Tag Archives: holocaust

Alt-Right is proposing an Alliance with Zionist Jews?

Lana Lokteff interviewed a person identified as the Reactionary Jew, a “Red Pilled” Alt-Right Jew, on Radio 3Fourteen the other day, which part of the Red Ice radio or TV network. The interview begins with Lana mentioning she met Reactionary Jew at the NPI conference where Richard Spencer made the infamous “Hail Trump” -salute, and she asks “Is it possible to create a bridge between Jewish nationalists and European nationalists?” If by “European nationalists” Lana Lokteff means the Alt-Right, then the answer is yes, although on the surface it may seem very contradictory.

When the Alt-Right emerged a couple of years ago and Red Ice converted to their ideology, I thought the main purpose of the Alt-Right was to expose the Jewish and/or Zionist control over many aspects of the world and topple it. The Jews were supposedly the eternal enemy of the Alt-Right. I’ve since come to realize that’s not the case. The Alt-Right is basically about worship of one’s race, or worship of oneself. It’s basically Talmudic Judaism for the goyim, or just Satanism. I’ve written about this phenomenon that I name Talmudic Aryanism before.

 

Reactionary Jew interview

Yet I question how viable an honest alliance between the Alt-Right and conservative Jews would be? In the interview Lana let’s Reactionary Jew do most of the talking without challenging him on issues such as the Holocaust. Reactionary Jew seems to believe in official narrative of the Holocaust even if he does not wish to obsess over it as much as main stream Jews. Both Red Ice and Radio 3Fourteen have done various programs on exposing the falsehoods in the Holocaust narrative. What if she were to challenge Reactionary Jew on the issue? Would they still engage in friendly banter? Is there anything else except their hatred of multiculturalist liberals and the threat of Islam holding them together? Both groups hold similar Talmudic views of being the chosen race, but this does not ultimately unify Jews and the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right envies the powerful position the Jews currently hold and ultimately wishes to usurp it, but I suppose currently they feel weak enough pretend being friendly. I suddenly got a flashback to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Then there’s the Israel question. Reactionary Jew just seems to assume that Jews have the right to live in Israel, and Lana Lokteff does not contest this. Presumably it’s based on the narrative in the Old Testament. Even if the ancestors of modern Jews did inhabit that land over 2000 years ago, does it still grant them the right to do so now? What if the proto-Finns lived in the area that is now known as Bulgaria 3000 years ago, for example, does it give me the right to kick out Bulgarians out of their homes and settle on their land? The historical accuracy of the Jewish diaspora narrative is in question, and has been studied people such as Shlomo Sand. And even if the Israelites did live in the so-called holy land and were exiled from it, and have a right to return there, can the modern Jews prove they are the descendants of those Israelites?

I don’t want to comment too much on the details of the conversation between Reactionary Jew and Lana Lokteff, but there was one interesting bit where the Jew said that light-skinned Jews are more likely to be liberals than darker skinned ones, and Lana agreed that White people tend to be the most left-leaning race out there. This lends credence to Common Filth’s theory that there is a genetic component to White man’s deviancy. If Lana really cares about the well-being of her race I hope she reflects on the implications of her own words. Maybe her race isn’t supposedly facing extinction because of an outside threat, but by an inner one.

I suppose the ultimate purpose why Reactionary Jew was chosen for an interview with Radio 3Fourteen was because of Richard Spencer. The Jew was at Spencer’s NPI conference and he said he would vote Spencer for president. For whatever reason Red Ice has allowed Richard Spencer to become their lord and saviour and are promoting him. Reactionary Jew, while he seems intelligent and well-versed in many political issues related to Israel, by his own admission does not know what the rich and powerful globalist Jews think, and cannot influence them.

 

Richard Spencer on the Jews

Early December, Richard Spencer was interviewed by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. He is quoted as saying: “I think it’s clear that Jews underwent tremendous suffering during World War II. I don’t deny the Holocaust”. Why exactly is Red Ice promoting this guy? I don’t agree with most of the stuff that Red Ice does these days, but at least I agree that the official Holocaust narrative is bullshit.

The Haaretz also refers to an article Spencer wrote on his Radix Journal website back in 2010 titled “An Alliance with the Jews”. In it Spencer suggests the following: “Who knows? Israeli nationalists might want to help finance the far Right in Europe and North America.” Spencer has been hoping for a long time that Israel would become his sugar daddy.

