Tag Archives: psy-op

Apparently Hollywood actresses are male

I had heard of the claim that Michelle Obama is a man, in fact I wrote about it back in 2014, but I hadn’t heard that there are claims floating around the internet that countless female celebrities are actually transgender men. I saw a video by a Youtuber named Simona Rich claiming that several famous actresses are male, and I find her video convincing, although I’m still not entirely convinced. On top of that it seems there are many other Youtube videos made about similar subjects.

To me this suggests two possible outcomes: either there is some truth to these claims, or it’s the latest psy-op perpetrated by who knows which agency. It does sort of remind me of how the flat earth thing popped onto Youtube a few years ago. There are plenty of ardent flat earth believers out there of questionable origins and intentions. I don’t think the notion of flat earth research itself is a psy-op though, since a lot what we’ve been told of the make-up and shape of our world is conjecture at best, and sometimes all-out lies. I find the alleged evidence suggesting that the earth is curved to be lacking, but I’ve yet to seen conclusive proof of any flat earth model either.

 

Transgender Celebrities

Anyway, let’s get back to this trannygate. In the video Simona Rich shows the facial and bodily features of several famous women like Angelina Jolie, Barbara Bush, Laura Bush, Julianne Moore, Sandra Bullock and many more. She points out some masculine features in them such as male hips and arms. Later on she also points out similarities between the appearance of certain celebrities who are not related, and even shows some of the famous pictures of people from decades ago that resemble celebrities of today. Rich suggests that cloning might be involved, or that these people might actually be fallen angels, nephilim, since they are supposedly genderless.

Now assuming that there is some truth to the whole hypothesis of these people not being truly female I see a few different possibilities. These people could be nephilim, and they are immortal or at least live for a very long time, but the celebrities seem to age, so perhaps they have to renew their skin every now and then just like serpents do. The person, or spirit, inside does not die, but the husk is discarded or regrown somehow. Another possibility is that this is part of a very elaborate Satanic psy-op where these men have been groomed to be women from a very early age and subjected to sex change surgeries in order to make normal men lust after these fake women, and gradually brainwash them into developing homosexual desires. Maybe the gay agenda is a bigger conspiracy than we ever could imagine?

Another video on the same topic I saw is by Cae sar. The video points out that Justin Biber’s ring finger is shorter than his index finger. Men usually have a longer ring finger, whereas women are reversed. This then would suggest that Justin Biber is female. More interesting is the fact that Justin Biber and Miley Cyrus look almost identical although I don’t think they’re related, and one is male while the other is female. I’ve wondered about this before that maybe they are clones, but I just couldn’t figure out why they would bother.

If some of these people actually are clones, maybe they’re not really male or female at all. Perhaps they are neuter by nature, and the genetic engineers that grow them add features to them to make them seem more male or more female. The video by Cae sar said something like estrogen makes the index finger grow longer than the ring finger. So maybe Justin Biber had an excess amount of estrogen go into him while he was still in the cloning vat, although the designer chose to make him male. Their skills clearly aren’t perfect. Perhaps the same goes for the other female celebrities that have male features. The basic model or template the genetic engineers have might have male hips, which is why all of their final products have male hips, but they are technically female. If they’re human at all.

 

Naturally all of this is simply theorizing. I don’t know if they’re clones or transgender or anything like that.

 

Is it a psy-op?

These claims that our vapid Hollywood celebrities are transgender might simply be a psy-op, a distraction. Maybe they are physically normal people and all of this controversy over their gender, or them being clones, is simply nonsense. Then again maybe there is some truth to it. For the sake of the argument let’s say that Michelle Obama is male. Certain people might have multiplied this idea to apply to pretty much every female celebrity to make the whole claim sound ridiculous. Instead of inquiring into Michelle Obama’s background, people are just jumping into conclusions that every female celebrity is male.

The globalist elites are certainly heavily pushing transgenderism and the gay agenda onto us. Bruce Jenner transitioning into female and being celebrated in the media is proof of this. Perhaps the claim that female celebrities are actually transgender is meant to make people who oppose transgenderism in general seem crazy. The media could point at somebody who thinks Bruce Jenner is nuts for trying to change his sex, and say the trans-skeptic is the crazy one. Look how they all believe that Hollywood actresses are actually men.

