Tag Archives: royalty

What is the Origin of the Elite Bloodlines?

It seems to be an established fact that there is an elite bloodline, or a mix of bloodlines, that rule our world. Many conspiracy theorists have described 12 Illuminati bloodlines, while I don’t know if the number is accurate or not, I haven’t seen anyone really dispute the existence of these bloodlines. Even main stream society seems to submissively accept that these bloodlines are a fact. For example most US presidents have been related to each other and to European royalty. The main stream media has even dicussed how Dick Cheney and Barack Obama are related.

The question then is why is this royal bloodline significant? What makes them different, why do they always seem to be in power? From what I see, among conspiracy theorists the prevailing theory is that they have descended from the Nephilim, fallen angels, or possibly the serpent from Eden through Cain. There are variations to this, such as they were descended from Annunaki aliens or reptilians, but in the end the narrative is that the elite bloodlines are evil because they descended from evil non-human entities. And I don’t think it’s a bad theory, but it’s still just a theory, so I will propose another one.


Seed of Abraham

Genesis 17:4-8 states:

Gen 17:4  As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations.
Gen 17:5  Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.
Gen 17:6  And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee.
Gen 17:7  And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
Gen 17:8  And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.

God formed “an everlasting covenant” with Abraham and his seed to make him “a father of many nations”, and “kings will come out of” Abraham, which presumable means he will be the progenitor of many kings. Perhaps the seed of Abraham still is ruling many nations through his kings. If this is true, and the elite bloodlines of today are the seed of Abraham, then it would imply two different possibilities: either the God that came to Abraham to make a covenant with him was an evil one, or it was the true God and the only way for anyone to rule over the earth is through the seed of Abraham.

In Genesis 17:1 God, or LORD, says Abram (as he was still known) was perfect (or complete, whole, sound, without blemish, or entirely in accord with truth and fact).  This is why God chose to make the covenant with him. Then why are the elites of today so evil and corrupt then? Perhaps that is reason for their generational Satanist, MK Ultra mind control rituals. That is why the Illuminati trannies seem to exist. God had decided that the seed of Abraham will be kings over nations, and the other side cannot change that, but if they manage to control the seed, they can control the world. This might be what has happened. I’m not saying this necessarily true, but I am putting it out there as an alternative.

If my theory is correct, it would be utterly pointless to try start a revolution to oust the elite bloodlines from power. It would be pointless to hate them. The only way to free ourselves would be to free the elites from the mind control.


Canaan and the Goys

Before I finish, I’d like to take a look at a couple of interesting words from Genesis 17. The word “nations” is used a few times. The original Hebrew word is “goy”, which is certainly familiar as the Jews tend to call non-Jews that, and it supposedly refers to cattle. According to Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary the word has the following meanings:

1) nation, people (noun masculine)
1a) nation, people
1a1) usually of non-Hebrew people
1a2) of descendants of Abraham
1a3) of Israel
1b) of swarm of locusts, other animals (figuratively)
1c) Goyim? = “nations” (noun proper masculine)

Goy means nation, non-Hebrews, Israel, and descendants of Abraham. Does this mean that all of us non-Jews are the true descendants of Abraham and the true Israelites, and the Jews envy us for this?

Another interesting tidbit in Genesis 17 is: “And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession”.

What is Canaan then? According to Ancient.eu “Canaan was the name of a large and prosperous country (at times independent, at others a tributary to Egypt) which corresponds roughly to present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Israel and was also known as Phoenicia.”

The Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary gives the following definitions for Canaan:

Canaan = “lowland”
1) the 4th son of Ham and the progenitor of the Phoenicians and of the various nations who peopled the seacoast of Palestine (noun proper masculine)
2) the land west of the Jordan peopled by the descendants of Canaan and subsequently conquered by the Israelites under Joshua (noun proper locative)
3) merchant, trader (noun masculine)

God promised Canaan as an everlasting possessions to the non-Hebrew seed of Abraham. Canaan was inhabited by the Phoenicians, which was conquered by the goy-Israelites, and became known as Israel. It would seem to me that the modern day Jews are the descendants of Canaan, or the Phoenicians, Brown-Driver-Briggs even mentions how Canaan can mean “merchant” or “trader”. If the information presented above is correct, even the Bible itself would seem to state that the Jews have no right to Israel, Syria or other adjacent locations. In fact, the land was held by the Jews a long time ago, but God decided it should go to the goyim, for an eternity.

