Tag Archives: multiculturalism

Jussi Halla-Aho of True Finns: Freemason Connection?

I don’t usually pay that much attention to the politics, or particularly the doings of politicians, here in Finland. I’m often better versed in the happenings of central Europe and America than my home country. One reason is probably that most of the media that I pay attention to, i.e. alternative and conspiratorially oriented media, don’t tend to discuss Finland much, I also think that the puppet politicians of this small puppet country don’t matter much in the grand scheme of things, and seeing how inane the talking points in the media and politics of my own country is even more painful than those of a foreign country. However this time an occurrence in Finnish politics caught my attention: Jussi Halla-Aho was selected the chairman of the True Finns or Finns party.

I don’t know a great deal about Halla-Aho, but I know he has spoken against globalization and multiculturalism, and that he is heavily demonized in the media. Earlier this year, the former long time chairman of the True Finns party, Timo Soini, stepped down, and yesterday, I believe, the controversial Halla-Aho was chosen as the new chairman. Timo Soini, despite all his promises he had done little to advance any real nationalist cause in Finland, nor did he really do anything to help us leave the EU. Halla-Aho becoming the new chairman would be great thing then, right? Maybe. Probably not.

 

Is he a Mason?

Since he has been able to get this far, I find it hard to believe he is genuine. Naturally the thought occurred to me whether he might a Freemason. I found a thread on the Kauppalehti economic newspaper’s website from 2010 where someone claimed he is a Freemason. They did not provide any proof of this though.

I found on another discussion forum, Suomi24, from 2008 someone asking whether Halla-Aho has any connections to the Masons. The discussion didn’t go far. The most conclusive argument was that he cannot be accepted as a Mason since he is publicly an atheist. To join the Masons, you need to believe in a deity. I’ve seen this argument elsewhere used as evidence that Halla-Aho is not a Mason.

I couldn’t find any conclusive evidence that Jussi Halla-Aho is a Mason. That must mean he’s not one then, right? No. First of all, the Kauppalehti thread where someone makes a seemingly baseless allegation that Halla-Aho is a Mason, yet offers no evidence may itself be Masonic plot to lead people who suspect him of being one astray. Then again, maybe it was just a random guy on the internet making a baseless accusation. That is not unheard of. Yet I also find the talking point that Halla-Aho cannot be a Mason since he is an atheist a bit convenient. Certainly Masons lie to non-Masons for various reasons. He might worship Jahbulon or Lucifer or who knows what in secret, while pretend to be an atheist.

 

Halla-Aho’s Symbolism

Since this sort of regular investigation did not yield me much, I figured I should take a different approach and see what sort of symbols and signals Jussi Halla-Aho puts out. I did uncover certain intriguing images.

This is Jussi Halla-Aho. He just looks gay to me. Of course he doesn’t look this gay in every picture, but this wasn’t the only one either. He is married though, which doesn’t mean much if he is a member of a secret society.

 

I found this picture of him posing with the devil horns. For some people using this symbol itself might be a dead giveaway that is he is a member of some club. Yet regular people use this symbol quite often here in Finland, since it associated with rock and roll and other cool stuff. Heavy metal is big here, and this sort of thing comes with the territory. I myself have used the symbol many times in the past just to seem cool, although I try not to do it anymore.

 

Then I found this picture. It’s the same picture that shows the Minister of Defense, Jussi Niinistö, next to him showing the 666/OK symbol. Two politicians using these occult, Satanist signs next to each other is highly suspicious.

 

Here Halla-Aho seems to be doing the diamond sign with his hands, although the symbol is not intact.

 

I found former chairman of True Finns, Timo Soini, doing the same thing. Timo Soini is 33 in Chaldean numerology, by the way.

 

I found this mirrored image of Halla-Aho, which is according to Youtuber Russianvids a common Masonic trick.

 

There he is with an upside down pentagram next to him.

 

This image is from a TV inteview I believe. The numbers say 3:54. I’m not sure what it refers to. Perhaps a biblical quote. Notice also the broken pentagram next to the number 3.

 

There’s also an opinion piece on the Uusi Suomi newspaper’s website written by someone called Väinö Kuukka about Halla-Aho. It’s titled: “We built stairs for Halla-Aho” (Rakensimme Halla-Aholle portaat). This sounds like a Masonic reference to me.

