Tag Archives: hoax

Is this the organization that has contrived the terror attacks in Europe?

The Bureau of False Flags might have been found, although it seems more like a private corporation than a governmental bureau. In his interview with SGT Report Ole Dammegard mentioned a website he found: Crisis Solutions, or Crisis Cloud. This organization seems to be involved in staging crisis simulations.

 

Can it really be this obvious? “The clue is in the name”. The logo sort of looks like 666 and tentacles like Ole Dammegard pointed out.

 

The Company

The website of Crisis Solutions says they are “Europe’s leading crisis simulation company” and they’ve been doing this since 2000. Their managing director is Richard Whitby. According to his LinkedIn he’s been in that role since 2003. Whitby brag’s in his message on the website that:

“Crisis Solutions delivered the very first ‘Market-Wide Exercise’, involving more than 100 organisations and thousands of participants in a day-long simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector. We were also a key part of the UK Government’s preparations to provide resilience against cyber attacks during the London Olympics.”

Could this “simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector refer to the 7/7 attack in London in 2005?

One interesting point is that Crisis Solutions was started already in 2000, that was before 9/11. I guess they had the lobes for business or something since they predicted that terrorism and counter-terrorism will be big business in the years to follow.

 

What They Do

Here’s a bit more on what they do:

“Crisis Solutions specialises in getting organisations crisis ready: we set about this by running crisis simulation exercises and crisis workshops.”

“We plan and deploy crisis simulation exercises that feel REAL.”

They have also developed a “secure exercise web portal” called Crisis Cloud: “This includes simulated news videos, news stores [sic] that are updated as the exercise progresses, together with social media activity and interactive web pages where you can post internal and external statements.”

They make crisis exercises that are believable, and they have a computer program, Crisis Cloud, that I suppose mimicks real media and social media in reporting on the development of the situation. Now what I’m thinking is whether sometimes, or all times, this simulated media environment is actually connected to the real world? In other words, simulated terrorist attacks are reported in simulated media, but are shown to the public as if it was real. That is a possibility.

Another section “CRISIS CLOUD – YOUR SCENARIO, OUR REALISM” states the following:

“Crisis Cloud is tailored to your specific exercise requirements, but a typical example will include:

  • News stories based on the scenario. Stories are updated as the crisis exercise progresses
  • News videos to bring the immediacy of media scrutiny
  • Client pages for internal and external statements
  • A Twitter inspired social media page that is accessible to players and updated in real time”

They admit they make fake news based on their fake scenarios. They also have fake social media accounts doing this. The question then, once again is, do they pass off these fake stories to the general public as real news, or are they truly confined to the people involved with the simulation?

 

“Fighting” Terrorism

There’s a “Current Threats” section on the website. One of the pages is about terrorism. It says the following:

“Britain is currently on its second highest alert level of ‘severe’, as a terrorist attack is considered highly likely. This is hardly surprising given the recent devastating terrorist attacks on mainland Europe.

On 7th January 2015 two armed men forced their way into the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo where they killed 12 and injured 11 others.

Then on the 13th November 2015 Paris was subjected to a series of coordinated terrorist attacks with suicide bomb outside the Stade de France, several shootings, and a suicide bombing, at cafés and restaurants, and the mass shooting at a rock concert in the Bataclan theatre. 130 people were killed; 89 at the Bataclan theatre, and another 368 injured.

On the morning of 22 March 2016, three coordinated suicide bombings occurred in Belgium, killing 32 members of the public and three terrorists, and injuring more than 300.”

It appears as if it was written back in 2016, or possibly early 2017, since it mentions terror attacks in France and Belgium, but merely suggests at the possibility of such attacks in Britain. The people who wrote this must be Nostradamus, since they guessed correctly that there will be terror attacks in Britain. Or alternatively, I’m wondering if this is an indirect way of admitting/bragging that Crisis Solutions orchestrated these attacks/simulations/hoaxes, and the reference to Britain being on high security alert is an advert that they will strike there next?

