Tag Archives: jews

Circumcision and the Bible

In May (although it became hot topic on the internet a couple of weeks ago) a Jewish man, Eric Clopper, held a presentation at Harvard titled Sex and Circumcision: An American Love Story. In his presentation he decries circumcision as a barbaric and evil blood sacrifice, and wants to abolish this Jewish covenant. Clopper describes how the foreskin is an integral part in generating pleasure in the sexual act, and cutting it off replaces pleasure with rage. I recommend watching the two hour presentation. It did inspire me to write this.

In recent years I’ve grown interested in Christianity, but circumcision is one of the details that makes is very difficult to accept the possibility that the biblical God is the true and righteous one. Although the New Testament seems to reject the notion of circumcision, whereas the Old affirms it. Does it mean God updated his Terms of Service with the coming of Jesus Christ and rendered circumcision obsolete, or is circumcision a heretical practice that creeped into the Old Testament? However, if the former is true, it would contradict the biblical claim that God is unchanging, such as James 1:17: “Every good thing given and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shifting shadow”, or Malachi 3:6 “For I the Lord do not change; therefore you, O children of Jacob, are not consumed”. Of course you could argue that God doesn’t change, but his rules do, but that still makes God sound fickle. If the latter is true, it detracts from the reliability of the Bible.

 

Circumcision

What is circumcision? As has been practiced by Jewish rabbis for centuries, it entails cutting off the foreskin of a baby on their 8th day, sometimes with sharpened claws, and then the rabbi sucks the blood from the penis with his mouth. Sounds like an evil pedophillic blood sacrifice to me. This is called the metzitzah b’peh. Nowadays this practice is not always used, but I still don’t find modern or “medical” forms of circumcision much better. Circumcision is likely to instill some sort of trauma in the baby. In fact Eric Clopper points out in his presentation that certain rabbis commit circumcision for this very purpose, to associate sex with pain.

As far as I know, the Bible does not describe the exact circumcision procedure, such as the metzitzah b’peh, so I suppose it’s possible circumcision worked differently in the time of Abraham. Genesis 17: 9-14 states:

“And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.”

It appears that cutting the foreskin is still clearly mentioned in Genesis, even if they did do it in some more humane manner. Another interesting detail is that slaves bought with money by Jews should be circumcised. This not only suggests that God condoned slavery, but that in modern days the goyim, such as in America, who are circumcised are slaves of the Jews.

Why would God require the faithful to cut of the foreskin of their children and slaves as his covenant? One explanation that I’ve heard is that it represents dedication to spirit instead of the corrupted flesh. If circumcision hinders one’s ability to enjoy sex, and sex is the foremost method of engaging in pleasures of the flesh, cutting off the foreskin would signify dedication to spirit instead of flesh. I can understand as an abstract concept, but I cannot accept in practice. Moreover it sounds like a member of organized crime cutting off a finger to show loyalty to the Don. Also as Michael Glass wrote in his article Answers from the Bible to Questions about Circumcision that the foreskin wasn’t a mistake of nature as “The Bible says that God pronounced creation ‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31) and that humans were made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). The Apostle Paul also said that God made every part of the body as he wanted it. (1 Corinthians 12:18).”

 

Circumcision in the Bible

Let’s have a look at some passages from the New Testament on circumcision. Certain passages are vehemently anti-circumcision such as Galatians 5: 1-3:

“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.

For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.”

Paul calls circumcision a “yoke of bondage”, and apparently if you are unable to “profit” from Christ if you are circumcised. Galatians 5: 5-6 sort of contradicts it though:

“For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.”

According to it circumcision seems irrelevant, whereas faith in Jesus and love are necessary. First Paul had described circumcision as harmful, but then he goes to say it’s irrelevant. While I agree with his motives, it does not sound like he preaching the word of God, but spouting his own political views.

Philippians 3: 2-3 (also featuring Paul, or Timotheus) states:

“Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision [mutilation or cutting]. For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

It describes circumcision as act of “evil workers” and encourages Christians to worship God in the spirit. For the Christian circumcision seems to be more of a symbolical act, cutting oneself off from earthly concerns, rather than mutilating one’s genetalia literally. In fact, Romans 2: 25-29 (also from Paul) mentions the circumcision of the heart:

“For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.”

This seems to be basically the letter of the law vs spirit of the law argument. If you are circumcized, you have to adhere to the letter of the law, but if you are not, you have to follow the spirit of the law. However, this does suggest that originally God cared only about the letter of the law, he wanted total obedience from his followers, but he softened up later and loosened his demands with Jesus.

What I see with Paul, is a liberal political pundit who is rebelling against the old, strict traditions of circumcision, and not as much a holy prophet spreading the word of God. However, the same could be said about the promoters of circumcision in the Old Testament, not them being liberal rebels, but political pundits. Let’s take a look at what Jesus has to say about circumcision in John 7: 22-24:

“Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.”

Michael Glass writes on this passage the following: “the Greek expression for making a man completely well could also be translated as making him completely whole.” It could even be interpreted to say that Jesus cure and uncircumcized the man, i.e. grew back his foreskin. Whatever the case, it appears Jesus was not overly concerned about circumcision, or the Sabbath for that matter.

Also in John 7:22 as can be seen above, Jesus said “Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers)”. It would suggest that Jesus claims Moses did not teach circumcision, as is often believed, but it’s an older tradition. As Michael Glass writes:

“the Children of Israel abandoned circumcision during Moses’ leadership (Joshua 5: 4-7). Exodus 4: 24-26 tells us that Moses had not circumcised his own son.

This suggests several scribal traditions. In the first, Moses did not practise circumcision, and the custom was abandoned under his leadership (Joshua 5: 4-7).”

