Tag Archives: Hitler

Bill Nye the Fall Guy

I watched a Youtube video titled “Flat earth denier Bill Nye caught up in lies! GAME OVER 2017”. It shows a few clips of people in the main stream starting to turn against Bill Nye the Science Guy.

The video starts off with Joe Rogan saying “scientists are all going after Bill Nye.” Then Rogan’s guest, I don’t know who that is, responponds “Bill Nye the Weimar Guy?” Referring to the decadent Weimar republic that preceded Hitler’s National Socialist Germany. Rogan and his guest also mention that Bill Nye is not even a scientist, and he’s a conman. They’re also pointing out that back in the nineties Bill Nye’s program said that gender comes from chromosomes, but now his TV show is pushing the liberal gender fluidism crap. These are valid points of course, but then there are a couple of comments that make the lightbulb in my head go off.

Rogan’s guest says Bill Nye has fallen into an ideology that is complete religion. Joe Rogan says Bill Nye’s been “influenced”. At least Rogan’s guest says Nye is getting rewarded for it, but I don’t know if Rogan and the other guy go into it in more detail in the full interview. However at least here they make it out to seem like Bill Nye is pushing this liberalism propaganda because he’s “drunk the cool-aid”. This is complete BS, of course. Bill Nye is an actor, and he’s merely doing what he’s being paid for. I don’t know if he really believes any of the gender fluid crap he’s pushing now, or if he cares. He’s clearly being influenced by the producers of his TV show, who want to push this propaganda. I doubt Nye himself has much power to decide the message of his show himself.

What’s interesting is that this establishment puppet Joe Rogan is pushing an anti-leftism angle, and attacking one of the puppets of scientism and leftism. I cannot say Rogan is controlled opposition, since I don’t think he’s even pretending to be opposition, but he is controlled. It seems now the establishment is starting turn the social engineering around. They have an army of brainwashed liberals, and now they want to manipulate others into a suitable right-wing counter-reaction.

I wrote back in 2015: “What is happening today in the West bears an eerie resemblance to what the alleged Freemason Albert Pike supposedly described in his letter to Giuseppe Mazzini over a hundred years ago.” The infamous letter of course details that The Powers That Be plan to unleash the nihilists and the atheists so the decent people would react to defend themselves against these “destroyers of civilization” and eradicate them. I think they are preparing us for this eradication of the “nihilists and atheists”.

The point of this far-left liberalism was never to turn the whole West into a Marxist “paradise”. It was to weaken the West to transform it into something else. Like the alchemical Solve and Coagula, dissolve and coagulate. First the left dissolves the West, and the new Right will coagulate, or form, it into a new image. It doesn’t matter whether your ideology is far-left, far-right or even far-center if you are being controlled by the people who created the problem in the first place.

Over the years I’ve heard conspiracy claims here and there that the elites are actually secret Nazis, which of course sounds like a baseless accusation seeing that Zionists Jews wield a lot of influence in the world and Hitler is the most demonized person in the world, yet things like this make me think maybe this has all been an eloborate conspiracy to Nazi-ize the West. Like Joe Rogan’s anonymous guest said: Bill Nye the Weimar Guy. This is fairly blatantly pushing the narrative that we live in the decadent Weimar republic and it’s only natural to become more National Socialist-like to fight against it. Moreover, in just 5 years more people have become sympathetic toward the Nazis, mainly due to Islamic immigration into the West and the troubles that it brings. So this makes me think, what if there is something to these crypto-Nazi conspiracy theories?

To clarify, I have described myself as Nazi-sympathizer, meaning I do think that the National Socialists and Hitler have been unfairly maligned, and I’ve thought for years that the Holocaust narrative is a lie. Yet I am not convinced that Hitler was a great hero either, the saviour of White race, or anything like that. I don’t know if he was genuine in his efforts, a Rothschild agent, a British agent, a Freemason, or what. At best though, he was a loser with good intentions, but his actions in the end worked against the German people, and the West in general, as his failure to win the war has greatly strengthened the “internationalist clique” that he supposedly fought against.