 

Conclusion

I’m not convinced that the female celebrities are actually transgender, but I do think there is something to the argument. I like the cloning angle. These people could be some sort of automatons, biological robots, or vehicles for non-corporeal spirits. I know it sounds like science fiction, but the faces of Miley Cyrus and Justin Biber keep haunting me. Besides, Hollywood and the globalist establishment is already avash with mind control and the occult. Adding a few clones to the mix wouldn’t make it sound any more crazy.

Yet, whatever the truth about the nature of these people is, it’s very improbably we’ll see any solid proof any time soon. I don’t think we’ll see Alex Jones break into a secret New World Order cloning facility. Or if this is all crazy talk, and the celebrities are just normal people, I don’t think we’ll see proof of that either.

 

Links:

My Strangest Discovery After Flat Earth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuaYhTzUNow

There are no real women of the flat earth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WcRP13_xm4

Is Michelle Obama a Man?: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/is-michelle-obama-a-man/

 

Advertisements

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.

The Red Pill, or rather Suppository, of the Alt-Right

I wrote a year ago how the taking the red pill is another false choice like the blue pill. Stay clear of drugs. Recently it’s become even more obvious to me how right I was.

When I listened to the interview of Reactionary Jew on Radio 3Fourteen a few weeks ago, the most annoying thing about the whole interview is how the Reactionary Jew over-used the term red pill. Him, and many other Alt-Righters use it as if once you are “red pilled” you know everything. There is no longer need for you to look into matters further. You don’t need to think or question anymore. You are red pilled.

I can accept people using the term red pilled in the sense that you are red pilled on an issue, such as being red pilled on 9/11. You understand that the official story doesn’t make sense, building 7 fell down even though no plane hit it and so forth, but it does not mean you know everything about 9/11. But this isn’t how most people use the term nowadays.

I’ve been reading people’s comments on the Mike Enoch doxing and his leftist faghag Jew-wife. Some of his fans and supporters try to excuse the fact that this supposed “neo-Nazi” White Nationalist who pretended to hate Jews was married to one since Mike Enoch supposedly red pilled so many people and brought them into the movement? What does red pilling then even mean? Enoch tells his followers about the duplicity of the Jews, turns them against the Jews, but when it’s found out Enoch is literally and figuratively in bed with Jews they say it doesn’t matter? It just means the red pill is worthless. Enoch’s followers learned nothing. All they got is a celebrity to fawn over. Additionally, since the Alt-Righters seem to be only concerned with bringing more people to their movement, instead of making sure they have decent and trustworthy people, it’s a clear sign that they only care about quantity, not quality. The Alt-Right is not a political movement. It is a gentleman’s club where pretentious dilettantes just want to hold glasses of wine in their hand while they discuss their hobbies and other trivial matters. Their precious 14 words, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”, are nothing but a fashion statement. The same as far-left SJWs who sit in Starbucks tweeting on their i-Pads how capitalism is bad.

Enoch’s defenders also say that Enoch “has done so much for the movement”. As someone who is not well-versed in Mike Enoch’s accomplishments I wonder what he has actually done? I’ve seen people claim he has red pilled people, but so far I haven’t seen a single example of any great insight he has had. No philosophical breakthrough or a strategic maneuver that has benefited the White Nationalist cause in a practical way. Maybe he has done some of that, but based on what I’ve seen he has merely entertained people. He’s been witty, funny and pleasant to listen to, for some people. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it hardly makes him an integral part of any actual political movement.

The whole of Alt-Right is just another drug to distract you from the drudgery of everyday life. Some people get fed up with the blue pill of being an ordinary consumer with a 9-to-5 job and believing everything the TV says. This is good of course, but instead of trying to wake up from the drug-induced stupor you get the red adrenaline pill of fighting for a Noble Cause™. I agree that it is more exciting than the blue pill that makes you mellow and obedient, but you’re still drugged and delusional.

It’s certainly not only the Alt-Right that drugged by the red pill. There are various alternatives of the red pilled tailored for your pleasure. There’s the red pill of the left when you discover how the world is ruled by the evil White cis-het male capitalist patriarchy and you have to fight against them. There’s the leftie-environmentalist pill where you have to fight for animal rights, veganism and all that against the oil companies and the nuclear power industry. There’s the red pill of the conspiracy theorist where everything bad that happens is because it was an Illuminati sacrifice, a hoax or a false flag. That is not to say that Illuminati sacrifices, hoaxes and false flags don’t happen, but you have to investigate every event separately to understand what happened. Then there’s the Alt-Right White Nationalist red pill. And I guess you could say the latest pharmaceutical could be called the Sargon-pill when you are so extremely centrist and moderate you try to make sitting on the fence and being lukewarm an artform.