Joshua was Moses’ assistant who took over after Moses died. When he was in charge, he started circumcizing children again. So there is some anti-circumcision sentiment even in the Old Testament, and not merely from a random dude, but from Moses himself.

While Paul’s anti-circumcision rhetoric seems personally or politically motivated, it also does seem to follow Jesus’ approach as well, where a person’s health is more important than ancient religious customs. However Jesus did state in Matthew 5: 17-19 the following:

““Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”

Shouldn’t that contradict Jesus and his followers’ assertions against circumcision? It is part of the law, after all? Perhaps he is referring the Ten Commandments only, or perhaps the law employed by people, including passages in the Old Testament had been corrupted doctrines conjured up by men? Michael Glass makes similar suggestions:

“Jesus himself criticized the scribes and their traditions. (e.g., Matthew 15: 1-9, also Isaiah 29 :13). Jeremiah’s assessment of the Law must also be pondered.

How can you say, “We are wise,
and the law of the LORD is with us,”
when in fact, the false pen of the scribes
has made it into a lie?
(Jeremiah 8: 8, New RSV)”

 

Conclusion

I am still asking Christians, or anyone else, how do reconcile the disconnect between the contradictory positions on circumcision in the Old and New Testaments? Genesis 17 claims God told Abraham to circumcize his offspring, but in the New Testament Paul especially is vehemently against it. Did the omniscient and unchanging God change his mind on the content of his decrees, even his covenant, with men? Are there errors in the Old Testament where the word of God has been replaced with the word of men? Or was Paul merely a heretic speaking selfishly against circumcision?

Personally I would not have a problem had God changed his mind, although it would sort of suggest he is not all-knowing. Let’s take a hypothetical description of God. He is the Creator of all life and the world, and compared to human beings he might as well be described as all-powerful, yet even he has his limitations. He wants humans to have free will, but also to direct them to live their lives properly. First he makes a certain kind of policy or a decree in hopes of directing humanity in a certain way, but over the course of years he notices it’s not working. Then like a king, he makes a new policy which he hopes will be more succesful. I have no problem with such a concept of God, but it would probably go against Christian dogma as it implies God is flawed in some manner.

Another possible interpretation of this circumcision hassle is that, as is according to Christian belief, the Bible describes historical events from Eden up to the time of Christ from various different authors. While the events underneath the words of men have been true, but many of the smaller or even bigger details are up for revision. This would explain how when the Book of Genesis was written, circumcision was seen as a decree from God, but in the time of Jesus it was seen as a yoke. Both are merely views held by men. This view also makes sense to me, but it goes against the dogmatic view that the Bible is the infallible word of God.

I should note that my purpose is not to attack Christianity or the Bible, but to questionsthem. After all, if Christians wish to convert me, or others with similar views, they should have an answer to these questions. Christians who believe in Jesus and all that, should have asked themselves these questions as well. Why did God demand circumcision as the holy covenant with his followers back in the old days, but now you just need faith in Jesus? If your answer is: ‘it doesn’t matter. You just have to believe in Jesus.’ Then what’s the point in having the Bible in the first place? You know the book that describes what Jesus did and said. Ignore what the book says, just believe. Believe in what?

 

Links:

Sex & Circumcision: An American Love Story by Eric Clopper: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc

Answers from the Bible to Questions about Circumcision: http://www.cirp.org/pages/cultural/glass2/

Advertisements

Kabbalistic Origins of the Copernican Model

The Copernican heliocentric model and the Big Bang are the basis to the understanding of the cosmology of modern science. Those who tend to look at things critically have probably found these claims somewhat questionable, and there are claims that these ideas, and others concepts of modern science, such as Evolution, are actually of occult or religious origin. There is also alleged Jesuit involvement in our current understanding of the universe. While there are certainly plenty of material on the internet about this, I decided to take a look at it myself. In this article I’ll focus on Nicolaus Copernicus and his ideas. Next time I’ll look at the Big Bang.

However before I move on, I’d like to share my take on the Jesuits, or the claim you see here and there: “It’s the Jesuits.” Jesuits are actually the first conspiratorial group I ever heard about. When I was a child learned that Jesuits embodied the maxim: the ends justify the means. I’m not sure where I learned, maybe from my parents, but ever since I had had the idea of Jesuits of being some sort of conspiratorial cabal. That was years before I even heard the names Freemason or Illuminati. Then around ten years ago, when I was getting serious about learning about conspiracies and secret societies, I heard from a Christian friend that Jesuits are actually really nice, he said they are sort of like hippies. That confused me greatly.  He seemed to be describing a completely different group from the historical Jesuits. Both because I suppose I associated Jesuits with my former childhood self, and my friend’s confusing comments, I hadn’t looked much into Jesuit conspiracy theories in my conspiracy theorist “career”, but maybe a couple years ago I saw some articles about Jesuit universities.

I’ll this article from NY Times as an example from 2013. It describes how the Jesuit Georgetown college celebrated OUTober, an LGBT gay-parade with students prancing around wearing pink shirts. My friend’s view of Jesuits must have originated from these kind of liberal, tolerant modern Jesuit colleges. The Jesuits have been, and still are, all about pursuing their own nefarious agendas and subverting society’s values. It’s just that the times are different, and they are using different methods nowadays. A few centuries ago they were probably more focused on sequestering knowledge, assassination and more traditional cloak and dagger stuff, now they are putting on a benevolent mask and are engaging in social engineering, such as LGBT agenda.

Yet I still do not agree that “it is the Jesuits”. You see and hear these people saying “it’s the Jesuits and that guy never mentions the Jesuits, so he must be a shill”. The next guy says: “No, it’s actually the Freemasons. You’re the shill.” Whereas the third guy claims: “It’s the Jews.” I think these groups, and many others are part of the secret society control system, but I do not know who or what group is on top of it all, nor do I trust anyone who claims they know the truth, unless they are a member of the group that rules over all other groups.