There’s one section on the website saying how social media is an important part of crisis management: “Social media is the perfect platform to disseminate messages to as wide an audience as possible.”

They also says that “Social media, digital media, the new media, call it what you will, has the unique ability to break and make stories.” Clearly this company is interested in creating believable stories, i.e. and not so interested in helping security services strengthen themselves to prevent further crises.

 

What I think about it

There’s probably more interesting tidbits on the website to go into, but I want to discuss the implications of this website. Is it real, a red herring, or a hoax? At least I’m pretty sure it’s not just a hoax by a troll. The company seems real, the LinkedIn account of the manager seems real, and I found their webpage back in Wayback Machine going back to 2001. The website appears to have existed over 15 years.

Then again, when you look at the website it seems a bit too obvious that Crisis Solutions is all about managing false flags and crisis actors. This might be some sort of red herring to direct conspiracy researchers away from the truth. For all I know the website was made a month ago, and all of the alleged history of the company, including the Wayback Machine snapshots and LinkedIn profile have been faked. People who are capable to managing false flags and hoaxes across the world would surely be capable of faking the history of such a company.

But maybe it is real. If Crisis Solutions is behind manufactoring false flags, then maybe the globalist conspirators behind it don’t really care should a handful of conspiracy nuts know about it. After all, what can we do about it? That’s the heart of the question: what can we do with this information? Crisis Solutions exists, can we somehow prove it has orchestrated false flags in the past? Can we somehow force the police to investigate the company? Can we expose them somehow? I don’t know if there is anything we can do, but maybe someone else has a better idea.

 

Links:

Ole Dammegard with SGT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNntN-RbAfw

Crisis Solutions: http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Richard Whitby LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-whitby-185322b/?ppe=1

Crisis Solutions on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20170601000000*/http://www.crisis-solutions.com

The Manchester Terrorist Bombing and Eric Schiffer

I already mentioned Eric Schiffer in my first article on the Manchester terrorist attack after an Ariana Grande concert. I am now even more convinced that the attack was a false flag or a hoax, since I’ve seen some very obvious crisis actor videos, or Disingenuous Relatives of Victims. I’ll probably write about that at a later date, but now I’ll focus on a person who might be somehow involved in the false flag: Eric Schiffer.

 

Schiffer / Grande Connection

A couple of days after the attack, Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News about the attack. His role in the interview was that of a “crisis management expert”. As far as I know Eric Schiffer was not anywhere near the attack site, nor is he even British. He does, however, state in the interview that he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.”

Ariana Grande has described her mother as follows: “My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.” This was mentioned in an Illuminati Watcher article. Ariana’s mother is Joan Grande. Based on LinkedIn, the company seems to be HMC Communiations. Assuming that’s the correct Joan Grande. There’s no profile picture, and very little information about her.

 

Eric gets around

Eric Schiffer seems to have his finger in many pies. His own website says he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants.” His LinkedIn profile also states he is the chairman of DigitalMarketing.com.

He has also been interviewed many times by various media organizations, so he seems to be well-connected among the elite.  In 2014 he was interviewed by Newsmax TV as an economist.  In 2016 he was a “tech expert” in a CGTN America clip. There are dozens of his interviews on Youtube.

Schiffer has been quoted by Salon about his statement on Donald Trump’s alleged anti-Semitic ties. In 2015 he wrote an article on The Washington Times how people shouldn’t be too politically correct when talking about Islamic terrorism. He was quoted by Forbes in connection to the controversy that PewDiePie is allegedly a Nazi. He is involved with a charity called “The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Annual Gala”. I’m not sure if Schiffer himself is a Jew, but his girlfriend Dr. Jenn Mann is.

These are just a few examples of how Eric Schiffer seems to be well-respected and connected in global elite, although I hadn’t heard about him before. Perhaps Americans know him better though.