There are some redeeming qualities to all of these red pills, but ultimately they are a ready-made template that will lead you astray.

I don’t think in this day and age any political movement can work. Internet-based movements just aren’t real movements, and organizing a grass-roots movement in meatspace that could actually wield power in the real world sounds like Utopian dream. Most likely they’ll never get of the ground, or they’ll end getting co-opted either by trained operatives or simply by self-serving assholes. Be it the Alt-Right movement, truth movement, Occupy Wallstreet or anything like that. They always seem to fail. This is not me being black-pilled, but realistic. The only thing we can really do is to try to pursue the truth where it leads and stick with whatever principles we have. Don’t go along with any movement that changes its principles on a whim or based on what sounds convenient.

To finish this off, I’d like to share some screencaps from Daily Stormer of people excusing Mike Enoch’s duplicity. Many on the website don’t and call him out on it, but there are plenty fanboys out there as well.

 

mikepass

It’s nice to see you stick with your principles.

 

contribution

How did he actually contribute to the cause? By lying a deceiving all you idiots who fawned over him?

 

complicated

Such mental chicanery. I guess he refuses to look into it further to find out that Mike’s wife is a faghag diversity officer as well.

 

married-for-10-years

Mike brought a lot of people to the movement. “Mine more souls!” Only quantity matters. And he chooses to assume the best about Enoch’s intentions. “I have no doubt if…”, “I can’t imagine how…” These comments just reveal you are clueless, and nothing about Enoch’s benevolence.

 

mikespants

This post might be a troll. Even the poster’s name is Pakis4Anglin, which doesn’t sound very White Nationalist. However, if this is genuine, it wins the award on mental chicanery to excuse Mike Enoch’s duplicitous actions.

  1. Sure, I used to watch the Nanny with Fran Drescher when I was a teenager. It still doesn’t mean I married a Jew, and I’m not a White Nationalist who has built his career around hating Jews.
  2. Mike clerly did not wear pants since he allowed his wife to be a faghag with LGBT drag queens.
  3. Maybe I’m missing out on something since I am not a White Nationalist, but I don’t think the number of bedrooms is an important issue in White Nationalism. It is not a bedroom or furniture compairing club, it is supposedly a political movement based around race and nationalism. Race-mixing is an anathema to them, especially race-mixing with Jews.

 

pro-white-community

Let’s end this with this week’s “Common Filth was right again” -comment. Saying that this controversy “is sending a shockwave through the pro-white community” just sounds gay as hell. You replace “pro-white” with “LGBT” when talking about any event that the gays don’t like and say “[this event] is sending a shockwave through the LGBT community”.

 

 

Links:

Maybe you shouldn’t take the Red Pill either: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/maybe-you-shouldnt-take-the-red-pill-either/

Alt-Right leader Mike Enoch is married to a Jew

A couple of months ago the Economist published the magazine cover with a prediction for 2017 in the form of 8 tarot cards. It would seem like some of the predictions are already becoming true.

In recent weeks many of the members of the Alt-Right website The Right Stuff (TRS) have been doxed (or doxxed if you prefer, but my favourite is doxxxed), i.e. their personal information has been leaked to the public. For most of them perhaps there have been some embarrassing revelations, but no major upsets, except perhaps for the person getting doxed. But a couple of days ago Mike Enoch, the owner of TRS, (or as he known now, Kike Enoch) was doxed by the far-left organization, Antifa. It has been revealed that Enoch wife is a Jew, not even a “Red-Pilled” right-wing Jew, but a faghag and active member in the LGBT community.

This is naturally a great upset since the TRS and Alt-Right in general are White Nationalists who are against race-mixing, especially with Jews. There is no doubt that Mike Enoch had wittingly lied and deceived his followers. The only question is, did he do it just for the money, was this some sort of alphabet agenda psy-op, or was it a joke gotten out of hand? My money’s on it being a government psy-op, as I’ve written disparagingly about Richard Spencer several times, and as Mr. Enoch has proven, it is prudent to distrust those who associate with Spencer who has appeared on Enoch’s Daily Shoah podcast several times, I believe.

Spencer’s recent tweet

As we can see above, Richard Spencer seems to have no problems with this revelation of extreme hypocrisy on the part of Enoch. Naturally he wouldn’t.

