Tag Archives: disingenuous victims

Is this the organization that has contrived the terror attacks in Europe?

The Bureau of False Flags might have been found, although it seems more like a private corporation than a governmental bureau. In his interview with SGT Report Ole Dammegard mentioned a website he found: Crisis Solutions, or Crisis Cloud. This organization seems to be involved in staging crisis simulations.

 

Can it really be this obvious? “The clue is in the name”. The logo sort of looks like 666 and tentacles like Ole Dammegard pointed out.

 

The Company

The website of Crisis Solutions says they are “Europe’s leading crisis simulation company” and they’ve been doing this since 2000. Their managing director is Richard Whitby. According to his LinkedIn he’s been in that role since 2003. Whitby brag’s in his message on the website that:

“Crisis Solutions delivered the very first ‘Market-Wide Exercise’, involving more than 100 organisations and thousands of participants in a day-long simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector. We were also a key part of the UK Government’s preparations to provide resilience against cyber attacks during the London Olympics.”

Could this “simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector refer to the 7/7 attack in London in 2005?

One interesting point is that Crisis Solutions was started already in 2000, that was before 9/11. I guess they had the lobes for business or something since they predicted that terrorism and counter-terrorism will be big business in the years to follow.

 

What They Do

Here’s a bit more on what they do:

“Crisis Solutions specialises in getting organisations crisis ready: we set about this by running crisis simulation exercises and crisis workshops.”

“We plan and deploy crisis simulation exercises that feel REAL.”

They have also developed a “secure exercise web portal” called Crisis Cloud: “This includes simulated news videos, news stores [sic] that are updated as the exercise progresses, together with social media activity and interactive web pages where you can post internal and external statements.”

They make crisis exercises that are believable, and they have a computer program, Crisis Cloud, that I suppose mimicks real media and social media in reporting on the development of the situation. Now what I’m thinking is whether sometimes, or all times, this simulated media environment is actually connected to the real world? In other words, simulated terrorist attacks are reported in simulated media, but are shown to the public as if it was real. That is a possibility.

Another section “CRISIS CLOUD – YOUR SCENARIO, OUR REALISM” states the following:

“Crisis Cloud is tailored to your specific exercise requirements, but a typical example will include:

  • News stories based on the scenario. Stories are updated as the crisis exercise progresses
  • News videos to bring the immediacy of media scrutiny
  • Client pages for internal and external statements
  • A Twitter inspired social media page that is accessible to players and updated in real time”

They admit they make fake news based on their fake scenarios. They also have fake social media accounts doing this. The question then, once again is, do they pass off these fake stories to the general public as real news, or are they truly confined to the people involved with the simulation?

 

“Fighting” Terrorism

There’s a “Current Threats” section on the website. One of the pages is about terrorism. It says the following:

“Britain is currently on its second highest alert level of ‘severe’, as a terrorist attack is considered highly likely. This is hardly surprising given the recent devastating terrorist attacks on mainland Europe.

On 7th January 2015 two armed men forced their way into the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo where they killed 12 and injured 11 others.

Then on the 13th November 2015 Paris was subjected to a series of coordinated terrorist attacks with suicide bomb outside the Stade de France, several shootings, and a suicide bombing, at cafés and restaurants, and the mass shooting at a rock concert in the Bataclan theatre. 130 people were killed; 89 at the Bataclan theatre, and another 368 injured.

On the morning of 22 March 2016, three coordinated suicide bombings occurred in Belgium, killing 32 members of the public and three terrorists, and injuring more than 300.”

It appears as if it was written back in 2016, or possibly early 2017, since it mentions terror attacks in France and Belgium, but merely suggests at the possibility of such attacks in Britain. The people who wrote this must be Nostradamus, since they guessed correctly that there will be terror attacks in Britain. Or alternatively, I’m wondering if this is an indirect way of admitting/bragging that Crisis Solutions orchestrated these attacks/simulations/hoaxes, and the reference to Britain being on high security alert is an advert that they will strike there next?

There’s one section on the website saying how social media is an important part of crisis management: “Social media is the perfect platform to disseminate messages to as wide an audience as possible.”

