Tag Archives: lucifer

Big Bang is an occult concept known as the Cosmic Egg

Last time I wrote about the Kabbalistic ideas behind the Copernican model of the solar system, and how the Catholic church did not seem to have a problem with these un-Biblical theories. This time I’ll look at the Big Bang.

Although the Big Bang is supposedly a theory, it is commonly heralded as scientific fact in our modern society, and if you question it, people look at you as an uneducated bumpkin or a religious nut. This is quite silly since purely by reason can debunk the claim the Big Bang is a fact, since the event supposedly occurred billions of years ago when there was no life, no-one to observe it. It is at best a far-fetched theory that we can never falsily. At least by comparison the Copernican heliocentric model is more scientific since we should at least be able to verify if it’s true or not; does the earth revolve around the sun, or vice versa? It is not based on non-sensical theorizing of something that might have happened before anything even existed. However, I don’t want to discuss the ridiculousness of the Big Bang any further, since plenty of people have already done it, instead I’ll focus on the occult or religious aspect of it.

 

Georges Lemaître and the Cosmic Egg

The Big Bang theory was coined by Georges Lemaître, a Belgian Catholic priest. According to main stream history he attended a Jesuit secondary school, and according to many others, he was a Jesuit. Whether or not he was one is not as relevant as the fact that he was a Catholic priest.

The Physics of the Universe website “Lemaître himself called his [Big Bang theory the] ‘hypothesis of the primeval atom’ or the ‘Cosmic Egg’.” Cosmic Egg, that sounds intriguing. What is it? In the Greek Orphic tradition there is the Orphic Egg, another version of the cosmic egg. According to myth, the hermaphroditic deity Phanes hatched out of it. Hermaphroditic, i.e. male and female at the same time, reminds me of the LGBT agenda, Conchita Wurst in the Eurovision song contest and so on.

 

Wikipedia describes Phanes as having had golden wings, he was male-female deity of light and goodness, his name means “to bring light” or “to shine”. Does it sound like Lucifer yet? Wikipedia also refers to a tradition according to which Phanes had been hatched from the World Egg of Chronos (or Saturn).

 

“The Secret Doctrine of the Rosicrucians” says the following: “The Germ within the Cosmic Egg takes unto itself Form. The Flame is re-kindled. Time begins. A Thing exists. Action begins. The Pairs of Opposites spring into being. The World Soul is born, and awakens into manifestation. The first rays of the new Cosmic Day break over the horizon.”

 

Un-Biblical Catholics

The Cosmic Egg clearly is an ancient occult, pagan and/or religious concept. It has nothing to do with science, i.e. gathering evidence by observation of natural world. Ever since I was a child had bought the narrative that there is tug-of-war between scientists and fundamentalist Christians, or science and the Bible. The conflict, in fact, is between two religious systems: occult and the Bible. Science itself seems to have been pushed to the side.

And what is of course interesting is that it is the Catholic church that has been pushing these unscientific, pagan notions as science. This is curious for two reasons: the Catholic church is allegedly a Christian organization that believes in the Bible. That is an old and debunked allegations. Second is that the Big Bang, and many other pillars of modern scientific thought, such the Copernican model and Evolution, are not scientific, are religious notions at best, complete lies at worst.

My point is not to argue that the Biblical account of history and cosmology is the correct one. It’s more that if the Catholics want to pretend Christian, they should not be pushing these non-Christian religious ideas. Moreover, I’d like to see more of actual scientific observations related to cosmology, alas we have very little as the concept of Dark Matter pretty much proves all of modern cosmology as pointless theorizing. So far, the Bible does seem more reasonable than most of modern science, but that does not prove the validity of the Bible either.