 

Copernicus and Kabbalah

Let’s move on to Nicolaus Copernicus and the heliocentric model of the solar system. Before Copernicus’ theories, most Europeans believed in the geocentric Ptolemaic system. According to Wikipedia, Copernicus had formulated his theory already in 1510, but his book “On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres” was published after his death in 1543. Interestingly in the Controversy-section of the article it states:

“The immediate result of the 1543 publication of Copernicus’s book was only mild controversy. At the Council of Trent (1545–63) neither Copernicus’s theory nor calendar reform (which would later use tables deduced from Copernicus’s calculations) were discussed. It has been much debated why it was not until six decades after the publication of De revolutionibus that the Catholic Church took any official action against it, even the efforts of Tolosani going unheeded. Catholic side opposition only commenced seventy-three years later, when it was occasioned by Galileo.”

I suppose the Catholic church created the controversy on purpose, since Copernicus’ theories had not caught on in the regular people. So they turned Galileo into this oppressed anti-hero basically to advertise the Copernican model as the new and exciting thing that the establishment supposedly is afraid. Sort of how they got a lot of people, myself included, to support Donald Trump. (Although my support of him wasn’t really so much because the establishment pretended to hate him, but because of Hillary Clinton and Pizzagate, but that’s another story.)

Let’s get back to Copernicus. His book was called “On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres”. Just the name itself reminds me of the Tree of Life of Kabbalah and Sephiroth spheres on it, or the Norse World Tree with the hanging worlds on it.

 

I used to think this similarity pretty much proves there is some truth to Kabbalah and the ancient myths, but now I am skeptical of the modern cosmology, so I am more inclined to think the “scientists” who have been pushing this model do so because their religion says so. Nowadays many of the flat earthers believe in the Biblical geocentric, domed-model. I suppose I am one of them, but I am happy to admit I could be wrong. There does seem to be some sort spiritual and scientific battle between these two religious concept going on. One of them could be right, and one wrong, or perhaps both are simply religious ideas.

Anyway, the heliocentric model that Copernicus was pushing is rather Kabbalistic. A Kabbala site called Revealing Science of God says: “It should be noted that the 16th century also witnessed perhaps the first scientific verification of Kabbalist teaching with the book written by Copernicus. The Kabbalists never taught the Earth to be the center of the universe, and Copernicus’ discovery proved them right.”

Another blogger on WordPress had written an article titled: “Copernicus And His Kabbalistic Methods”. He quotes Copernicus saying: “Nor is it necessary that these hypotheses should be true, nor indeed even probable, but it is sufficient if they merely produce calculations which agree with the observations…” This sort of reasoning does indeed seem Kabbalistic.

Torahscience.org has an article states that the Torah, i.e. the first five books of the Old Testament, has a geocentric universe. However, when a “holy” Rabbi Ruzhiner was presented with Copernicus’ theories, people expected him to deny them, however the Rabbi responded as follows:

“When he was informed of this, the Holy Ruzhiner remained completely composed and his response was a very special one. He said that whether the earth revolves around the sun or the sun revolves around the earth depends on the service of the tzaddikim, the righteous Jews of the generation. The answer to the question of “What revolves around what?” is not an absolute answer. If, for instance, the tzaddikim in this generation would serve God in a manner in which it would be correct to see Pluto as the center of the solar system, then in some mysterious way scientific discoveries would adapt to reflect that change.”

Those “tzaddikim” are probably the good Jews who believe in Kabbalah and the Talmud instead of the Torah.

Later on the article gives another example of this: “Accordingly, the variation between geocentricism and heliocentricism can be compared to a difference between a service of God that sees man (on earth) as the center, with God, as it were, revolving around man and caring for all of man’s needs; or perceiving God as the center, whereby man is obligated to God and His commandments.”

According to Kabbalah, it would seem, anything can be anything as long as you can bullshit and fast talk others to believe in it. Even the laws of nature and God are subject one’s ability to make stuff up. I have noticed similar things have permeated all aspects of modern society. Feminism is one example. They say rape is power + privilege, and since White women have them, they cannot be raped. Alternatively, a woman who had consensual sex with man can turn the act post coitum into a rape if she regrets later her promiscuity. Once again, twisting words around can supposedly change reality to suit one’s needs.

I do not know whether Nicolaus Copernicus had studied the Kabbalah, but he did seem to adhere to many Kabbalistic notions. I also do not know if there is any connection between Copernicus and the Jesuits. The Jesuit order was officially formed 1540 and Copernicus died 1543, so it is possible they might have had something to do with it, but I haven’t seen any actual evidence of this.

 

The Catholics

The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy says that during Copernicus’ lifetime, the Catholic church seemed to be fine with his theories:

“Pope Clement VII (r. 1523–1534) had reacted favorably to a talk about Copernicus’s theories, rewarding the speaker with a rare manuscript. There is no indication of how Pope Paul III, to whom On the Revolutions was dedicated reacted; however, a trusted advisor, Bartolomeo Spina of Pisa (1474–1546) intended to condemn it but fell ill and died before his plan was carried out. Thus, in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy.”

So Pope Clement VII, who appears to have died before Copernicus, reacted favourably to his theories, and the Pope who succeeded him was Paul III to whom Copernicus dedicated his book. Had the Catholic church been hostile to Copernicus’ theories, you might interpret this as a kind of FU from Copernicus, however it does not appear that was the case. There probably were many individuals who did not appreaciate his un-Biblical cosmology, but overall, as Stanford Encyclopedia stated, the heliocentric system was not a heresy.

