Tag Archives: Jew

A Few Case Studies on being Jewish

I have gathered up a few examples of Jews and how Jewishness affects them. The people in question are a Hungarian politician, Csanád Szegedi, a Sicilian man (and his grandmother), Christopher Columbus, and David Seaman, a controversial Pizzagate researcher.

Perhaps a title that says a few examples on being Jewish would be more accurate, but case studies sounds much nicer.

 

The Hungarian Politician

Csanád Szegedi was a Hungarian nationalist politician known for his “anti-Semitic” remarks. However, he eventually he discovered he himself is a Jew. The NPR website states the following:

“[I]n 2010 a prisoner confronted him with evidence that he had Jewish roots. According to the AP, Szegedi tried to bribe the prisoner to keep him quiet, but rumors and innuendo reached a fever pitch by late last year and in June, Szegedi conceded that his mother was a Jew. According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.”

Szegedi’s eventual reaction to this was to become a Jew. In fact, he appears to be making aliya, i.e. immigrating to Israel. Or maybe he already did it. Prior to these revelations Szegedi has accused Jews of “‘buying up’ the country” and he “railed about the ‘Jewishness’ of the political elite and claimed Jews were desecrating national symbols”, according to The Star.

What makes this interesting is that Szegedi changed his critical stance on Jews after finding out that he is a Jew, instead of fighting the Jewish elite and continuing to promote Hungarian nationalism. He embraced his Jewishness. There are two different viewpoints on what makes a person a Jew, is it genetic or a cultural/religious thing. If Jewishness is genetic in a way that it makes Jews behave differently, then shouldn’t he have been pro-Jewish to begin with? Instead this case might support the argument that Jews behave in a Jewey way because they are raised in a certain way.

Then again maybe Szegedi knew he was a Jew to begin with, but hid his identity from others, but after he was outed, he forsook Hungarian nationalism as people wouldn’t trust him anymore. Alternatively, perhaps he was intrigued by Jews to begin with because of his Jewish genetics, but only after Szegedi learned he is Jewish he understood his interest in Jews.

Another interesting tidbit is how NPR described his mother being a Jew: “According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.” Are you Jews somehow spiritual affected by this law that force them to behave a certain way?

 

Jews in Sicily

An article in The Economist titled “Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring” describes one Jewish man, Gabriele Spagna, who grew up as normal Sicilian, presumably a Catholic, but his grandmother on her deathbed had confided to him that she was had been Jewish all along, while pretending to be something else. Apparently this revelation also turned Spagna into a practising Jew as well. He seems beholden to Jewish law as well.

 

Columbus a crypto-Jew?

I had heard of conspiracy theories before alleging that Christopher Columbus had been a crypto-Jew, a Jew who pretends to be Christian while practicing in secret, but I found an article on Daily Mail saying that some (main stream?) historian are claiming the same thing. According to these historians Columbus had been a “Marrano”, crypto-Jew, and he had been looking for a safe haven for Jews in his voyages.

All of these three accounts, Szegedi, Spagna and Columbus, seem to suggest that Jews are never really Christians or Europeans, instead they owe allegiance to their Jewishness.

 

David Seaman

David Seaman is a main stream journalist who became well-known for his coverage of Pizzagate on his Youtube channel, but a rather intriguing controversy has arisen around him in the last week.

I discovered his Youtube channel around the time that Pizzagate started trending around the internet. I was a bit skeptical of Seaman at first, since he said he had worked for Huffington Post, yet his coverage of Pizzagate was reasonable, and I was happy to see a main stream journalist promote the topic so I followed him for a few months. Eventually though I stopped following him for a few different factors: he didn’t seem to be bringing much new research on Pizzagate, I began to suspect he was more interested in getting donations, and he looked Jewish and his name sounds Jewish as well. Once or twice Seaman even said something like grown people had gotten physically sick and vomited due to their research on Pizzagate, which I found a bit excessive. It sounds more like a character in a movie might say, instead of something that actually happens, so it got my alarm bells ringing. I stopped following him maybe a month ago, and did not pay more attention to him until now.

I try not to judge people simply on the grounds that they are Jewish yet centuries of European heritage, two Millennia of Christian teachings, and my personal observations have taught me that you should not trust Jews, and it appears it was a sensible course of action.

A week ago a Youtuber by the name of Nathan Stolpman published a video on his channel, Lift the Veil, exposing some dubious facts about Seaman. Shortly after this Seaman deleted all of his videos. It seems Seaman had been “shilling” for (his own words) a company called Goldmoney, owned by an Israeli Jew, and Seaman appeared to be promoting Pizzagate more for attention and money instead truly caring about the issue. Stolpman even found out that Seaman had written a book “Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself” in 2008. The book describes how you can promote yourself and make money by figuring out a topic before it becomes popular if you keep talking about it. If you can make people associate yourself as the guy who discovered it, you can gain a lot of views and clicks. It appears Pizzagate was a topic that allowed him to gain buzz.