 

Links:

Georges Lemaître: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

The Physics of the Universe: http://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/scientists_lemaitre.html

Orphic Egg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphic_Egg

Phanes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phanes_(mythology)

Secret Doctrine of the Rosicrucians: http://www.sacred-texts.com/sro/sdr/sdr04.htm

 

Advertisements

The LORD, God and the Book of Job

I was watching Rob Skiba’s latest video, and in it he mentioned a passage from the Bible how there are supposedly “storehouses of snow” (Job 38:22). Skiba suggested the possibility that this should be interpreted literally. I had a look of it, although I had no great insight on its meaning. I did notice something else that is quite interesting in the Book of Job though.

Before I get to it though, I should point out something else. In the Old Testament God is referred to by a few different names. Sometimes it’s God, or Elohim in Hebrew, other times it’s LORD, Yehovah in Hebrew. I think sometimes it’s also LORD God, Yehovah Elohim. The word Elohim is plural, which has led some to interpret it to mean a multitude of gods, or perhaps a pantheon. This may or may not be accurate. Another possible interpretation is that God/Elohim and LORD/Yehovah refer to two different characters.

In Genesis 1, the word for God is always Elohim, and it continues until the beginning of Genesis 2. This starts with God creating the world and ends with him resting on the seventh day. After that starts the story of Eden with Adam and Eve. From then on God is called LORD God, Yehovah Elohim. Possibly these two Gods are two different characters.

Let’s jump to the Book of Job. The story should be familiar, but I’ll recount it quickly. Satan and the sons of God (presumably the same ones that had offspring with the daughters of men in Genesis) came to God, or rather the LORD (Yehovah). Job was a wealthy and happy man with a big family who was righteous, praised God and all that. Satan said to the LORD then that Job only praises God because he is so well off. The LORD granted Satan the power to take away Job’s wealth and eventually even to give him hideous boils. Job lost almost everything and got terribly ill. After a while his friends come to see him. They discuss the reason for Job’s predicament, and Job laments him state, and basically says it’s unfair what has happened to him. He claims to be sinless. Eventually the LORD comes to talk to him as well.

The Book of Job sometimes refers to God as Elohim, and sometimes as LORD or Yehovah. When Satan and LORD have discussions together, the discussion is always with the LORD, not God. Job 1:20-22 says as follows:

Job 1:20 Then Job arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground, and worshipped,
Job 1:21 And said, Naked came I out of my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.
Job 1:22 In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly.

 

Here it would seem that LORD and God are synonymous. However, when Job refers to God, he says LORD, but when the narrator of the Bible refers to God, he says God. Maybe Elohim and Yehovah are two different beings, but Job doesn’t know it. I’ll get back to that later.

Job 19:21 recounts Job lament his condition:

“Have pity upon me, have pity upon me, O ye my friends; for the hand of God hath touched me. ”

According to the Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary that is in the e-Sword Bible software that I am using, the word which has been translated “touched” is “naga”, and can also mean “to strike”, i.e. “hand of God hath struck me”. However, more interesting is the notion of hand of God. The word for God here is not Elohim, nor even Yehovah, but “eloahh”. According to the above-mentioned dictionary it has two meanings:

1) God

2) false god

Was Job struck by a false god or God? Or perhaps the phrase “hand of God” refers to a person, like in the Game of Thrones there is a person with a high rank known as the Hand of the King, or King’s Hand. He is sort of like Prime Minister who takes care of important affairs of the king. Might the LORD or Yehovah be a powerful angel who takes care of affairs for God such as Lucifer or Metatron?

The LORD arrives on the scene in Job 38. It is said he “answered Job out of the whirlwind”. First of all, I find this entrance curious. Why would God need a whirlwind or a hurricane to travel? Moreover Ephesians 2:2 says that Satan, or another malevolent character, is “prince of the power of the air”. Using whirlwinds to travel around, power of air…

After that the LORD starts exclaiming how dare Job claim he has been treated unfairly, and the LORD brags about the various feats he can do far beyond the scope of mortals. This goes on for a while. It sounds very prideful to be frank. Now what was Lucifer’s sin, I wonder?

Job 38:6  says:

“Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;”

Isn’t cornerstone something the Freemasons are harping on about? This LORD sounds like the Grand Architect or the Demi-Urge of the world, not the real God.

