Tag Archives: disingenous relatives of victims

Is this the organization that has contrived the terror attacks in Europe?

The Bureau of False Flags might have been found, although it seems more like a private corporation than a governmental bureau. In his interview with SGT Report Ole Dammegard mentioned a website he found: Crisis Solutions, or Crisis Cloud. This organization seems to be involved in staging crisis simulations.

 

Can it really be this obvious? “The clue is in the name”. The logo sort of looks like 666 and tentacles like Ole Dammegard pointed out.

 

The Company

The website of Crisis Solutions says they are “Europe’s leading crisis simulation company” and they’ve been doing this since 2000. Their managing director is Richard Whitby. According to his LinkedIn he’s been in that role since 2003. Whitby brag’s in his message on the website that:

“Crisis Solutions delivered the very first ‘Market-Wide Exercise’, involving more than 100 organisations and thousands of participants in a day-long simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector. We were also a key part of the UK Government’s preparations to provide resilience against cyber attacks during the London Olympics.”

Could this “simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector refer to the 7/7 attack in London in 2005?

One interesting point is that Crisis Solutions was started already in 2000, that was before 9/11. I guess they had the lobes for business or something since they predicted that terrorism and counter-terrorism will be big business in the years to follow.

 

What They Do

Here’s a bit more on what they do:

“Crisis Solutions specialises in getting organisations crisis ready: we set about this by running crisis simulation exercises and crisis workshops.”

“We plan and deploy crisis simulation exercises that feel REAL.”

They have also developed a “secure exercise web portal” called Crisis Cloud: “This includes simulated news videos, news stores [sic] that are updated as the exercise progresses, together with social media activity and interactive web pages where you can post internal and external statements.”

They make crisis exercises that are believable, and they have a computer program, Crisis Cloud, that I suppose mimicks real media and social media in reporting on the development of the situation. Now what I’m thinking is whether sometimes, or all times, this simulated media environment is actually connected to the real world? In other words, simulated terrorist attacks are reported in simulated media, but are shown to the public as if it was real. That is a possibility.

Another section “CRISIS CLOUD – YOUR SCENARIO, OUR REALISM” states the following:

“Crisis Cloud is tailored to your specific exercise requirements, but a typical example will include:

  • News stories based on the scenario. Stories are updated as the crisis exercise progresses
  • News videos to bring the immediacy of media scrutiny
  • Client pages for internal and external statements
  • A Twitter inspired social media page that is accessible to players and updated in real time”

They admit they make fake news based on their fake scenarios. They also have fake social media accounts doing this. The question then, once again is, do they pass off these fake stories to the general public as real news, or are they truly confined to the people involved with the simulation?

 

“Fighting” Terrorism

There’s a “Current Threats” section on the website. One of the pages is about terrorism. It says the following:

“Britain is currently on its second highest alert level of ‘severe’, as a terrorist attack is considered highly likely. This is hardly surprising given the recent devastating terrorist attacks on mainland Europe.

On 7th January 2015 two armed men forced their way into the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo where they killed 12 and injured 11 others.

Then on the 13th November 2015 Paris was subjected to a series of coordinated terrorist attacks with suicide bomb outside the Stade de France, several shootings, and a suicide bombing, at cafés and restaurants, and the mass shooting at a rock concert in the Bataclan theatre. 130 people were killed; 89 at the Bataclan theatre, and another 368 injured.

On the morning of 22 March 2016, three coordinated suicide bombings occurred in Belgium, killing 32 members of the public and three terrorists, and injuring more than 300.”

It appears as if it was written back in 2016, or possibly early 2017, since it mentions terror attacks in France and Belgium, but merely suggests at the possibility of such attacks in Britain. The people who wrote this must be Nostradamus, since they guessed correctly that there will be terror attacks in Britain. Or alternatively, I’m wondering if this is an indirect way of admitting/bragging that Crisis Solutions orchestrated these attacks/simulations/hoaxes, and the reference to Britain being on high security alert is an advert that they will strike there next?

There’s one section on the website saying how social media is an important part of crisis management: “Social media is the perfect platform to disseminate messages to as wide an audience as possible.”

They also says that “Social media, digital media, the new media, call it what you will, has the unique ability to break and make stories.” Clearly this company is interested in creating believable stories, i.e. and not so interested in helping security services strengthen themselves to prevent further crises.