 

Eric’s Companies

Now I’ll take a look at the companies Schiffer is involved with. Patriarch Organization or Patriarch Equity sounds like a sinister umbrella organization from a B-movie. And as far as I know they are, since I didn’t find much information about what they actually do, and with whom they are connected. They apparently control businesses in the digital industry and develop them somehow. I don’t know which businesses they have “helped”.

Digital Marketing (DM) sounds a less ominous version of Patriarch. They seem to be involved with, as the name suggests, marketing in digital media. The client list of the company is interesting though. It has some big names: Activision, Du Pont, Intel, Microsoft, Boeing, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Fox and you can see the rest below.

 

I just realized Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News and Fox is a client of his company. Isn’t that sort of a conflict of interest?

Anyway, something tells DM isn’t just helping faceless corporations make more money, but is involved in manipulating people’s opinions on a deeper level.

 

Reputation Management

Speaking of manipulating people’s opinions, let’s check out Reputation Management Consultants (RMC). This is where it gets good. It is as the name suggests involved in salvaging people’s reputations.

 

This includes suppression of information: “RMC offers much more than a fast suppression of negative search listings. Our compelling, quality content will be created and placed with your branding in mind.”

This is as it sounds: if search engines keep offering negative opinions on you, RMC will somehow manipulate the results to make you seem better.

 

They help “high-profile businesses and individuals”, such as politicians, high profile business owners, multinational corporations and local not-for-profit organizations.

 

They suppress negative views of their client by promoting existing press releases, or they write their own propaganda pieces to make you look good. They also create “Social Network profiles” to help their client. Sounds like paid shills to me.

 

They allege to be a successfull business, and work with “the wealthiest men and women in the world and high profile invididuals”. I wonder who exactly has been their client? Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, all of them?

 

I don’t know if all of this is legal, but sounds morally questionable as hell. You basically pay this corporation to lie for you across the internet and media. Not to mention that Eric Schiffer is also connected to Digital Marketing that works with defense contractors like Du Pont and Boeing, i.e. the military-industrial complex. Therefore I wouldn’t be suprised if the online shills you see, especially after false flags like the Manchester bombing, are controlled by RMC. I also suspect Eric Schiffer, or one of his companies, were somehow involved with the Manchester attack, or alleged attack. Perhaps they hire or control crisis actors as well. I cannot prove anything, yet. So this is still just my hunch.

That’s all I have now. I should probably check out Joan Grande’s company, HMC Communications, and verify that this Joan is actually Ariana Grande’s mother. I’m not very good at researching the backgrounds and connections of corporations, or their money trails, so I hope if someone else can do deeper research on Patriarch especially.

 

Links:

Ariana Grande speaks out on UK deadly blast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

Joan Grande: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joan-grande-a2538510/

Eric Schiffer: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

Eric Schiffer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ericschiffer/

Newsmax TV interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

Damage control: How does Donald Trump convince Americans he’s not an anti-Semite when he’s surrounded by them?: http://www.salon.com/2017/03/19/damage-control-how-does-donald-trump-convince-americans-hes-not-an-anti-semite-when-hes-surrounded-by-them/

Say no to walking on eggshells: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/21/eric-schiffer-say-no-walking-eggshells/

Here’s Why PewDiePie Will Still Earn Millions, Even After Anti-Semitic Videos: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maddieberg/2017/02/16/heres-why-pewdiepie-will-still-earn-millions-even-after-anti-semitic-videos/#1884bc024e68

Philanthropist and Socialite Eric Schiffer, Attends The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Gala Hosted by Larry King: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/01/prweb337818.htm

Patriarch: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

Digital Marketing: http://digitalmarketing.com/

Reputation Management Consultants: https://www.reputationmanagementconsultants.com

Questionable Details in the Manchester Attack

I’ve been looking more into the Manchester terrorist attack that occured during or after an Ariana Grande concert on Monday. It increasingly seems like a hoax or a drill rather than an actual terrorist attack.