Let’s continue to Job 38:7:

“When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?”

Morning stars, many Lucifers? The LORD seems to have impressed the sons of God, who are, according to my understanding, the angels who rebelled against God.

Another interesting, although somewhat unrelated piece of information I found was in Job 38:32:

“Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?”

According to e-Sword dictionary Mazzaroth refers to the 12 signs of the Zodiac. Christians tend to think that astrology is of the devil. Maybe they are right, and the LORD is the devil, or if the LORD is actually God, he seems to be proud of the Zodiac.

The last chapter of the Book of Job stars as follows:

Job’s Confession and Repentance
Job 42:1  Then Job answered the LORD, and said,
Job 42:2  I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee.
Job 42:3  Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.
Job 42:4  Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.
Job 42:5  I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.
Job 42:6  Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. 
The Lord Rebukes Job’s Friends
Job 42:7  And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath.

The key phrases are: “Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite…”

Does not the LORD here admit he was wrong, and say he abhors (alternative meanings: reject, despise, refuse) himself? Maybe I interpret this wrong, but this is how I see this. Basically the LORD fell for Satan’s trick, and allowed Job to be tortured. After Job complains about it, first the LORD makes a grandiose show of how dare he, but in the end he admits his mistake. This is not the infallible God.

My interpretation is that the LORD, at least in the Book of Job, is a fallen angel, possibly Lucifer or Metatron, who used to be God’s right hand man, but now pretends like he is running the whole show. Job possibly does not know this, and might be under the impression that whatever the LORD does has been sanctioned by God. Satan appears to be a different character than the LORD though, since they have conversations together.

 

 

Links:

The goals of our high altitude weather balloon test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeQJfImIZ3E

Occult Symbolism of Eurovision 2017

I’m doing this a week late since the Eurovision song contest was held a week ago, but since one of my readers asked for my opinion on the symbolism of the Current Year Eurovision I feel obligated to write blog post about it.

I browsed through the final fairly quickly so it’s possible I missed something, and also I should point out these are just my impressions and interpretations of the show. Perhaps the people designing the show did not intend to signal these things.

 

Diversity Strikes Back

The slogan of the contest was “Celebrate Diversity”, which when translated into normal speech means: annihilate diversity, or promote monoculturalism. David Icke said years ago that when the elites say something, they usually mean the opposite. It’s absolutely true when it comes to “diversity”. Overall, celebrating the destruction was one of the themes I saw in the Eurovision contest.

The logo is a ring of red and black balls. They could be planets, represent the Ouroborous, horns of a bull (or Osiris), or perhaps the pearl necklace of Orion. I’m not sure what they are meant to represent, if anything.

 

The Start of the Show

As the show started each artist came on the stage as if to introduce themselves. Most of the men were effeminate cucks, and the women just looked weird. At the beginning the camera panned onto the stage, and also a few times during the show as can be seen in the picture below. It reminded me of CERN.

 

Another interesting bit was when the artists introduced themselves every waved their arms in celebration, except Portugal’s Salvador Sobral, who ended winning the contest. He seemed reserved and humble, whereas most others were very flashy and superficial. I don’t know if this is significant, but he seemed a bit nervous. Perhaps he knew he was going to win, or perhaps his behaviour represented his unique nature that European resonated with, and therefore voted for him.

 

Another interesting bit is that Israel (which isn’t even European) was the first contestant in the show. Maybe the order was chosen randomly, or perhaps it’s supposed to mean Israel First, Europe Second.

 

Israel

Now I will discuss some of the symbols I saw during the performances of certain artists. Israel had this black sun or iris in the background.

 

Poland

Poland’s song was about freedom and liberation. At first I figured it was just a generic topic for a song, but then I noticed something. There was a night sky with stars in the background. It made me think “A Thousand Points of Light”. Or that according to the Bible, the stars are angels. These stars might represent angels.

 

Later the word “Freedom” appear in the background. The stars or angels want to freedom, i.e. they are imprisoned.

