Tag Archives: jews

A Few Case Studies on being Jewish

I have gathered up a few examples of Jews and how Jewishness affects them. The people in question are a Hungarian politician, Csanád Szegedi, a Sicilian man (and his grandmother), Christopher Columbus, and David Seaman, a controversial Pizzagate researcher.

Perhaps a title that says a few examples on being Jewish would be more accurate, but case studies sounds much nicer.

 

The Hungarian Politician

Csanád Szegedi was a Hungarian nationalist politician known for his “anti-Semitic” remarks. However, he eventually he discovered he himself is a Jew. The NPR website states the following:

“[I]n 2010 a prisoner confronted him with evidence that he had Jewish roots. According to the AP, Szegedi tried to bribe the prisoner to keep him quiet, but rumors and innuendo reached a fever pitch by late last year and in June, Szegedi conceded that his mother was a Jew. According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.”

Szegedi’s eventual reaction to this was to become a Jew. In fact, he appears to be making aliya, i.e. immigrating to Israel. Or maybe he already did it. Prior to these revelations Szegedi has accused Jews of “‘buying up’ the country” and he “railed about the ‘Jewishness’ of the political elite and claimed Jews were desecrating national symbols”, according to The Star.

What makes this interesting is that Szegedi changed his critical stance on Jews after finding out that he is a Jew, instead of fighting the Jewish elite and continuing to promote Hungarian nationalism. He embraced his Jewishness. There are two different viewpoints on what makes a person a Jew, is it genetic or a cultural/religious thing. If Jewishness is genetic in a way that it makes Jews behave differently, then shouldn’t he have been pro-Jewish to begin with? Instead this case might support the argument that Jews behave in a Jewey way because they are raised in a certain way.

Then again maybe Szegedi knew he was a Jew to begin with, but hid his identity from others, but after he was outed, he forsook Hungarian nationalism as people wouldn’t trust him anymore. Alternatively, perhaps he was intrigued by Jews to begin with because of his Jewish genetics, but only after Szegedi learned he is Jewish he understood his interest in Jews.

Another interesting tidbit is how NPR described his mother being a Jew: “According to Jewish law, that makes Szegedi Jewish, too.” Are you Jews somehow spiritual affected by this law that force them to behave a certain way?

 

Jews in Sicily

An article in The Economist titled “Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring” describes one Jewish man, Gabriele Spagna, who grew up as normal Sicilian, presumably a Catholic, but his grandmother on her deathbed had confided to him that she was had been Jewish all along, while pretending to be something else. Apparently this revelation also turned Spagna into a practising Jew as well. He seems beholden to Jewish law as well.

 

Columbus a crypto-Jew?

I had heard of conspiracy theories before alleging that Christopher Columbus had been a crypto-Jew, a Jew who pretends to be Christian while practicing in secret, but I found an article on Daily Mail saying that some (main stream?) historian are claiming the same thing. According to these historians Columbus had been a “Marrano”, crypto-Jew, and he had been looking for a safe haven for Jews in his voyages.

All of these three accounts, Szegedi, Spagna and Columbus, seem to suggest that Jews are never really Christians or Europeans, instead they owe allegiance to their Jewishness.

 

David Seaman

David Seaman is a main stream journalist who became well-known for his coverage of Pizzagate on his Youtube channel, but a rather intriguing controversy has arisen around him in the last week.

I discovered his Youtube channel around the time that Pizzagate started trending around the internet. I was a bit skeptical of Seaman at first, since he said he had worked for Huffington Post, yet his coverage of Pizzagate was reasonable, and I was happy to see a main stream journalist promote the topic so I followed him for a few months. Eventually though I stopped following him for a few different factors: he didn’t seem to be bringing much new research on Pizzagate, I began to suspect he was more interested in getting donations, and he looked Jewish and his name sounds Jewish as well. Once or twice Seaman even said something like grown people had gotten physically sick and vomited due to their research on Pizzagate, which I found a bit excessive. It sounds more like a character in a movie might say, instead of something that actually happens, so it got my alarm bells ringing. I stopped following him maybe a month ago, and did not pay more attention to him until now.

I try not to judge people simply on the grounds that they are Jewish yet centuries of European heritage, two Millennia of Christian teachings, and my personal observations have taught me that you should not trust Jews, and it appears it was a sensible course of action.

A week ago a Youtuber by the name of Nathan Stolpman published a video on his channel, Lift the Veil, exposing some dubious facts about Seaman. Shortly after this Seaman deleted all of his videos. It seems Seaman had been “shilling” for (his own words) a company called Goldmoney, owned by an Israeli Jew, and Seaman appeared to be promoting Pizzagate more for attention and money instead truly caring about the issue. Stolpman even found out that Seaman had written a book “Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself” in 2008. The book describes how you can promote yourself and make money by figuring out a topic before it becomes popular if you keep talking about it. If you can make people associate yourself as the guy who discovered it, you can gain a lot of views and clicks. It appears Pizzagate was a topic that allowed him to gain buzz.

Certainly it is normal for anyone with a Youtube channel or a blog like mine to take advantage of buzz and comment on trending topics, since they are issues that people find interesting. Nothing wrong with that as long as you’re being honest and bringing something to the table. However, I don’t think Seaman has been honest about it.

I won’t go into all of the details of what Seaman has said and done, but I suggest looking into what Stolpman has uncovered and drawing your own conclusions. I have. To me Seaman is another example of a Jew that exploits other people for his personal benefit and monetary gain. And yes, he is Jewish, it was stated in an interview Seaman did with some Youtuber whose name I don’t recall.