Certainly it is normal for anyone with a Youtube channel or a blog like mine to take advantage of buzz and comment on trending topics, since they are issues that people find interesting. Nothing wrong with that as long as you’re being honest and bringing something to the table. However, I don’t think Seaman has been honest about it.

I won’t go into all of the details of what Seaman has said and done, but I suggest looking into what Stolpman has uncovered and drawing your own conclusions. I have. To me Seaman is another example of a Jew that exploits other people for his personal benefit and monetary gain. And yes, he is Jewish, it was stated in an interview Seaman did with some Youtuber whose name I don’t recall.

I was suspicious of him before this, and Stolpman/Lift the Veil confirmed my suspicions. The way Seaman has responded to Stolpman’s revelations is dishonest in my opinion as well. He has not proven them false, instead Seaman has tried to sidestep the issue and make it seem as if he is being attacked for telling the truth about Pizzagate. That is not the case at all, at least not when it comes to the videos on Lift the Veil’s channel. But once again, I suggest you look into it yourself instead of taking my word for it.

 

Conclusions

All of the cases of Jewish behaviour seem to lend credence to the “anti-Semitic” view that Jews do not feel beholden to the morals of the goyim. As the Talmud says, different principles apply to Jews and to goyim. Gypsies are similar in this respect. Stealing from non-Gypsies is allowed, while stealing from other Gypsies is not. Most other people, such as Europeans and East-Asians at least think that stealing and exploiting others is wrong. It matters little whether the person you are stealing from is of your race or religion or an outsider. Of course, there are still many immoral people in every ethnic group, but the initial values that the society promotes differ between Jews and the rest of us.

My reason for pointing this out is simply that you should be aware of how Jews think. Their morals are different than yours. It is foolish to expect them to think like we do.

 

Links:

Leader Of Anti-Semitic Party In Hungary Discovers He’s Jewish: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/08/14/158773637/leader-of-anti-semitic-party-in-hungary-discovers-hes-jewish

Former antisemitic Hungarian MP who discovered Jewish roots to make aliya: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Former-antisemitic-Hungarian-MP-who-discovered-Jewish-roots-to-make-aliya-468386

Leader of anti-Semitic party in Hungary discovers he is Jewish: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2012/08/14/leader_of_antisemitic_party_in_hungary_discovers_he_is_jewish.html

Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring: http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2017/02/jewish-revival-sicily

Was Columbus secretly Jewish? Historians argue explorer’s epic voyage was to establish new homeland for his people as they escaped the Spanish Inquisition: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2147558/Christopher-Columbus-Jewish-looking-new-homeland-discovered-America-historians-say.html

David Seaman, Pizzagate & Goldmoney: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZXDHzZlYzU

altNews: David Seaman’s Open Invitation, Mind Control & Phone Calls | 3.3.2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIgqGn42jcM

A Few Examples of Jewish Tricks

When discussing the influence that Jews wield in the media, economics and other aspects of modern society, influential people like George Soros and Henry Kissinger are usually brought up. Some see their Jewishness as merely co-incidental, bearing little significance in the role they play, whereas others, myself included, see their Jewishness as one of the most significant details in their character and background. While these elite class Jews are highlighted, Judaism itself is often excused from criticism saying that only the Zionists, or members of the Jewish cabal, are bad, but regular Jews are not like that. There are some people though, who say that there are no good Jews.

I am not quite certain what to think, so I’ll just share a few examples of Jewish behaviour. I saw these on /pol a few weeks ago.

My first piece of evidence is this video of a man holding up a sign saying one side: “Repent! Trump is God’s punishment on America”. On the other it says: “White men against Trump”. The person taking the video, however, calls out the man as a Jew. The Jew not only admits that he is Jewish, but the video guy says Jews aren’t White to which a woman on the side says [being White or being Jewish] “is the same thing”, the video guy says he read on the forum that Jews aren’t White, and the Jew says: “That’s true.”

Link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyOqafHBiJE

EDIT: The original video had been up on Youtube for a few weeks, but soon after I embedded it here, it was shut down for “harassment and bullying”. I found another channel that has the video though.

 

Basically in the video a Jew is pretending to be a White man to persuade “other” White people to be anti-Trump, although he himself does not think of himself as White.

There’s also a few Tweets I’ve seen with similar behaviour of Jews being White one time, and Jewish another.

In the first picture is one guy saying “as a white guy…” and in the next “As a Jew…” Which one is it? White or Jewish? There’s only 1-2 weeks between these Tweets so I doubt he had a drastic change of identity in that time (and the Jew-Tweet happened first).

tweet1

The next one is from a Jewish woman complaining about White Privilege™, and saying “My fellow white people”, i.e. she is allegedly identifies as White, and wants to share her racial guilt with others. In the next picture, she says she has a Jewish family. So maybe she isn’t Jewish herself, but her family is? The Jew-Tweet was from 2009 and the White Privilege one was from 2016, so a change of ideology is more reasonable possibility in this case.