 

In the end they turns into a birds (free as a bird) as the angels are freed. I interpret the presentation to mean the celebration as the fallen angels of Lucifer are freed.

 

The song by the Polish singer, Kasia Mos, isn’t even really about freedom. It’s more a passionate love song. It does have these lines though:

“Like two animals on the run
Not afraid to fly into the sun
Invisible, we don’t leave a trace
We’re shadows in love, we were ghosts”

“Not afraid to fly into the sun” is an obvious reference to Icarus, the symbol of hubris. Also “we” are invisible and do not leave a trace. It sounds like a secret society.

 

Belarus

Next in line is Belarus. There was a planet and a bridge (London Bridge is falling down? in the background. Is the planet Nibiru or something?

 

Toward the end of the performance there was a sun, or a big star in the background. The singers were standing on an airship of some sort. The background show had a Victorian space adventure feel to it.

 

The lyrics say the following:

“Present day will become a birth
Of new wills and better thoughts

Story of my life
Will shine brighter

The sun will sparkle in our blood
The entire beauty of your eyes”

A herald of the New World Order or a new race, the Moonchild?

Artistically speaking I found the Belarus song to be one of the best in the contest. The singers were obnoxiously cheerful to behold, but their song was pretty decent, at least for Eurovision standards.

 

Austria

The Austrian perfomance has the moon in center stage. The astrological theme in the whole show is obvious. And the singer seems like an obvious cuck.

 

Armenia

The Armenian singer looks like a witch, and the performance looks like she’s in hell. There’s also a hindu-like imagery in the performance. There is a symbol in the background that looks hindu to me, and at one point the singer and two dancers create a multi-armed deity icon at some point.

 

The lyrics go as follows:

“Over deeps, over hills
She casts her wings and now it feels
Love is one

Flying high she became
A sun who’s love and light the same
For everyone”

Seems like an angel. “Love is one” sounds very Current Year “love is love” Luciferian breaking down the boundaries crap. Sun’s love and light sounds like Lucifer to me.

 

Netherlands

The Netherlands singers remind me of three witches, but maybe it’s just me. At one point, figure of a person appears to be falling into the sun, or something like that. The singers say “angel”. Is the figure Lucifer? Is this an ode to Lucifer?

 

Italy

Italy’s song is Occidentali’s Karma, or Westerner’s Karma. It sounds like a celebration of the fall of the West.  The dancing monkey or gorilla might represent the degradation or dumbing down of people, to turn this world into the Planet of the Apes.

The venue in the music video is a Buddhist temple, but in the performance on stage the chakra system is shown in the background.

 

Both in the music video and the performance the singer does an odd pose while dancing. I think it’s some sort of symbol.

 

It looks like the sign of Saturn.

 

Or the sign of Jupiter reversed.

 

Portugal

Portugal won the show, but I don’t have much to say about the performance as it almost put me to sleep.

The lyrics say:

“My dear, listen to my prayers
I beg you to return, to want me again”

He could be praying for the return of Lucifer or the Nephilim.

 

Azerbaijan

I actually thought the Azerbaijan performance was sort of interesting. At the end the singer draws a cross on the back of black-robed dancers. The Mark of Cain?

 

Spain

In the Spanish performance there’s the planet Saturn in the background. Nuff’ said. The singer annoys the hell out of me.

Is it just me, or does it seems like every male singer seems like a short manlet? The Swedish guy looked normal/tall though. But most seem short.

 

United Kingdom

In the UK show, the singer is standing on an oyster shell like Venus. Her image is split into three by mirrors, possibly representing her alters created through mind control. The song is about madness after all.

 

Germany

The music video of the German song was full of obvious triangles or pyramids.

 

There was a pyramid in the background at some point in the live performance as well, but it wasn’t as obvious.

 

I feel bad for the artist. It seems to me that she is completely controlled and subjugated by the industry, and probably has to perform all sorts of favours to her handlers. Perhaps the triangles in the video represent how whole of Germany has been subjugated by the Illuminati.