They also says that “Social media, digital media, the new media, call it what you will, has the unique ability to break and make stories.” Clearly this company is interested in creating believable stories, i.e. and not so interested in helping security services strengthen themselves to prevent further crises.

 

What I think about it

There’s probably more interesting tidbits on the website to go into, but I want to discuss the implications of this website. Is it real, a red herring, or a hoax? At least I’m pretty sure it’s not just a hoax by a troll. The company seems real, the LinkedIn account of the manager seems real, and I found their webpage back in Wayback Machine going back to 2001. The website appears to have existed over 15 years.

Then again, when you look at the website it seems a bit too obvious that Crisis Solutions is all about managing false flags and crisis actors. This might be some sort of red herring to direct conspiracy researchers away from the truth. For all I know the website was made a month ago, and all of the alleged history of the company, including the Wayback Machine snapshots and LinkedIn profile have been faked. People who are capable to managing false flags and hoaxes across the world would surely be capable of faking the history of such a company.

But maybe it is real. If Crisis Solutions is behind manufactoring false flags, then maybe the globalist conspirators behind it don’t really care should a handful of conspiracy nuts know about it. After all, what can we do about it? That’s the heart of the question: what can we do with this information? Crisis Solutions exists, can we somehow prove it has orchestrated false flags in the past? Can we somehow force the police to investigate the company? Can we expose them somehow? I don’t know if there is anything we can do, but maybe someone else has a better idea.

 

Links:

Ole Dammegard with SGT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNntN-RbAfw

Crisis Solutions: http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Richard Whitby LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-whitby-185322b/?ppe=1

Crisis Solutions on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20170601000000*/http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Did the Pulse Nightclub shooting actually happen?

Yesterday a shooting allegedly happened where an Islamic extremist ISIS-supporter, Omar Mateen, killed 50 people in a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida. This might have been a genuine event, a false flag or a hoax, much like Sandy Hook. I’m not making any definite judgement yet, however some of the eyewitnesses who’ve come out on media sound dubious at best, and are more likely to be “crisis actors”.

Let’s get the facts straight first. We haven’t seen any concrete evidence yet that a mass shooting occurred, or that anyone died at the club. I’m not saying they didn’t, and usually the media wouldn’t show pictures of a shot-up venue with bodies and blood anyway, but the fact is we don’t know the media is telling the truth. It behooves us being skeptical.

 

Hansen Interview

The first witness video I saw is an interview with Christopher Hansen. Apparently he was interviewed by FOX 35, but the video is up on The Telegraph’s website.

Hansen does not come off as someone who just experienced life-threatening shock. I don’t see or hear fear in him. It’s more like he’s been through a rowdy rock concert. Hansen describes how he had been splattered with someone’s blood, and initially he wasn’t sure if it was him blood or another person’s. He motions toward him left arm as if to show that is where the blood was splattered, yet we don’t see it. They don’t see blood, he does not look dirty, just a bit sweaty.

Then Hansen describes the person he “was with” got shot in the back. I presume this means the other person was his friend or acquaintance, yet Hansen describes it calmly and unconcerned that the person might have died. He even says he used his bandanna to tie up a bullethole in his friend’s back. Yet his clothes don’t look bloody at all. He even claimed his hands were covered in blood, but I guess Hansen went home, had a nice shower and a change of clothes before he was interviewed by the media.

At the end Hansen says “this can’t be real” and compares his alleged experience to a scary movie. He also says that “when you’re actually a part of an event, it’s not something you want to be a part of”, yet he looks very excited about it. Like he was part of an exercise that went live or something.

The same video also records the interview with Mina Justice, a mother of a hostage. She is completely non-chalant and emotionless when describing the situation, that the hostage is in the bathroom and going to die. Although, she’s talking about the “dispatch” so maybe she’s actually a 911 worker or something, and the media confused her with being a mother of a hostage. Yet if she was a 911 worker why would they be interviewing her out there near the scene of the crime? It’s just odd.

 

Bulls guy interview

Another interview of an alleged witness is with an anonymous man with a Chicago Bulls cap and an ORMC T-shirt. ORMC probably refers to Orlando Regional Medical Center. The same guy is in two interviews by ABC Action News.