Spencer was also interviewed by the self-titled human rights advocate David Duke the other day. In the interview Spencer does seem to indirectly agree with Duke that media is controlled by Jews, and they want to destroy White people. Spencer contrasts the gray areas of today with the Bolshevic revolution in Russia. Back then it was supposedly more black and white, when “we” were facing destruction. You’re not Russian, Dick. I suppose the implication is that the communist Jews were genociding White people in Russia, but nowadays it’s more complicated and you cannot just blame Jews for it. Or maybe not. This is classic Richard Spencer; never being clear on what you say to have plausible deniability, and allowing people to draw the conclusions they want. If you are Red Pilled on Jews, you assume he’s exposing the Jew. If you don’t want be associated with anti-Semites he can say that he didn’t say anything about Jews. Another reason for avoiding blaming Jews is that he still wants that Israeli funding.

Quite interestingly at some point Spencer says you shouldn’t be nice to the main stream media, which is actually something I agree with. Then he comments on some misguided Alt-Right people: “They’re living this delusion if only we’re nice to the media, if only we’re nice to our enemies, they’ll be nice back.” It’s refreshing to hear such honesty from Richard Spencer. He admits he’s delusional. In his weak and effeminate way he seems to agree with Duke that Jews are their enemies, yet he wants to be nice to the Jews to get their money. At least Spencer gives the impression that he doesn’t like Jews. He even says one rabbi’s stupidity makes him question the alleged high IQ of the Askernazis. Maybe this sucking up to Jews is a next level play of pretending to be their friend to steal their money, and when he has it he uses it against them?

David Duke starts a new meme in the interview. Since Spencer orignates from Whitefish, Montana, Duke calls him Whitefish. A more accurate description though when it comes to Richard Spencer would be of course Gayfish. Spencer has adopted the mantle of Gayfish from Kanye West. All hail Richard Spencer, Gayfish of Alt-Right, or Aut-Kike or whatever you call it.

 

Conclusion

Red Ice, which is a mouthpiece for the Alt-Right, is promoting an alliance with their enemy, the Zionist Jews. Richard Spencer already did so 6 years ago, and it doesn’t seem like he has changed direction. While making one interview asking the question whether Zionist Jews and “European nationalists”, or should it be (((European nationalists)))?, can be friends does not imply it’s the absolute opinion of Red Ice, discussing this topic is itself a promotion of the idea. As far as I know, Red Ice has not made a single program discussing the Flat Earth debate, for example, since clearly they don’t want anything to do with the issue. They do appear to want to become closer friends with Zionists though. As long as they’re pro-White, and Spencer is the one to determine what things are good for the White man.

 

P.S.

To clarify my personal position on Jews is that while I do not wish to “gas all of the kikes” I’ve been aware of the globalist Jewish elites influence for a long time, yet I do not think they are on top of the pyramid either. This means I am distrustful of anyone I know to be a Jew, but certainly some Jews do stand up from the crowd as positive examples, such as David Cole. He’s a Holocaust revisionist, and his life was threatened for his views. He had to change his name and live for a pseudonym for several years. Cole was interviewed by Radio 3Fourteen a year or two ago. The difference between Reactionary Jew and David Cole, and why I’m ambivalent toward one and somewhat favorable toward the other, is that Reactionary Jew simply espouses certain political views that the Alt-Righters agree with. David Cole on the other hand has done actual research. The facts that he has brought forward speak for themselves, not his identity or mere opinions.

 

Links:

Is it Possible for Jewish Nationalists & European Nationalists to Work Together?: https://redice.tv/radio-3fourteen/is-it-possible-for-jewish-nationalists-and-european-nationalists-to-work-together

Talmudic Aryanism: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/talmudic-aryanism/

The Invention of the Jewish People: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invention_of_the_Jewish_People

Alt-right Leader Has No Regrets About ‘Hail Trump,’ but Tells Haaretz: Jews Have Nothing to Fear: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:L3ITaWfKoDEJ:www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-1.756645+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fi&client=firefox-b

An Alliance with the Jews: http://www.radixjournal.com/altright-archive/altright-archive/main/blogs/untimely-observations/an-alliance-with-the-jews

The David Duke Show w/Guest Richard Spencer 12/26/16: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBX3P-ZcAXY

Advertisements

Who rules in Russia?