 

The Tower and Upheaval

How is this doxing and marrying of Jews -scandal related to the Economist’s tarot cover then?  The first card on the magazine cover is the Tower. In my analysis of the cover I wrote: “The Tower represents upheaval. It may look like an outside force strikes the tower, but it is actually derived from psychological principles. They often result from ‘neglected and mishandled situations’. One example given by [Rachel] Pollack [author of Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom] for the Tower is friends turning against you.”

The revelations of Mike Enoch’s duplicity has naturally created a lot of tension within the Alt-Right and internet far-right in general. Tension has already existed between 8chan’s /pol and TRS for quite some time as /pol is more National Socialist than Alt-Right, in other words /pol is more far-right, or just more genuinely right. Some TRS forum members are complaining about /pol punching to the right when they criticize TRS, especially since certain TRS forum members are attempting to excuse Enoch’s treachery. Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me. Anyway this dissension within the right is clear example of the Tower’s effect of friends of turning against each other.

On the Tower card on the Economist cover both Communists and Christians seem to be protesting against the tower as it is being hit by lightning which also has a Christian cross on it. Now it makes perfect sense. The Communists represent Antifa, which did the doxing of Mike Enoch, whereas the demonstrating Christians are the puristic right-wingers (such as /pol) who do not approve of TRS’s pro-Jewish actions. Both factions, although normally enemies, want to see The Right Stuff fall as the Antifa Communists see them as evil racist Nazis, whereas /pol users see them as being a Jewish honeypot, and it seems they were right.

economist2017

 

Of course many people in the Alt-Right and /pol are not Christians, but I do think the cross on the card represents the different factions within the right-wing.

 

My Two Cents

I’m going to share my take on this TRS scandal whether you like it or not. First of all, I must I say I am not a fan doxing, and generally see it as a bad thing. But I could say the same thing about murder, it’s generally bad, but if there is a pedophile in your neighbourhood molesting children then it doesn’t sound too bad. In this case there was a person who is allied with Jews pretending to be anti-Jew, and a bunch of anti-Jew White men became his followers. I think this says tons about not only Jews, that they seem to thrive on anti-Semitism so they perpetuate it themselves, but also about the goy who seem to be so willing to give their money and support to dishonest Jews. (I am also guilty of this, not in relation to TRS, but to 108morris108.)

I’ve listened to a few Daily Shoah podcasts maybe a year ago or so. I thought they were sort funny with a good attitude, but ultimately found them too low brow and simplistic. What ultimately made me dismiss them as pointless, I think, was that some of the people on it said disparaging about investigating conspiracy theories. Recently I saw a tweet by Mike Enoch saying this:

enoch911

 

“The Jews did 9/11 conspiracy theory is retarded. Sorry. It’s embarrassing.” Anyone who says this is either retarded, scared of being called a conspiracy theorist or anti-Semitic, or is simply dishonest. I don’t know into which category Mike Enoch falls, but if I had to bet, based on recent revelations I’d say he wants to make you think Jews are just some greedy comical merchants.  Although “Jews did 9/11” is a simplistic way of putting it. I would rather say Israel/Mossad was heavily involved in 9/11.

Anyway, based on failing the litmus test that is 9/11, and being married to a LGBT-loving faghag Jews while pretending to be some sort of Nazi leader, i.e. a complete fraud, I do think it was a good thing that Mike Enoch was doxed. The truth came out. Although after having seem pictures of Mike Enoch I can’t really hate him. He looks like a scruffy sad bear or something. I won’t show his picture or mention his real name since I don’t wanna be part in doxing him (I know I’m a hypocrite). I don’t wish Enoch any more ill will than he has already gotten, but naturally his political career should be demolished and his lies exposed.

 

P.S.

As I was finishing this I checked /pol and it seems Mike Enoch mother is Jewish too, which would make him a Jew.

 

Links:

Mike Enoch doxed by Antifa: https://archive.is/I7eME

The Economist’s 2017 Tarot cover, Part 1: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/11/23/the-economists-2017-tarot-cover-part-1/

108morris108 censors his comments: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/108morris108-censors-his-comments/

Jewish Mother confirmed: http://8ch.net/pol/res/8792524.html

 

 

Alt-Right is proposing an Alliance with Zionist Jews?

Lana Lokteff interviewed a person identified as the Reactionary Jew, a “Red Pilled” Alt-Right Jew, on Radio 3Fourteen the other day, which part of the Red Ice radio or TV network. The interview begins with Lana mentioning she met Reactionary Jew at the NPI conference where Richard Spencer made the infamous “Hail Trump” -salute, and she asks “Is it possible to create a bridge between Jewish nationalists and European nationalists?” If by “European nationalists” Lana Lokteff means the Alt-Right, then the answer is yes, although on the surface it may seem very contradictory.