Nevertheless, this is still evidence of this Jewish racial double-think even if we cannot be sure whether this woman is Jewish or not, and there are several years between these Tweets.

tweet2

 

The third picture is of a Jewish woman who in the first Tweet complains about “my fellow white people” having been raised to behave like sociopaths. In the second Tweet she says she was “raised orthodox Jewish”. Although the date isn’t shown on the picture, I checked her Twitter and both Tweets are from 2016.

This is a clear example of Jewish racial duplicity. Moreover it’s interesting that in both Tweets she is referring to how she (as a White person) has been raised, first how to be a sociopath and in the second she has been raised to be an Orthodox Jew. Perhaps her mind is somewhat split on the issue, and she was raised to be a sociopath by her Orthodox Jewish upbringing.

tweet3

 

There’s also an opinion piece from Jewish Journal and a blog from The Times of Israel both saying that Jews aren’t White. The first article praises that “Jews will always believe Black Lives matter because Jews do not think of themselves as ‘White People.'” In Tel Aviv there are Jews from various races. The blog post from The Times of Israel takes another approach and states that Ashkenazi Jews are not White.

jewishjournal

ashkenaziwhite

 

While you could just take the easy way out and say that different Jews have different views on race and Jewishness, but that’s not really what I see. What I see is that a Jew is White when he or she wants to berate White people for their real and imagined sins, but when a Jew wants sympathy for being oppressed, praise for being progressive or simply wants to celebrate their culture, the Jew becomes a Jew. Basically a Jew is White only to attack White culture and identity, and even then the Jew presents him or herself as more noble than “other Whites” who do not understand their privilege as well as the Jew does.

My point is not that Jews should not criticize White people, but when Jews do it, they do it from a highly dishonest position. People of all races have certainly done reprehensible acts in the history of the world, but there difference with Jews and all other races seem to be that the Jew is unwilling to assume responsibility for their sins, and try to blame others instead.

The whole worldview of the Jew seems highly relativistic. You are one thing when it suits you, and another when it ceases to work for you. The only consistent aspect of a Jew is that they are a Jew. When trying to identify the specifics of what makes a Jew, sooner or later you will encounter a dead-end. Sometimes Jews are race, other times they are a religion, but there are plenty of atheist Jews so they might be a culture. Trying to chase that trail will just leave your head spinning. The Jew is a Jew.

Certainly the video and few quotes presented here are merely anecdotal evidence, yet based on what I’ve seen from the behaviour of Jews, they seem fairly representative. One thing that I wonder about is do the Jews do the “racial shift” from Jew to White and back again consciously or unconsciously? The Jew in the video with the anti-Trump sign certainly seems to be acting wittingly, but I am not so sure about the Tweets. The mind of the average Jew might be schizophrenic in some sense, and they themselves do not realize what they are doing. They are acting subversively because it is in their nature to do so.

Anyway, before I finish I’d just like to add I am not writing this to say that we should start rounding up Jews and gassing them or anything like that. I am merely pointing out this intriguing, yet possibly harmful characteristic in Jews, in the hope that you take heed of this.

 

P.S.

Thinking of the nature of the Jew has made recall a book I read a few years ago, Dispelling Wetiko by Paul Levy. It describes this parasitic mind virus that affects the humanity. It doesn’t exist in the absolute sense, yet it does exist as you can see it’s influence in the world and in the behaviour of the people. Pinpointing the Wetiko virus is difficult as if you point at one thing and say it is Wetiko, then the virus is deluding, you but also if you say it doesn’t exist you are getting deluded. It is much like the nature of the Jew. More interestingly I think the author, Paul Levy, might be a Jew. His name certainly sounds like it.

 

Talmudic Aryanism

One particular brand of White Nationalism, let’s call it Alt-Right White Nationalism, bares a striking reseblance to Talmudic Judaism despite pretense to being opposed to all things Jewish. These are the people who act as if race was the first and foremost thing that matters, and White people are superior just by their genetic inheritance. Often they advocate, directly or indirectly, that other races should be exterminated or enslaved. This vile form of White Nationalism, and nationalism in general, should be distinguished from those people who simply wish to preserve their race and heritage. A more suitable moniker for Alt-Right White Nationalism would be Talmudic Aryanism, as they like to pretend to have descended from the Aryans and they behave like Talmudic Jews.

Let’s take a look at some of the ideas propagated by the Talmud first:

Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.

The Talmudic Jews worship their race, the same as the Talmudic Aryans.

Sanhedrin 57a. When a Jew murders a Gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.

I was just listening to the Red Ice interview of Andrew Auernheimer, AKA Weev. He was saying that it’s OK to steal from Jews. The funny thing is, he is supposedly a Jew himself, and even if he is not, he sure is behaving like one.

Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the Gentiles should all be killed”).

You can replace Jew with White and Gentile with non-White in all of these examples and they match the views of the Alt-Right White Nationalists.

