Tag Archives: space

The Infamous NASA Tether Incident with UFOs

Anyone who has watched several videos on the UFO phenomenon has probably seen the NASA STS-75 tether experiment video with weird floating things around a stick (allegedly) in space. UFO researchers usually describe the floating things as UFOs. The official explanation, apparently, is that they are debris illuminated by the sun. I don’t believe in either explanation.


Back when I saw the video, 10 years ago or so, I didn’t know what to think of it. The “UFOs” looked more like jellyfish, amoebas, or at least something organic, whereas as my preconception was if they were UFOs they should be round, metallic flying saucers. The whole video confused me. Back then me, and many other conspiracy minded people, expected NASA to have a Secret Space Program of some sort, and possibly be hiding an extraterrestrial presence.

Nowadays, myself, and many others (which is a good reason to remain skeptical of this concept as well), question whether NASA really ever had anything to do with space exploration, except maybe faking the notion that they really do send astronauts and probes out into space. There are also some videos suggesting that some, if not all, of the footage supposedly showing astronauts in space were actually filmed underwater. With this in mind, the tether experiment starts to make more sense.


The Official Story

Before I explain what I think is going on in the video, I’m going to go over some official facts about the tether experiment. The STS-75 mission was conducted between February and March of 1996. The primary objective was to put a Tethered Satellite System into orbit and attach a tether, or a cable, to it. The more specific objectives were according NASA’s website:

“[C]haracterize the current-voltage response of the TSS-orbiter system, characterize the satellites high-voltage sheath structure and current collection process, demonstrate electric power generation, verify tether control laws and basic tether dynamics, demonstrate the effect of neutral gas on the plasma sheath and current collection, characterize the TSS radio frequency and plasma wave emissions and characterize the TSS dynamic-electrodynamic coupling.”

On top of that they also flew a “Microgravity Payload (USMP3-)designed to investigate materials science and condensed matter physics.” I don’t really know what all of these things mean. I’m no astrophysicist. I also don’t know if the experiment actually occurred or not, and whether it was a complete hoax or not.

Wikipedia and NASA articles do not even mention the infamous UFO footage. Instead I had to go to RationalWiki to read what the official explanation for the UFOs is. It goes as follows:

“NASA mission video recordings of the tether experiment show what appear to be a number of bright objects swirling around the tether. Astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz explained the bright spots seen near the tether were ‘a little bit of debris that kind of flies with us’ that was illuminated by the sun.”

The debris does look alive and somewhat autonomous, and not like inanimate debris, to me. But what do I know.


Underwater UFOs

Now that we got the official story out of the way, I can discuss what I think is going on in the video. I am talking about the video now. I don’t know whether the actual STS-75 experiment occurred or not. Perhaps the experiment did take place, but the video was hoaxed for whatever reason.

Anyway, I already mentioned that the video looks like there are amoebas or other organic lifeforms in it. I think the video was filmed underwater. I have two different scenarios on it. How the “debris” or the “UFOs” move looks like they are alive to me. One scenario is that the footage was actually filmed up there in what is usually called space, but instead of an empty void up there, there is actually water up there as the Bible suggests. If there is water up there, clearly NASA isn’t telling everything about it, so there might be some sort of nautical lifeforms up there as well.

The second, and more likely, scenario is that the footage was filmed in a bucket full of water under a microscope. There tether in the picture is not actually some huge thing out in space, but a small needle in a pool of water. With a microscope shooting at it, it’s supposed to look big. The “UFOs” are actually some sort of microbial lifeforms that were either deliberately or accidentally released into the water. Perhaps NASA wanted to create this UFO controversy over the video for some reason, or a whistleblower wanted to sabotage the fake video.

Now that I look at the footage with new eyes, it looks like it’s underwater. I probably would not associate the video with outer space unless I had been told it.


Sex in Space

The Wikipedia article does not mention the alleged UFOs, but it does mention another interesting tidbit: an allegedly fraudulent NASA document that claimed STS-75 was studying sex in microgravity. Apparently “Document 12-571-3570” was published on a Usenet newsgroup in November 28, 1989. It claimed that:

“[A]stronauts aboard space shuttle mission STS-75 performed a variety of sex acts to determine which positions are most effective in zero gravity. The document goes on to report that of the 10 positions tested, six required the use of a belt and an inflatable tunnel, while four were contingent on hanging on. The document also discusses a video record of the 10 one-hour sessions in the lower deck of the shuttle, and notes that the subjects added their own personal footnotes to help scientists.”

This document was published in 1989, seven years before the “real” STS-75 tether experiment. I don’t know if these claims of sex in space were just a joke, or other kind of hoax, or if there is any truth behind it. I don’t even know whether NASA, or any other human agency, has ever gone into space or not. If all the claims of going to space are false, then claims of studying sex in space would be false too. However, I don’t find Wikipedia’s logic for debunking the document very convincing: “The real STS-75 mission occurred in 1996, 7 years after the text was published, and consisted of an all-male crew, clearly indicating that the document is a hoax.”

I don’t think seven male astronauts, many of whom are probably Freemasons or other Luciferians occultists, having sex with each other is a far-out concept. Perhaps the goal of NASA is to boldly sodomize where no-man has sodomized before. Maybe the Microgravity Payload aboard the shuttle referred to microgravity cumload.



Whatever the truth behind the “sex in space” document is, I don’t find either of the usual explanations on the tether video plausible. I don’t think the pulsating things are spaceships, nor do I think they are merely debris. I think the whole thing was filmed underwater for whatever reason.