The lyrics go: “I’m almost a sinner, nearly a saint”

Sounds Luciferian to me where morals are just decided on a whim.

 

Ukraine

A huge head of a titan or Nephilim is in the background in the Ukrainian performance.

 

The song is about time. Is the giant Cronos or Saturn?

 

Sweden

The Swedish artist did the OK sign with his hand both in the music video, and the performance. What it means I do not know, since I’ve heard in the past that it means 666. Nowadays it’s supposedly a racist Alt-Right Trump supporter symbol for White supremacy.

 

Bulgaria

There seems to be the abyss in the background  in the Bulgarian performance. It’s like Leviathan is coming up.

 

France

The dome above the stage turns into a spaceship at some point during the French performance. The dome looks like a space helmet to begin with, but during this song it’s most obvious.

 

The Lowdown

I left out some performances since I didn’t have much to say about them. I noticed some over-arching themes such as astrology and space. There were stars, the moon, the sun, Saturn in various performances. The Italian performance had a symbol that resembles an astrological one.

Religious themes were fairly prevalent as well. Some songs talked about angels. Germany’s mentioned a saint. Portugal’s song had prayer. Italy’s performance featured Buddhism and Hinduism. Armenia had a hindu-feel as well.

Sure, religious themes have been employed in song writing since forever, so this does not necessarily imply some bigger scheme.

Overall I see the Eurovision 2017 performance as another celebration to Lucifer, the return of the Nephilim, or Osiris, or whatever you want to call the religious obsession of the elites. I might simply be interpreting things  through my own bias, as I’ve been researching this sort of stuff for years. Some of the symbolism might be innocuous, but I don’t think all of it is.

If there is some sort of occult agenda behind this, I don’t think the artists are necessarily wittingly involved, but I wouldn’t rule it out either. In this day and age I don’t think it’s impossible that the Illuminati, or whatever you want to call the secret societies, could put their puppet in place in every single country involved in the contest.

 

 

Links:

Flashlight (Poland) lyrics: http://www.karaoke-lyrics.net/lyrics/eurovision-song-contest/kasia-mos-flashlight-poland-803554

Belarus lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/02/03/historyja-majho-zyccia-lyrics-navi-belarus-eurovision-2017/171088/

Armenia lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/04/05/fly-with-me-lyrics-artsvik-armenia-eurovision-2017/183853/

Portugal lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/03/18/amar-pelos-dois-lyrics-salvador-sobral-portugal-eurovision-2017/181079/

Germany lyrics: http://wiwibloggs.com/2017/02/01/perfect-life-lyrics-germanys-unser-song-2017/170594/

The Final: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehH0_UXtQlY

 

 

Saint Lucia, Orion and the Occult

Saint Lucia’s day was a couple of days ago December 13th. Saint Lucia was allegedly a Sicilian girl who lived around 300 AD. For some reason though, her day is celebrated especially here in Finland and in Sweden around Christmas time. Blonde girls wear a wreath on their heads with burning candles on it and sing about Saint Lucia. This is something you’re forced to experience every year at school if you’re a child in Finland, and presumably Sweden (although maybe today it’s considered racist).

lucianeito

 

My wife, who is Asian, experienced her first Saint Lucia song experience the other day and told me about. It got me thinking about it again with my symbolically aware conspiracy nut mind that I lacked as a child. The first thing that comes to mind is that Lucia sounds a lot like Lucifer. It’s not the first time that Lucifer would be rendered into a more simplified form for public consumption. See Lucifer Trust becoming Lucis Trust. Moreover the whole Lucia celebration is about bringing light into darkness.

Another reason why the existence of this tradition in Finland and Sweden perplexes me is that Saint Lucia was a saint canonized by the Catholic church, and apparently revered by the Orthodox church as well according to Wikipedia, yet Finland and Sweden are Lutheran countries. Lutherans aren’t supposed to give a damn about saints. What is the point with this tradition?