It would appear that the Cananite/Phoenician/Jews that pretend to be Israelites want their old land back. That is why Zionism was invented to “return” Israel to the Jews under false pretenses, and why there is a war in Syria right now.

I am not trying to twist this into any kind of “anti-Semitic” narrative. I am merely describing what I see.



Is ruling in the genes? All presidents bar one are directly descended from a medieval English king: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html

History and Purpose of the Freemasons and other Secret Societies: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/masons.htm

Canaan: http://www.ancient.eu/canaan/


What does the Monarch stand for in Monarch Mind Control?

One aspect of MK Ultra mind control is called Monarch Mind Control. The word monarch has perplexed me for a long time why is it used here?

The word monarch has two basic meanings; a type of butterfly and “one who rules alone”, basically a king or a queen. The monarch butterfly is often used to symbolize mind control, but how it is the connection here? One explanation I’ve heard is that the mind control victim experiences a kind of chrysalis and emerges as a new person, or alter, from the cocoon after being subjected to various types of torture and conditioning. Fritz Springmeier also said in his interview with Chuck and Kim Ochelli in 2015 something to the extent that some genes are inherited in the same way as monarch butterflies’, but I don’t remember exactly what he said.

My personal theory on the matter of the monarch is related to genes and the second meaning for the word, ruler, i.e. royalty. Many conspiracy researchers, including Fritz Springmeier, have discussed the notion of the 13 Illuminati bloodlines that rule the world. While I do not know if there are exactly 13 of these bloodlines and whether they call themselves Illuminati or not, it is well documented that a kind of royal bloodline is still ruling over most of the world. The vast majority of US presidents have been related to each other and European royalty. Even former vice-president Dick Cheney is related to Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton is related to the Bush family. And so on.

There clearly is some sort of “noble” family ruling the world. Most conspiracy researchers who discuss this issue describe this bloodline as somehow wicked, and seem to suggest that the idea that they rule over the masses is somehow immoral. While it is certainly true that this ruling family, or community of interconnected bloodlines, has acted fiendishly in recent centuries to say the least, but I theorize that the bloodline itself may not be wicked.

It is called Monarch Mind Control; the monarchs are being mind controlled. Perhaps the monarchs themselves are not wicked, but the ones controlling them are. I theorize that the purpose of this bloodline is to rule over people, and they are the only ones that can. Without this bloodline society would descend into chaos. The reason that the vast majority of the masses who see George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or whoever of the blood, on a podium talking are inclined to put their faith in the speaker, no matter what that person is saying. They have a certain unique attribute that makes the listener compliant on a genetic level. You can, of course, resist the effect if you are conscious of it, or of the vile actions of the speaker, but if you are unaware, then you are bound to be affected.

If my theory is correct (and I don’t mean this theory necessarily entirely my unique invention as I’ve read and listened to countless researchers over the years and may have gathered bits and pieces from different people) then the way to fix the world’s problems is not to overthrow the ruling elite, but to release them of the mind control. If a regular guy like or you who probably do not possess the mystical genetic marker try to run a huge nation, it would probably fail despite our good intentions or intelligence. We just don’t have the genetic component that is required to sway the masses.

The Rh negative blood type probably has something to do with all of this as well, but I don’t know about it in great detail.