When the Alt-Right emerged a couple of years ago and Red Ice converted to their ideology, I thought the main purpose of the Alt-Right was to expose the Jewish and/or Zionist control over many aspects of the world and topple it. The Jews were supposedly the eternal enemy of the Alt-Right. I’ve since come to realize that’s not the case. The Alt-Right is basically about worship of one’s race, or worship of oneself. It’s basically Talmudic Judaism for the goyim, or just Satanism. I’ve written about this phenomenon that I name Talmudic Aryanism before.

 

Reactionary Jew interview

Yet I question how viable an honest alliance between the Alt-Right and conservative Jews would be? In the interview Lana let’s Reactionary Jew do most of the talking without challenging him on issues such as the Holocaust. Reactionary Jew seems to believe in official narrative of the Holocaust even if he does not wish to obsess over it as much as main stream Jews. Both Red Ice and Radio 3Fourteen have done various programs on exposing the falsehoods in the Holocaust narrative. What if she were to challenge Reactionary Jew on the issue? Would they still engage in friendly banter? Is there anything else except their hatred of multiculturalist liberals and the threat of Islam holding them together? Both groups hold similar Talmudic views of being the chosen race, but this does not ultimately unify Jews and the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right envies the powerful position the Jews currently hold and ultimately wishes to usurp it, but I suppose currently they feel weak enough pretend being friendly. I suddenly got a flashback to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Then there’s the Israel question. Reactionary Jew just seems to assume that Jews have the right to live in Israel, and Lana Lokteff does not contest this. Presumably it’s based on the narrative in the Old Testament. Even if the ancestors of modern Jews did inhabit that land over 2000 years ago, does it still grant them the right to do so now? What if the proto-Finns lived in the area that is now known as Bulgaria 3000 years ago, for example, does it give me the right to kick out Bulgarians out of their homes and settle on their land? The historical accuracy of the Jewish diaspora narrative is in question, and has been studied people such as Shlomo Sand. And even if the Israelites did live in the so-called holy land and were exiled from it, and have a right to return there, can the modern Jews prove they are the descendants of those Israelites?

I don’t want to comment too much on the details of the conversation between Reactionary Jew and Lana Lokteff, but there was one interesting bit where the Jew said that light-skinned Jews are more likely to be liberals than darker skinned ones, and Lana agreed that White people tend to be the most left-leaning race out there. This lends credence to Common Filth’s theory that there is a genetic component to White man’s deviancy. If Lana really cares about the well-being of her race I hope she reflects on the implications of her own words. Maybe her race isn’t supposedly facing extinction because of an outside threat, but by an inner one.

I suppose the ultimate purpose why Reactionary Jew was chosen for an interview with Radio 3Fourteen was because of Richard Spencer. The Jew was at Spencer’s NPI conference and he said he would vote Spencer for president. For whatever reason Red Ice has allowed Richard Spencer to become their lord and saviour and are promoting him. Reactionary Jew, while he seems intelligent and well-versed in many political issues related to Israel, by his own admission does not know what the rich and powerful globalist Jews think, and cannot influence them.

 

Richard Spencer on the Jews

Early December, Richard Spencer was interviewed by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. He is quoted as saying: “I think it’s clear that Jews underwent tremendous suffering during World War II. I don’t deny the Holocaust”. Why exactly is Red Ice promoting this guy? I don’t agree with most of the stuff that Red Ice does these days, but at least I agree that the official Holocaust narrative is bullshit.

The Haaretz also refers to an article Spencer wrote on his Radix Journal website back in 2010 titled “An Alliance with the Jews”. In it Spencer suggests the following: “Who knows? Israeli nationalists might want to help finance the far Right in Europe and North America.” Spencer has been hoping for a long time that Israel would become his sugar daddy.

Spencer was also interviewed by the self-titled human rights advocate David Duke the other day. In the interview Spencer does seem to indirectly agree with Duke that media is controlled by Jews, and they want to destroy White people. Spencer contrasts the gray areas of today with the Bolshevic revolution in Russia. Back then it was supposedly more black and white, when “we” were facing destruction. You’re not Russian, Dick. I suppose the implication is that the communist Jews were genociding White people in Russia, but nowadays it’s more complicated and you cannot just blame Jews for it. Or maybe not. This is classic Richard Spencer; never being clear on what you say to have plausible deniability, and allowing people to draw the conclusions they want. If you are Red Pilled on Jews, you assume he’s exposing the Jew. If you don’t want be associated with anti-Semites he can say that he didn’t say anything about Jews. Another reason for avoiding blaming Jews is that he still wants that Israeli funding.