To get back on topic, I think Bill Nye is being set as a fall guy for fake science and leftism in order to allow other kind of fake science and socially engineered agendas to flourish. The elites create these golemic strawmen, such as Feminism, give them power in order to tear them down after a while in order to further other agendas. A lot of people finally see liberalism as a deluded lie now after it has caused a lot of damage, but they will most likely fall for the next delusion that is waiting around the corner.



Flat earth denier Bill Nye caught up in lies! GAME OVER 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eonqHPPqWjo

How Albert Pike’s letter can aid us in the Nationalist Revival: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/pikes-letter/


What is the White Race?

White Nationalists and Alt-Right continuously talk about the preservation of the White race, White Genocide and all that, but I’m still not quite sure what they mean when they say White. As a rough generalization I can understand that the White people refers to people of European descent, yet the various European peoples do not constitute a homogenous group.

I’ve already written about White Nationalism and the White Genocide previously, and I don’t want to repeat everything here, but suffice to say I find the word White when referring to race as ambiguous at best.


Tabula Rasa

The talk of us as White people reminds me of something said in the movie “Malcom X”, which recounted the exploits of the African-American activist. When Malcolm X was in prison he met another Black man who told him to look at what the dictionary says about the words “black” and “white”. I don’t remember the exact definitions stated in the movie, but the Merriam-Webster dictionary gives definitions such as “thoroughly sinister or evil”, “marked by the occurrence of disaster” and  “characterized by hostility or angry discontent”, i.e. the word has negative connotations. White on the other hand is associated with light, purity and positive things. This, according to the character in Malcolm X, affects the self-image of Black people negatively. I agree.

Let’s look at the word “white” then. What connotations does that word have? These are some of the definitions mentioned in Merriam-Webster: “free from color”, “being a member of a group or race characterized by light pigmentation of the skin”, “marked by upright fairness”, “free from spot or blemish: as . . . free from moral impurity” and “not intended to cause harm”. I certainly see the attitude in the Alt Right that White people are inherently more moral or pure compared to other races, or as Common Filth criticizes the attitude “it’s alright as long as White people are doing it”. No person nor race is inherently moral, instead moral behaviour is something each individual must strive to maintain.

What I find most intriguing definition is the first one: free from color, i.e. colorless. The dictionary elaborates on “colorless” by these attributes: “dull or boring : not interesting”. First of all, I see this attitude in especially all of the White women who are obsessed with dating African or Arabic men, since White people, i.e. the woman herself and men of her race, are so dull, so she has to have some color in her life. Moreover, this definition of us as being colorless is like saying we are a Tabula Rasa, a blank slate. We have no identity, no history, but you’re welcome to draw or write anything on us and we will become that. Both the far left and the far right are guilty of this. The Cultural Marxists and Social Justice Warriors focus on the negative sides of our history and paint a picture of cruelty and bloodshed, whereas the Alt Right chooses to fill the slate with Roman high culture.

This is how the Left paints the White man.
This is how the Left paints the White man.
How the Right paints him.

Both views are cherry-picked instances of Western history and culture. It’s predicated on the idea that we are a White Tabula Rasa where anything goes. But this is not true. There is no White race. There are various different White nations.


No White race, but White nations

The English, for example, have many significant cultural accomplishments such as Shakespeare, John Milton, William Blake and Monty Python. The Germans and Greeks have several important philosophers. But we Finns don’t really anything comparable to those. It would just seem odd for me as a Finnish man to brag about my heritage as a White man for something an Englishman has done. We are not the same people. And although Finns lack many of the accomplishments of other European peoples I can take pride in the fact that we lack many of the negative aspects of those Europeans. We didn’t conquer half of the world by imperialism, and although the British empire had positive aspects to it, overall I think it’s one of the worst things that has happened in the world. Nor has Finland ever been as decadent as the Weimar republic was, or modern Germany is. Nor has Finland fallen from the height of European culture that Greece was over 2000 years to the 3rd world country it is now.

Although as this rough generalization I can describe myself as White and compare myself to other Europeans, yet it would be nonsensical to say that the different cultures and histories of Europe form a homogenous collective.