I was suspicious of him before this, and Stolpman/Lift the Veil confirmed my suspicions. The way Seaman has responded to Stolpman’s revelations is dishonest in my opinion as well. He has not proven them false, instead Seaman has tried to sidestep the issue and make it seem as if he is being attacked for telling the truth about Pizzagate. That is not the case at all, at least not when it comes to the videos on Lift the Veil’s channel. But once again, I suggest you look into it yourself instead of taking my word for it.

 

Conclusions

All of the cases of Jewish behaviour seem to lend credence to the “anti-Semitic” view that Jews do not feel beholden to the morals of the goyim. As the Talmud says, different principles apply to Jews and to goyim. Gypsies are similar in this respect. Stealing from non-Gypsies is allowed, while stealing from other Gypsies is not. Most other people, such as Europeans and East-Asians at least think that stealing and exploiting others is wrong. It matters little whether the person you are stealing from is of your race or religion or an outsider. Of course, there are still many immoral people in every ethnic group, but the initial values that the society promotes differ between Jews and the rest of us.

My reason for pointing this out is simply that you should be aware of how Jews think. Their morals are different than yours. It is foolish to expect them to think like we do.

 

Links:

Leader Of Anti-Semitic Party In Hungary Discovers He’s Jewish: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/08/14/158773637/leader-of-anti-semitic-party-in-hungary-discovers-hes-jewish

Former antisemitic Hungarian MP who discovered Jewish roots to make aliya: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Former-antisemitic-Hungarian-MP-who-discovered-Jewish-roots-to-make-aliya-468386

Leader of anti-Semitic party in Hungary discovers he is Jewish: https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2012/08/14/leader_of_antisemitic_party_in_hungary_discovers_he_is_jewish.html

Dormant for five centuries, Jewish life in Italy’s far south is stirring: http://www.economist.com/blogs/erasmus/2017/02/jewish-revival-sicily

Was Columbus secretly Jewish? Historians argue explorer’s epic voyage was to establish new homeland for his people as they escaped the Spanish Inquisition: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2147558/Christopher-Columbus-Jewish-looking-new-homeland-discovered-America-historians-say.html

David Seaman, Pizzagate & Goldmoney: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZXDHzZlYzU

altNews: David Seaman’s Open Invitation, Mind Control & Phone Calls | 3.3.2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIgqGn42jcM

Purple and Indigo Wandering Jews

I was thinking what if any connection there is between the Jews and Phoenicians. The colour purple supposedly originates from the Phoenicians so I put “purple Jews” into Google. The first result I got was an article titled: “Growing Wandering Jew Plants – How To Grow Wandering Jew Plants”. Apparently there is a purple plant called wandering jew.

On the gardening website I saw a related article titled “Killing Wandering Jew… Plants: How to Get Rid of Wandering Jew Weeds In The Garden”. I added the three dots. I’m surprised the ADL hasn’t deemed these weeds anti-Semitic.

Apparently there are at least two kinds of wandering jew plants, weeds and “good jews”. The “good jew” is Tradescantia pallida, a purple plant, whereas the weed is Tradescantia fluminensis, a White plant. I guess that answers the question are Jews White? Looks Purple to me.

tradescantiapallida

 

Let’s not get side-tracked to botany any longer. I was supposed to discuss Jews and the colour purple. The Phoenicians got their purple dye from sea snails. This is called Tyrian purple. A Wikipedia article on Jewish symbolism says that Israelites used to have an indigo or purple-blue dye called “tekhelet”. This is derived from a sea snail called Hexaplex trunculus. This dye appears to have been similar yet different to the Tyrian purple. That dye was derived from the sea slug Murex brandaris (currently named Bolinus brandaris). Interestingly the Wikipedia article on Hexaplex trunculus decribes “tekhelet” as purple-blue, and Tyrian purple as purple-red. They are both different hues of purple apparently.

While this does not prove any indisputable connection between Jews and the Phoenicians, it appears they had a similar technique of obtaining purplish dye from sea snails. Whether it actually means anything, I do not know. The Wikipedia article on Tyrian purple mentions one interesting fact:

“Recent research in organic electronics has shown that Tyrian purple is an ambipolar organic semiconductor. Transistors and circuits based on this material can be produced from sublimed thin-films of the dye. The good semiconducting properties of the dye originate from strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding that reinforces pi stacking necessary for transport.”

This sounds like it might be significant. However, I don’t know what an “ambipolar organic semiconductor”, and what people in classical times would have done with such substances. Did the ancient Phoenicians make transistors and circuits with their dye?

 

Links:

Growing Wandering Jew Plants – How To Grow Wandering Jew Plants: https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/houseplants/wandering-jew/growing-wandering-jew-plants.htm

Killing Wandering Jew Plants: How To Get Rid Of Wandering Jew Weeds In The Garden: https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/houseplants/wandering-jew/get-rid-of-wandering-jew.htm

Tyrian purple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple

Jewish symbolism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_symbolism

Hexaplex trunculus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexaplex_trunculus

Bolinus brandaris: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolinus_brandaris

Red Ice, rather Red Slush, pussies out on the Mike Enoch issue

Around a week ago Greg “Grindr Greggie” Johnson was interviewed by Henrik Palmgren at Red Ice TV. I was intrigued enough to listen to the interview since they discussed the Mike Enoch doxing incident. I was wondering whether Red Ice will take a stand or even comment on the issue. Turns out not really.