The Talmudic Aryans worship their race the same as Talmudic Jews do. They believe that race is more important than morality, or the laws of reality. Race, and racial differences, do exist to be sure, and there is nothing wrong with holding one’s heritage in high regard, but there is a difference with deluding you are divine by your mere existence, or that morality does not apply to you because of it.

I don’t think the White Genocide agenda is really about the literal destruction of the White race, but about creating a survivalist mindset to corrupt White people into the Talmudic path. They back us into a corner and make us concerned for our survival, and try to make us only react to immediate stimuli without looking at the big picture.

This reminds me of the discussion between Luke Skywalker and the Emperor at the end of Return of the Jedi:

“The Emperor: Come, boy, see for yourself. From here, you will witness the final destruction of the Alliance and the end of your insignificant rebellion.

[Luke’s eyes go to his lightsabre]

The Emperor: You want this, don’t you? The hate is swelling in you now. Take your Jedi weapon. Use it. I am unarmed. Strike me down with it. Give in to your anger. With each passing moment you make yourself more my servant.

Luke: No.

The Emperor: It is unavoidable. It is your destiny. You, like your father, are now mine.”

They want us to strike down the Talmudic Jew only to take their place. This is what obsessing over one’s race brings. “Pro-White” identity politics do not actually benefit the people of European descent, they merely corrupt us, i.e. it is not truly pro-White.

 

Links:

Talmud Exposed: http://www.christusrex.org/www3/talmud-exposed/talmud.htm

Black Hat Hacking: Survival of the West, Syria & #GamerGate: https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/black-hat-hacking-survival-of-the-west-syria-and-gamergate

The Circle

I was listening a program with Ochelli and The Greek at American Freedom Radio, when the latter man mentioned the Greek goddess Circe and its connection to the word church. This reminded me of a topic that has been going around in my head for a few months now. Let’s jump in.

Circe is a goddess of magic in Greek myth. Wikipedia describes her as follows: “Circe was renowned for her vast knowledge of potions and herbs. Through the use of magical potions and a wand or a staff, she transformed her enemies, or those who offended her, into animals.”

The word church comes from the old English cirike, circe. Some sources claim the word’s etymology originates the Greek kyriakon (adj.) meaning “of the lord”. This supposed refers the lord’s house. However this interpretation is supposedly false, and I certainly don’t find it credible. A more likely etymological background for the word church is “circle”.

A man called Steven writes on the Bein’ a Berean website that what is called in the New Testament a church, is in the original Greek ekklesia which means “congregation”. However, King James I, known for commissioning the King James Bible, wanted the translators to use the word “church” instead of “congregation”. Although that wasn’t the first bible to use the word church.

Moreover, Steven points out that King James I was also a Freemason, possibly even the originator of the worldwide lodge system, and a homosexual. He even mentions that a circle with a dot inside is a Freemasonic symbol. I believe the conspiracy researcher Freeman has stated that the logo symbolizes apotheosis, i.e. man becoming God.

This is the logo of the company Target, that is behind Walmart. They wish to become gods, I suppose.

Then there is the derogatory term for Jews, “kike”. Etymonline states a possible origin for the word as follows: “Philip Cowen, first editor of ‘The American Hebrew,’ suggests a source in Yiddish kikel ‘circle.’ According to him, Jewish immigrants, ignorant of writing with the Latin alphabet, signed their entry forms with a circle, eschewing the ‘X’ as a sign of Christianity. On this theory, Ellis Island immigration inspectors began calling such people kikels, and the term shortened as it passed into general use.”

This reminds me of another company logo, the Circle K.

The kike circle. Then there’s the Red Ice interview where Dennis Fetcho talked about the Kosher tax. Certain products that have a U or a K on them are taxed by Jewish rabbis.

Then there’s still the word “circus” which comes from the same Latin word meaning “ring, circular line”. A circus is a circle in which performers entertain you. The ring also reminds me of the squared circle of a boxing or “pro-wrestling” match. And of Masons, of course.

All of these words are related to the circle and the goddess Circe; church, kike and circus. What it all comes down to is that the kikes and Freemasons give bread and circuses to distract us, and we go to their churches (or at least used to) to go around in circles trying to find spirituality, or we go buy in their stores for more distractions, while in the background they worship their goddess Circe. Circe transformed men into animals, and that’s certainly happening to many people nowadays. I suppose all of this is some sort of alchemical attempt at attaining godhood to be by Circe’s side.

 

Links:

Ochelli and The Greek: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Ochelli_Greek_15.html

GMO Babies, What’s Next? – The Greek: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nhddPSRdCQ

Circe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circe

Church: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=church&allowed_in_frame=0

The Mysterious Word “Church”: http://www.beinaberean.org/writings/church.html

The 2015 Super Bowl – Grammy Ritual Spectacular!: http://freemantv.com/2015-super-bowl-grammy-ritual-spectacular/

Kike: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=kike

Dennis Fetcho – Hour 1 – Secrets of the Hidden Kosher Mark & The Rabbinical Tax: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/01/RIR-150123.php

The Secret Kosher Tax: http://www.radioislam.org/judaism/kosher.htm

Circus: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=circus

Are Jews genetically different?