 

Conclusion

I don’t think the symbols I’ve covered here is definitive proof that Jussi Halla-Aho is a Freemason or their puppet. However, I do have a strong suspicion that he is. I certainly won’t take it at face value that he is some sort of nationalist hero. It takes more than a few nice words to prove that you’re genuine.

 

Links:

Jussi Halla-Aho on Vapaamuurari: http://www.hs.fi/politiikka/artikkeli/Jussi+Halla-aho+pimeit%C3%A4+muuraust%C3%B6it%C3%A4/

Halla-Aho ja vapaamuurarit: http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/t/6657539/halla-aho-ja-vapaamuurarit

Rakensimme Halla-Aholle portaat: http://vinkuukka.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/238294-rakensimme-halla-aholle-portaat

Multiculturalism in China

This a continuance to my previous post on how the Cultural Marxists are pushing multiculturalism in Japan and South Korea. This time I discuss China. The push from the Marxists seems weaker in China than the two aforementioned countries, yet Mao’s Cultural Revolution about 50 years ago and the capitalism of the last couple of decades have eroded the Chinese identity somewhat already.

 

BBC

A BBC article discusses how the Chinese view multiculturalism. The journalist mentions a trip to Shanghai where he was shown around by a Chinese student. The student mentioned other Chinese who studied in America and ended up marrying Americans. Then the journalist writes: ” I told her that I had recently seen such a mixed couple in Hong Kong, a Chinese woman with a black American. This was clearly not what she had in mind. Her reaction was a look of revulsion. I was shocked. Why did she react that way to someone black, but not someone white? ”

Racism is bad, ‘mmkay. This seems to be the gist of the “problematic” view the Chinese have when it comes to multiculturalism; they don’t think everyone is equal. And that is a thought-crime, of course.

The article admits that 9 out of 10 Chinese belong to the Han race, and that China has existed as a single country for over 2000 years. The reason for this is: “[W]hereas all the other great empires of the world have long since broken up, China remains united. Why? In one word – the Han. The Han identity has served as the glue which has kept a geographically and demographically vast country together. Without that shared identity, China would long ago have fallen apart.” So a strong, unified national identity is strength, even the BBC admits it, yet it’s bad because the Han have a “relative lack of respect for difference”. Minorities like the Tibetans and Uighurs from Xinjiang are expected to integrate. And, of course, since the Chinese ” attitude has been to regard those of darker skin as inferior”.

The Cultural Marxists really look down on Black people. They seem to view Blacks as inherently retarded or something, and the only use they have in the world is to make others feel guilty for their ableism, i.e. not having been born Black.

The lowdown of this BBC article is then that the Chinese have a unified identity, which gives them strength, but it’s bad because they don’t like Black people.

 

How Multiculturalism works in China

The Huffington Post writes that officially China consists of 56 different ethnic groups, and although China presents itself as a  “united socialist multiethnic state”, but this is a lie. The Han oppress the minority groups: “The areas populated by minorities like the Tibetans and the Uighurs still experience extreme poverty.” “Tibetan children face corporal punishment and abuse by authorities for wearing traditional dress and singing Tibetan songs.  More recently, the Muslim Uighur population has clashed with authorities. Resentment has grown towards the government which discourages the practice of Islam. At job fairs in the mineral-rich region, signs often read, ‘Uighurs need not apply.'”

Presumably the journalists just want the government to promote the culture and faith of these minorities, but it doesn’t occur to them that independence from the central government could be an actual solution. Free Tibet is so 1990s. Nowadays everything has to be controlled by an inclusive central government.

An article on the La Trobe University website notes that when the People’s Republic of China was founded in 1949 “as a ‘unified multiethnic country’, comprising 55 distinct ethnic minorities and a single Han majority. It followed the model of the Soviet Union in creating a complex system of institutions and statutes aimed at promoting the equality, harmonious coexistence and mutual prosperity of all these groups.” Also “the 1954 Law on Regional Ethnic Autonomy created an extensive regime of special educational rights and privileges for minorities, including extra funding and subsidies, preferential enrolment quotas, remedial classes, and specialised schools and curricula.” So the Affirmative Action prevalent in contemporary America is literally a Communist idea.

The author points out that despite this the minority communities are underdeveloped, and the Han majority resent these policies, and possibly the minorities as well because of them.