Interestingly, as is mentioned above, Pope Paul III’s advisor, Bartolomeo Spina, wanted to condemn Copernicus’ book, and presumably he could have influenced the Pope as well, but he fell ill and died. Convenient, wouldn’t you say? Perhaps he was poisoned. His Wikipedia page doesn’t say much, but it says Bartolomeo Spina was involved in prosecuting witches, so he probably understood the Copernical model as the occult concept that it is.

There are some claims that Nicolaus Copernicus may have been a prist. At least he did not marry, and he was a member of the Third Order of Saint Dominic, which is some sort of lay Dominican order. The New Advent website states:

“After his university studies Copernicus practised medicine for six years (1506-1512) at Heilsberg, being sought by bishops and princes, but especially by the poor, whom he served gratis. There is no document to show that Copernicus ever received higher orders. His medical practice, which was only private, would not speak against him being a priest, and the fact that in 1537 King Sigismund of Poland put his name on the list of four candidates for the vacant episcopal seat of Ermland, makes it probable that, at least in later life, he had entered the priesthood.”

So he might have died a Catholic priest. I’ve uncovered no evidence of any involvement of Jesuits with Copernicus himself. The Catholic church, however, did seem be in good relations with him.

Copernicus certainly seems to have been influenced by the Kabbalah, and it was all approved by the Catholic church.

Next time I’ll focus on the Big Bang theory and it’s obvious occult origins.

 

Links:

A Rainbow Over Catholic Colleges
How Georgetown Became a Gay-Friendly Campus: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/how-georgetown-became-a-gay-friendly-campus.html

Nicolaus Copernicus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus

One Possible History of Kabbalism: http://www.revealingscienceofgod.com/index.php?page=one-possible-history-of-kabbalism

Copernicus And His Kabbalistic Methods: https://migchels.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/copernicus-and-his-kabbalistic-methods/

Science Versus Torah?: http://www.torahscience.org/natsci/astronomy_rav2.htm

Nicolaus Copernicus: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/copernicus/

Bartolommeo Spina: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartolommeo_Spina

Do you have a calling to be Third Order of St. Dominic?: http://www.sacredheart-op.org/Vocations.htm

Copernicus: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04352b.htm

The Jesuits & The Globe Earth: The Mother Of All Conspiracies!: https://www.worldslastchance.com/end-time-prophecy/the-jesuits-the-globe-earth-the-mother-of-all-conspiracies.html

Bill Nye the Fall Guy

I watched a Youtube video titled “Flat earth denier Bill Nye caught up in lies! GAME OVER 2017”. It shows a few clips of people in the main stream starting to turn against Bill Nye the Science Guy.

The video starts off with Joe Rogan saying “scientists are all going after Bill Nye.” Then Rogan’s guest, I don’t know who that is, responponds “Bill Nye the Weimar Guy?” Referring to the decadent Weimar republic that preceded Hitler’s National Socialist Germany. Rogan and his guest also mention that Bill Nye is not even a scientist, and he’s a conman. They’re also pointing out that back in the nineties Bill Nye’s program said that gender comes from chromosomes, but now his TV show is pushing the liberal gender fluidism crap. These are valid points of course, but then there are a couple of comments that make the lightbulb in my head go off.

Rogan’s guest says Bill Nye has fallen into an ideology that is complete religion. Joe Rogan says Bill Nye’s been “influenced”. At least Rogan’s guest says Nye is getting rewarded for it, but I don’t know if Rogan and the other guy go into it in more detail in the full interview. However at least here they make it out to seem like Bill Nye is pushing this liberalism propaganda because he’s “drunk the cool-aid”. This is complete BS, of course. Bill Nye is an actor, and he’s merely doing what he’s being paid for. I don’t know if he really believes any of the gender fluid crap he’s pushing now, or if he cares. He’s clearly being influenced by the producers of his TV show, who want to push this propaganda. I doubt Nye himself has much power to decide the message of his show himself.

What’s interesting is that this establishment puppet Joe Rogan is pushing an anti-leftism angle, and attacking one of the puppets of scientism and leftism. I cannot say Rogan is controlled opposition, since I don’t think he’s even pretending to be opposition, but he is controlled. It seems now the establishment is starting turn the social engineering around. They have an army of brainwashed liberals, and now they want to manipulate others into a suitable right-wing counter-reaction.

I wrote back in 2015: “What is happening today in the West bears an eerie resemblance to what the alleged Freemason Albert Pike supposedly described in his letter to Giuseppe Mazzini over a hundred years ago.” The infamous letter of course details that The Powers That Be plan to unleash the nihilists and the atheists so the decent people would react to defend themselves against these “destroyers of civilization” and eradicate them. I think they are preparing us for this eradication of the “nihilists and atheists”.

The point of this far-left liberalism was never to turn the whole West into a Marxist “paradise”. It was to weaken the West to transform it into something else. Like the alchemical Solve and Coagula, dissolve and coagulate. First the left dissolves the West, and the new Right will coagulate, or form, it into a new image. It doesn’t matter whether your ideology is far-left, far-right or even far-center if you are being controlled by the people who created the problem in the first place.

Over the years I’ve heard conspiracy claims here and there that the elites are actually secret Nazis, which of course sounds like a baseless accusation seeing that Zionists Jews wield a lot of influence in the world and Hitler is the most demonized person in the world, yet things like this make me think maybe this has all been an eloborate conspiracy to Nazi-ize the West. Like Joe Rogan’s anonymous guest said: Bill Nye the Weimar Guy. This is fairly blatantly pushing the narrative that we live in the decadent Weimar republic and it’s only natural to become more National Socialist-like to fight against it. Moreover, in just 5 years more people have become sympathetic toward the Nazis, mainly due to Islamic immigration into the West and the troubles that it brings. So this makes me think, what if there is something to these crypto-Nazi conspiracy theories?