 

What I think about it

There’s probably more interesting tidbits on the website to go into, but I want to discuss the implications of this website. Is it real, a red herring, or a hoax? At least I’m pretty sure it’s not just a hoax by a troll. The company seems real, the LinkedIn account of the manager seems real, and I found their webpage back in Wayback Machine going back to 2001. The website appears to have existed over 15 years.

Then again, when you look at the website it seems a bit too obvious that Crisis Solutions is all about managing false flags and crisis actors. This might be some sort of red herring to direct conspiracy researchers away from the truth. For all I know the website was made a month ago, and all of the alleged history of the company, including the Wayback Machine snapshots and LinkedIn profile have been faked. People who are capable to managing false flags and hoaxes across the world would surely be capable of faking the history of such a company.

But maybe it is real. If Crisis Solutions is behind manufactoring false flags, then maybe the globalist conspirators behind it don’t really care should a handful of conspiracy nuts know about it. After all, what can we do about it? That’s the heart of the question: what can we do with this information? Crisis Solutions exists, can we somehow prove it has orchestrated false flags in the past? Can we somehow force the police to investigate the company? Can we expose them somehow? I don’t know if there is anything we can do, but maybe someone else has a better idea.

 

Links:

Ole Dammegard with SGT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNntN-RbAfw

Crisis Solutions: http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Richard Whitby LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-whitby-185322b/?ppe=1

Crisis Solutions on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20170601000000*/http://www.crisis-solutions.com

The Manchester Terrorist Bombing and Eric Schiffer

I already mentioned Eric Schiffer in my first article on the Manchester terrorist attack after an Ariana Grande concert. I am now even more convinced that the attack was a false flag or a hoax, since I’ve seen some very obvious crisis actor videos, or Disingenuous Relatives of Victims. I’ll probably write about that at a later date, but now I’ll focus on a person who might be somehow involved in the false flag: Eric Schiffer.

 

Schiffer / Grande Connection

A couple of days after the attack, Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News about the attack. His role in the interview was that of a “crisis management expert”. As far as I know Eric Schiffer was not anywhere near the attack site, nor is he even British. He does, however, state in the interview that he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.”

Ariana Grande has described her mother as follows: “My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.” This was mentioned in an Illuminati Watcher article. Ariana’s mother is Joan Grande. Based on LinkedIn, the company seems to be HMC Communiations. Assuming that’s the correct Joan Grande. There’s no profile picture, and very little information about her.

 

Eric gets around

Eric Schiffer seems to have his finger in many pies. His own website says he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants.” His LinkedIn profile also states he is the chairman of DigitalMarketing.com.

He has also been interviewed many times by various media organizations, so he seems to be well-connected among the elite.  In 2014 he was interviewed by Newsmax TV as an economist.  In 2016 he was a “tech expert” in a CGTN America clip. There are dozens of his interviews on Youtube.

Schiffer has been quoted by Salon about his statement on Donald Trump’s alleged anti-Semitic ties. In 2015 he wrote an article on The Washington Times how people shouldn’t be too politically correct when talking about Islamic terrorism. He was quoted by Forbes in connection to the controversy that PewDiePie is allegedly a Nazi. He is involved with a charity called “The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Annual Gala”. I’m not sure if Schiffer himself is a Jew, but his girlfriend Dr. Jenn Mann is.

These are just a few examples of how Eric Schiffer seems to be well-respected and connected in global elite, although I hadn’t heard about him before. Perhaps Americans know him better though.

 

Eric’s Companies

Now I’ll take a look at the companies Schiffer is involved with. Patriarch Organization or Patriarch Equity sounds like a sinister umbrella organization from a B-movie. And as far as I know they are, since I didn’t find much information about what they actually do, and with whom they are connected. They apparently control businesses in the digital industry and develop them somehow. I don’t know which businesses they have “helped”.

Digital Marketing (DM) sounds a less ominous version of Patriarch. They seem to be involved with, as the name suggests, marketing in digital media. The client list of the company is interesting though. It has some big names: Activision, Du Pont, Intel, Microsoft, Boeing, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Fox and you can see the rest below.

 

I just realized Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News and Fox is a client of his company. Isn’t that sort of a conflict of interest?