One particular omission regarding these people discussing multiculturalism and mistreatment of minorities in China is that they focus solely on the mistreatment of ethnic minorities, but ignore other types of oppression. The Han Chinese government mistreating the Uighurs or Tibetans is bad, but there’s no problem when the government oppresses other Han Chinese. Hong Kong is being inundated by immigrants from mainland China. The central government has taken steps to suppress the usage of the Cantonese dialect in Guandong and Hong Kong, but since they’re all of the same race, there’s no problem. People of the same race fighting each other is good, people of different races fighting each other is bad.

 

Multiculturalism and Human Stupidity

An article in The Diplomat mentions how White people are getting preferential treatment in China simply because of their race. Simply having White people in your company gives the impression of being international, so they get hired regardless of their skills. Some White people are getting hired as musicians or English teachers, even if they don’t really know what they are doing, and are getting paid better than Chinese people for the same job, according to the article. I don’t think this is just some Marxist propaganda. I’ve heard similar stories from Chinese I’ve met.

The writer imparts one very interesting account: “white English teachers make considerably more than their bilingual Chinese counterparts and often more than Chinese-Americans too. It doesn’t matter that Chinese-Americans are native English speakers. If parents see an Asian person teaching their children, they often assume the person doesn’t speak English well (even if they themselves speak it too poorly to be able to judge). I once met a Russian who taught at a local English school in Chengdu. He could barely string a dozen words together in English. Nevertheless, he was paid more than four times the average Chinese salary. Naturally, he was white.”

The story is a perfect example of why multiculturalism is a bad idea; human stupidity. Some people, certainly not all, are just stupid and cannot discriminate between the race of a person and the individual themselves. They seem to think that people of another, distant race are all mass-produced cookie-cutter replicas of each other, i.e. some Chinese believe all White people are good at English. While this is a fairly benign form of stupidity, but we can go to Europe for really disturbing examples of this phenomenon. Let’s take the German woman who apologized for the Muslim immigrants that raped her. Since Muslims are all oppressed and cannot help their actions, and they cannot be individuals where some are good and some are bad.

Some people are just so dumb and incapable of seeing the world outside of their own cultural context, so they should not be put in situations where their lack of understanding can cause damage to themselves or others.

 

Conclusion

Multiculturalism doesn’t seem that strong in China, although Marxists in the West wish to strengthen it. It seems more like a bureaucratic hindrance than a truly nation-threatening problem. That is not to say that China doesn’t have plenty of social problems, but at least they do not seem to be suffering from multiculturalism as as much as the West, or even Japan and South Korea.

The White Genocide-crowd who claim that nobody is saying that East Asia should become multicultural has been proven wrong as well. Some Marxists, such as the ones working for the BBC, want the Chinese to be more accepting of Black people for example, but the Chinese don’t seem to care. Once again we should ask why people of European stock are much more deeply afflicted by this “pathological altruism” than others?

 

Links:

Cultural Marxists are pushing their agenda in East-Asia as in the West: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/02/12/cultural-marxists-are-pushing-their-agenda-in-east-asia-as-in-the-west/

A Point Of View: How China sees a multicultural world: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-20083309

China’s Diversity Doesn’t Mean Multiculturalism: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-and-marc-kielburger/chinas-diversity-doesnt-m_b_125967.html

Multicultural education in China: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/news/articles/2010/opinion/multicultural-education-in-china

Guangzhou Television Cantonese controversy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangzhou_Television_Cantonese_controversy

Rethinking Multiculturalism in China: http://www.asiapacific.ca/op-eds/rethinking-multiculturalism-china

‘Monkey Shows’: Being a Foreigner in China: http://thediplomat.com/2015/05/monkey-shows-being-a-foreigner-in-china/

GERMANY: Muslim-loving leftist/socialist woman who was raped by 3 Muslim invaders apologizes to them: http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/02/13/germany-muslim-loving-leftistsocialist-woman-who-was-raped-by-3-muslim-invaders-apologizes-to-them/

Cultural Marxists are pushing their agenda in East-Asia as in the West

One thing I’ve heard people who harp on about White Genocide say is that the Marxists are pushing their multiculturalism only in the West, that only White countries are expected to increase their diversity. This is incorrect. The Cultural Marxists are pushing their foul ideas in East-Asia as they are in the West. I’ll focus on Japan and South Korea in this post. I’ll write about China later.