 

Astrological Connection

I was reading the lyrics to the Saint Lucia song with my wife. The Finnish lyrics start off with “Taivaalla tähtivyö kirkkaana loistaa”. It means in the sky the star belt shines bright. Star belt? That is obviously Orion. Although I don’t think the Swedish version of the song mentions the belt. Nevertheless this isn’t the only connection between Orion and Lucia.

Wikipedia mentions that the winter solstice was on December 13th in the Julian calendar. In the Middle-Ages the solstice co-incided with Lucia’s day. Orion starts to become visible in the night sky in November and December. Acharya S writes that in ancient Egypt the Nile flooded in the summer around the beginning of the summer solstice when Sirius was rising, and the flooding began to stop as Orion was rising around winter solstice. I also saw this picture on Wikipedia from the Lucia’s day in Sweden. Notice the boys behind the girl with the burning head wearing KKK-style wizard hats with three stars. Another Orion connection?

lucia-in-sweden

 

Mythological Collection with Orion

There’s more evidence linking Orion to Saint Lucia. Wikipedia has this picture of Saint Lucia with her eyes on the platter. The Finnish language article explains that Lucia is the saint of the blind and visually impaired. It also tells a short story of a young man who would harass Lucia, because he had fallen in love with her beautiful eyes. Therefore she ripped out her eyes and gave them to him on a platter. When Virgin Mary saw her strong faith she gave Lucia new, even more beautiful eyes.

saint-lucia

 

In Greek myth Orion was blinded by king Oenopion. The blind Orion met Hephaistos (known as Vulcan by the Romans, and as Tubal-Cain by Freemasons) who was lame. The smith Hephaistos felt pity for him and ordered his servant, Cedalion, to help Orion. Eventually the sun god Helios healed the sight of Orion.

Although the details differ between Saint Lucia and Orion, but both became blind, but their sight was eventually restored. Some researchers also associate the constellation Orion with Osiris. In Star Trek, the Orions are a race of green-skinned slave traders. Osiris was known as the green god, but I don’t want this train to get off the rails, so I’ll just end this by stating that Lucia’s day has something to do with the bringing of the light (to put it in an Italian way), and is connected to Orion. Religion and the occult is still going strong in northern Europe even if most people aren’t aware of it.

 

Links:

Saint Lucia (in Finnish): https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyh%C3%A4_Lucia

Lucia’s day (in Finnish): https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucian_p%C3%A4iv%C3%A4

Saint Lucy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Lucy

Lucia song lyrics in Finnish: http://lyricsfi.com/joululaulu/pyha-lucia

Orion the Hunter now easy to view: http://earthsky.org/tonight/orion-rises-in-the-east-at-mid-evening

The Star in the East and Three Kings: http://www.stellarhousepublishing.com/star-east-three-kings.html

Orion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(mythology)

Feminism despises Femininity

Let’s get down to the basics of what feminism is. I have had this understanding of the core assumption or emotion behind modern feminism for several years now, and I thought I had discussed on my blog, but apparently I had not. So here goes…

Feminism is almost a machine-like hatred of women, and on top of that simply hatred of simple facts of reality. I’m not trying to sound controversial, I am merely stating the facts. Feminists are obsessed with being the victim. Women are supposedly always oppressed by men, they claim to want equality, but they what they want is the subjugation of men. However, feminists do not hate men, at least not as much as they hate women. Feminism is premised on the underlying assumption that women are inferior to men. That is an unquestioned truth in the mind of a feminist, yet the feminist resents this and creates an imaginary social construct where this is not true. The feminist projects the hatred she holds for herself to men, since feminists tend to be deeply disturbed.

Let’s take an example from the hastag-campaign #LikeaGirl. It was an ad-campaign, or something like that, last year with a propaganda video where girls say its harmful when men call someone who is weak, or doesn’t know how to throw a ball they throw it, like a girl. As Youtuber Thunderf00t points out in the video linked below, girls and women are generally physically weaker than boys and men. That is a fact. I think both men and women have understood that simply fact for millennia and dealt with it, but only since feminism came along simple facts of reality have become offensive. It may not be fair from some viewpoint that women are weaker than men, but it matters little that is simply how it is. That does not decrease the value of women as human beings, it merely decreases their value as soldiers, physical competition with men, and in heavy construction. It’s like if I was offended by reality because I cannot turn into a flying dinosaur.