In the beginning of the interview Henrik Palmgren says the hasn’t looked much into the Mike Enoch incident, so he cannot say much about it, instead he’s going to let Grindr Greggie explain his view on it. Fair enough, except not really. The interview happened a week ago, Mr. Red Ice should have had enough time to look into it by now, but I haven’t seen any “official policy” from Red Ice on the Mike Enoch thing. Unless there is a video or an article on their website that I just happened to miss, I can only deduce that either Henrik continues to support Mike Enoch and they’re choosing to ignore this issue in hopes that it will blow over, or that he disapproves of Mike Enoch’s Jewey wife, but is too much of a pussy to speak out against it. I can understand if he wants to avoid in-fighting in their movement, but there is difference between in-fighting and calling out traitors and liabilities.

Greg Johnson doesn’t seem to say much about Mike Enoch in the interview. He mostly repeats the stuff he wrote about in his article Why I support Mike Enoch. Unsurprisingly, he supports Mike Enoch. He does admit that he knew about Mike Jew-wife already back in 2014, and many of the inner circle in Alt-Right knew about it as well. Henrik Palmgren says in the interview that he didn’t, and he had met Mike Enoch only twice in person. I suppose I’ll believe him on this. Johnson also admits in his article that Enoch’s wife is 1/2 Jewish, although in truth she might be more than that, but half-Jewish is still Jewish. The fact that she is also a faghag who hangs around with trannies is conspicuously absent from the article. Grindr Greggie makes some false claims about Enoch’s wife, Ames Friedman: “she does not have a strong sense of Jewish identity and ethnocentrism”.

Ames Friedman had uploaded this video on her Youtube account (but she has deleted since the doxing, I believe):

thisishowwejew

It’s about a tranny and two (gay?) Jews dancing around and singing “This is how we Jew it”. In the comment below we can see Ames saying she’s Jewish. She admits she’s Jewish, she enjoys depraved music acts with trannies and gays promoting Jewish ethnonationalism, so I’m just going to say that Greg Johnson is full of shit.

Naturally, Grindr Greggie would have no problem with LGBT-shows like these since he is a known sodomite. Speaking of sodomites, Henrik Palmgren and Johnson spent the first half of the interview speaking about the Alt-Right Youtuber, Millenial Woes, another known sodomite. He had been doxed much earlier, maybe a couple of months ago, and apparently went into hiding, but now he’s come back, since Red Ice has another article promoting Millenial Woes’ return. It states: “After a brief hiatus, Millennial Woes is back at it. In his most recent video, he outlines the recent media attacks against him. If you support Woes, please consider sending a few e-shekels his way.” Yes, keep sending those shekels to the phoneys.

I discovered Millenial Woes’s channel a year, or year and a-half ago, and initially liked it. He has a flair for the dramatic and watching his videos makes you feel like it’s a video blog from a survivor in zombie apocalypse. But after a while I realized, that’s all his videos are: entertaining. They hold little of actual informational content, no great philosophical insight, no practical advice. It’s all about his feelings.

Anyway, I went on this tangent to make a point, which is that these are the priorities of Red Ice. They are promoting sodomites and “intellectuals” who are full of hot air like Greg Johnson and Millennial Woes, but ignore significant issues such as Mike Enoch having a LGBT-promoting Marxist Jew-wife. At the end of the Grindr Greg interview Henrik even tries to defend his wife Lana interviewing Reactionary Jew last year. He’s calling out people who have problems with is as “paranoid”. He says something about people being obsessed with someone having 0.001% Jewish DNA being excessive. I agree, but Mike Enoch’s wife has at least 50% Jewish DNA, or if Henrik’s not talking about her, what is he rambling on about?

The problem with the Reactionary Jew interview is not that they had the audacity to talk to him, but that they are sort of throwing the idea out there to see if someone is willing to bite that the Alt-Right might co-operate with Zionist Jews. Now after the backlash they got, I expect Red Ice to tone down this pro-Jew propaganda for a while. When the Alt-Right emerged I thought their two main issues were nationalism and exposing the Jewish Zionist influence in the world, which is why I liked them at first. Co-operating with Jewish Zionists goes against both of these principles, since Zionists want ethno-nationalism only for the Jews, and are responsible for much of the third-world immigration that is flooding into Europe. I don’t think that the leaders in the Alt-Right are so dumb as not to realize it. Either they are wittingly working for the Jews, or they just don’t care about Jews either way but figure that co-operating with Jews will help themselves personally. The whole of Alt-Right is a scam, and seems like it has been from the get-go.

Just to make a friendly reminder, Richard Spencer, the apparent leader of the Alt-Right, has been caught trying to rub elbows with Zionists again. January 16th, the Forward website published an article of an interview between Spencer and a Jewish rabbi. I think these couple of sentences say all that needs to be said about it: “Spencer says his dream of building a ‘white ethno-state’ is ‘very similar to how Jews conceive of Israel.’ He even describes his vision as something like ‘white Zionism.'”

A couple of years ago when Red Ice started exposing the Holohoax and talking about Jews, I thought it was great. Now it seems it was all more like an advertisement campaign: see how the Jews are controlling everything and screwing us over. First they tried to fight against the Jews, but eventually they decided it’s too hard so according to the beta male maxim: “If you can’t beat them, join them.” Now the Alt-Right Whites want to become the new Jews. The Talmudic Aryans, the White Zionists.

Red Ice has shown how irrelevant they are becoming. They won’t even address the important Mike Enoch issue. Instead of Red Ice, Red Slush would be a better name for them. Cuck Ice Radio.

 

P.S.

Henrik Palmgren tries to defend the Reactionary Jew interview by pointing out how they’ve interviewed other Jews in the past, such as Gilad Atzmon, who criticizes the Jewish establishment, and David Cole, a Holocaust revisionist. That’s the point exactly. Has interviewing those people created controversy, have they gotten a huge backlash from their audience? I don’t think so because people understand that those Jews are at least to some degree on the same side. A Zionist Jew is not.