 

Japan

The Marxists are very clearly promoting their ideas in Japan. An Al Jazeera article by Alanna Schubach from 2014 mentioned that “Hidenori Sakanaka, the head of the Japan Immigration Policy Institute, said that a social revolution is necessary, in which Japan is reconceived as a multiethnic nation”. The Marxists are promoting censorship of free speech, or ban on “hate speech”, in Osaka. This apparently backed by the U.N. The article describes the writer’s Marxist ideology as follows: “even mainstream Japan is, at best, ambivalent about multiculturalism and has resisted loosening its immigration laws despite a rapidly aging citizenry. An ordinance outlawing hate speech would be a significant step toward tolerance, and Osaka, known for being a comparatively lively and liberal city, would be an appropriate leader to soften attitudes about difference.”

Miss Japan of 2015 was the half-black Ariana Miyamoto. She also was chosen to represent Japan in the Miss Universe pageant. The person behind this decision was Inès Ligron, who just happens to be Jewish. She’s also very influential in the fashion world as is promoting prostitute-like attire for models. “In 1998, she was appointed the Japan National Director of the Miss Universe Organization owned by New York real estate mogul Donald Trump & NBC Universal INC.”

Marxists have been pushing multiculturalism in the academic sphere as well. Chris Burgess discussed in the Asia-Pacific Journal in 2007 how certain other academics have called Japanese ethnic homogeneity a myth. This reminds me of claims that Britain has always been “multicultural nation”. It is a way of trying to influence people to accept multiculturalism into their country today, if they perceive that this is the way things have always been. Burgess’ conclusion is that Japan “does not appear to be particularly multicultural, and he he adds that “This begs the question of whether those writing in the ‘multicultural Japan’ vein are not being descriptive but rather prescriptive: not saying what Japan is like but what it should, ought to, or must be like.”

These are just a few examples of Marxists pushing their ideology in Japan. Many other articles on this can be found simply by Google.

 

South Korea

An article in The Diplomat claims that:

“Few countries take multiculturalism as seriously as Korea does. While most countries have vague and ambiguous multicultural policies consisting of either forcing immigrants to assimilate to the local culture or allowing immigrants to integrate while keeping their traditions, Korea has come up with a new concept: tamunhwa.

Tamunhwa means multiculturalism in Korean, and the basic idea is for Koreans to learn as much as they can about immigrants’ original culture while setting up as many cultural immersion programs as possible for immigrants. With foreign residents now accounting for nearly 3 percent of the population of a country that long defined itself as homogenous, Koreans are taking multiculturalism seriously.”

This sounds like a governmental agenda to push multiculturalism onto people rather than something organic from the regular people. The article also states that Korea has two demographic problems: Koreans being too well educated, so there is a lack of unskilled workers and women from the countryside attending universities, and the farmers having lack of wives, which leads to decreasing birth rates. The solution to this is of course immigration; importing unskilled workers and women as brides. How about just shutting down the universities and letting people do something useful with their lives?

Korea.net has an info-piece titled “Transformation into a Multicultural Society”. This makes it sound like multiculturalism is something to be proud about. It is also mentioned that: “Foreigners are also starting to take a more prominent role in their adopted country. For example, Jasmine Lee is a Filipina- Korean who is currently serving as a member of the Gender Equality and Family Committee of the 19th National Assembly”. Gender Equality committee sounds Marxist as hell.

The UPI website has an article named “South Korea’s population becoming more diverse, but tolerance lagging”. The mere wording is Marxist. The article quotes the aforementioned Jasmine Lee: “There’s negative perception regarding multiculturalism . . . Even in Europe, [Koreans say] multiculturalism has failed, so why would a small country like South Korea succeed?” I don’t think she answered her question, yet she is still pushing the ideology since clearly it’s just something she has to do.

Later on the UPI article quotes Cindy Lou Howe, “an American filmmaker of African-American and Korean heritage” saying: “And multiculturalism is going to be one of those things. Whether or not Koreans are ready, it’s going to happen.” We are the Borg. Resistance is Futile.