This is where we get to the heart of feminism; it wants women to be as good at being men as men are, but since that is impossible, feminists begin to resent reality instead of recognizing the falsehood of their belief system. This creates the loop where feminists despise themselves for not being as good men as men, but instead of having the decency of blaming themselves for this nonsensical weakness, they project their hatred towards those who remind them of how reality actually works. When rational people point out the insanity in feminist thought, the feminist of course goes deeper into her delusion, and resents reality even more.

Feminism lured women away from the home to the work place to work in the world of men. They want women to have masculine roles like corporate CEOs, soldiers or top politicians. Although most women don’t seem to want that. It is feminism that is oppressive to women, and gives them social constructs to believe, not the Patriarchy or men. Feminism hates for women to be feminine, moreover it hates men to be masculine. Feminism hates the tender, nurturing qualities that are innate to most women, and wants to replace them with simulacra-masculine attributes. If I didn’t know better, I’d almost say this was some sort of cosmic conspiracy that tries to undermine the natural order of life on this planet…

The principle of resenting the perceived superior class and trying to undermine it is applicable to Cultural Marxism in general as well. Cultural Marxists basically claim that White heterosexual men are the root of all evil, and those victimized by them are good people. The further you distance from that the better, for example a white heterosexual woman is not as good a victim as a transgender black woman. We can apply the same formula to this as we did to feminism; the underlying assumption is that White heterosexual men are superior to other demographics. That is seen as being the reality, and therefore it has to be resented and subverted. Feminism and Cultural Marxism is very schizophrenic. They create a generalized social construct, which is not entirely true, but then try to assault and subvert what they perceive to be reality. Where this originates must be some sort Archontic infection or Wetiko mind virus.

I assume these mind virus-infected people assume White heterosexual men to be superior, since its basically a historical fact that the world has been dominated by White heterosexual men for the last few centuries. European men have conquered most of the world, invented new technologies, introduced their ideas all over the world. That is obvious, but I would not make any universal statement that European men are superior. European men may be superior in some areas, but Asian women can be superior in others. I don’t believe in the equality of races or sexes, but neither do I believe in the superiority of one. White men have been dominant in the 19th and 20th centuries for sure, but in the Middle-Ages Arabs were superior in science, for example. In pre-historical times some societies were matriarchal and so on. I think it’s more of a cyclical thing.

Anyways, feminists and Cultural Marxists believe White heterosexual men to be superior. That is their sense of reality. And they resent reality. They want to rebel agains it like Lucifer. Ultimately this sounds Luciferian to me, where these people are unwilling to accept reality as it is (as God made it, as it were), but want to make a reality which is a construct. This truly is some deep, occult shit. I am not joking.

Feminism is sexist, although it purports to be the opposite, Cultural Marxism is racist and intolerant although it claims the opposite. Social Justice Warriors fight for social injustice. That is the nature of the beast. You cannot reason with it, you merely have to understand how it behaves. I don’t really understand why it behaves like this, but I can see this is how it is.

None what I said here should be viewed as insulting. I am not saying this to be pejorative nor funny somehow. Feminism is a twisted, spiritual ideology that hates anything natural. Devout feminists are basically demon-possessed. I should add that of course most of the people who buy into feminism are simply naive, and think its about gender equality and girl power, but that’s just the packaging, not what’s inside.

 

P.S.

Feminism Is a form of Jewish Control: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGarmqCQfXw

 

Links:

RE #LikeaGirlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_xSZ0HXiIU

Ban bossy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMHoNi7rLqk

The Djinn World Order

I heard about Rosemary Ellen Guiley a couple of years ago. She’s been researching paranormal stuff for 30 years. Her most intriguing stuff is her work on the djinn. I read her book The Vengeful Djinn soon after I discovered Guiley. The djinn are of course supernatural beings of Arabic and Islamic (and pre-Islamic) lore. Although according to Guiley they are not limited to the Middle-East. European description of fairies matches that of the djinn to a great deal (and fairy encounters bear a lot of similarity to ET encounters).