 

Links:

Grindr Greggie on Red Ice: https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/doxing-only-works-once

Why I suck off… support Mike Enoch: http://www.counter-currents.com/2017/01/why-i-support-mike-enoch/

Woes by any other name: https://redice.tv/news/a-woes-by-any-other-name

The ‘Alt-Right’ Hates the Jews. But It Also Loves Them — and Israel.: https://archive.is/E87su#selection-4625.105-4625.275

Revisiting the Jewish Question

I’ve written countless times about Jews and their role in the problems that the world is facing. I’m still not sure what actually makes a Jew a Jew, what is the essence of Jewry and what causes their tendency for subversive behaviour. Are they a race or a religion, are their actions motivated by their genetics, culture or some metaphysical component? All I can say is that they are Jews, and apparently being a Jew makes one act Jewish. Trying to pinpoint the particulars of Jewish characteristics only leads you down an endless rabbit hole as Jews can claim to be a unique when it suits them, but the next moment they are a religion. Sometimes they’re white, other times they are Jewish.

The whole Mike Enoch fiasco has made me re-organize my thoughts on the whole Jewish Question. For those who do not know, Mike Enoch is a host on the Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah, and the owner, I suppose, of The Right Stuff-website. It was revealed a week ago that Mike Enoch’s, who used to joke about gassing the Jews and whatnot, wife is a Jew, and not just any Jew, but a Jew who is into transvestites and promotes the LBGT-agenda. There are also some audio clips out there where Mike Enoch more or less admits that he is a Jew as well. I don’t know if it is true, since Enoch has proven himself to be a very shifty character, but he at least seems to think of himself as a Jew.

When I first discussed this issue I wrote: “I don’t wish Enoch any more ill will than he has already gotten, but naturally his political career should be demolished and his lies exposed.” That was when I thought that Mike Enoch is just going to give up on The Right Stuff and skulk back into the shadows. Now it seems he has the chutzpah to continue on with his Alt-Right podcast as if nothing had happened. Mike Enoch is in essence a caricature of the Eternal Jew, a con man who is willing to do anything for money and attention and has no sense of shame. I no longer have any sympathy for him.

Enoch is also an obvious case study of how the Jew seems to thrive on so-called anti-Semitism. This isn’t the first time that a White Nationalist or “neo-Nazi” leader turns out to be a Jew. There have been cases where a swastika or other symbol of a “hate crime” is found in public, the media blames neo-Nazis, but it turns out the person behind the incident was actually a Jew. Jews seem to want people to hate them. Or on the other hand, they want to be worshiped by the Goyim, such as when Benjamin Netanyahu gets a standing ovation from the US congress, or that we have to remember the Jews who died in the alleged Holocaust, but never mind the millions of other people who died in WWII. Perhaps the worst thing for Jews is to be ignored.

Another important lesson to be learned from Mike Enoch is how easy it is for the Jew to find a bunch of gentiles to fool. He had plenty of fans prior to the scandal, most shockingly, even after his duplicity and Jewishness was revealed many people were still defending him. Unless all of the supportive comments I’ve seen on the internet are from a bunch of sock puppet accounts run by five people, but I doubt it. It’s like Corneliu Zelea Codreanu said:

mosquitojew

 

Europeans have understood the subversive nature of Jews for centuries, yet we’ve allowed them in and put them on a pedestal. A great deal of responsibility on the problems created by Jews fall on us. We’ve allowed them to do what is in their nature. Yet I am not convinced by the Common Filth argument either that Jews are purely reactive. That they are behind a lot of the LGBT-agenda, feminism, pornography only because the Goyim are a willing audience for it. Common Filth claims Jews basically promote these harmful things because there is profit in it. No, I don’t think so. They seek to subvert other people to make them a willing audience for their filth. My view is that the responsibility in all of this more like 50/50. It’s as much our fault as theirs.

I am not in favour of any solution to this problem such as “gassing the kikes”. One reason is simply because of basic humanitarian reasons, but also because I don’t think it would work. I’ve suggested a couple of years ago that the Jews have the Mark of Cain, or something similar to it. If we actively hurt them, the punishment will come back to us sevenfold. I believe Jews were sent to us either by god or the devil to punish us. We have learn to deal with them from a higher perspective than mere violence and coercion. Indentify the Jew and say no more. And stop falling for their tricks.

Before I finish, I’d like to dispel some myths. You don’t have to a White Nationalist, a neo-Nazi or anything like that to be aware of the nature of the Jew. It is one of these premade templates that the media pushes, a skinhead or a guy with a buzzcut who hates Jews because it’s basically their hobby. I don’t hate the Jew. I am more angry at the rest of us for always falling for Jewish tricks. Moreover the Jew wants you to hate him. You cannot blame a fox for eating your chickens if you make him guard the henhouse. The reason I have a problem with Jews is simply because I’m a truthseeker. An open mind and honest observation of the world leads you to notice the Jewish influence in economics, the media and so on. Even Milo Yiannopoulos, a homosexual Jew, admitted it in one video. But I suppose you’re just supposed to brush it off since he said in a humoristic tone.

Alt-Right leader Mike Enoch is married to a Jew

A couple of months ago the Economist published the magazine cover with a prediction for 2017 in the form of 8 tarot cards. It would seem like some of the predictions are already becoming true.