 

Balloon Pop

Apparently someone tweeted from the arena just after the alleged explosion that they heard a big balloon pop, but everyone else freaked out because of it.

 

Masonic Symbolism

I saw someone on the internet point out that one of the pictures supposedly portraying one of the survivors resembles a hoodwinker Freemason. The clothes are similar, as are the pant-legs.

 

Manchester Arena Note

Yesterday there was a note on the Manchester Arena website confirming that there was an “incident”:

“We can confirm there was an incident as people were leaving the Ariana Grande show last night.

The incident took place outside the venue in a public place.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims.

Please follow @gmpolice on Twitter for all further updates.”

 

I didn’t see this note anymore on their website, so I’m glad I saved it yesterday. I find the wording curious: “We can confirm there was an incident”. It sort of suggests that there was uncertainty whether or not the there was an “incident”. Why call it incident, and not an attack, explosion or something clearer?

Another interesting bit is how they state that the “incident took place outside the venue in a public place”. It sounds rather legalize. It happened in a public place so we are no culpable in way. Also I thought the alleged explosion happened at the ticket office, so wouldn’t it still technically be in the arena, and not a public place?

 

Professional Photographer at the Scene

The photographer who took most of the pictures of the aftermath of the bombing is Joel Goodman. He is a professional photographer and a suspicious character.

These staged looking pictures were taken by him, as was the picture above showing the man dressed in white with leg injuries.

 

Our friend Joel has also tweeted his support for Comet Ping Pong in the past. I wonder if he’s friends with Alefantis?

 

Living Dead Girl

Youtuber Lift the Veil noticed something interesting. One girl, Gerogina Callander,  who was allegedly killed in the attack looks very much like a survivor from the event, Jessica.

The girl on the left is Georgina, who allegedly died, and Jessica is on the right. They look very similar, especially on Lift the Veil’s video. On this screenshot they don’t look as alike, because the lighting and the facial expressions on the girls are different, so I recommend watching the video.

 

But wait, there’s more. Another Youtuber, Russianvids, made a rebuttal to this video. He says the two girls look similar on purpose, but they are actually two different girls. Russianvids suggests that this done to discredit conspiracy researchers who will eventually catch on with this similarily and claim they are the same, but after that someone can prove they are two different girls. This would discredit anyone who says this was false flag or a hoax attack. I find Russianvids’ argument compelling.

Moreover, Russianvids point out that both girls, Georgina and Jessica had met Ariana Grande a couple of years ago and took a picture with her. This was apparently at the same event, since Ariana Grande seems to be wearing the same clothes in both pictures with the girls. There’s no way this is a coincidence.

Georgina and Ariana
Jessica and Ariana with a third chick

 

That’s not all. Day before the concert, Georgina had said on her Twitter account: “Kill me kill me kill me please tell me they are coming to manchester tomorrow”. She was probably talking about Ariana and her band when she said “they”. Yet if she was going to the concert, wouldn’t she have a ticket and she should know they were coming to Manchester. Then again I don’t really understand teen girl logic. However, this sounds more like some magical spell or ritual thingy that she’s saying “kill me” and then she is allegedly killed.

One last thing is to refer to Lift the Veil’s video. In it two girls, Jessica and her friend are being interviewed. Jessica’s friend sounds like a lousy actor and does not sound at all like she underwent a life threatening situation recently. Jessica is at least convincing in her performance that she is grieving, but she does not seem to be shedding tears.

 

The Announcement

There is a video that someone apparently took with their cellphone as they were leaving the concert arena. There is an announcent in the PA that goes as follows: “Ladies and gentlemen, please take your time. There’s no need to [unclear words] (punt shot?). There’s no problems here. Just take your time and exit the building.”

This is supposedly after the explosion. “No problems here”? I can understand they are trying to make the crowd remain calm, but this doesn’t sound like there has been a serious explosion/ terrorist attack. It sounds more like a drill.