To clarify, I have described myself as Nazi-sympathizer, meaning I do think that the National Socialists and Hitler have been unfairly maligned, and I’ve thought for years that the Holocaust narrative is a lie. Yet I am not convinced that Hitler was a great hero either, the saviour of White race, or anything like that. I don’t know if he was genuine in his efforts, a Rothschild agent, a British agent, a Freemason, or what. At best though, he was a loser with good intentions, but his actions in the end worked against the German people, and the West in general, as his failure to win the war has greatly strengthened the “internationalist clique” that he supposedly fought against.

To get back on topic, I think Bill Nye is being set as a fall guy for fake science and leftism in order to allow other kind of fake science and socially engineered agendas to flourish. The elites create these golemic strawmen, such as Feminism, give them power in order to tear them down after a while in order to further other agendas. A lot of people finally see liberalism as a deluded lie now after it has caused a lot of damage, but they will most likely fall for the next delusion that is waiting around the corner.

 

Links:

Flat earth denier Bill Nye caught up in lies! GAME OVER 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eonqHPPqWjo

How Albert Pike’s letter can aid us in the Nationalist Revival: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/pikes-letter/

A Few Case Studies on being Jewish

I have gathered up a few examples of Jews and how Jewishness affects them. The people in question are a Hungarian politician, Csanád Szegedi, a Sicilian man (and his grandmother), Christopher Columbus, and David Seaman, a controversial Pizzagate researcher.

Perhaps a title that says a few examples on being Jewish would be more accurate, but case studies sounds much nicer.

 

The Hungarian Politician

Csanád Szegedi was a Hungarian nationalist politician known for his “anti-Semitic” remarks. However, he eventually he discovered he himself is a Jew. The NPR website states the following:

“[I]n 2010 a prisoner confronted him with evidence that he had Jewish roots. According to the AP, Szegedi tried to bribe the prisoner to keep him quiet, but rumors and innuendo reached a fever pitch by late last year and in June, Szegedi conceded that his mother was a Jew. According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.”

Szegedi’s eventual reaction to this was to become a Jew. In fact, he appears to be making aliya, i.e. immigrating to Israel. Or maybe he already did it. Prior to these revelations Szegedi has accused Jews of “‘buying up’ the country” and he “railed about the ‘Jewishness’ of the political elite and claimed Jews were desecrating national symbols”, according to The Star.

What makes this interesting is that Szegedi changed his critical stance on Jews after finding out that he is a Jew, instead of fighting the Jewish elite and continuing to promote Hungarian nationalism. He embraced his Jewishness. There are two different viewpoints on what makes a person a Jew, is it genetic or a cultural/religious thing. If Jewishness is genetic in a way that it makes Jews behave differently, then shouldn’t he have been pro-Jewish to begin with? Instead this case might support the argument that Jews behave in a Jewey way because they are raised in a certain way.

Then again maybe Szegedi knew he was a Jew to begin with, but hid his identity from others, but after he was outed, he forsook Hungarian nationalism as people wouldn’t trust him anymore. Alternatively, perhaps he was intrigued by Jews to begin with because of his Jewish genetics, but only after Szegedi learned he is Jewish he understood his interest in Jews.

Another interesting tidbit is how NPR described his mother being a Jew: “According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.” Are you Jews somehow spiritual affected by this law that force them to behave a certain way?

 

Jews in Sicily

An article in The Economist titled “Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring” describes one Jewish man, Gabriele Spagna, who grew up as normal Sicilian, presumably a Catholic, but his grandmother on her deathbed had confided to him that she was had been Jewish all along, while pretending to be something else. Apparently this revelation also turned Spagna into a practising Jew as well. He seems beholden to Jewish law as well.

 

Columbus a crypto-Jew?

I had heard of conspiracy theories before alleging that Christopher Columbus had been a crypto-Jew, a Jew who pretends to be Christian while practicing in secret, but I found an article on Daily Mail saying that some (main stream?) historian are claiming the same thing. According to these historians Columbus had been a “Marrano”, crypto-Jew, and he had been looking for a safe haven for Jews in his voyages.

All of these three accounts, Szegedi, Spagna and Columbus, seem to suggest that Jews are never really Christians or Europeans, instead they owe allegiance to their Jewishness.

 

David Seaman

David Seaman is a main stream journalist who became well-known for his coverage of Pizzagate on his Youtube channel, but a rather intriguing controversy has arisen around him in the last week.

I discovered his Youtube channel around the time that Pizzagate started trending around the internet. I was a bit skeptical of Seaman at first, since he said he had worked for Huffington Post, yet his coverage of Pizzagate was reasonable, and I was happy to see a main stream journalist promote the topic so I followed him for a few months. Eventually though I stopped following him for a few different factors: he didn’t seem to be bringing much new research on Pizzagate, I began to suspect he was more interested in getting donations, and he looked Jewish and his name sounds Jewish as well. Once or twice Seaman even said something like grown people had gotten physically sick and vomited due to their research on Pizzagate, which I found a bit excessive. It sounds more like a character in a movie might say, instead of something that actually happens, so it got my alarm bells ringing. I stopped following him maybe a month ago, and did not pay more attention to him until now.

I try not to judge people simply on the grounds that they are Jewish yet centuries of European heritage, two Millennia of Christian teachings, and my personal observations have taught me that you should not trust Jews, and it appears it was a sensible course of action.

A week ago a Youtuber by the name of Nathan Stolpman published a video on his channel, Lift the Veil, exposing some dubious facts about Seaman. Shortly after this Seaman deleted all of his videos. It seems Seaman had been “shilling” for (his own words) a company called Goldmoney, owned by an Israeli Jew, and Seaman appeared to be promoting Pizzagate more for attention and money instead truly caring about the issue. Stolpman even found out that Seaman had written a book “Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself” in 2008. The book describes how you can promote yourself and make money by figuring out a topic before it becomes popular if you keep talking about it. If you can make people associate yourself as the guy who discovered it, you can gain a lot of views and clicks. It appears Pizzagate was a topic that allowed him to gain buzz.