In recent weeks many of the members of the Alt-Right website The Right Stuff (TRS) have been doxed (or doxxed if you prefer, but my favourite is doxxxed), i.e. their personal information has been leaked to the public. For most of them perhaps there have been some embarrassing revelations, but no major upsets, except perhaps for the person getting doxed. But a couple of days ago Mike Enoch, the owner of TRS, (or as he known now, Kike Enoch) was doxed by the far-left organization, Antifa. It has been revealed that Enoch wife is a Jew, not even a “Red-Pilled” right-wing Jew, but a faghag and active member in the LGBT community.

This is naturally a great upset since the TRS and Alt-Right in general are White Nationalists who are against race-mixing, especially with Jews. There is no doubt that Mike Enoch had wittingly lied and deceived his followers. The only question is, did he do it just for the money, was this some sort of alphabet agenda psy-op, or was it a joke gotten out of hand? My money’s on it being a government psy-op, as I’ve written disparagingly about Richard Spencer several times, and as Mr. Enoch has proven, it is prudent to distrust those who associate with Spencer who has appeared on Enoch’s Daily Shoah podcast several times, I believe.

Spencer’s recent tweet

As we can see above, Richard Spencer seems to have no problems with this revelation of extreme hypocrisy on the part of Enoch. Naturally he wouldn’t.

 

The Tower and Upheaval

How is this doxing and marrying of Jews -scandal related to the Economist’s tarot cover then?  The first card on the magazine cover is the Tower. In my analysis of the cover I wrote: “The Tower represents upheaval. It may look like an outside force strikes the tower, but it is actually derived from psychological principles. They often result from ‘neglected and mishandled situations’. One example given by [Rachel] Pollack [author of Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom] for the Tower is friends turning against you.”

The revelations of Mike Enoch’s duplicity has naturally created a lot of tension within the Alt-Right and internet far-right in general. Tension has already existed between 8chan’s /pol and TRS for quite some time as /pol is more National Socialist than Alt-Right, in other words /pol is more far-right, or just more genuinely right. Some TRS forum members are complaining about /pol punching to the right when they criticize TRS, especially since certain TRS forum members are attempting to excuse Enoch’s treachery. Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me. Anyway this dissension within the right is clear example of the Tower’s effect of friends of turning against each other.

On the Tower card on the Economist cover both Communists and Christians seem to be protesting against the tower as it is being hit by lightning which also has a Christian cross on it. Now it makes perfect sense. The Communists represent Antifa, which did the doxing of Mike Enoch, whereas the demonstrating Christians are the puristic right-wingers (such as /pol) who do not approve of TRS’s pro-Jewish actions. Both factions, although normally enemies, want to see The Right Stuff fall as the Antifa Communists see them as evil racist Nazis, whereas /pol users see them as being a Jewish honeypot, and it seems they were right.

economist2017

 

Of course many people in the Alt-Right and /pol are not Christians, but I do think the cross on the card represents the different factions within the right-wing.

 

My Two Cents

I’m going to share my take on this TRS scandal whether you like it or not. First of all, I must I say I am not a fan doxing, and generally see it as a bad thing. But I could say the same thing about murder, it’s generally bad, but if there is a pedophile in your neighbourhood molesting children then it doesn’t sound too bad. In this case there was a person who is allied with Jews pretending to be anti-Jew, and a bunch of anti-Jew White men became his followers. I think this says tons about not only Jews, that they seem to thrive on anti-Semitism so they perpetuate it themselves, but also about the goy who seem to be so willing to give their money and support to dishonest Jews. (I am also guilty of this, not in relation to TRS, but to 108morris108.)

I’ve listened to a few Daily Shoah podcasts maybe a year ago or so. I thought they were sort funny with a good attitude, but ultimately found them too low brow and simplistic. What ultimately made me dismiss them as pointless, I think, was that some of the people on it said disparaging about investigating conspiracy theories. Recently I saw a tweet by Mike Enoch saying this:

enoch911

 

“The Jews did 9/11 conspiracy theory is retarded. Sorry. It’s embarrassing.” Anyone who says this is either retarded, scared of being called a conspiracy theorist or anti-Semitic, or is simply dishonest. I don’t know into which category Mike Enoch falls, but if I had to bet, based on recent revelations I’d say he wants to make you think Jews are just some greedy comical merchants.  Although “Jews did 9/11” is a simplistic way of putting it. I would rather say Israel/Mossad was heavily involved in 9/11.

Anyway, based on failing the litmus test that is 9/11, and being married to a LGBT-loving faghag Jews while pretending to be some sort of Nazi leader, i.e. a complete fraud, I do think it was a good thing that Mike Enoch was doxed. The truth came out. Although after having seem pictures of Mike Enoch I can’t really hate him. He looks like a scruffy sad bear or something. I won’t show his picture or mention his real name since I don’t wanna be part in doxing him (I know I’m a hypocrite). I don’t wish Enoch any more ill will than he has already gotten, but naturally his political career should be demolished and his lies exposed.

 

P.S.

As I was finishing this I checked /pol and it seems Mike Enoch mother is Jewish too, which would make him a Jew.

 

Links:

Mike Enoch doxed by Antifa: https://archive.is/I7eME

The Economist’s 2017 Tarot cover, Part 1: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/11/23/the-economists-2017-tarot-cover-part-1/

108morris108 censors his comments: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/108morris108-censors-his-comments/

Jewish Mother confirmed: http://8ch.net/pol/res/8792524.html

 

 

Alt-Right is proposing an Alliance with Zionist Jews?

Lana Lokteff interviewed a person identified as the Reactionary Jew, a “Red Pilled” Alt-Right Jew, on Radio 3Fourteen the other day, which part of the Red Ice radio or TV network. The interview begins with Lana mentioning she met Reactionary Jew at the NPI conference where Richard Spencer made the infamous “Hail Trump” -salute, and she asks “Is it possible to create a bridge between Jewish nationalists and European nationalists?” If by “European nationalists” Lana Lokteff means the Alt-Right, then the answer is yes, although on the surface it may seem very contradictory.