Holocaust denial has become illegal in Russia. Forward.com writes:

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law on Monday making the denial of Nazi crimes and distortion of the Soviet Union’s role in the World War Two a criminal offence punishable by up to five years in jail.

Actions speak louder than words. Maybe Putin has been finally co-opted, maybe he’s always been like that or he’s been replaced by a doppelgänger. Nevertheless seems like he cares for a small ethnic group more than the Russian people.

 

Links:

Holocaust Deniers in Russia Now Face Five Years in Prison: http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=33907

“It’s the Jews” vs “Don’t look at the Jews”

I tend to think the truth is usually found in the middle. Extremist arguments may be worth entertaining for a while, but one should not get stuck in such mindsets. I’m sort of Buddhist that way, preferring the golden middle way.

The Jewish question is one with great extremes. There’s the politically correct stance where you must not look at any dubious or criminal event if it looks like there is a Jewish influence somewhere there. To suggest that people who are Jewish might conspire to commit crimes can mean only one thing: you’re a anti-semitic, racist Nazi. This childish attitude still seems rather prevalent in society, although I’d wager it’s really not. It’s just what the media wants you to think.

The other extreme is the “It’s the Jews”-attitude. According to it any conspiracy of any magnitude can be traced down to the Jews. I’m well aware that many of the grievous conspiracies of our time, such as 9/11, feminism, or multiculturalism/mass immigration have a significant Jewish, Israeli or Zionist element behind them. Yet I would be very hesitant to make the statement that it’s ultimately Jews who are behind it all.

I’ve been thinking about this attitude recently. Some researchers and commentators only talk about the Jews. There’s something off-putting about it. Last week someone named John Friend was interviewed on Red Ice, and he was basically blaming it all on the Jews. There’s couple of good comments criticizing his simplistic attitude and pointing out the he doesn’t offer many sources for his information. Unfortunately the comments seem to be visible only for subscribers.

Friend also calls the Holocaust story “ridiculous” and many times completely dismisses it. I call myself a Holocaust (or Holohoax) denier, but there’s something in the way that Friend does it that does not agree with me. According to my best knowledge the Nazis did not kill anywhere near 6 million Jews, nor did they try to eradicate all of them, they did not kill Jews in gas chambers, but simply wishes to get them out of Germany. However, this does not mean that National Socialist Germans did not mistreat, abuse or kill Jews, and other people, at all. John Friend’s idea of Nazi Germany seems rather black and white, like they were the last line of defense against the Jewish New World Order. I certainly don’t think the Nazis were anywhere near as demonically evil as they are usually depicted, but they were militaristic and collectivistic, which are attributes I don’t admire. They may even have been morally superior to the allies, but that still doesn’t make them heroes to be admired.

Friend also made one reference to David Duke, who is another “It’s the Jews”-guy. Jews seem to be the only thought in his head. I’ve seen a few of Duke’s videos, and usually what he says makes sense, yet there’s something off. Another “It’s the Jews”-guy is Brother Nathaniel. He’s quite entertaining to watch too, but…

All three men mentioned above, John Friend, David Duke and Brother Nathaniel, seem a bit too pleased when they point out the criminality of certain Jews. It’s not something that should make you happy. I don’t know how else to put it. I just don’t trust these people. There’s something dubious in their agenda or world view. I’m not saying they are necessarily crooked, controlled opposition or anything like that. I’m just saying the story they are pushing is not balanced. They only see the trees, not the forest.

(BTW if I recall correctly Brother Nathaniel himself said in one of his videos he was born a Jew, but reformed himself a Christian.)

Quite frankly I don’t think the Jews are really in control. Many of these high-level criminal Jews probably think they are, but they are just pawns or useful idiots. Whatever is above them I cannot say for sure. Call it the Illuminati, the Satanic Brotherhoods or whatever, I just don’t think it’s really the Jews. That’s not to say some individual Jews aren’t on the higher levels.