Quite interestingly at some point Spencer says you shouldn’t be nice to the main stream media, which is actually something I agree with. Then he comments on some misguided Alt-Right people: “They’re living this delusion if only we’re nice to the media, if only we’re nice to our enemies, they’ll be nice back.” It’s refreshing to hear such honesty from Richard Spencer. He admits he’s delusional. In his weak and effeminate way he seems to agree with Duke that Jews are their enemies, yet he wants to be nice to the Jews to get their money. At least Spencer gives the impression that he doesn’t like Jews. He even says one rabbi’s stupidity makes him question the alleged high IQ of the Askernazis. Maybe this sucking up to Jews is a next level play of pretending to be their friend to steal their money, and when he has it he uses it against them?

David Duke starts a new meme in the interview. Since Spencer orignates from Whitefish, Montana, Duke calls him Whitefish. A more accurate description though when it comes to Richard Spencer would be of course Gayfish. Spencer has adopted the mantle of Gayfish from Kanye West. All hail Richard Spencer, Gayfish of Alt-Right, or Aut-Kike or whatever you call it.

 

Conclusion

Red Ice, which is a mouthpiece for the Alt-Right, is promoting an alliance with their enemy, the Zionist Jews. Richard Spencer already did so 6 years ago, and it doesn’t seem like he has changed direction. While making one interview asking the question whether Zionist Jews and “European nationalists”, or should it be (((European nationalists)))?, can be friends does not imply it’s the absolute opinion of Red Ice, discussing this topic is itself a promotion of the idea. As far as I know, Red Ice has not made a single program discussing the Flat Earth debate, for example, since clearly they don’t want anything to do with the issue. They do appear to want to become closer friends with Zionists though. As long as they’re pro-White, and Spencer is the one to determine what things are good for the White man.

 

P.S.

To clarify my personal position on Jews is that while I do not wish to “gas all of the kikes” I’ve been aware of the globalist Jewish elites influence for a long time, yet I do not think they are on top of the pyramid either. This means I am distrustful of anyone I know to be a Jew, but certainly some Jews do stand up from the crowd as positive examples, such as David Cole. He’s a Holocaust revisionist, and his life was threatened for his views. He had to change his name and live for a pseudonym for several years. Cole was interviewed by Radio 3Fourteen a year or two ago. The difference between Reactionary Jew and David Cole, and why I’m ambivalent toward one and somewhat favorable toward the other, is that Reactionary Jew simply espouses certain political views that the Alt-Righters agree with. David Cole on the other hand has done actual research. The facts that he has brought forward speak for themselves, not his identity or mere opinions.

 

Links:

Is it Possible for Jewish Nationalists & European Nationalists to Work Together?: https://redice.tv/radio-3fourteen/is-it-possible-for-jewish-nationalists-and-european-nationalists-to-work-together

Talmudic Aryanism: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/05/12/talmudic-aryanism/

The Invention of the Jewish People: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invention_of_the_Jewish_People

Alt-right Leader Has No Regrets About ‘Hail Trump,’ but Tells Haaretz: Jews Have Nothing to Fear: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:L3ITaWfKoDEJ:www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-1.756645+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fi&client=firefox-b

An Alliance with the Jews: http://www.radixjournal.com/altright-archive/altright-archive/main/blogs/untimely-observations/an-alliance-with-the-jews

The David Duke Show w/Guest Richard Spencer 12/26/16: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBX3P-ZcAXY

Thank you Edward Snowden

It’s been a bit over three years since Edward Snowden made his great revelation to the public that the NSA is spying on pretty much everyone. Except this wasn’t really news to anyone who has been paying attention; it was news only to the drowsy and apathetic masses still looking the main stream for answers. What has happened in these past three years? Have Snowden’s revelations somehow turned back the tide on government and corporate surveillance? No. More like the opposite, and this time with they do it with the consent of the masses.

Snowden’s revelations stirred up some debate back in the day. People were shocked and all that, but then everything went back to normal. People went back to consuming, governments and corporations went back to promoting their interests at the expense of the people. The only difference is that now everyone knows they’re been spied on, and it’s somehow cool. It used to be that there are only two things that are certain: death and taxes. Now it’s death, taxes and spying.

