steve Stephens faced multiple evictions, financial trouble: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/18/accused-facebook-killer-steve-stephens-faced-multiple-evictions-financial-trouble.html

altNews: Cleveland Facebook Live Killer (Hoax): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrmU-ajkmxM

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.