Tag Archives: Bureau of False Flags

Another False Flag in Paris or Mandela Effect?

Seems like Bureau of False Flags is at it again. A gunman killed a police officer in Paris, France, near Champs Elysees. Two others were apparently injured, and the gunman died as well. According to the media at least. Except last night when I saw this news story before going to sleep, the RT article I read said there were two attackers. Today when I woke up, all of the media sources I’ve seen are saying there was only one, including the same RT article. This must be Mandela Effect, right?

 

The Second Gunman already forgotten

No. I found a website, News Sniffer, that records the changes that news articles undergo as they’re updated. Every instance of the article is recorded. The RT article did originally say:

“The assault was “very probably” a “terrorist act,” with two attackers apparently involved, Reuters reported, citing police source. Howver, there is no official confirmation of that so far.”

Now there is no reference to this second attacker. I’ve heard the same story so many times I’ve forgotten most of them. A terrorist attack occurs or a crazy gunman goes on a rampage, initially there are reports of two or more assailants, but eventually it’s reduced to a lone nut. Sometimes the media at least has the decency to state that there were reports of two attackers, but they were mistaken, however this time it has been brushed aside entirely.

A couple of examples of two attackers in a shooting where one of them is discarded from the official story are the Utøya massacre in Norway in 2011, when Anders Breivik allegedly shot nearly a 100 people, and in 2012, James Holmes allegedly shot up a movie theater showing a Batman movie. Certain eye witnesses claimed he had had an accomplice, but he’s been erased from history as well.

Then there’s a little event you might have heard of, the JFK assassination.

 

The Election

The timing of this attack is convenient as the French presidential election is only a few days away. Some people are already saying this attack has confirmed the victory for Marine Le Pen. News articles on the terrorist attack have a similar structure to them. RT reports on the attack, and then posts the Twitter responses of candidates Marine Le Pen and François Fillon. BBC reports on the attack and asks “Could the attack influence the elections?”. CNN reports on the attack and has a big sub-headline “Elections on Sunday”.

Clearly they want you to be thinking of this incident when the French go vote. So was this a false flag to make Le Pen win? Possibly, maybe not. Last year in Britain before the Brexit vote, a remainer MP, Jo Cox, was killed by a right-wing Lone Nut™. Despite this Brexit happened. Perhaps the global conspirators want the French to feel the need for Le Pen, but they will fix the election in favour of Fillon to make the French feel even more desperate to possibly cause a civil war, or a new French Revolution.

Then again, the psy-op may have simply shifted from left to right. I was happy that Brexit happened, I was relieved when Trump won the presidency and I hope Le Pen wins as well. Yet I suggest to remain vigilant. The entity or entities behind these false flags, wars and everything else might simply be manipulating us into another cul-de-sac. I certainly am not clear to what extent the anti-globalist sentiment that has arisen in recent years is a genuine threat to their establishment, or simply another red herring.

 

Links:

Police officer killed, 2 seriously injured in Paris Champs Elysees attack of ‘terrorist nature’: https://www.rt.com/news/385468-officer-killed-shooting-paris/

Different versions of the RT article: https://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/1365820/diff/1/2

Paris shooting: Gunman was ‘focus of anti-terror’ probe: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39663300

Paris gunman who killed police officer known to security forces, source says: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/20/europe/champs-elyses-in-paris-closed/index.html

Norway attacks: the unanswered questions: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/24/norway-attacks-unaswered-questions

Eyewitness Account: James Holmes Possible Second Shooter in tragic Batman Denver Shooting: https://www.infowars.com/james-holmes-possible-second-shooter-in-tragic-batman-denver-shooting-eyewitness-account/

Cleveland Facebook Killer Claptrap

A 37-year old man, Steve Stephens, is allegedly going around Cleveland, Ohio, killing people and he even uploaded a video of it on Facebook. The police still haven’t caught him. I find this story unbelievable for several reasons.

First of all, in the contemporary West surveillance is everywhere. There are CCTV cameras, they can locate your cellphone and who knows what they can do to turn your own devices against you. Yet the police cannot find a man who advertised his crimes on Facebook. The ever-present surveillance never seems to help with any kind of terrorism or other extremely violent crimes. Curious, isn’t it?

I don’t think the police want to find him. This could be for various reasons. One is that the perpetrator is Black, and the liberal establishment does not want to demonize Blacks, so they aren’t really trying. I don’t think this is the case, but it’s possible. Another reason might that the authorities want to cause havoc for whatever reason, such as invoking martial law in Cleveland.

Then again, I’m not convinced he has actually killed anyone. If there have been these 14 murders Stephens alludes to, he may be a (willing?) patsy, or maybe no-one died. There’s a video where Stephens appears to be driving, and very calmly he says he just snapped and killed some people. I think he’s acting. At some point he appears to even be looking at his dashboard as if reading his lines. I don’t find his performance credible at all. Moreover, he is holding a phone he is talking to with one hand, and he is supposedly holding another phone with the other and he is driving with the same hand. It’s not impossible to do so, I suppose, but I don’t find it credible either.

It seems most likely that this event is going to be used to push for some sort of agenda. Might be gun control, heavier surveillance such as microchipping of cars or people, or something else. There have been a few “trucks of peace” in Europe in recent months, and a car is involved here as well as the cops supposedly cannot find it, so maybe the globalists are going to push for some sort of “smart” cars that can be tracked and remote-controlled somehow to prevent terrorism and other crimes. But that is just speculation.

I didn’t go looking into this event assuming it’s some sort of false flag or a hoax. I honestly took it at face value when I heard there’s some Black guy killing people and uploading it on Facebook. However, today when I heard that the police still haven’t caught him it raised a red flag. Then I saw the video of Stephens admitting to killing 13, and planning to kill another person, I just found it fake. I’m really beginning to think I was correct when I said that there is some sort of Bureau of False Flags a month ago, which is why we keep getting these half-assed hoaxes and false flags. They’ve got job to do, and gotta fill that quota of at least one event per month.

 

 

Links:

Accused Facebook killer Steve Stephens faced multiple evictions, financial trouble: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/18/accused-facebook-killer-steve-stephens-faced-multiple-evictions-financial-trouble.html

altNews: Cleveland Facebook Live Killer (Hoax): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrmU-ajkmxM

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.