Interestingly, around the same time as Snowden was making government spying public information, Microsoft announced that Xbox One would have to be connected to the internet and spying on you all the time. I don’t think this was co-incidental. Even if Microsoft did go back on some of their threats against privacy, I’d be surprised if Xbox One didn’t spy on you in some way. Then there’s Windows 10.

It has installed itself onto the computers of countless people who didn’t want it, it spies on you and based on what I’ve heard it’s not very good to use either. Still even some of my friends use Windows 10. Their attitude is that since everyone is spying on you, you might as well accept it. Since it’s so prevalent, it’s supposedly normal. Like the movie Se7en put it: “We see a deadly sin on every street corner, in every home, and we tolerate it. We tolerate it because it’s common, it’s trivial. We tolerate it morning, noon, and night.”

Microsoft is just the most blatant example of a software company that is spying on you, but collection of data is everywhere from computer games to sites like Facebook and searching things with Google. The contribution to society that Snowden provided is not to inform us of this potential danger, since you already knew about it if you wanted to be informed, but to make you accept a deeper level of enslavement. Or perhaps that you’re like a rat in a maze being studied. But as long as you get the piece of cheese in the end, you don’t mind. This is how the average person reacts to spying.

I’ve even seen people on the internet defend this violation of privacy. They love their enslavement, or rather they tell themselves they do, so they don’t have to face the seemingly impossible task of resisting it. I’ve seen people on the internet get angry if you speak out against mass surveillance. They’d rather be happy slaves instead of disgruntled ones.

This is what Edward Snowden has brought us. It wasn’t about giving us a favour. It was another successful attempt at social engineering. People are even more willing to accept their place as slaves and guinea-pigs than before.

I’m not. I may not be able to stop all the spying. I don’t have the time, energy, and know-how to prevent them from spying on me, but at least I can try to limit it. More importantly, I don’t need to accept it mentally and emotionally. This spying is wrong. It is immoral and ill-dignified. Even if it is everywhere, even if it is common it’s something I don’t have to accept. I don’t have to pretend I’m fine with it.

What is going on with the Mandela Effect?

I’ve recently discovered the phenomenon known as the Mandela Effect. Supposedly several people remember that Nelson Mandela died in prison in the eighties, whereas according to the understanding of most of us he died as late as 2013. The phenomenon gets its name from this, but there are various other curious misrememberings by people that are classified under the Mandela Effect. The phenomenon has sparked various theories on what had caused it ranging from parallel universes, to time paradoxes and elaborate conspiracies.

I’ll mention of some alleged examples of the Mandela Effect, but as there are plenty of them, I won’t repeat all I’ve heard so far. Then I’ll discuss my own views on the phenomenon.

 

Misremembered Movie Quotes

There are many famous movie quotes that people seem to remember incorrectly, and this is attributed to the Mandela Effect. For example, most people seem to remember a quote from Forrest Gump saying “Life is a like box of chocolates” whereas it appears that in reality the quote is “Life was like a box of chocolates”. A quote from Field of Dreams is remembered as “If you build it, they will come”, but the movie actually says “If you build it, he will come”. In Snow White people remember the witch saying “Mirror, mirror on the wall…” whereas it actually says “Magic mirror on the wall…”

A lot of people seem to have gotten these lines wrong, perhaps even the majority. Do they simply have bad memory or have the lines changed? At least for me regarding these movies, I think I’ve seen Forrest Gump and Field of Dreams only once, and that was back in the 90ies, i.e. 20 years ago. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen Snow White, I’ve seen many clips of it, and I know the story, but I may not have seen the whole movie ever. Yet I’ve heard these famous quotes, or memes, being repeated countless times. Perhaps this is a case of the broken telephone game where people remember the message that other people tell them instead of the original one.

Then again, a short clip on Youtube of the scene where Forrest Gump says the “box of chocolates”-line is titled: “Life is like a box of chocolate”. Is even the person who uploaded the video so absent-minded they didn’t notice how the quote actually goes, or has the line in the movie actually changed?

 

Changed Book Titles

Certain book titles have supposedly changed as well. There’s the thing with some children’s book called Berenstain Bears that many people seem to remember as Berenstein Bears. I have no comment on this one, since the first time I heard of it was in connection to the Mandela Effect. There are many other products and things that have been allegedly changed that I can offer no comment on since they don’t really exist here in Finland, and certainly did not do so in the past. I’ve seen many America or Australia-specific things that I had not heard of before.