This clip can be seen on another of Lift the Veil’s videos around 35:18.

 

Concertgoers in Confusion

I found a little clip interviewing a few different survivors of this horrendous attack. There’s girl being interviewed around 0:10. She says: “It was just a real loud bang. We have no idea what it were, but… Everyone just started running. We didn’t think anything of it, but then everyone was screaming at us to run so…”

Then after that one young man is being interviewed with a friend next to him. He says they heard the bang too, but according to him people were saying it was a speaker. Then people “chilled out”. As they went to the exit, he says there was blood across the floor and the ran. As he starts talking about the blood he develops a smile on his face. After that he says they went outside and there was girl bleeding .

The girl seems like she is genuine. That she was actually at the concert, heard a loud bang and then followed the crowd when they ran away. From this, I get the impression that possible some of the people in the audience might have been sort of agents provocateur, or agents panicateur. Their purpose was to cause panic after the bang.

The young with his calm demeanor and smile does not seem genuine. I think he is lying, although the smile could result from nervousness and incredulity. He might have simply been planning to go a concert and have fun, and not expect to see any people bleeding as it’s something you usually see only in the movies. However, I don’t find him credible. I just think he is a bad actor.

 

I am not saying anything definite yet, but this whole thing seems contrived. So far it seems like another false flag or a hoax, like we’ve seen in the past. I’ve also seen plenty of shills in Youtube comment sections and internet forums trying to dissuade people from investigating this, and trying to convince you it wasn’t certainly a false flag.

 

Links:

Manchester Arena: http://www.manchester-arena.com/

Manchester Bombing False Flag – Dead Victim is Alive!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-ufj7swnHc&t=1s

Response Video To “Lift The Veil” Comparison Of Georgina vs. Jessica – 100% Predictive Programming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNGHWJFaHQo

Manchester Bombing False Flag | Another Hoax in the UK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpLI8WNlVt8

Manchester terror attack: Concertgoers describe hearing loud bang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xeuy6cp6CU

 

 

 

 

The Infamous NASA Tether Incident with UFOs

Anyone who has watched several videos on the UFO phenomenon has probably seen the NASA STS-75 tether experiment video with weird floating things around a stick (allegedly) in space. UFO researchers usually describe the floating things as UFOs. The official explanation, apparently, is that they are debris illuminated by the sun. I don’t believe in either explanation.

 

Back when I saw the video, 10 years ago or so, I didn’t know what to think of it. The “UFOs” looked more like jellyfish, amoebas, or at least something organic, whereas as my preconception was if they were UFOs they should be round, metallic flying saucers. The whole video confused me. Back then me, and many other conspiracy minded people, expected NASA to have a Secret Space Program of some sort, and possibly be hiding an extraterrestrial presence.

Nowadays, myself, and many others (which is a good reason to remain skeptical of this concept as well), question whether NASA really ever had anything to do with space exploration, except maybe faking the notion that they really do send astronauts and probes out into space. There are also some videos suggesting that some, if not all, of the footage supposedly showing astronauts in space were actually filmed underwater. With this in mind, the tether experiment starts to make more sense.

 

The Official Story

Before I explain what I think is going on in the video, I’m going to go over some official facts about the tether experiment. The STS-75 mission was conducted between February and March of 1996. The primary objective was to put a Tethered Satellite System into orbit and attach a tether, or a cable, to it. The more specific objectives were according NASA’s website:

“[C]haracterize the current-voltage response of the TSS-orbiter system, characterize the satellites high-voltage sheath structure and current collection process, demonstrate electric power generation, verify tether control laws and basic tether dynamics, demonstrate the effect of neutral gas on the plasma sheath and current collection, characterize the TSS radio frequency and plasma wave emissions and characterize the TSS dynamic-electrodynamic coupling.”