The djinn are the Hidden Ones. They live thousands of years (as will their agendas). They are shapeshifters. They might remind you of the reptilians, and they should. Rosemary Ellen Guiley’s new book (but probably not the newest) is called The Djinn Connection: The Hidden Links Between Djinn, Shadow People, ETs, Nephilim, Archons, Reptilians and Other Entities. I haven’t read it yet, but the title seems self-explanatory, meaning all of those beings are connected to the djinn in some way, or might be different personas of the djinn. I’ve always had problems with the reptilian story à la David Icke. I thought there is truth to it, but something is missing, and the missing link might be the djinn. To be fair I discovered Guiley through David Icke’s website.

None of this info about the djinn and other entities is new for me, like I said. I heard about couple of years ago, but for some reason now it’s starting to make sense in the bigger picture, I guess. Maybe I’m just letting go of that nagging self-doubt and skepticism regarding all of this crazy spirit and paranormal stuff.

What does the New World Order have to do with this then? I’ve never really accepted the New World Order narrative. Just as with the reptilians, something was missing. While it is obvious the New World Order announced by George Bush senior on 9/11 1991, mentioned by many others since, and advertised by Alex Jones ad nauseam, is a “thing”, it’s probably what everybody thinks it is. It is also obvious that the world is heading to a global Orwellian or Huxleyan Brave New World dystopian prison, but I’ve never agreed that it is the final product. It was always supposed to be one phase in the plan, though a very big and important phase. I think the so called Illuminati want the people to be aware of the iniquity of our system and its leaders (à la Externalization of the Hierarchy). As is indicated by the Snowden Affair. There’s gonna be oppression and suffering, death and atrocity, but the New World Order will be defeated, and that is the plan.

After the destruction of the NWO the real Djinn World Order can arise. The blue-beam fake alien invasion may be part of this. Perhaps they bring fake ETs to save us and tell us they are the Elohim, Annunaki or the ancient astronauts, and they are our space brothers and are here to help us. They’re more likely to be human-djinn hybrids. Maybe there won’t be any alien invasion/ disclosure event. It could be the fake global messiah scenario. It could merely be a secular political faction with a nice and cozy philosophy. It might be a combination of all scenarios. But the game plan is that they make humanity suffer and struggle for survival, and we manage to beat them. After that they want people to lay on their asses, twiddling their thumbs while they bring on a new deception that sounds sweet, feels squishy and warm so people buy it. And it will seem really tempting. It will seem like there is no downside to accepting whatever they are offering. But be aware the true conflict is a spiritual one. We must reject whatever magical snake oils they have and hold on to whatever each individuals deems righteous and holy.

This might sound religious or something, but it’s not. I’m sure the djinn have a practical agenda from their point of view, and it isn’t to conquer humanity with tanks, planes and surveillance cameras. What that agenda is though, is a mystery. It might merely be Matrix-esque human farming for energy. Maybe the djinn want to change the nature of our reality in some way to allow them to exist on our vibration, or something-ish. Maybe they just wanna rule the earth with their deception. They still probably wouldn’t do it openly since they are the Hidden Ones, they’d more likely pretend to be the space brothers or reptilians overlords. Don’t buy into the Harry Potter hype.

The New World Order has been called Satanic, or Luciferian. Lucifer was the light-bringer, also the Biblical account of fallen angels and stuff is similar to some story about fallen djinn. Prometheus stole fire from the gods, and the torch is a common “brotherhood” symbol, such as the Statue of Liberty or the Olympic torch. The djinn were created of smokeless fire. There’s gotta be some sort of connection, right?

 

Links:

Rosemary E Guiley interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7inZxTou5lI