It being Christmas Eve and all, it’s natural to discuss everybody’s favourite topic, the Jews. It’s an old source of controversy whether Jews are a race or a religion, but just by looking at what they believe they are a race. Another point of contention is, since they are a race, are they somehow significantly different to us? I’ll first address the issue of them being a race, and the other, more difficult question.

Jews consider anyone born of a Jewish mother to be a Jew. This by itself suggest some sort of ancient understanding of hereditary genetics, and that Jews see themselves as a race. Christians, Muslims and Buddhists don’t think that one is born into the faith, but it based on a decision made by the individual, although in practice they usually do raise their children to adopt their religion.

Modern Israel too has been criticized for for being a racist “apartheid” state.  They wish to keep their country Jewish, and it does not merely mean that they want people who live in Israel to convert, but they want their citizens to be racially Jewish. Even the black Jews from Ethiopia, the Falashas, are not considered proper Jews in Israel despite Ethiopians being Semites. Jews definitely seem to think of themselves as a race.

Many scientific studies have been conducted on the genetics of Jews. Their outcomes are contradictory at times and it appears that no-one has been able to pinpoint what the Jewish race actually is, but the overall consensus with these studies seems to be that Jews are a race. There’s a pretty long article on Wikipedia about it, and as it is Wikipedia it should be treated with a grain of salt, but at least it cites plenty of scientific studies. I’ll highlight a few interesting details in the article.

 

The Wikipedia Article

One common conception is that Askernazi and Sephardic Jews are very different from each other, or that Sephardic are the real Jews and Ashkenazi are somehow racially diluted. The Wikipedia article however refutes that by quoting Nicholas Wade:  “‘Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East.’ He further noticed that ‘The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.'” Despite Ashkenazis having been in Europe for centuries, if not Millennia, they are still racially similar to the Middle-Eastern Sephardics.

Another study suggests that Jews and Palestinians are closely related: “In a study of Israeli and Palestinian Muslim Arabs, more than 70% of the Jewish men and 82% of the Arab men whose DNA was studied, had inherited their Y chromosomes from the same paternal ancestors, who lived in the region within the last few thousand years.” However, a bit later it said: “In relation to the region of the Fertile Crescent, the same study noted; ‘In comparison with data available from other relevant populations in the region, Jews were found to be more closely related to groups in the north of the Fertile Crescent (Kurds, Turks, and Armenians) than to their Arab neighbors.'” If I get this right, the original ancestors are closely related to Kurds, Turks and Armenians, who eventually mixed with the Palestinian Arabs? Possibly the Arabs lived in Palestine and the pre-Jews invaded, or the pre-Jews lived there and were invaded by the Arabs.

Map of the Fertile Crescent:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Map_of_fertile_crescent.svg

Later on the article offers some minor evidence that Jews are indeed mutants differing from regular people: “A study of haplotypes of the Y chromosome, published in 2000, addressed the paternal origins of Ashkenazi Jews. Hammer et al. that the Y chromosome of most Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews contained mutations that are also common among Middle Eastern peoples, but uncommon in the general European population. This suggested that the male ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews could be traced mostly to the Middle East.” Of course, the article does not elaborate what these mutations are and how they affect people, but I doubt it is anything significant.

Wikipedia refers to one study that seem suggest that Judaism being inherited through the mother is false:  “Studies of mitochondrial DNA of Jewish populations are more recent and are still debatable. However, it seems that there are no maternal lines common to all Jewish people.”

The article is also dismissive of the theory that Ashkenazis have descended from the Turkic-Khazars. I am suspicious of this theory as well.

Anyway, I just discussed a few details in the article I found relevant. I suggest you read the rest yourself if you are so inclined.

 

Other Sources

Two fairly recent competing theories on the Jewish race are the ones brought forward by Harry Oster and Eran Elhaik. Ostrer, who I think is not Jewish, simply seems to be saying that Jews are a race. Elhaik, however, who is a Jew, is pushing the Khazar-theory. Elhaik calls Ostrer and his supporters “liars” and “frauds”.

The problem with the Khazar-theory is that it is mostly promoted by Jews. It was invented by the Jewish Arthur Koestler, and nowadays the two of the people with a scientific background who promote it are Jews, Eran Elhaik and Shlomo Sand, the author of The Invention of the Jewish People.

There is however one fairly recent study by geneticist Martin Richards whose findings contradict Ostrer’s was discussed in Science. His study suggests Ashkenazis might have originated in Italy. The article discussing the study states:  “Jews have traditionally considered that the mother determines the ethnic identity of her children. If being Jewish is defined as genetically descending from the Israelites through the maternal line, then many Ashkenazi Jews fail the test, according to this data.” According this this study then, Sephardics and Ashkenazis aren’t of the same race, it seems. The study also offered more evidence to disprove the Khazar-theory.