That’s basically my theory. Too often I hear this fairly Marxist idea in conspiracy research that the world is so messed up because we are ruled over by these evil oligarchs and if we just get rid of them everything will be fine. The oligarchs we have now are indeed evil, but are downtrodden masses genuinely any better? There is the old saying that a country gets the kind of leader it deserves. If we just fetched our guillotines and executed the ruling class, soon after we’d just have more of the same. Perhaps the world wouldn’t be as centralized, but we’d just have local thugs oppressing us. I’m not saying we should be happy with the status quo, but that we need to look for alternative explanations on what is going on, and how to fix things.

When I look at someone like Hillary Clinton I despise what she has done, but when I see all of these weird seizures she has I can’t help but feel sorry for her. It’s like this poor woman is possessed by an evil entity. I think we should help her if we can. The human inside this husk for the globalist Luciferian agenda may simply be another victim.



Jaded Chuck and Kim Interview Fritz Springmeier 6 20 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXnCe3KtZZE

Jupiter Ascending symbolism and messages

I just finished watching Jupiter Ascending. Honestly it wasn’t as bad as it seemed after the first 20 minutes, but I don’t really understand why they make all of this sci-fi directed at teenage girls, as they don’t usually like sci-fi that much. It’s like making pudding for people who don’t like pudding. There’s stuff like Hunger Games and Caprica (prequel to Battlestar Galactica).

Anyways, let’s get down to business.

*Warning spoilers*

When Jupiter Ascending came out a few months ago, the name stunned me. It was around the time I had read Kerth Barker’s Angelic Defenders & Demonic Abusers. Kerth Barker was allegedly abused as a child by the Satanic Illuminati networks, and his grandfather was part of, they tried to make him part of it, but he managed to escape. According to his book, several decades ago there was a movement within the Satanic networks that wished to reform the ways of the Illuminati. The resistance’s symbol was Jupiter, the child of Saturn who ended up killing his father. Supposedly even the fact that in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey ends near Jupiter, instead of Saturn, as in the novel, is a reference to the success of the resistance. However, the resistance got wiped out in the end.

These things popped up in my head as I saw the name Jupiter Ascending. Could this mean there has been some change in the structure of the “Illuminati”, they’re just taking the piss, or it’s a co-incidence. I don’t think it’s any of the above really.

There’s reptilians and gray aliens in  the movie as foot soldiers for the bad guys. I actually don’t think it means much. They’re everywhere nowadays. There’s one reference in Jupiter Ascending that the earth was originally inhabited by reptilians, i.e. dinosaurs, and humans from outer space wiped them out. I’m not sure if that has any deeper meaning either.

What I find interesting though, is the story the movie is pushing that human beings are not originally from earth, but some distant planet somewhere else. We were supposedly seeded here. I think this stuff, along with much of the ancient alien stuff, is propaganda to try to make us disassociate with our home. In the beginning of the movie there’s even the modern yet old argument that since there’s so many planets out there in the universe, wouldn’t it be silly to think earth is the only place with intelligent life. Well, yes it would seem like a waste if there are countless planets out there, and this is the only one with life on it, but so far evidence seems to suggest that is the case. Haven’t we remote-probed countless planets out there and discovered no signs of life? Seems like a wasteland out there to me.

Another story Jupiter Ascending is pushing is that the earth is some sort of farm, like in the Matrix. In Jupiter Ascending it’s a farm for biomatter to make space royalty young again.

Then we get to the idea of royalty and genes. One character in the movie says that out there in their space federation they treat genes almost religiously, or something to that extent. Like the “royal” bloodlines we have on earth today.  Somewhere along the movie the main character, Jupiter, played by Mila Kunis, finds out she’s not just another earthling, but a reincarnation of the queen of… space? The movie just doesn’t explain what’s so special about being royalty except that bees like you, and you are “entitled” to all sorts of legal privileges. I wonder if this is deliberate? First the movie makes a big deal about Jupiter being royalty, but in the end it doesn’t make her any different from others, except from what some legal documents say.