When the Alt-Right emerged a couple of years ago and Red Ice converted to their ideology, I thought the main purpose of the Alt-Right was to expose the Jewish and/or Zionist control over many aspects of the world and topple it. The Jews were supposedly the eternal enemy of the Alt-Right. I’ve since come to realize that’s not the case. The Alt-Right is basically about worship of one’s race, or worship of oneself. It’s basically Talmudic Judaism for the goyim, or just Satanism. I’ve written about this phenomenon that I name Talmudic Aryanism before.

 

Reactionary Jew interview

Yet I question how viable an honest alliance between the Alt-Right and conservative Jews would be? In the interview Lana let’s Reactionary Jew do most of the talking without challenging him on issues such as the Holocaust. Reactionary Jew seems to believe in official narrative of the Holocaust even if he does not wish to obsess over it as much as main stream Jews. Both Red Ice and Radio 3Fourteen have done various programs on exposing the falsehoods in the Holocaust narrative. What if she were to challenge Reactionary Jew on the issue? Would they still engage in friendly banter? Is there anything else except their hatred of multiculturalist liberals and the threat of Islam holding them together? Both groups hold similar Talmudic views of being the chosen race, but this does not ultimately unify Jews and the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right envies the powerful position the Jews currently hold and ultimately wishes to usurp it, but I suppose currently they feel weak enough pretend being friendly. I suddenly got a flashback to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Then there’s the Israel question. Reactionary Jew just seems to assume that Jews have the right to live in Israel, and Lana Lokteff does not contest this. Presumably it’s based on the narrative in the Old Testament. Even if the ancestors of modern Jews did inhabit that land over 2000 years ago, does it still grant them the right to do so now? What if the proto-Finns lived in the area that is now known as Bulgaria 3000 years ago, for example, does it give me the right to kick out Bulgarians out of their homes and settle on their land? The historical accuracy of the Jewish diaspora narrative is in question, and has been studied people such as Shlomo Sand. And even if the Israelites did live in the so-called holy land and were exiled from it, and have a right to return there, can the modern Jews prove they are the descendants of those Israelites?

I don’t want to comment too much on the details of the conversation between Reactionary Jew and Lana Lokteff, but there was one interesting bit where the Jew said that light-skinned Jews are more likely to be liberals than darker skinned ones, and Lana agreed that White people tend to be the most left-leaning race out there. This lends credence to Common Filth’s theory that there is a genetic component to White man’s deviancy. If Lana really cares about the well-being of her race I hope she reflects on the implications of her own words. Maybe her race isn’t supposedly facing extinction because of an outside threat, but by an inner one.

I suppose the ultimate purpose why Reactionary Jew was chosen for an interview with Radio 3Fourteen was because of Richard Spencer. The Jew was at Spencer’s NPI conference and he said he would vote Spencer for president. For whatever reason Red Ice has allowed Richard Spencer to become their lord and saviour and are promoting him. Reactionary Jew, while he seems intelligent and well-versed in many political issues related to Israel, by his own admission does not know what the rich and powerful globalist Jews think, and cannot influence them.

 

Richard Spencer on the Jews

Early December, Richard Spencer was interviewed by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. He is quoted as saying: “I think it’s clear that Jews underwent tremendous suffering during World War II. I don’t deny the Holocaust”. Why exactly is Red Ice promoting this guy? I don’t agree with most of the stuff that Red Ice does these days, but at least I agree that the official Holocaust narrative is bullshit.

The Haaretz also refers to an article Spencer wrote on his Radix Journal website back in 2010 titled “An Alliance with the Jews”. In it Spencer suggests the following: “Who knows? Israeli nationalists might want to help finance the far Right in Europe and North America.” Spencer has been hoping for a long time that Israel would become his sugar daddy.

Spencer was also interviewed by the self-titled human rights advocate David Duke the other day. In the interview Spencer does seem to indirectly agree with Duke that media is controlled by Jews, and they want to destroy White people. Spencer contrasts the gray areas of today with the Bolshevic revolution in Russia. Back then it was supposedly more black and white, when “we” were facing destruction. You’re not Russian, Dick. I suppose the implication is that the communist Jews were genociding White people in Russia, but nowadays it’s more complicated and you cannot just blame Jews for it. Or maybe not. This is classic Richard Spencer; never being clear on what you say to have plausible deniability, and allowing people to draw the conclusions they want. If you are Red Pilled on Jews, you assume he’s exposing the Jew. If you don’t want be associated with anti-Semites he can say that he didn’t say anything about Jews. Another reason for avoiding blaming Jews is that he still wants that Israeli funding.

Quite interestingly at some point Spencer says you shouldn’t be nice to the main stream media, which is actually something I agree with. Then he comments on some misguided Alt-Right people: “They’re living this delusion if only we’re nice to the media, if only we’re nice to our enemies, they’ll be nice back.” It’s refreshing to hear such honesty from Richard Spencer. He admits he’s delusional. In his weak and effeminate way he seems to agree with Duke that Jews are their enemies, yet he wants to be nice to the Jews to get their money. At least Spencer gives the impression that he doesn’t like Jews. He even says one rabbi’s stupidity makes him question the alleged high IQ of the Askernazis. Maybe this sucking up to Jews is a next level play of pretending to be their friend to steal their money, and when he has it he uses it against them?