Certainly it is normal for anyone with a Youtube channel or a blog like mine to take advantage of buzz and comment on trending topics, since they are issues that people find interesting. Nothing wrong with that as long as you’re being honest and bringing something to the table. However, I don’t think Seaman has been honest about it.

I won’t go into all of the details of what Seaman has said and done, but I suggest looking into what Stolpman has uncovered and drawing your own conclusions. I have. To me Seaman is another example of a Jew that exploits other people for his personal benefit and monetary gain. And yes, he is Jewish, it was stated in an interview Seaman did with some Youtuber whose name I don’t recall.

I was suspicious of him before this, and Stolpman/Lift the Veil confirmed my suspicions. The way Seaman has responded to Stolpman’s revelations is dishonest in my opinion as well. He has not proven them false, instead Seaman has tried to sidestep the issue and make it seem as if he is being attacked for telling the truth about Pizzagate. That is not the case at all, at least not when it comes to the videos on Lift the Veil’s channel. But once again, I suggest you look into it yourself instead of taking my word for it.

 

Conclusions

All of the cases of Jewish behaviour seem to lend credence to the “anti-Semitic” view that Jews do not feel beholden to the morals of the goyim. As the Talmud says, different principles apply to Jews and to goyim. Gypsies are similar in this respect. Stealing from non-Gypsies is allowed, while stealing from other Gypsies is not. Most other people, such as Europeans and East-Asians at least think that stealing and exploiting others is wrong. It matters little whether the person you are stealing from is of your race or religion or an outsider. Of course, there are still many immoral people in every ethnic group, but the initial values that the society promotes differ between Jews and the rest of us.

My reason for pointing this out is simply that you should be aware of how Jews think. Their morals are different than yours. It is foolish to expect them to think like we do.

 

Links:

Leader Of Anti-Semitic Party In Hungary Discovers He’s Jewish: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/08/14/158773637/leader-of-anti-semitic-party-in-hungary-discovers-hes-jewish

Former antisemitic Hungarian MP who discovered Jewish roots to make aliya: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Former-antisemitic-Hungarian-MP-who-discovered-Jewish-roots-to-make-aliya-468386

Leader of anti-Semitic party in Hungary discovers he is Jewish: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2012/08/14/leader_of_antisemitic_party_in_hungary_discovers_he_is_jewish.html

Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring: http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2017/02/jewish-revival-sicily

Was Columbus secretly Jewish? Historians argue explorer’s epic voyage was to establish new homeland for his people as they escaped the Spanish Inquisition: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2147558/Christopher-Columbus-Jewish-looking-new-homeland-discovered-America-historians-say.html

David Seaman, Pizzagate & Goldmoney: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZXDHzZlYzU

altNews: David Seaman’s Open Invitation, Mind Control & Phone Calls | 3.3.2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIgqGn42jcM

Purple and Indigo Wandering Jews

I was thinking what if any connection there is between the Jews and Phoenicians. The colour purple supposedly originates from the Phoenicians so I put “purple Jews” into Google. The first result I got was an article titled: “Growing Wandering Jew Plants – How To Grow Wandering Jew Plants”. Apparently there is a purple plant called wandering jew.

On the gardening website I saw a related article titled “Killing Wandering Jew… Plants: How to Get Rid of Wandering Jew Weeds In The Garden”. I added the three dots. I’m surprised the ADL hasn’t deemed these weeds anti-Semitic.

Apparently there are at least two kinds of wandering jew plants, weeds and “good jews”. The “good jew” is Tradescantia pallida, a purple plant, whereas the weed is Tradescantia fluminensis, a White plant. I guess that answers the question are Jews White? Looks Purple to me.

tradescantiapallida

 

Let’s not get side-tracked to botany any longer. I was supposed to discuss Jews and the colour purple. The Phoenicians got their purple dye from sea snails. This is called Tyrian purple. A Wikipedia article on Jewish symbolism says that Israelites used to have an indigo or purple-blue dye called “tekhelet”. This is derived from a sea snail called Hexaplex trunculus. This dye appears to have been similar yet different to the Tyrian purple. That dye was derived from the sea slug Murex brandaris (currently named Bolinus brandaris). Interestingly the Wikipedia article on Hexaplex trunculus decribes “tekhelet” as purple-blue, and Tyrian purple as purple-red. They are both different hues of purple apparently.

While this does not prove any indisputable connection between Jews and the Phoenicians, it appears they had a similar technique of obtaining purplish dye from sea snails. Whether it actually means anything, I do not know. The Wikipedia article on Tyrian purple mentions one interesting fact:

“Recent research in organic electronics has shown that Tyrian purple is an ambipolar organic semiconductor. Transistors and circuits based on this material can be produced from sublimed thin-films of the dye. The good semiconducting properties of the dye originate from strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding that reinforces pi stacking necessary for transport.”

This sounds like it might be significant. However, I don’t know what an “ambipolar organic semiconductor”, and what people in classical times would have done with such substances. Did the ancient Phoenicians make transistors and circuits with their dye?

 

Links:

Growing Wandering Jew Plants – How To Grow Wandering Jew Plants: https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/houseplants/wandering-jew/growing-wandering-jew-plants.htm

Killing Wandering Jew Plants: How To Get Rid Of Wandering Jew Weeds In The Garden: https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/houseplants/wandering-jew/get-rid-of-wandering-jew.htm

Tyrian purple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple

Jewish symbolism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_symbolism

Hexaplex trunculus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexaplex_trunculus

Bolinus brandaris: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolinus_brandaris

Red Ice, rather Red Slush, pussies out on the Mike Enoch issue

Around a week ago Greg “Grindr Greggie” Johnson was interviewed by Henrik Palmgren at Red Ice TV. I was intrigued enough to listen to the interview since they discussed the Mike Enoch doxing incident. I was wondering whether Red Ice will take a stand or even comment on the issue. Turns out not really.