Anyway, something tells DM isn’t just helping faceless corporations make more money, but is involved in manipulating people’s opinions on a deeper level.

 

Reputation Management

Speaking of manipulating people’s opinions, let’s check out Reputation Management Consultants (RMC). This is where it gets good. It is as the name suggests involved in salvaging people’s reputations.

 

This includes suppression of information: “RMC offers much more than a fast suppression of negative search listings. Our compelling, quality content will be created and placed with your branding in mind.”

This is as it sounds: if search engines keep offering negative opinions on you, RMC will somehow manipulate the results to make you seem better.

 

They help “high-profile businesses and individuals”, such as politicians, high profile business owners, multinational corporations and local not-for-profit organizations.

 

They suppress negative views of their client by promoting existing press releases, or they write their own propaganda pieces to make you look good. They also create “Social Network profiles” to help their client. Sounds like paid shills to me.

 

They allege to be a successfull business, and work with “the wealthiest men and women in the world and high profile invididuals”. I wonder who exactly has been their client? Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, all of them?

 

I don’t know if all of this is legal, but sounds morally questionable as hell. You basically pay this corporation to lie for you across the internet and media. Not to mention that Eric Schiffer is also connected to Digital Marketing that works with defense contractors like Du Pont and Boeing, i.e. the military-industrial complex. Therefore I wouldn’t be suprised if the online shills you see, especially after false flags like the Manchester bombing, are controlled by RMC. I also suspect Eric Schiffer, or one of his companies, were somehow involved with the Manchester attack, or alleged attack. Perhaps they hire or control crisis actors as well. I cannot prove anything, yet. So this is still just my hunch.

That’s all I have now. I should probably check out Joan Grande’s company, HMC Communications, and verify that this Joan is actually Ariana Grande’s mother. I’m not very good at researching the backgrounds and connections of corporations, or their money trails, so I hope if someone else can do deeper research on Patriarch especially.

 

Links:

Ariana Grande speaks out on UK deadly blast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

Joan Grande: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joan-grande-a2538510/

Eric Schiffer: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

Eric Schiffer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ericschiffer/

Newsmax TV interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

Damage control: How does Donald Trump convince Americans he’s not an anti-Semite when he’s surrounded by them?: http://www.salon.com/2017/03/19/damage-control-how-does-donald-trump-convince-americans-hes-not-an-anti-semite-when-hes-surrounded-by-them/

Say no to walking on eggshells: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/21/eric-schiffer-say-no-walking-eggshells/

Here’s Why PewDiePie Will Still Earn Millions, Even After Anti-Semitic Videos: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maddieberg/2017/02/16/heres-why-pewdiepie-will-still-earn-millions-even-after-anti-semitic-videos/#1884bc024e68

Philanthropist and Socialite Eric Schiffer, Attends The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Gala Hosted by Larry King: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/01/prweb337818.htm

Patriarch: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

Digital Marketing: http://digitalmarketing.com/

Reputation Management Consultants: https://www.reputationmanagementconsultants.com

Alternative Media morphing into the Main Stream Media

Why is much of the alternative media hiding its head in the sand in regard to the Virginia TV reporter shooting incident? They’re not looking at the facts, but promoting their own particular agendas.

In an interview with Richie Allen, Michael Rivero of What Really Happened said he believes the shooting was real.  Rivero points out that TV and movies exaggerate the blood splatter,  and that real shootings look different. Fair enough, he’s probably right, but that still doesn’t change the fact that the video that Flanagan supposedly filmed himself of shooting Alison Parker looks fake. Even the other video looked fake before I saw the shooting video.

Rivero says that even though shooting was real, everyone’s going to use it to push their agenda, such as the anti-gun agenda. A few minutes later Rivero starts pushing his own agenda that antidepressants make people go crazy and shoot others.

Another reason why Rivero does not think the shooting was fake is that it doesn’t fit his interpretation of the agendas the government is pushing; gun control and White on Black violence. He says the guy was crazy, so it doesn’t fit the gun control agenda, since people with mental illness already are forbidden by law to get guns. But as he stated already, most of the mass shooters have been on antidepressants, i.e. crazy, and the incidents have been used to push gun control, so I don’t really follow his logic. Another thing is since the Charleston shooting was used to demonize White people, this incident is reverse, with a Black guy shooting White people. It supposedly doesn’t fit the agenda. But I would say it just doesn’t fit Rivero’s perception of what the agenda is. The enemy isn’t as simple-minded and predictable as Rivero is, apparently. And to me it looks like the Charleston shooting and the Virginia shooting complement each other perfectly if the manipulators want to cause a race war, or at least increase tensions between the races.