David Duke starts a new meme in the interview. Since Spencer orignates from Whitefish, Montana, Duke calls him Whitefish. A more accurate description though when it comes to Richard Spencer would be of course Gayfish. Spencer has adopted the mantle of Gayfish from Kanye West. All hail Richard Spencer, Gayfish of Alt-Right, or Aut-Kike or whatever you call it.

 

Conclusion

Red Ice, which is a mouthpiece for the Alt-Right, is promoting an alliance with their enemy, the Zionist Jews. Richard Spencer already did so 6 years ago, and it doesn’t seem like he has changed direction. While making one interview asking the question whether Zionist Jews and “European nationalists”, or should it be (((European nationalists)))?, can be friends does not imply it’s the absolute opinion of Red Ice, discussing this topic is itself a promotion of the idea. As far as I know, Red Ice has not made a single program discussing the Flat Earth debate, for example, since clearly they don’t want anything to do with the issue. They do appear to want to become closer friends with Zionists though. As long as they’re pro-White, and Spencer is the one to determine what things are good for the White man.

 

P.S.

To clarify my personal position on Jews is that while I do not wish to “gas all of the kikes” I’ve been aware of the globalist Jewish elites influence for a long time, yet I do not think they are on top of the pyramid either. This means I am distrustful of anyone I know to be a Jew, but certainly some Jews do stand up from the crowd as positive examples, such as David Cole. He’s a Holocaust revisionist, and his life was threatened for his views. He had to change his name and live for a pseudonym for several years. Cole was interviewed by Radio 3Fourteen a year or two ago. The difference between Reactionary Jew and David Cole, and why I’m ambivalent toward one and somewhat favorable toward the other, is that Reactionary Jew simply espouses certain political views that the Alt-Righters agree with. David Cole on the other hand has done actual research. The facts that he has brought forward speak for themselves, not his identity or mere opinions.

 

Links:

Is it Possible for Jewish Nationalists & European Nationalists to Work Together?: https://redice.tv/radio-3fourteen/is-it-possible-for-jewish-nationalists-and-european-nationalists-to-work-together

Talmudic Aryanism: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/talmudic-aryanism/

The Invention of the Jewish People: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invention_of_the_Jewish_People

Alt-right Leader Has No Regrets About ‘Hail Trump,’ but Tells Haaretz: Jews Have Nothing to Fear: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:L3ITaWfKoDEJ:www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-1.756645+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fi&client=firefox-b

An Alliance with the Jews: http://www.radixjournal.com/altright-archive/altright-archive/main/blogs/untimely-observations/an-alliance-with-the-jews

The David Duke Show w/Guest Richard Spencer 12/26/16: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBX3P-ZcAXY

Are Jews genetically different?

It being Christmas Eve and all, it’s natural to discuss everybody’s favourite topic, the Jews. It’s an old source of controversy whether Jews are a race or a religion, but just by looking at what they believe they are a race. Another point of contention is, since they are a race, are they somehow significantly different to us? I’ll first address the issue of them being a race, and the other, more difficult question.

Jews consider anyone born of a Jewish mother to be a Jew. This by itself suggest some sort of ancient understanding of hereditary genetics, and that Jews see themselves as a race. Christians, Muslims and Buddhists don’t think that one is born into the faith, but it based on a decision made by the individual, although in practice they usually do raise their children to adopt their religion.

Modern Israel too has been criticized for for being a racist “apartheid” state.  They wish to keep their country Jewish, and it does not merely mean that they want people who live in Israel to convert, but they want their citizens to be racially Jewish. Even the black Jews from Ethiopia, the Falashas, are not considered proper Jews in Israel despite Ethiopians being Semites. Jews definitely seem to think of themselves as a race.

Many scientific studies have been conducted on the genetics of Jews. Their outcomes are contradictory at times and it appears that no-one has been able to pinpoint what the Jewish race actually is, but the overall consensus with these studies seems to be that Jews are a race. There’s a pretty long article on Wikipedia about it, and as it is Wikipedia it should be treated with a grain of salt, but at least it cites plenty of scientific studies. I’ll highlight a few interesting details in the article.

 

The Wikipedia Article

One common conception is that Askernazi and Sephardic Jews are very different from each other, or that Sephardic are the real Jews and Ashkenazi are somehow racially diluted. The Wikipedia article however refutes that by quoting Nicholas Wade:  “‘Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East.’ He further noticed that ‘The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.'” Despite Ashkenazis having been in Europe for centuries, if not Millennia, they are still racially similar to the Middle-Eastern Sephardics.

Another study suggests that Jews and Palestinians are closely related: “In a study of Israeli and Palestinian Muslim Arabs, more than 70% of the Jewish men and 82% of the Arab men whose DNA was studied, had inherited their Y chromosomes from the same paternal ancestors, who lived in the region within the last few thousand years.” However, a bit later it said: “In relation to the region of the Fertile Crescent, the same study noted; ‘In comparison with data available from other relevant populations in the region, Jews were found to be more closely related to groups in the north of the Fertile Crescent (Kurds, Turks, and Armenians) than to their Arab neighbors.'” If I get this right, the original ancestors are closely related to Kurds, Turks and Armenians, who eventually mixed with the Palestinian Arabs? Possibly the Arabs lived in Palestine and the pre-Jews invaded, or the pre-Jews lived there and were invaded by the Arabs.

Map of the Fertile Crescent:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Map_of_fertile_crescent.svg

Later on the article offers some minor evidence that Jews are indeed mutants differing from regular people: “A study of haplotypes of the Y chromosome, published in 2000, addressed the paternal origins of Ashkenazi Jews. Hammer et al. that the Y chromosome of most Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews contained mutations that are also common among Middle Eastern peoples, but uncommon in the general European population. This suggested that the male ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews could be traced mostly to the Middle East.” Of course, the article does not elaborate what these mutations are and how they affect people, but I doubt it is anything significant.