On top of that they also flew a “Microgravity Payload (USMP3-)designed to investigate materials science and condensed matter physics.” I don’t really know what all of these things mean. I’m no astrophysicist. I also don’t know if the experiment actually occurred or not, and whether it was a complete hoax or not.

Wikipedia and NASA articles do not even mention the infamous UFO footage. Instead I had to go to RationalWiki to read what the official explanation for the UFOs is. It goes as follows:

“NASA mission video recordings of the tether experiment show what appear to be a number of bright objects swirling around the tether. Astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the bright spots seen near the tether were ‘a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us’ that was illuminated by the sun.”

The debris does look alive and somewhat autonomous, and not like inanimate debris, to me. But what do I know.

 

Underwater UFOs

Now that we got the official story out of the way, I can discuss what I think is going on in the video. I am talking about the video now. I don’t know whether the actual STS-75 experiment occurred or not. Perhaps the experiment did take place, but the video was hoaxed for whatever reason.

Anyway, I already mentioned that the video looks like there are amoebas or other organic lifeforms in it. I think the video was filmed underwater. I have two different scenarios on it. How the “debris” or the “UFOs” move looks like they are alive to me. One scenario is that the footage was actually filmed up there in what is usually called space, but instead of an empty void up there, there is actually water up there as the Bible suggests. If there is water up there, clearly NASA isn’t telling everything about it, so there might be some sort of nautical lifeforms up there as well.

The second, and more likely, scenario is that the footage was filmed in a bucket full of water under a microscope. There tether in the picture is not actually some huge thing out in space, but a small needle in a pool of water. With a microscope shooting at it, it’s supposed to look big. The “UFOs” are actually some sort of microbial lifeforms that were either deliberately or accidentally released into the water. Perhaps NASA wanted to create this UFO controversy over the video for some reason, or a whistleblower wanted to sabotage the fake video.

Now that I look at the footage with new eyes, it looks like it’s underwater. I probably would not associate the video with outer space unless I had been told it.

 

Sex in Space

The Wikipedia article does not mention the alleged UFOs, but it does mention another interesting tidbit: an allegedly fraudulent NASA document that claimed STS-75 was studying sex in microgravity. Apparently “Document 12-571-3570” was published on a Usenet newsgroup in November 28, 1989. It claimed that:

“[A]stronauts aboard space shuttle mission STS-75 performed a variety of sex acts to determine which positions are most effective in zero gravity. The document goes on to report that of the 10 positions tested, six required the use of a belt and an inflatable tunnel, while four were contingent on hanging on. The document also discusses a video record of the 10 one-hour sessions in the lower deck of the shuttle, and notes that the subjects added their own personal footnotes to help scientists.”

This document was published in 1989, seven years before the “real” STS-75 tether experiment. I don’t know if these claims of sex in space were just a joke, or other kind of hoax, or if there is any truth behind it. I don’t even know whether NASA, or any other human agency, has ever gone into space or not. If all the claims of going to space are false, then claims of studying sex in space would be false too. However, I don’t find Wikipedia’s logic for debunking the document very convincing: “The real STS-75 mission occurred in 1996, 7 years after the text was published, and consisted of an all-male crew, clearly indicating that the document is a hoax.”

I don’t think seven male astronauts, many of whom are probably Freemasons or other Luciferians occultists, having sex with each other is a far-out concept. Perhaps the goal of NASA is to boldly sodomize where no-man has sodomized before. Maybe the Microgravity Payload aboard the shuttle referred to microgravity cumload.

 

Conclusion

Whatever the truth behind the “sex in space” document is, I don’t find either of the usual explanations on the tether video plausible. I don’t think the pulsating things are spaceships, nor do I think they are merely debris. I think the whole thing was filmed underwater for whatever reason.