The main character’s love interest is a generic combat hunk werewolf-boy by the name of Caine, who looks like a younger Ron Perlman. This certainly dips into what Freeman has been saying about the princess programming for girls, and warrior programming for boys, that Hollywood is pushing these days. The name Caine, or Cain, is of course interesting. Why did they pick that one? There’s even one scene where Caine is imprisoned and put into a pit with a metal grate that looks a bit like the rays of the sun. Cain is the Black Sun, and imprisoned in the pit, according to Tracy Twyman’s demonic informants in Clock Shavings.

The movie has also been written and directed by the Wachowskis, known for The Matrix and V for Vendetta. I didn’t even realize that when I started watching the movie. I don’t know if ultimately these themes or symbols mean anything in terms of predictive programming or manipulation. Perhaps the Wachowskis simply spent a few days on the internet studying interesting details to put into the movie so more people would go see it. I’m sure plenty of conspiracy theorists have been interested just because the movie has reptilians and grays.


P.S. I wrote the name of the movie as Jupiter Rising, not Jupiter Ascending several times. Maybe I’m subconsciously thinking of Lucifer Rising.



Jupiter Ascending: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1617661/

De Vere appears to confirm my ideas on demons in the DNA

A couple of months ago I asked Are demons embedded in our DNA or Genetic Memory? I recently started reading a book that seems to suggest yes.

I wrote: “In a Ouija session the entity uses the hand of the people involved to move the planchette. Perhaps the entity has been in the people to begin with, it is part of their DNA or genetic memory, or in the blood already. It is an ancient program that is activated, similar to a suppressed instinct. The person allows this program to run its course and control him or her, this results in some degree of possession. Using a Ouija board is a slight form of possession, since the entity uses the hands of the participants to use the planchette.”

The Dragon Legacy by Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg says: “The Witch was possessed by this daemon, because the Witch by descent and heredity was that daemon itself. It was his or her genetic inheritance and part of his or her racial consciousness. To that the Witch would yield, when occasion necessitated, placing the Witch and the words wicce or Wicca firmly in the tradition of the trance seer (Derkesthai), practice rooted in Scythian shamanic culture.”

Nicholas de Vere was a member of the true royal bloodline, the dragon bloodline of witches, according to himself. He refers to most of the European royalty as “Tinker Kings”, who are not of the blood. De Vere’s bloodline is not of reptilian shapeshifters, but the “Derkesthai”, the one’s who see clearly, and view life from a more spiritual viewpoint than normal people. His book The Dragon Legacy got published because Baphomet asked her to.

When I wrote about demons and DNA I had no idea of who De Vere was or what his book says. All I knew was that De Vere was the name of some guy. Naturally I was aware of Twyman at that point, as I refer to her experiences, although I hadn’t read Clock Shavings yet. I find De Vere’s depiction of the witch being possessed by the daemon in his or her genetic inheritance some degree of corroboration of my ideas. At least someone else has considered it.



Are demons embedded in our DNA or Genetic Memory?: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/are-demons-embedded-in-our-dna-or-genetic-memory/

Bloodlines, Richard III and the Golden Fleece

I saw the news that Richard III’s bones had been discovered, and apparently confirmed to have belonged to him. Also DNA analysis revealed that one of his relatives, Edward III, Richard’s great-great-great grandfather if I understand correctly, had had a son who was not actually his but another man’s. John of Gaunt was not actually related to the Plantagenet House of York dynasty, but to others. And from his offspring was spawned the House of Tudor, which ruled England for a long time. There’s even a TV series about them that I have not watched.

This discovery of different lineage apparently puts into the question the of legitimacy the Tudors and the current Queen of England’s claim to the throne. While this is all intriguing it got me thinking about other stuff: the story we are given about Richard III.

And don’t take my word for the connections between these houses and bloodlines. I may misunderstand some details.

We are given the story that Richard III was a terrible person. He killed two children to usurp the throne, one of them was Edward V, the rightful king of England. After two years of rule Richard III was defeated by Henry Tudor in battle. Shakespeare even made a play about it. “A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse.” I suggest looking into what Joseph Atwill said about Shakespeare.