Wikipedia refers to one study that seem suggest that Judaism being inherited through the mother is false:  “Studies of mitochondrial DNA of Jewish populations are more recent and are still debatable. However, it seems that there are no maternal lines common to all Jewish people.”

The article is also dismissive of the theory that Ashkenazis have descended from the Turkic-Khazars. I am suspicious of this theory as well.

Anyway, I just discussed a few details in the article I found relevant. I suggest you read the rest yourself if you are so inclined.

 

Other Sources

Two fairly recent competing theories on the Jewish race are the ones brought forward by Harry Oster and Eran Elhaik. Ostrer, who I think is not Jewish, simply seems to be saying that Jews are a race. Elhaik, however, who is a Jew, is pushing the Khazar-theory. Elhaik calls Ostrer and his supporters “liars” and “frauds”.

The problem with the Khazar-theory is that it is mostly promoted by Jews. It was invented by the Jewish Arthur Koestler, and nowadays the two of the people with a scientific background who promote it are Jews, Eran Elhaik and Shlomo Sand, the author of The Invention of the Jewish People.

There is however one fairly recent study by geneticist Martin Richards whose findings contradict Ostrer’s was discussed in Science. His study suggests Ashkenazis might have originated in Italy. The article discussing the study states:  “Jews have traditionally considered that the mother determines the ethnic identity of her children. If being Jewish is defined as genetically descending from the Israelites through the maternal line, then many Ashkenazi Jews fail the test, according to this data.” According this this study then, Sephardics and Ashkenazis aren’t of the same race, it seems. The study also offered more evidence to disprove the Khazar-theory.

So all that can be said is that the road discovering the truth about Jewish genetics is confusing and perilous.

 

Parasitic Jews

It has been argued here and there that Jews have a genetic disposition for subversions and parasitic behaviour. I certainly agree that Jews have achieved this negative stereotype by their actions, but I cannot say whether this is due to their culture, religion or race. I think it is possible that Jews have such a genetic quality, but I am skeptical of it. I think the subversive actions the Jews have perpetrated on the West are mostly due to their position as an outsider. They are similar to Gypsies that they are outside to the native European cultures and don’t share our values, and therefore do not respect our laws and customs, but I wouldn’t say that Gypsies have a genetic propensity for kleptomania. It is more a cultural thing.

However, I looked a bit into the notion of genetic inheritance from the mother. Men have one X-chromosome and one Y-chromosome, and women have two Xs. Men inherit one Y from their fathers, and one X from their mothers. Women inherit an X-chromosome from both. The UK NHS website explains that if a woman has a mutated X-chromosome it is unlikely to affect them, since the effect tends to be recessive. If one of the Xs is normal, the woman is normal. These women can, however, become carriers of a harmful mutation, and if their son was to inherit the mutated X-chromosomes he would be affected by it. Yet a boy would not inherit the harmful X-chromosome from his father since he gains Y from his father, but daughters of the man would inherit the X-chromosome and become carriers.

This suggests then the theoretical possibility that being Jewish is a mutation that passes from mother to son. I am of course not a geneticist, so I my interpretation could be wrong. Moreover, even if I’m right, this is still just a theoretical possibility. As far as I know this has not been proven to be a fact.

 

Conclusion

I’m still more inclined to think that the subversive behaviour exhibited by Jews by can be explained by other means, such as them simply being a cultural outsider with preference for their own people, much as the same as the Gypsies, or possibly the trauma caused by circumcision shortly after birth, or the persecution complex inherited in verbal tradition.

Moreover, if one was to argue that Jews are genetically predisposed for certain type of behaviour, I would say that white people, or particularly Anglo-Saxons or Germanic people are genetically predisposed to obey the Jews. How else do you explain the unquestioned support the Jews have gotten from Europeans and Americans over the years? The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail also referred to some researcher who had suggested that all Europeans noble families were of Judaic descent. I don’t have the book at hand now, so I cannot check who said it, but interesting idea, to say the least.

I want the Jews to be removed from power as much as everyone else, but it does no good simply repeating the same clichés. There is the question of how did the Jews attain the position they’re in? I think the answer lies in looking at us. What is wrong with men of European stock to allow this to happen?

 

EDIT:

I discovered that a man called Michael Bradley suggests that Jews have descended from neanderthals. I don’t know how valid his claims are, but it is at least evidence supporting those who say that Jews are genetically different from the rest of us.

He has at least written a book called The Iceman Inheritance, and here’s an interview with him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnmU1i5eakY

John de Nugent has also written about this topic: https://www.johndenugent.com/neanderthals-and-semites/

 

Links:

6 Crazy Things Israel Has Done to Maintain Racial Purity: http://www.alternet.org/world/6-crazy-things-israel-has-done-maintain-racial-purity

Israel’s Racial Purity Laws: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-palestinian-israeli-race.html

Genetic studies of Jewish origins: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_of_Jewish_origins

Jews Are a ‘Race’, Genes Reveal: http://forward.com/culture/155742/jews-are-a-race-genes-reveal/

‘Jews a Race’ Genetic Theory Comes Under Fierce Attack: http://forward.com/news/israel/175912/jews-a-race-genetic-theory-comes-under-fierce-atta/

Did Modern Jews Originate in Italy?: http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2013/10/did-modern-jews-originate-italy

Nature of the Jews…: http://expeltheparasite.com/books/the-nature-of-the-jews/

How genetic conditions are inherited: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Genetics/Pages/Facts.aspx