 

EDIT: I found a Youtube video saying similar things about the tether video. They beat me to it by a week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5buFZr5huI

 

Links:

STS-75: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-75

STS-75: https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-75/mission-sts-75.html

STS-75 incident: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/STS-75_incident

Document 12-571-3570: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_12-571-3570

The tether incident: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XDgDYDDhyA

 

President Trump talks with Astronauts aboard the International Space Station

I just finished watching a discussion between Donald Trump, his daughter Ivanka and some astronauts, two of whom were allegedly aboard the International Space Station (ISS). It’s just that I don’t think the ISS exists, or if it does the supposed videos showing astronauts aboard it are fake, if nothing else. There are several videos on Youtube showing the dubious nature of the videos allegedly shot aboard the space station, and I recommend taking a look at them if the claim that the ISS is a hoax seems far-fetched to you.

 

Trump and Space

Trump must be in on the scam if he is doing an interview with these hoaxters. I don’t think he’s dumb enough to fall for it. Ever since Trump won the election there have been articles saying he will strengthen the space program by sending people to Mars, Jupiter’s moon Europa or where-ever. Peter Thiel has supposedly been pushing Trump to use private space companies. Trump has been working with SpaceX’s Elon Musk as well. Now he was chatting with astronauts “out in space” and saying he wants to put man on Mars.

A couple of months ago Trump signed two laws to promote women going into STEM fields and NASA. Many people criticized him for that, since he is caving into the pressure by feminists. Sure, it would have been nice to hear Trump tell them to go screw themselves, but I don’t think it’s going to make a big difference who goes to NASA to perpetuate their lies, since the agency has little to do with any science anyway. In fact, I welcome the dumb feminists taking over NASA, perhaps they would accidentally reveal some of the frauds that NASA has been perpetrating over the years. Trump’s interview with two astronauts allegedly aboard the ISS referred to the signing of these laws as well.

 

The Interview

The interview though was the usual stuff from the ISS, not credible at all. The astronauts, Peggy Whitson and Jack Fischer, and  are laughing and smiling like they’re in an amusement park, instead of in the most hostile environment known to man. This is how astronauts behave in pretty much every video clip I’ve seen from the ISS. They do not feel at all like professionals doing a dangerous job. They are lousy actors who cannot stop smiling, or that they know how feeble the lie is, so they try to lull the audience into a soft, child-like state by their overly friendly antics.

Peggy Whitson had supposedly broken some records and there’s even a banner in the background saying: “Congrats Peggy!! New U.S. High-Time Space Ninja”. They’re not even trying to be serious. Jack Fischer keeps using the word “amazing” to fool the audience into thinking it is so. No, it’s not amazing. It’s badly done boring sci-fi.

 

Conclusion

I’m not quite sure what the underlying agenda with pushing these fake space programs is. Maybe Trump really believes in it, or the people in his cabinet do, and are pushing it for that reason. Maybe it’s just expensive bread and circuses for the masses. Or maybe there is a bigger agenda behind it all. They could be laying the groundwork for an even greater deception.

Or, as wild card alternative, maybe Trump is playing 4D chess and is drawing attention to NASA in order to make people first start following them intently, and then he sets them up to fail and reveal their false nature. I still don’t what Trump’s agenda, or who his masters are. I don’t think he’s just another Neo-Con. I do think he represents change, but I don’t quite know change to what direction.

I’ve had this analogy in my head for a while about Trump, so I might as well share it. He was memed to be the God-Emperor from the fictional Warhammer 40,000 universe by people who worship a chaotic frog god, Kek. In the Warhammer universe there are four different evil chaos gods: Khorne, god of blood and war, Nurgle, the god of disease, Slaanesh, the god of debauchery, and Tzeentch, the god of magic and change. Let’s say that George W. Bush represented Khorne as he started a bunch of wars. Obama then might represent both Nurgle and Slaanesh as he brought weakness, sickness and hedonism to his country and the world. Trump then could be a herald of Tzeentch. Meme magics have been allegedly at work for a long time now, and Trump might actually change some things, although not necessarily for the better or for worse.