In the beginning of the interview Henrik Palmgren says the hasn’t looked much into the Mike Enoch incident, so he cannot say much about it, instead he’s going to let Grindr Greggie explain his view on it. Fair enough, except not really. The interview happened a week ago, Mr. Red Ice should have had enough time to look into it by now, but I haven’t seen any “official policy” from Red Ice on the Mike Enoch thing. Unless there is a video or an article on their website that I just happened to miss, I can only deduce that either Henrik continues to support Mike Enoch and they’re choosing to ignore this issue in hopes that it will blow over, or that he disapproves of Mike Enoch’s Jewey wife, but is too much of a pussy to speak out against it. I can understand if he wants to avoid in-fighting in their movement, but there is difference between in-fighting and calling out traitors and liabilities.

Greg Johnson doesn’t seem to say much about Mike Enoch in the interview. He mostly repeats the stuff he wrote about in his article Why I support Mike Enoch. Unsurprisingly, he supports Mike Enoch. He does admit that he knew about Mike Jew-wife already back in 2014, and many of the inner circle in Alt-Right knew about it as well. Henrik Palmgren says in the interview that he didn’t, and he had met Mike Enoch only twice in person. I suppose I’ll believe him on this. Johnson also admits in his article that Enoch’s wife is 1/2 Jewish, although in truth she might be more than that, but half-Jewish is still Jewish. The fact that she is also a faghag who hangs around with trannies is conspicuously absent from the article. Grindr Greggie makes some false claims about Enoch’s wife, Ames Friedman: “she does not have a strong sense of Jewish identity and ethnocentrism”.

Ames Friedman had uploaded this video on her Youtube account (but she has deleted since the doxing, I believe):

thisishowwejew

It’s about a tranny and two (gay?) Jews dancing around and singing “This is how we Jew it”. In the comment below we can see Ames saying she’s Jewish. She admits she’s Jewish, she enjoys depraved music acts with trannies and gays promoting Jewish ethnonationalism, so I’m just going to say that Greg Johnson is full of shit.

Naturally, Grindr Greggie would have no problem with LGBT-shows like these since he is a known sodomite. Speaking of sodomites, Henrik Palmgren and Johnson spent the first half of the interview speaking about the Alt-Right Youtuber, Millenial Woes, another known sodomite. He had been doxed much earlier, maybe a couple of months ago, and apparently went into hiding, but now he’s come back, since Red Ice has another article promoting Millenial Woes’ return. It states: “After a brief hiatus, Millennial Woes is back at it. In his most recent video, he outlines the recent media attacks against him. If you support Woes, please consider sending a few e-shekels his way.” Yes, keep sending those shekels to the phoneys.

I discovered Millenial Woes’s channel a year, or year and a-half ago, and initially liked it. He has a flair for the dramatic and watching his videos makes you feel like it’s a video blog from a survivor in zombie apocalypse. But after a while I realized, that’s all his videos are: entertaining. They hold little of actual informational content, no great philosophical insight, no practical advice. It’s all about his feelings.

Anyway, I went on this tangent to make a point, which is that these are the priorities of Red Ice. They are promoting sodomites and “intellectuals” who are full of hot air like Greg Johnson and Millennial Woes, but ignore significant issues such as Mike Enoch having a LGBT-promoting Marxist Jew-wife. At the end of the Grindr Greg interview Henrik even tries to defend his wife Lana interviewing Reactionary Jew last year. He’s calling out people who have problems with is as “paranoid”. He says something about people being obsessed with someone having 0.001% Jewish DNA being excessive. I agree, but Mike Enoch’s wife has at least 50% Jewish DNA, or if Henrik’s not talking about her, what is he rambling on about?

The problem with the Reactionary Jew interview is not that they had the audacity to talk to him, but that they are sort of throwing the idea out there to see if someone is willing to bite that the Alt-Right might co-operate with Zionist Jews. Now after the backlash they got, I expect Red Ice to tone down this pro-Jew propaganda for a while. When the Alt-Right emerged I thought their two main issues were nationalism and exposing the Jewish Zionist influence in the world, which is why I liked them at first. Co-operating with Jewish Zionists goes against both of these principles, since Zionists want ethno-nationalism only for the Jews, and are responsible for much of the third-world immigration that is flooding into Europe. I don’t think that the leaders in the Alt-Right are so dumb as not to realize it. Either they are wittingly working for the Jews, or they just don’t care about Jews either way but figure that co-operating with Jews will help themselves personally. The whole of Alt-Right is a scam, and seems like it has been from the get-go.

Just to make a friendly reminder, Richard Spencer, the apparent leader of the Alt-Right, has been caught trying to rub elbows with Zionists again. January 16th, the Forward website published an article of an interview between Spencer and a Jewish rabbi. I think these couple of sentences say all that needs to be said about it: “Spencer says his dream of building a ‘white ethno-state’ is ‘very similar to how Jews conceive of Israel.’ He even describes his vision as something like ‘white Zionism.'”

A couple of years ago when Red Ice started exposing the Holohoax and talking about Jews, I thought it was great. Now it seems it was all more like an advertisement campaign: see how the Jews are controlling everything and screwing us over. First they tried to fight against the Jews, but eventually they decided it’s too hard so according to the beta male maxim: “If you can’t beat them, join them.” Now the Alt-Right Whites want to become the new Jews. The Talmudic Aryans, the White Zionists.