So all that can be said is that the road discovering the truth about Jewish genetics is confusing and perilous.

 

Parasitic Jews

It has been argued here and there that Jews have a genetic disposition for subversions and parasitic behaviour. I certainly agree that Jews have achieved this negative stereotype by their actions, but I cannot say whether this is due to their culture, religion or race. I think it is possible that Jews have such a genetic quality, but I am skeptical of it. I think the subversive actions the Jews have perpetrated on the West are mostly due to their position as an outsider. They are similar to Gypsies that they are outside to the native European cultures and don’t share our values, and therefore do not respect our laws and customs, but I wouldn’t say that Gypsies have a genetic propensity for kleptomania. It is more a cultural thing.

However, I looked a bit into the notion of genetic inheritance from the mother. Men have one X-chromosome and one Y-chromosome, and women have two Xs. Men inherit one Y from their fathers, and one X from their mothers. Women inherit an X-chromosome from both. The UK NHS website explains that if a woman has a mutated X-chromosome it is unlikely to affect them, since the effect tends to be recessive. If one of the Xs is normal, the woman is normal. These women can, however, become carriers of a harmful mutation, and if their son was to inherit the mutated X-chromosomes he would be affected by it. Yet a boy would not inherit the harmful X-chromosome from his father since he gains Y from his father, but daughters of the man would inherit the X-chromosome and become carriers.

This suggests then the theoretical possibility that being Jewish is a mutation that passes from mother to son. I am of course not a geneticist, so I my interpretation could be wrong. Moreover, even if I’m right, this is still just a theoretical possibility. As far as I know this has not been proven to be a fact.

 

Conclusion

I’m still more inclined to think that the subversive behaviour exhibited by Jews by can be explained by other means, such as them simply being a cultural outsider with preference for their own people, much as the same as the Gypsies, or possibly the trauma caused by circumcision shortly after birth, or the persecution complex inherited in verbal tradition.

Moreover, if one was to argue that Jews are genetically predisposed for certain type of behaviour, I would say that white people, or particularly Anglo-Saxons or Germanic people are genetically predisposed to obey the Jews. How else do you explain the unquestioned support the Jews have gotten from Europeans and Americans over the years? The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail also referred to some researcher who had suggested that all Europeans noble families were of Judaic descent. I don’t have the book at hand now, so I cannot check who said it, but interesting idea, to say the least.

I want the Jews to be removed from power as much as everyone else, but it does no good simply repeating the same clichés. There is the question of how did the Jews attain the position they’re in? I think the answer lies in looking at us. What is wrong with men of European stock to allow this to happen?

 

EDIT:

I discovered that a man called Michael Bradley suggests that Jews have descended from neanderthals. I don’t know how valid his claims are, but it is at least evidence supporting those who say that Jews are genetically different from the rest of us.

He has at least written a book called The Iceman Inheritance, and here’s an interview with him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnmU1i5eakY

John de Nugent has also written about this topic: https://www.johndenugent.com/neanderthals-and-semites/

 

Links:

6 Crazy Things Israel Has Done to Maintain Racial Purity: http://www.alternet.org/world/6-crazy-things-israel-has-done-maintain-racial-purity

Israel’s Racial Purity Laws: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-palestinian-israeli-race.html

Genetic studies of Jewish origins: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_of_Jewish_origins

Jews Are a ‘Race’, Genes Reveal: http://forward.com/culture/155742/jews-are-a-race-genes-reveal/

‘Jews a Race’ Genetic Theory Comes Under Fierce Attack: http://forward.com/news/israel/175912/jews-a-race-genetic-theory-comes-under-fierce-atta/

Did Modern Jews Originate in Italy?: http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2013/10/did-modern-jews-originate-italy

Nature of the Jews…: http://expeltheparasite.com/books/the-nature-of-the-jews/

How genetic conditions are inherited: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Genetics/Pages/Facts.aspx

Burning down the Neo-Nazi Strawman

Today is Finland’s independence day, so I’ll try to force this topic to somehow correspond with that fact, since Finland was allied with Germany during the Second World War.

Whenever someone questions the Holocaust, says something positive about the Nazis or shows any interest in race other than saying “there’s only one race, the human race” or demonizes white people, they are labelled Nazi, racist, Stormfag or something similar. As if that somehow invalidates what the person was saying.

It’s an argument based solely on emotion and the pre-programmed image of a Neo-Nazi no-one wants to associate with. The program triggers an image of a person such as these:

Of course nobody wants to be regarded as being similar to these guys or sympathizing with them. Nor do they want to be seen as someone who condones the murder of six million innocent Jews. Fortunately then, we have facts that point out that the Holocaust was mostly a hoax, and the real Nazis, you know the Germans in the 30s and 40s, wouldn’t have liked the nutcases pictured above either.