Another, a more optimistic way to see Trump, if we don’t want to discard the notion that he might be the next King Cyrus, a profane man who God used to do good, is that regardless of what Trump’s intentions are, he might be used by benevolent forces. Let’s take a pseudo-biblical analogy this time. Satan is the ruler of the world, but God wants to change this. There are lesser demons as well who want to change it, since they hate Satan and envy his position. They want to rule the earth instead of Satan. God then gives a lesser demon a slight push or encouragement to fight Satan, and in the end both Satan and the lesser demon end up destroying each other, and freeing the world from their demonic grasp. Perhaps Trump is a puppet of such a lesser demon.

 

Links:

President Trump Has a Video Conference with NASA Astronauts Aboard the International Space Station: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_D4i3CLNqU

Peter Thiel is pushing Donald Trump to use private space companies at NASA: https://qz.com/869105/peter-thiel-is-pushing-donald-trump-use-private-space-companies-like-spacex-at-nasa/

Elon Musk Is Sticking With Trump For SpaceX Contracts: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elon-musk-is-sticking-with-trump-for-spacex-contracts_us_58b5b12ce4b0658fc20f9a72

Trump signs laws to promote women in STEM: https://www.cnet.com/news/trump-women-in-stem-tech-laws/

Cleveland Facebook Killer Claptrap

A 37-year old man, Steve Stephens, is allegedly going around Cleveland, Ohio, killing people and he even uploaded a video of it on Facebook. The police still haven’t caught him. I find this story unbelievable for several reasons.

First of all, in the contemporary West surveillance is everywhere. There are CCTV cameras, they can locate your cellphone and who knows what they can do to turn your own devices against you. Yet the police cannot find a man who advertised his crimes on Facebook. The ever-present surveillance never seems to help with any kind of terrorism or other extremely violent crimes. Curious, isn’t it?

I don’t think the police want to find him. This could be for various reasons. One is that the perpetrator is Black, and the liberal establishment does not want to demonize Blacks, so they aren’t really trying. I don’t think this is the case, but it’s possible. Another reason might that the authorities want to cause havoc for whatever reason, such as invoking martial law in Cleveland.

Then again, I’m not convinced he has actually killed anyone. If there have been these 14 murders Stephens alludes to, he may be a (willing?) patsy, or maybe no-one died. There’s a video where Stephens appears to be driving, and very calmly he says he just snapped and killed some people. I think he’s acting. At some point he appears to even be looking at his dashboard as if reading his lines. I don’t find his performance credible at all. Moreover, he is holding a phone he is talking to with one hand, and he is supposedly holding another phone with the other and he is driving with the same hand. It’s not impossible to do so, I suppose, but I don’t find it credible either.

It seems most likely that this event is going to be used to push for some sort of agenda. Might be gun control, heavier surveillance such as microchipping of cars or people, or something else. There have been a few “trucks of peace” in Europe in recent months, and a car is involved here as well as the cops supposedly cannot find it, so maybe the globalists are going to push for some sort of “smart” cars that can be tracked and remote-controlled somehow to prevent terrorism and other crimes. But that is just speculation.

I didn’t go looking into this event assuming it’s some sort of false flag or a hoax. I honestly took it at face value when I heard there’s some Black guy killing people and uploading it on Facebook. However, today when I heard that the police still haven’t caught him it raised a red flag. Then I saw the video of Stephens admitting to killing 13, and planning to kill another person, I just found it fake. I’m really beginning to think I was correct when I said that there is some sort of Bureau of False Flags a month ago, which is why we keep getting these half-assed hoaxes and false flags. They’ve got job to do, and gotta fill that quota of at least one event per month.

 

 

Links:

Accused Facebook killer Steve Stephens faced multiple evictions, financial trouble: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/18/accused-facebook-killer-steve-stephens-faced-multiple-evictions-financial-trouble.html

altNews: Cleveland Facebook Live Killer (Hoax): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrmU-ajkmxM

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.