Even Adolf Hitler believed in the superiority of the Germanic “Aryans”. He was not there to uplift the White man, but the Germanic man. He considered Slavs to be subhuman, although nowadays the Anglo-Saxon White Nationalists seem to consider Slavs as part of their race. Hitler was not only proven wrong about his theories about the superiority of the Germanic man by failing to conquer Russia, and nowadays when you compare the Slavic eastern Europe to western and northern Germanic Europe, the Slavs come off as having enough common sense to take care of their own people, whereas Germans and Swedes only care about the rights of the “rapefugees” and the LGBT community.


What is the White race?

My question stands: what is the White race? What do the White Nationalists and Alt Right mean when they want to conserve their blessed White man? I haven’t seen them define what they mean by it. Perhaps someone somewhere has offered a definition, but I haven’t seen it. This isn’t some minor detail I’m nit-picking on, but the most important part of their identity politics, yet they don’t define their terms.

Greg Johnson, in his article on the White Genocide, defines the meaning of the word “genocide”, but not what he means by the White race. In another he states that race is not a social construct, which I agree with. He also points out that different races have observable differences, even among seemingly similar races such as Australian aborigines and Africans. Later on Johnson suggests there are five distinct races: “Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Congoid, Capoid, and Australoid”. The Caucasoid would be the White race then. If the Caucasoid are a single race, why do different ethnic groups within the alleged White/Caucasian race also bare physiological differences? The English, Italians, Finns and Russians are all part of the supposed White race, yet all of them have very different features. How are they all of the same race, yet observably different? I’ve heard Alt Right people mention on a few different occasion that Italians weren’t considered White a century or two ago. Why are they considered White now? Was there are racial shift, or is Whiteness just an arbitrary definition based on the whims and emotions of the speaker?

Wikipedia states that the United States Census Bureau defines White people as follows: “having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicated their race(s) as “White” or reported entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Arab, Moroccan, or Caucasian” and so is a wider group than European American.” According to this definition Arabs, Jews and Mexicans would be White. This isn’t what most Alt Right people believe, so this definition clearly does suffice to explain their definition of Whiteness. What is the fabled White race they are intent on protecting? I doubt even they know. The Alt Right aren’t Racial Realists, but Racial Idealists.



I see this recent push for international White Nationalism as just another attempt at replacing nationalism with internationalism or globalism. It has the same goal as Communism or Corpocratism. Only the method is different. If people fall for it, the result would be undermining national sovereignty and identity of each “White” nation in favour of some abstract unified cluster of various races that have some cultural ties to each other, although deep down they are different.

I have no problem with White Nationalists out there in America wanting to create a nation of their own in America, but I have problem with people who promote the agendas of the “small, rootless, international clique that is turning the people against each other, that does not want them to have peace. It is people who are at home both nowhere and everywhere, who do not have a soil where that have grown up, but who live in Berlin today, in Brussels tomorrow, in Paris the day after that, and then again in Prague, Vienna or London, and who feel at home everywhere. They are the only ones who can can be addressed as international elements, because they conduct their business everywhere.”



Black: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/black

White: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white

Colorless: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/colorless

White Genocide by Greg Johnson: http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/09/white-genocide/

Why Race is Not a “Social Construct”: http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/07/why-race-is-not-a-social-construct/

White Americans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Americans

Stuff I’ve written previously:

White Nationalism: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/10/18/white-nationalism/

White Genocide: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/05/13/white-genocide/



So you say the Nazis were racist and hated everything?

Already back in the early to mid-2000s before I was seriously into conspiracy theories and facts, questioned the Holocaust and all that, the common depiction of Nazi Germany perplexed me. Supposedly they were racist and could not stand other races, but how then Japan had been one of their closest allies? Didn’t the Germans notice the Japanese were… different? Moreover I saw a TV documentary about the Nazi expedition into Tibet where they were trying to uncover traces of the alleged Aryan heritage. Back then I thought Tibet was so cool and mysterious, which raised my interest in the Nazis as well. If the Nazis hated all the other races, or thought them inherently inferior and repugnant, why would they bother to travel all the way to Tibet to look for evidence of their ancestry? The Nazi interest in Asia did not really fit the main stream narrative.