What kind of a person is a modern Nazi sympathizer then? Well, take me for instance. If you saw me and talked to me, you’d see something like this instead of a skinhead Neo-Nazi:

It’s not my actual image, nor do I play a guitar, but I would say this is more the feel I give to people than somebody who looks like they wanna bash your face in.

No, I’m not making the argument that the hippies would have actually loved the Nazis, or anything like that. I’m just saying I’m a regular, peace-loving guy, and I’d say most people who have begun to sympathize with the actual, historical Nazis are. While I am certainly not saying that I think everything about the Nazis was good and perfect, but looking at the world today, and comparing it with what the Nazis did, if I am being intellectually honest, I cannot fathom how the world could be any worse than it is now had the Nazis won World War II. Let’s look at some of their beliefs and exploits.

First of all, the Nazis managed to turn Germany from an extremely impoverished state to a prosperous one in just ten years or so. The Nazi government actually seemed to care about the people. Nowadays governments seem hell-bent on making the people impoverished. The Nazis were against sexual deviancy and perversion, whereas in 2015 the West celebrates transgenderism and deviancy. They were of course against the World Jewry and its control over economics, but the Nazis did not irrationally try to exterminate the Jews. Nazis merely wanted them out of Germany. They were against Freemasonry and the Clique of Internationalists. They were against both communism and capitalism. The Nazis wanted to see their country prosper and people be happy.

Maybe it’s just me, but I agree with all of these points. I’m not saying their methods were always correct, or effective, but the National Socialist philosophy seems certainly worth studying. However, it should be noted the Nazis failed, so no doubt they committed severe mistakes, and they should not be imitated uncritically.

If I’m a person who sympathizes with the Nazis, what kinds of values does it mean I hold? First of all, it means I value truth and scientific fact over peoples’ emotions and consensus based on repetition. I believe that people should be allowed to discuss historical facts like reasonable adults, instead of the government threatening people and imprisoning them for holding politically incorrect ideas. Questioning the Holocaust is still illegal in several European countries. I believe in some degree of decency, and oppose the celebration of the deviancy rampant in today’s society. I believe that society should exist for the benefit of the people of said society, instead of being exploited for profit as in capitalism, or all of their thoughts and actions being controlled as in communism.

One thing usually associated with the Nazis are their ideas on race. Quite frankly I don’t know enough of the actual Nazi ideas on the topic. I know plenty of accusations on how racist they were, but I do not know to what extent they were true or false. My own ideas on race is that race does exist, and we should be able to discuss race, and racial differences. Both the good and the bad. Too often the mere mention of race is regarded as something negative, and you’re being hateful for doing so. Is it hateful to point out that German shepherds are larger than Chihuahuas?

I’ve seen people on the internet, who are usually rational and intelligent, degenerate into calling others Stormfags and using other insults simply for suggesting the fact that the rapists in the Rotherham scandal in Britain might have something to do with race. The offenders were Pakistani, and supposedly they are into inbreeding with their cousins. Considering this possibility for their criminality should not be out of the question.

I think that is the difference between a communist and a Nazi. The communist will do anything to stand within the politically correct zone, whereas as the Nazi dares venture into unknown territory.

Let’s top this off with a reference to the infamous interview from Britain of some guy protesting against the Islamization of Britain and mumbling incoherently about Muslamic law, and Muslamic rape gangs or Muslamic Ray Guns. The video has spawned some internet memes and stuff. The guy in the video has usually been dismissed as an idiot and laughed at. However, while I think the guy is a dumb thug, he’s also right. He talks about how Muslims are trying to introduce Sharia law into Europe, he mentions how there are Islamic rape gangs in Britain (like the one in Rotherham), and he’s concerned about it.

While all the liberal intellectuals and internet geeks are laughing at him for not being able to express himself verbally, the guy is actually trying to do something to protect British girls from rape. So maybe it’s better to stop worrying how other people see you, and do what is right. I might not want people to associate me being someone like him, but he’s still a better champion for Europe than all of the politically correct people put together who only care about their image.

That shit is for teenage girls, and pop-idols who make money off of teenage girls. Men are not afraid of being called Nazi, racist or any of that. They pursue truth and justice independently regardless of social pressures.

“It’s the Jews” vs “Don’t look at the Jews”

I tend to think the truth is usually found in the middle. Extremist arguments may be worth entertaining for a while, but one should not get stuck in such mindsets. I’m sort of Buddhist that way, preferring the golden middle way.

The Jewish question is one with great extremes. There’s the politically correct stance where you must not look at any dubious or criminal event if it looks like there is a Jewish influence somewhere there. To suggest that people who are Jewish might conspire to commit crimes can mean only one thing: you’re a anti-semitic, racist Nazi. This childish attitude still seems rather prevalent in society, although I’d wager it’s really not. It’s just what the media wants you to think.

The other extreme is the “It’s the Jews”-attitude. According to it any conspiracy of any magnitude can be traced down to the Jews. I’m well aware that many of the grievous conspiracies of our time, such as 9/11, feminism, or multiculturalism/mass immigration have a significant Jewish, Israeli or Zionist element behind them. Yet I would be very hesitant to make the statement that it’s ultimately Jews who are behind it all.