The first, short interview of the Bulls guy starts off with him saying “this is actually real life”. This is in contrast with Hansen’s comment that “this cannot be real”. Both men are explicitly commenting on the reality of the incident. I think it’s like a psy-op to make you lose your sense of reality, that when the media says something is real, it’s real, if the media says it’s not, then it’s not.

In the longer interview he describes how he heard the gunfire and how the shooter changed the clip a couple of times, yet he didn’t see the shooter. I don’t think Hansen saw the shooter either.

The Bulls guy is a better actor than Hansen, but I don’t believe his story either.

 

Carlos Rosario interview

MSNBC interviewed Carlos Rosario, another alleged witness. His face is not shown, which makes it more difficult to see whether he is being genuine or not, but I don’t think he sounds terrified. Rosario also says he didn’t see the shooter. Interestingly he says he’s been a medical assistant for two years. The Bulls guy also seems have some sort of medical training, since he’s wearing the ORMC-shirt.

 

Shawn Royster interview

Shawn Royster was interviewed by CBSN. His description sounds more credible than the others, but his face is not shown either. Apparently he didn’t see the shooter either.

The same video shows footage of police and civilians carrying seemingly injured people, yet there is no blood.

There are probably other witness testimonies out there, but this is far enough. I am not saying the event was necessarily fake or a false flag, but if it wasn’t, it’d be the first. Moreover most of the witnesses sound like Disingenuous Victims, like bad actors. Omar Mateen, the alleged shooter, had been known by the FBI for a few years now. This is commonplace among terror-suspects and false flags, since the FBI manufactures most of them.

 

What’s the agenda?

Assuming that the shooting was a false flag or other type of manufactured event, what would the agenda be? I’ve seen some comments on the internet that if it was a false flag, the suspect would have been a White Trump-supporter, not a Muslim. This is based on a huge assumption that you know what the initial agenda of the globalist establishment is. It is not as black and white as most people prefer to think.

One agenda it could be used to push is the war on Syria or other Middle-Eastern countries. Bernie Sanders had tweeted the following: “From what is now known, this was a terrorist act by an ISIS sympathizer. That despicable and barbaric organization must be destroyed.” If and when Hillary becomes president, I’d be surprised if she didn’t follow Bernie’s advice.

Another agenda is the martyring on homosexuals. The venue of the incident was a gay club, and most of the alleged victims were probably gay. It has been pointed out before that the establishment pushes it’s psy-ops more heavily during the summer, possibly because children are on holiday and pay more attention to these events. Especially the gay agenda is pushed during the summer, just as last year the whole world celebrated the gay marriage laws, now they grieve the victims of the Pulse club. Gays will be seen saintly by the mere virtue of being gay.

Gun control is another classic agenda. The media, of course, cannot blame radical Islam for the shooting, since that would be “racist”, so they blame guns. Most of the witnesses emphasized the scary “pop pop” sound the gun supposedly made. They want liberals to be even more afraid of guns.

The shooting incident will also increase support for Trump, who already wanted to ban Muslims from entering the US. The main stream media hates Trump, that is true, but he is not anti-establishment. He is controlled opposition. Trump’s been on WWE. He knows how the game is played. Trump is going to give a good show and garner a lot of support, but the game is fixed and Hillary Clinton is going to win. Ultimately, I think, the goal is to cause a civil war in the States. Hillary Clinton is an actual criminal, and anyone who has any sense knows this. Unfortunately there are plenty of people in the US and around the world who are completely senseless. The people with some common sense, but still aren’t really paying attention will support Trump. Yet when the victory is wrested from his hands by hook and/or crook, a lot of people will feel cheated. This will radicalize them, and lead to American society become even more polarized.

 

Links:

Christopher Hansen interview: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/12/we-thought-it-was-part-of-the-music-how-the-pulse-nightclub-mass/

Bulls guy short interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aHEKlNNr9w

Bulls guy long interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=US2rym39j1c

Carlos Rosario interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhxq9mfBSJ4

Shawn Royster interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvFT9Nr4Qa8