Moreover, I saw a DVD in a supermarket called The Occult History of the Third Reich. I was fascinated by it, and uncharacteristically I bought it although it wasn’t on sale. It was probably the first DVD I bought myself. When I watched it, I found it even more fascinating. The Nazis seemed to believe in something mysterious, something unknown and worth discovering. Compared to the main stream Western beliefs of both dogmatic Christianity and materialistic capitalism, the Nazi religion seemed more vibrant and alive.

I saw the documentary during the height of the War on Terror, in 2004-2005, and felt particularly trapped by the materialistic dogma of capitalism. As if the way we did things was the inherently best way of handling things, and there was no room for change or improvement. The Nazi beliefs hinted that they thought differently from the dogma of the West as well. It wasn’t all written in stone.

Back then, the Second World War looked like it was a conflict between the Old World Order of the Anglo-American Empire + France, and the Axis States that wanted to both bring something new and to revitalize something ancient. Although in my lifetime, decades after the war, the Axis States have been presented as intolerant, regressive and violent, I think that suits the Allies better. Back then I couldn’t imagine Britain, for instance, allying itself in an equal manner with a non-European nation, the way Germany did with Japan. The only way Britain would co-operate with non-Europeans is by conquering them into their empire, like India or Hong Kong. As far as I know, the Nazi expedition to Tibet was peaceful. The British expedition to Tibet in 1903-1904 wasn’t.

That was more or less my image of WWII ten about ten years ago, although I didn’t really dare to make too much of it, or bring the train of thought to its logical conclusion. So I didn’t look further until much later.

Modern media has made great effort to make people associate Hitler and the Nazis in a Pavlovian manner with hate and racism. However, if you bother to look, that’s not the whole story.

First let’s a couple of examples of anti-Nazi propaganda. This is an infamous clip from the Captain Planet cartoon with Hitler. Some bad guys apparently go back in time to sell a nuclear bomb to Hitler. When the superhero Captain Planet comes to save the day the mere presence of Hitler supposedly exudes such hate that it makes Captain Planet uncomfortable.

Who here really radiates hatred, Hitler, or the propagandists who made the cartoon? The same as contemporary Cultural Marxists who claim that everyone else is full of hate, the Cultural Marxists are the one’s who are only motivated by hate.

Apparenty this sort of propaganda originated already when Hitler was alive. There’s the infamous Jesse Owens affair. He was a black athlete who won a gold medal in the Olympics in Germany. According to the media Hitler snubbed him, because he’s black. This was a lie, and in fact Hitler congratulated him and shook his hand.

Modern research has also shown that Nazi Germany’s military was very multicultural. There were plenty of Jews, blacks, and Arabic Muslims who were in the military. Apparently the Germans trusted them enough to give them weapons.

In conclusion, like I’ve said before, the whole image of Nazis that we are presented by the main stream is mostly a fabrication. It is as real as the Captain Planet cartoon. This does not, of course, imply that the Nazis were necessary the good guys. History is not as black and white as a cartoon. But the Allies certainly weren’t fighting for any morally or spiritually lofty goals either.

P. S.

The Chinese (both nationalists and communists) were allied with the Allies, but that was mainly because they fought against Japanese, which I would say is mainly due an old ethnic conflict between the two countries.


1938–39 German expedition to Tibet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938%E2%80%9339_German_expedition_to_Tibet

The Occult History of the Third Reich ! The Enigma of the Swastika: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lOSnRu9tJo&list=PLcIwDLxDgkQkdw0WL-h-YKRLhGLjRXO-L

British expedition to Tibet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_expedition_to_Tibet#The_massacre_of_Chumik_Shenko

Hitler in Captain Planet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0MVuWDc5RQ

Hitler visists Oprah: http://www.tomatobubble.com/id412.html

As Many As 150,000 Jews
Served In Hitler’s Military: http://www.rense.com/general43/jewserved.htm

Black Nazis II!: Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler’s Armed Forces: The Unbiased History: http://www.amazon.com/Black-Nazis-II-Minorities-Foreigners/dp/1453812695

The Muslims who fought with the Nazis: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4645922,00.html

Hellstorm- Exposing the Real Genocide of Nazi Germany: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y58cNcrFjDw

Dirty Japs: http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=34006

The smiling Neonazi Ramzpaul in a nutshell: “I wish the Nazis had won the war”

This is the title of a Ramzpaul video on Youtube uploaded by a user called Trace Brady. It’s both funny and scary in its insanity and inaccuracy. The original video by Ramzpaul is titled My Tram Experience – British Woman Arrested. Trace Brady merely uploaded Ramzpaul’s video a second time with a new title and lower video quality.