I’ve been thinking about this attitude recently. Some researchers and commentators only talk about the Jews. There’s something off-putting about it. Last week someone named John Friend was interviewed on Red Ice, and he was basically blaming it all on the Jews. There’s couple of good comments criticizing his simplistic attitude and pointing out the he doesn’t offer many sources for his information. Unfortunately the comments seem to be visible only for subscribers.

Friend also calls the Holocaust story “ridiculous” and many times completely dismisses it. I call myself a Holocaust (or Holohoax) denier, but there’s something in the way that Friend does it that does not agree with me. According to my best knowledge the Nazis did not kill anywhere near 6 million Jews, nor did they try to eradicate all of them, they did not kill Jews in gas chambers, but simply wishes to get them out of Germany. However, this does not mean that National Socialist Germans did not mistreat, abuse or kill Jews, and other people, at all. John Friend’s idea of Nazi Germany seems rather black and white, like they were the last line of defense against the Jewish New World Order. I certainly don’t think the Nazis were anywhere near as demonically evil as they are usually depicted, but they were militaristic and collectivistic, which are attributes I don’t admire. They may even have been morally superior to the allies, but that still doesn’t make them heroes to be admired.

Friend also made one reference to David Duke, who is another “It’s the Jews”-guy. Jews seem to be the only thought in his head. I’ve seen a few of Duke’s videos, and usually what he says makes sense, yet there’s something off. Another “It’s the Jews”-guy is Brother Nathaniel. He’s quite entertaining to watch too, but…

All three men mentioned above, John Friend, David Duke and Brother Nathaniel, seem a bit too pleased when they point out the criminality of certain Jews. It’s not something that should make you happy. I don’t know how else to put it. I just don’t trust these people. There’s something dubious in their agenda or world view. I’m not saying they are necessarily crooked, controlled opposition or anything like that. I’m just saying the story they are pushing is not balanced. They only see the trees, not the forest.

(BTW if I recall correctly Brother Nathaniel himself said in one of his videos he was born a Jew, but reformed himself a Christian.)

Quite frankly I don’t think the Jews are really in control. Many of these high-level criminal Jews probably think they are, but they are just pawns or useful idiots. Whatever is above them I cannot say for sure. Call it the Illuminati, the Satanic Brotherhoods or whatever, I just don’t think it’s really the Jews. That’s not to say some individual Jews aren’t on the higher levels.

In recent years the quote by Voltaire has become popular in the alternative media: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” We certainly aren’t allowed to criticize the Jews. The simple conclusion would be that we are ruled over by the Jews. And to a certain degree we are, yet I do think there is something ruling over the Jews. For decades we have been fed lies about how Jews are always the victims of goyim racism, we should feel sorry for them and never blame them for anything. The media has created this illusory image of Jews that most of us believed in at one point or another. However, as we begin to wake up and see through the illusion, we begin to recent the Jews, and to blame them for the lies we bought. Yet how do we know it was truly the Jews who created the illusion? I’m more inclined to think, someone else created it, but many opportunistic Jews saw the chance to benefit from it.

I would say we have hit critical mass that a big enough amount of people have seen through the lies about Jews, and their power structure is going down eventually. I think the people behind the Jews anticipated this would happen, and therefore built up the Jews at first to control us, and now that we are regaining control we would only point our guns at the Jews and ignore the real master mind.

This is how I see it. And I know I’m a conspiracy nut and proud of it.

The topic of this post was supposed to be these two extreme views on Jews compared against each other, but there’s not much to say about those who refuse to acknowledge the fact that many people commit crimes under the guise of Jewishness to protect themselves from criticism. Adults who think you are a Neo-Nazi or Stormfront supporter just because you can see some simple facts in our world or question the Holocaust, are embarrasingly naive, and quite frankly so fucking stupid I cannot wrap my mind around it. There’s not much to say about them. The other side of the coin, the “It’s the Jews”-crowd is more nuanced. The issue should be handled with care.

I read years ago on Henry Makow’s website an article from an alleged insider, I think, that the Illuminati or New World Order is going to sacrifice Israel. Back then it seemed unlikely since Israel was still quite respected, but now it doesn’t seem so far off. Unfortunately I cannot find the article anymore.

EDIT: This video seems applicable to the Jewish question.

The Oldest Soul Trapping Game -Tobias Lars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsEj1-MHl94

 

Links:

John Friend – Hour 1 – Demystifying the New World Order: From WWII to 9/11: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/03/RIR-150309.php

How Jews divide and conquer – David Duke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sgFJOtTyvM

Brother Nathaniel’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/zionget/videos

Henry Makow’s site: http://www.henrymakow.com/

Christopher Bollyn 2015 “Solving 911 Ends the War” (as an example of a researcher pointing out Jewish criminality without being creepily “It’s the Jews”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP_Ezjm7xDg