In recent years the quote by Voltaire has become popular in the alternative media: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” We certainly aren’t allowed to criticize the Jews. The simple conclusion would be that we are ruled over by the Jews. And to a certain degree we are, yet I do think there is something ruling over the Jews. For decades we have been fed lies about how Jews are always the victims of goyim racism, we should feel sorry for them and never blame them for anything. The media has created this illusory image of Jews that most of us believed in at one point or another. However, as we begin to wake up and see through the illusion, we begin to recent the Jews, and to blame them for the lies we bought. Yet how do we know it was truly the Jews who created the illusion? I’m more inclined to think, someone else created it, but many opportunistic Jews saw the chance to benefit from it.

I would say we have hit critical mass that a big enough amount of people have seen through the lies about Jews, and their power structure is going down eventually. I think the people behind the Jews anticipated this would happen, and therefore built up the Jews at first to control us, and now that we are regaining control we would only point our guns at the Jews and ignore the real master mind.

This is how I see it. And I know I’m a conspiracy nut and proud of it.

The topic of this post was supposed to be these two extreme views on Jews compared against each other, but there’s not much to say about those who refuse to acknowledge the fact that many people commit crimes under the guise of Jewishness to protect themselves from criticism. Adults who think you are a Neo-Nazi or Stormfront supporter just because you can see some simple facts in our world or question the Holocaust, are embarrasingly naive, and quite frankly so fucking stupid I cannot wrap my mind around it. There’s not much to say about them. The other side of the coin, the “It’s the Jews”-crowd is more nuanced. The issue should be handled with care.

I read years ago on Henry Makow’s website an article from an alleged insider, I think, that the Illuminati or New World Order is going to sacrifice Israel. Back then it seemed unlikely since Israel was still quite respected, but now it doesn’t seem so far off. Unfortunately I cannot find the article anymore.

EDIT: This video seems applicable to the Jewish question.

The Oldest Soul Trapping Game -Tobias Lars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsEj1-MHl94

 

Links:

John Friend – Hour 1 – Demystifying the New World Order: From WWII to 9/11: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/03/RIR-150309.php

How Jews divide and conquer – David Duke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sgFJOtTyvM

Brother Nathaniel’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/zionget/videos

Henry Makow’s site: http://www.henrymakow.com/

Christopher Bollyn 2015 “Solving 911 Ends the War” (as an example of a researcher pointing out Jewish criminality without being creepily “It’s the Jews”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP_Ezjm7xDg

Jews and the Mark of Cain

I, like most people with a brain, have been pondering over the Jewish problem and its multifaceted dilemmas. Are they a race or a religion, or both? Has Judaism been hi-jacked by the Synagogue of Satan or is Judaism by it very nature the Synagogue of Satan with no need to hi-jack it? These are not simple questions and there is no answer that fits into a 5-minute Youtube video, although the solution to it might fit into a shorter video. Stop listening to their lies. Don’t blame the Jews for being what they are, but blame yourself for being dumb goyim and falling for it. You know the sentence George W. couldn’t say: “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” I should add: “Fool me a thousand times, since I’m asking for it.”

Although I don’t know what Jews really are, I’ve sort of perhaps kind of identified one attribute they have: the Mark of Cain. Cain is the guy from the Bible who killed his brother Abel, because God is a carnivore and not a pussy herbivore. God then cursed Cain with the Mark. Wikipedia: “A mark was put upon him to warn others that killing Cain would provoke the vengeance of God, that if someone did something to harm Cain, the damage would come back sevenfold.”

I see this with Jews. They are sinners and troublemakers, but when someone acts against them, they have to pay for it. Although I don’t believe in the Holocaust, i.e. systematic program to exterminate all Jews, I do think it’s fair to say the Nazis acted against the Jews and had to pay for it. In some sense the Jews seem to be a challenge for us “goyim”. We cannot just get rid of them in any aggressive manner, but we must not let them control us. It’s like if you know a guy who is a complete asshole, you can’t just shoot him, because you know it would be wrong, but you don’t want to hang around with him either, since he’s an asshole. Yet if you completely ignore him, he will start plotting something harmful against you. A real moral dilemma.

I’m not going to discuss the metaphysical or theological implications of the Mark of Cain in the Jews. I don’t know how and why, and can’t answer all those questions. I just calls it as I sees it.

Links:

Mark of Cain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_and_mark_of_Cain