Red Ice has shown how irrelevant they are becoming. They won’t even address the important Mike Enoch issue. Instead of Red Ice, Red Slush would be a better name for them. Cuck Ice Radio.

 

P.S.

Henrik Palmgren tries to defend the Reactionary Jew interview by pointing out how they’ve interviewed other Jews in the past, such as Gilad Atzmon, who criticizes the Jewish establishment, and David Cole, a Holocaust revisionist. That’s the point exactly. Has interviewing those people created controversy, have they gotten a huge backlash from their audience? I don’t think so because people understand that those Jews are at least to some degree on the same side. A Zionist Jew is not.

 

Links:

Grindr Greggie on Red Ice: https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/doxing-only-works-once

Why I suck off… support Mike Enoch: http://www.counter-currents.com/2017/01/why-i-support-mike-enoch/

Woes by any other name: https://redice.tv/news/a-woes-by-any-other-name

The ‘Alt-Right’ Hates the Jews. But It Also Loves Them — and Israel.: https://archive.is/E87su#selection-4625.105-4625.275

Revisiting the Jewish Question

I’ve written countless times about Jews and their role in the problems that the world is facing. I’m still not sure what actually makes a Jew a Jew, what is the essence of Jewry and what causes their tendency for subversive behaviour. Are they a race or a religion, are their actions motivated by their genetics, culture or some metaphysical component? All I can say is that they are Jews, and apparently being a Jew makes one act Jewish. Trying to pinpoint the particulars of Jewish characteristics only leads you down an endless rabbit hole as Jews can claim to be a unique when it suits them, but the next moment they are a religion. Sometimes they’re white, other times they are Jewish.

The whole Mike Enoch fiasco has made me re-organize my thoughts on the whole Jewish Question. For those who do not know, Mike Enoch is a host on the Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah, and the owner, I suppose, of The Right Stuff-website. It was revealed a week ago that Mike Enoch’s, who used to joke about gassing the Jews and whatnot, wife is a Jew, and not just any Jew, but a Jew who is into transvestites and promotes the LBGT-agenda. There are also some audio clips out there where Mike Enoch more or less admits that he is a Jew as well. I don’t know if it is true, since Enoch has proven himself to be a very shifty character, but he at least seems to think of himself as a Jew.

When I first discussed this issue I wrote: “I don’t wish Enoch any more ill will than he has already gotten, but naturally his political career should be demolished and his lies exposed.” That was when I thought that Mike Enoch is just going to give up on The Right Stuff and skulk back into the shadows. Now it seems he has the chutzpah to continue on with his Alt-Right podcast as if nothing had happened. Mike Enoch is in essence a caricature of the Eternal Jew, a con man who is willing to do anything for money and attention and has no sense of shame. I no longer have any sympathy for him.

Enoch is also an obvious case study of how the Jew seems to thrive on so-called anti-Semitism. This isn’t the first time that a White Nationalist or “neo-Nazi” leader turns out to be a Jew. There have been cases where a swastika or other symbol of a “hate crime” is found in public, the media blames neo-Nazis, but it turns out the person behind the incident was actually a Jew. Jews seem to want people to hate them. Or on the other hand, they want to be worshiped by the Goyim, such as when Benjamin Netanyahu gets a standing ovation from the US congress, or that we have to remember the Jews who died in the alleged Holocaust, but never mind the millions of other people who died in WWII. Perhaps the worst thing for Jews is to be ignored.

Another important lesson to be learned from Mike Enoch is how easy it is for the Jew to find a bunch of gentiles to fool. He had plenty of fans prior to the scandal, most shockingly, even after his duplicity and Jewishness was revealed many people were still defending him. Unless all of the supportive comments I’ve seen on the internet are from a bunch of sock puppet accounts run by five people, but I doubt it. It’s like Corneliu Zelea Codreanu said:

mosquitojew

 

Europeans have understood the subversive nature of Jews for centuries, yet we’ve allowed them in and put them on a pedestal. A great deal of responsibility on the problems created by Jews fall on us. We’ve allowed them to do what is in their nature. Yet I am not convinced by the Common Filth argument either that Jews are purely reactive. That they are behind a lot of the LGBT-agenda, feminism, pornography only because the Goyim are a willing audience for it. Common Filth claims Jews basically promote these harmful things because there is profit in it. No, I don’t think so. They seek to subvert other people to make them a willing audience for their filth. My view is that the responsibility in all of this more like 50/50. It’s as much our fault as theirs.

I am not in favour of any solution to this problem such as “gassing the kikes”. One reason is simply because of basic humanitarian reasons, but also because I don’t think it would work. I’ve suggested a couple of years ago that the Jews have the Mark of Cain, or something similar to it. If we actively hurt them, the punishment will come back to us sevenfold. I believe Jews were sent to us either by god or the devil to punish us. We have learn to deal with them from a higher perspective than mere violence and coercion. Indentify the Jew and say no more. And stop falling for their tricks.

Before I finish, I’d like to dispel some myths. You don’t have to a White Nationalist, a neo-Nazi or anything like that to be aware of the nature of the Jew. It is one of these premade templates that the media pushes, a skinhead or a guy with a buzzcut who hates Jews because it’s basically their hobby. I don’t hate the Jew. I am more angry at the rest of us for always falling for Jewish tricks. Moreover the Jew wants you to hate him. You cannot blame a fox for eating your chickens if you make him guard the henhouse. The reason I have a problem with Jews is simply because I’m a truthseeker. An open mind and honest observation of the world leads you to notice the Jewish influence in economics, the media and so on. Even Milo Yiannopoulos, a homosexual Jew, admitted it in one video. But I suppose you’re just supposed to brush it off since he said in a humoristic tone.