As Rivero said the alleged shooting will be used to push agendas, we can find another agenda from Infowars: “Williams [AKA Flanigan] was radicalized by the race war narrative that the leftist media has been pushing since last year, in addition to the toxic politically correct environment being pushed by social justice warriors wherein anything and everything is deemed “offensive” or “racist”. ” Nuff said.

I’ve previously mentioned how Red Ice Creations is pushing an angle that suggests the alleged shooter Flanagan being an Jehovah’s Witness was motive for the shooting. Additionally they’re playing into the left-right tug of war.

In the grand scheme of things, the alleged Virginia shooting may not be a big thing, whether or not it was fake or real. What concerns me more is how the alternative media is handling it, since the narratives they’re pushing do not really contest the allegations of the main stream media and the political establishment. They merely seek to twist the official narrative in a way that suits them. Although main stream media like Fox News and CNN are losing credibility and people are turning to the alternative media for information, but the alternative media is gradually becoming like Fox News and CNN. In the end, nothing ever changes.

Fortunately not all alternative media is like this. David Icke’s website did link to an article by Activist Post calling the shooting a hoax. 21st Century Wire wrote pretty nice and objective article on it. They did not call the shooting a hoax, but did not automatically believe everything the main stream media says either. Moreover the article points out that the shooting video has been removed from Youtube several times. In addition to this countless Youtubers have called out the inconsistencies and the dubiousness of the shooting incident.

Rivero, Infowars and Red Ice are looking at the shooting incident with their political agenda glasses on, instead of focusing on the facts. And sometimes the facts contradict your beliefs and don’t fit your agenda. In that case, the same of the main stream media, these alternative media seem to ignore them. At least Michael Rivero did address the shooting video, and he thought it was real. I can appreciate it, and he might be right. I heavily doubt it, but the possibility exists. The video isn’t the only evidence that the shooting was a hoax, however. The boyfriend and the father of Alison Parker have been all over the main stream media, and their performance is obviously fake. Moreover they appear to be actual actors. Not very good ones obviously.

If the alternative media wishes to remain relevant, they should address issues like these “crisis actors”, or Disingenuous Relatives of Victims, as I call them. Yet, much of the more institutionalized alternative media ignores these things. They might be alternative, but they don’t seem independent.

Or maybe I’m just crazy, since I cannot bring myself to believe these fake videos. I cannot pretend I buy the story when the basis of the story is ridiculous. I certainly feel like I’m going crazy looking at the media reporting on these things and not addressing the elephant in the living room.

 

Links:

Michael Rivero: “Virginia Reporter Shooting Wasn’t A False Flag And Here’s Why”. : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wZVO5kfscA

What Really Happened: http://whatreallyhappened.com/#axzz3kO5aSMoD

Virginia TV Shooter Said, “Jehovah Spoke To Me That I Should Take Action”: http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=34133

ABC Is Hiding Details of Killer Vester Flanagan’s Manifesto …(Must Be Littered With Liberal Propaganda): http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=34140

Is The Virginia Shooting Hoax Blowing Up In The MSM’s Face?: http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/

DAILY SHOOTER: Made-For-TV – Virginia News Crew Gunned Down Live On Air (VIDEOS): http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/08/26/daily-shooter-made-for-tv-shooting-reporter-cameraman-gunned-down-live-on-air-videos/

Virginia Shooting: Meet the Actors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzxNpArEtnA

Virginia Shooting Crisis Actor Fails Miserably: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6q7Uc1CkoCQ

Virginia CBS shooting Hoax: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_zWLjzUebY

Virginia WDBJ Shooting Hoax COMPLETELY Busted! Gun Control & Race War PSYOP Exposed!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUaw35Gr_so

Is it really a big deal if the Virginia TV shooter was a Jehovah’s Witness?: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/08/29/is-it-really-a-big-deal-if-the-virginia-tv-shooter-was-a-jehovahs-witness/