A story in East Asia Forum clearly states the subversive goal of international Marxism: “North and South Korea are widely regarded to be ethnically homogenous societies. But with minority populations having grown 
in numbers and importance in both Koreas, demographic homogeneity has become a myth. Yet the importance of ethnic nationalism as an underlying identity of the two states prevents a genuine transition to a multicultural society in both cases.” Naturally you cannot then ask the question whether multiculturalism is such a good idea then? No, you just have to wipe out all national identity so that all will be assimilated into Marxism.

The same as Japan, South Korea is being slowly subverted by Marxist multiculturalism.

 

Conclusion

The Cultural Marxists do not not only hate the White man and want to genocide them, but they clearly also hate the Yellow man. It is a global agenda for international Marxism. It should be noted that both Japan and South Korea are military “allies” of the United States, or actually subjugated by them. As the US is more or less controlled by Israel, so are Japan and South Korea controlled by it by proxy. America, Europe, Japan and Korea all have the same enemy.

The multicultural Marxism hasn’t been as effective in East-Asia as it has been in the West. One reason most likely is that the Marxists have been manipulating the Western psyche far longer, however I don’t think that’s the only reason. Although the Marxists wish to subvert the East as well as the West, the East has been better at resisting it. It would appear Asians are better at holding onto their heritage than Europeans.

That is not to say that everything is perfect in Asia either. As in the West, we are taught to hate ourselves and believe that our cultures are inherently evil, and look to others for content, similar trends appear in East-Asia as well. In some ways Asian women are taught to admire Western men, and some even have plastic surgery to make themselves look Western. Plastic surgery in general is very popular in South Korea, which denotes the fact that they are not proud to be themselves.

Nationalists all over the world should co-operate to defeat the scourge of international Marxism. They do not only wish to bring about White Genocide, they wish to exterminate all ethnic and national identities.

 

Links:

The case for a more multicultural Japan: http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/11/multiculturalismjapanantikoreanprotests.html

Miss Universe Japan opens up about her racist critics: http://mashable.com/2015/04/08/miss-universe-japan-racism/#W0ICwN.04gqx

Meet Miss Universe Japan’s Former National-Director: http://renegadetribune.com/meet-miss-universe-japans-former-national-director/

Multicultural Japan? Discourse and the ‘Myth’ of Homogeneity: http://apjjf.org/-Chris-Burgess/2389/article.html

‘Multicultural Japan’ remains a pipe dream: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2007/03/27/issues/multicultural-japan-remains-a-pipe-dream/#.Vr4PJkYgiSp

Multiculturalism in Japan: Citizenship Policy for Immigrants: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/resources/periodicals/diversities/past-issues/vol-5-no-1-2003/multiculturalism-in-japan-citizenship-policy-for-immigrants/

South Korea redefines Multiculturalism: http://thediplomat.com/2014/07/korea-redefines-multiculturalism/

Transformation into a Multicultural Society: http://www.korea.net/AboutKorea/Society/Transformation-Multicultural-Society

South Korea’s population becoming more diverse, but tolerance lagging: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2015/04/08/South-Koreas-population-becoming-more-diverse-but-tolerance-lagging/6301428414418/

Multiethinic Korea?: http://ieas.directfrompublisher.com/catalog/book/multiethnic-korea

How ethnic nationalism undercuts multiculturalism on the Korean peninsula: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/04/30/how-ethnic-nationalism-undercuts-multiculturalism-on-the-korean-peninsula/

Migrant Propaganda on the streets in Finland

In recent months I’ve seen some ads on the street here in Finland that promote multiculturalism, multi-racialism, or as it is nowadays known, cultural cuckoldry. Some of the ads are just regular grocery store stuff, while others are more “humanitarian”. I don’t have photos of all of the pictures I’ve seem, but I’ll post the few I’ve taken pictures of.

This one shows a middle-eastern man. The caption says something like: “He is present/here. You decide if he can help.” To be quite honest, I don’t know what it means, but the advertisement is from the Red Cross, so they’re probably asking for money as usual.

SAMSUNG

 

Just yesterday I saw this spinning advertisement stand with three pictures of black people.

SAMSUNG

SAMSUNG

SAMSUNG

The caption Tulossa Suomeen means “Coming to Finland”. There is a clear double entendre here. The obvious meaning is that they’re saying this new fashion brand, or whatever it is they’re marketing, is coming to Finland. But the insidious message is that also truckloads and boatloads of people like them are coming to Finland.