As we all know, but seldom believe, is that history is written by the victors. What if Richard III wasn’t such a bad guy after all? We do not know he killed the two boys. What if, for example, he knew them and himself were under threat from another faction like the Tudors. Perhaps he simply sent the boys to a safe, secluded location to protect them and assumed to throne for the same purpose. I don’t know if that happened, but we shouldn’t trust the description of his enemies either. But it’s possible Richard III got the Hitler treatment.

Anyway, Henry VII defeated Richard III and became king. I’m no expert when it comes to English heraldry and history, I just recognize some familiar names, so I decided look what Wikipedia says about him. Right there is a painting of Henry VII with the description that he’s wearing the collar of the Order of the Golden Fleece. I wondered what’s that then and clicked the link. Sounds like a not-so-secret society.

The Order of the Golden Fleece received his name from the Greek myth of Jason and the Argonauts. The Order “is an order of chivalry founded in Bruges by Philip III, Duke of Burgundy in 1430, to celebrate his marriage to the Portuguese princess Infanta Isabella of Portugal, daughter of King John I of Portugal. It became one of the most prestigious orders in Europe.” Sounds boring but later it’s said:

“It [the Order] received further privileges unusual to any order of knighthood: the sovereign undertook to consult the order before going to war; all disputes between the knights were to be settled by the order; at each chapter the deeds of each knight were held in review, and punishments and admonitions were dealt out to offenders, and to this the sovereign was expressly subject; the knights could claim as of right to be tried by their fellows on charges of rebellion, heresy and treason, and Charles V conferred on the order exclusive jurisdiction over all crimes committed by the knights; the arrest of the offender had to be by warrant signed by at least six knights, and during the process of charge and trial he remained not in prison but in the gentle custody of his fellow knights.”

Reminds me of a clique of internationalists with no allegiance to any nation but to each other. Also possibly in sense the Order has inherited at least some traits from the Knights Templar. Also: “Who, to carry off the fleece of Colchis [the destination of the Argonauts], was willing to commit perjury.”

Nowadays the Order of the Golden Fleece is split into the two orders: the Spanish and the Austrian Order. (Like Freemasons?) Wikipedia lists the living members of the order. The Spanish Order in particular was quite interesting. It mention royals like the king of Spain, princess Beatrix of the Netherlands, and even the emperor of Japan and king of Thailand. But then there’s Javier Solana and Nicolas Sarkozy, the former president of France. What the? I thought the order was only for royalty. I recognized the name Javier Solana from the news and stuff although wasn’t that sure who he was. Wikipedia says he was “European Union’s High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, Secretary General of the Council of the European Union and Secretary-General of the Western European Union”.

So what is the Order of the Golden Fleece? It has been part of European royalty for 500 years and now has spread to Asia too. And it has regular politicians and bureaucrats in it too. Seems like an important thing. I don’t remember even conspiracy researchers talking about it, which doesn’t mean that they haven’t. It simply means they haven’t talked about it so much that it has stuck in my memory.

One comment on royalty and their bloodlines before I finish. It’s often assumed in the conspiracy theorist world that all their bloodlines are evil reptilians shapeshifters, either literally or figuratively. I am not convinced its that simple. I’m more leaning to the story that the origin of these royal bloodlines is something more benign, but it was infiltrated by the literal/figurative reptilians. Passing the English throne from the Plantagenets to the Tudors may be such an occurrence.



Does Richard III’s DNA question Queen’s right to the throne? Hunchback king’s genetic comparison with distant cousins reveals an illegitimate child in royal family tree: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2857524/Does-Richard-III-s-DNA-question-Queen-s-right-throne-Analysis-reveals-relative-monarch-conceived-wedlock.html

Richard III: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_III_of_England

Monty Python, Hospital for over acting, Richard III ward: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbS2WJdav6c

Joseph Atwill on Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/06/RIR-140613.php

Henry VII: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_VII_of_England

Order of the Golden Fleece: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Golden_Fleece

Javier Solana: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javier_Solana