Ramzpaul is an American nationalist who is usually quite witty and insightful, and generally seems like a decent guy. His videos are “Mostly satire that pokes fun at the establishment.”

Trace Brady’s video, and the only video he’s uploaded, has the following comment in the description section:

The smiling Neonazi Ramzpaul gives unwavering support for Hitler. Notice the striking similarity in looks to “Dr” David Duke…the shredded wheat wig and the effeminate Kermit the Frog voice !

at 2:41, his unwavering support for Nazis is evident

The “unwavering support for Nazis” Brady mentions is Ramzpaul’s comment on the Firebombing of Dresden and mention Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse 5 . Ramzpaul makes no mention of the word Nazi or Hitler in the video. He simply states that the Firebombing of Dresden was a massacre perpetrated by the Allies. This apparently is equivalent to supporting Hitler.

This is a great example of the insane world that most Cultural Marxists live in. They don’t care about the facts, except maybe the rare occasions when they happen to co-inside with their beliefs. But as Ramzpaul expresses concern for murdering German civilians he must be pro-Nazi since World War II was a black and white conflict where the good guys won. You cannot question that or point out that both sides committed brutal acts of violence.

Of course this isn’t merely about one Ramzpaul video, but of what he stands for in general. He’s a nationalist, and believes that all nations should have a right to determination. Cultural Marxists oppose self-determination vehemently, and especially the self-determination of European white peoples.

This video is how the imp-like Cultural Marxists reveal their inability to look at reality as it is instead of how they wish it was. They must invent attributes for people that they don’t have, and resort to ad hominem name-calling, i.e. effeminate Kermit the Frog voice, instead of discussing any of the points that Ramzpaul brought out in his video. I find this sort of insanity quite unsettling. I can only wonder if Trace Brady really believes what he is saying or it’s merely some alphabet agency shill trying to discredit real human beings saying something relevant.



Trace Brady’s video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUenHwhWRWA

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIVdR0RAo74

Blood Magic

I don’t think oil consists (merely) of dead dinosaurs and whatnot. I heard years ago also the claim that oil is abiotic, i.e. not made of dead biomatter.  When I heard it, I found the idea fascinating and at least got me to think of oil in a new way. I cannot say whether the abiotic oil theorists are right or not, but eventually it lead me to the idea that oil is the blood of the earth. I have no evidence for this, no science to back it up. The only support I have this that I’ve noticed some other people have reached the same conclusion independently. The earth is a living organism and therefore needs blood to circulate, although I’ve no idea whether oil circulates or not. I would not trust main stream science or oil companies to tell me how oil behaves in it’s natural environment either. It probably doesn’t circulate according to the Consensus.

If indeed oil is the blood of the earth, sucking it out of the earth each day to nourish our machines is vampirism; or rather using the blood to animate our contraptions is blood magic. Our whole society, our way of life is based on vampirism and blood magic. Moreover roads made of asphalt are built all over the land. And asphalt is made of oil. It’s as if drawing a bloody pentagram in stereotypical Satanic ritual to sacrifice something or cast a spell. We draw these sigils all over the earth. The earth does not like asphalt. Where-ever there is asphalt the earth tries to destroy it. Leave it there for a year or two and cracks will appear, plants will force themselves through the cracks to reclaim the land. However mankind, serving the oil vampires, destroys the plants and spreads more asphalt on it. Nothing grows on asphalt. Seeds sometimes fall on it and wither.

Hitler wanted to build great motorways all over Europe, even though supposedly the scheme originated before he came to power. They want to build highways all the way from Canada to Mexico through USA (or maybe they’ve done it already). In Who Framed Roger Rabbit? the bad guy judge Doom also wanted to dismantle Toon Town in order to build vast motorways. I rest my case.