There is one book and movie whose name I am sure has changed though; Interview with A Vampire. Nowadays it is called Interview with THE Vampire. I remember when the movie came out in the nineties. It was called Interview with A Vampire. I read the book around ten years ago; it was called Interview with A Vampire. A few months ago I saw that they’re making a remake of the movie, but this time it was called Interview with THE Vampire. I found it annoying, but ignored the issue. A few days ago I found that even the original has been changed to Interview with THE Vampire. So far I have not gotten hold of any physical, old copy of the book or the movie to see what it says, but as far as I know, they all say Interview with THE Vampire. I know it used to be Interview with A Vampire.

If it wasn’t for this one detail, it would be fairly easy for me to dismiss the Mandela Effect as simply bad memory or some weird, yet pointless phenomenon. Yet, I am certain that name has changed, and if it has the implications are profound.

 

Altered Geography

I’ve heard claims that maps, or Earth’s geography has been altered as well. Some of the common one’s are that in the past South America used to be directly below North America, whereas now it is more to the east. Australia used to be further to the south, but now it is very close to Papua-New Guinea. Many people remember that New Zealand was more to the north than Australia, but now New Zealand is more southern.

I concur with all of these observations. This is how I remember them as well, yet I don’t think it necessarily means the geography has changed. It may simply be a case of the fact that no map is 100% accurate. Especially the maps we used in our childhood may have been less accurate, but our mental image of the world was formed based on those maps and they conflict with more up-to-date maps. This may create some cognitive dissonance in our minds.

However, there are some sections of north-east Asia that I think look odd. The protrusion of land encircled in pink in the picture below, eastern Russia, looks bigger than I remember it. It looks bloated, and also the Kamchatka peninsula, encircled in red, stands out more than it used to be. Maybe it’s bigger.

I also don’t remember Sakhalin island, inside the purple ring, being so close to Hokkaido in Japan, and the island is much bigger as well. The island is known from the border tension between Japan and Russia, but according to my memory is was further away from Japan and more like three small islands or something. I don’t remember the small island chain going from Hokkaido to Kamchatka, and from Kamchatka toward Alaska. They are above the yellow line. Whether or not they used to be there, it looks like Japan is the outer edge of a submerged continent underneath the Pacific Ocean.

ChangedEarth

 

I am not saying that the geography of that region has necessarily changed. It may simply be that I never played that much attention to the region north of Japan before. Yet I don’t want to dismiss the possibility either than some sort of alteration may have occurred.

 

Disinformation and Misinformation

I do think there is a genuine issue behind the alleged Mandela Effect. I am sure that Interview with a Vampire’s name has changed, and I also believe that the originat of the phenomenon, claims that Nelson Mandela died in the eighties is genuine. Whether or not he died back then, I don’t know, but I believe that some people have the memory of his death, regardless of if they are mistaken or not.

However, there are countless allegations on the internet about the name of this and that product whose name has supposedly changed, or a family member who has ceased to exist and so on. I am not buying it. Some people are probably convinced that the Mandela Effect is real, i.e. some details of our world have changed, and they are looking for changes everywhere they look now. Anything they see that seems a bit off is described as being due to the Mandela Effect. Moreover, I think some people are lying about their Mandela Effect experiences, either to mislead people for some purpose or simply to gain attention, or clicks on their website or video.

There are also wild theories, or even claims that they know what it causing the Mandela Effect. It ranges from time travel and CERN, to parallel universes. I don’t think any of these theories are necessarily bad, but there is big differences between mentioning them as distinct possibilities, and saying they are the truth. People act as if they know what is going on are unreliable at best, or possibly dishonest.

 

Conclusion

Underneath all of the misinfo and wild claims, I do think there is something to the Mandela Effect. I don’t think it’s merely a product of bad memory and low attention span, or mass hysteria. At least Interview with a Vampire will always remind that there is something odd going on. However, I don’t want to speculate right now what the cause of this phenomenon could be.

 

Update:

This video shows several film clips from the nineties when Interview with a Vampire was filmed. People used to call it Interview with A Vampire. This includes the author of the book, Anne Rice. Interestingly, when the book name is shown in the video, it is named Interview with THE Vampire, yet that’s not how people say the name.

The video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynb40ADxmRQ

 

Links:

Nelson Mandela Died in Prison?: http://mandelaeffect.com/nelson-mandela-died-in-prison/

Forrest Gump – “Life is like a box of chocolate”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJh59vZ8ccc

How Do You Explain THIS Mandela Effect/CERN Connection?? (2016): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep3Tiuh1eaw