I don’t think these ads, and some others I’ve seen, are innocent marketing of consumer products (I don’t think marketing of consumer products is ever innocent either), but psychological conditioning trying to make us accept these armies of people from foreign races and cultures into our country without resistance. It’s sort of like when the United States attacked Iraq, they dropped flyers on the population explaining that they should just surrender and that Americans are the good guys. These ads are a disgusting display of manipulation and cuckoldry.

I also saw posters like this in the city center, probably plastered by leftist turncoats:

SAMSUNG

I shouldn’t have to point this out, but I don’t hate Africans, Middle-Easterners, or Muslims, but I hate this whole situation of them being forced into my country. It is an invasion that the High Command in the European Union, and the governments of most European nations are willingly participating in. It is a natural reaction to feel anger, aversion, and hate when something you don’t want is forced onto you.

If I invite friends to my apartment, I happily open my door for them. I am not happy when someone enters my apartment without my permission. It is natural to feel hate in such a situation. You should do the same.

“There’s panic at London Heathrow…”

I recently traveled to an undisclosed secret location in Asia. I had to stop by the Heathrow airport in London to transfer planes. It’s the first time I set foot on British soil, and I was a bit excited, even though I was going to spend only a couple of hours there. However, judging by the airport it seemed I landed hundreds of kilometers east of London.

Most of the airport staff were Pakistani or Indian. Since I did not ask everyone their ethnic origin I cannot be sure, but some of the women were wearing head scarves, and therefore apparently Muslim, they were probably Pakistani. So I’m just going to call them Pakistanis from now on for sake of simplicity.

Most of the staff in the airport in Helsinki have been Finnish, the staff in Beijing and Hong Kong have been Chinese, in the Incheon airport (close to Seoul) the staff has been Korean, in Bangkok they’ve been Thai, and in Osaka international they’ve been Japanese. The airport in Amsterdam was ethnically a bit more diverse when I’ve been through it, but it didn’t leave the impression it was dominated by a foreign ethnicity. Why is London different?

I’ve got several theories about it. Many of them ridiculous. First of all, maybe native Britons are simply so unreliable that few of the are hired to the airport. Then again Pakistani airport personnel may be superior to people of other nations, and therefore they are hired. Maybe the airports in Helsinki and Beijing should hire them as well. Or maybe the Pakistanis are remnants of the British empire, and forced to work in the airport as indentured servants while the native Britons play cricket all day.

Seriously speaking, the Pakistanis work there because of globalization and mass immigration, which, you could say, originates from the days of imperialism. Now the displacement of people from their homelands, and invasion of them is more socialist, soft and seemingly benevolent. This what it is, the displacement of people from their homeland, both for the Pakistanis and the Britons.

Now you might say I’m just a horrible racist, and the ethnic Pakistanis are British citizens, many of them may have even been born in Britain. But you’d be wrong. The one’s I talked to were not British, as they did not speak British English, they spoke English with an Indian/Pakistani accent. There was one British woman at the security check with a strong British accent, and a Chinese woman had hard time understanding what she was saying. British English, especially the local dialects, can be difficult to understand for foreigners. Thankfully I trained myself with Monty Python, Fast Show and all that stuff when I was a teenager so I’m fine with it.  Anyway, back to the story. That one woman with a thick native accent, was British, the Pakistanis were not British.

The Pakistanis certainly should not be blamed for not speaking actual British English, since they are not British. Since the British empire controlled half the world and forced their language onto others, you shouldn’t expect everyone to speak it perfectly. I’m using their language too, and I have a Finnish accent when I speak.

Ethnic identity and race are not just some bureaucratic construct you can be given to others by governments. Even if you gave me a British passport and citizenship, it would not make me British. It would just be a wad of papers saying I was, which does not make it true. The same goes for these Pakistanis. You can neither wipe off their original ethnicity by granting them some bureaucratic papers, nor can you make them British with those papers. It is insanity to claim you can do this. It is more insane to claim someone is racist for pointing out this fact.

I didn’t have any problem with the Pakistani individuals on the airport; they seemed to handle their job well enough. It’s just that I don’t see what sense is there in dislocating all these people out of their homes, and doing the same for the native Britons.

 

Soundtrack:

Blur – He Thought of Cars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGiWZ0NyvLE