EDIT: I found a Youtube video saying similar things about the tether video. They beat me to it by a week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5buFZr5huI



STS-75: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-75

STS-75: https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-75/mission-sts-75.html

STS-75 incident: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/STS-75_incident

Document 12-571-3570: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_12-571-3570

The tether incident: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XDgDYDDhyA



A Reminder that NASA has provided no proof of Exo-Planets on Trappist-1

As usual NASA has only provided CGI images of the Trappist-1 system. There are no photos. There are only artist’s renditions. Maybe I’m just a simple country boy, but I thought in science you have to prove your claims. I guess NASA has no need for that.

The NASA website has these pictures.


Looks pretty, yet has little actual significance. Besides this picture shows water. Have they found it on one of the new exoplanets?



Not a photo.


Caption on NASA website: “This poster imagines what a trip to TRAPPIST-1e might be like.”

This is perfect. It encapsulates all that NASA is. This is science fiction. Assuming that this planet even exists, maybe NASA should put a man on the moon or on Mars before they start hyping up this solar system that is 40 light-years away that they just allegedly discovered. They sell you fantasies like Hollywood and advertisement companies.

BTW, last night I was playing around with my own telescope and took a picture of a space ship, and a new alien planet with life on it.




If you doubt me, you’re a crazy conspiracy theorist. I’ve provided as much evidence as NASA did.

The newly discovered star system was named after the Trappist telescope that is situated in Chile, but operated from Belgium. Here’s a picture of it.


At least I believe this telescope exists. It sounds weird to me though that the telescope is in Chile, but they control it from Belgium. Wouldn’t it be simpler just to have a team in Chile controlling it? Or perhaps it is easier feed the scientists false data if they aren’t looking through it with their own eyes?

The sevel planets around Trappist-1 were supposedly detected with Spitzer Space Telescope, i.e. a telescope that is floating out in space. I’m doubtful that this telescope exists. The Wikipedia page for it shows the alleged telescope under a tarp, and it looks unfinished.



I also found several pictures of it being assembled, but no actual photos of the finished product.








Wikipedia has an artist rendering of it, and I found several similar ones on Google. I understand that if the telescope is actually out in space it’s not easy to take pictures of it, yet I’ve yet to see any pictures taken of it prior launching it to space. Taking into account the fact that NASA admits they cannot go beyond low earth orbit, I’m inclined to believe they didn’t send that thing into space. The pictures showing the telescope being assembled were probably made in benefit to gullible NASA employees who really believe NASA sends stuff out into space. “I saw them assemble the telescope. It’s real.”



I think it’s time to people to admit to themselves NASA has no credibility. Or if you still believe their claims, please do challenge me. Try to prove me wrong, and provide actual evidence of these exoplanets. NASA’s purpose is to create appealing images in the minds of people, like Eddie Bernays did back in the day by having the beautiful models smoke “liberty torches” so women would start smoking, or De Beers making people associate diamonds with romance.



NASA’s Spitzer Reveals Largest Batch of Earth-Size, Habitable-Zone Planets Around a Single Star: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Xr-WkW5JM&

NASA Telescope Reveals Largest Batch of Earth-Size, Habitable-Zone Planets Around Single Star: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-telescope-reveals-largest-batch-of-earth-size-habitable-zone-planets-around

Spitzer Space Telescope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitzer_Space_Telescope

NASA Can’t Go Beyond Low Earth Orbit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmoiwjXepHM

Diamonds Are A Brand’s Best Friend: The Evolution Of De Beers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob6aN4uYKTw

My previous article on this: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/nasa-claims-to-have-found-7-exo-planets-conjecturing-what-it-actually-means/

NASA claims to have found 7 Exo-Planets: Conjecturing what it actually means

I am doubtful NASA actually engages in any space exploration. Rather I think they are in the entertainment/deception business. They might actually partake in some space exploration, but as most of the information that comes out of them is unreliable, and they’ve been caught lying several times, it is prudent to be skeptical of their claims and intentions. I will explore NASA’s recent claim that they discovered 7 Earth-sized exoplanets in Trappist-1 (star or system?) from this viewpoint.

The star Trappist-1 is, according to The Atlantic website, located about 40 light-years from Earth. It’s size is only slightly bigger than Jupiter. The Atlantic states as follows: “The system resembles Jupiter’s moons Ganymede, Europa, and Io”. I doubt these 7 planets actually exist. I rather think it’s some sort of astrological meme-magic they are trying to feed to us. Let’s take a look at the meaning of some of these names.

Trappist refers to a kind of monk from the Trappist order. The name apparently comes from the abbey of La Trappe in France. Among us regular people the word Trappist is best known from certain types of beers, and I think there’s also Trappist milk in Hong Kong at least. According to Wikipedia, Trappists are contemplative order, they do not take vow of silence but refrain from speaking when not necessary. They follow the rule of St. Benedict. I’m not sure what its significance is, but it might mean something that previous pope, Ratzinger’s, papal name was Benedict.

The Trappist Cisterian order was founded by Armand Jean le Bouthillier de Rancé. I don’t know his significance either. Wikipedia says that he was “originally intended for the Knights of Malta”, but became a monk instead, I suppose. Knights of Malta is a secret society that still exists today. I don’t know if any of is significant in relation to NASA’s alleged discovery, but it might be.

It’s curious that Jupiter is connected to this new star system, as Jupiter is not only another persona of Osiris, a deity supposedly important to modern secret societies, but it also allegedly represents a shift in the secret society structures.

Ganymede was a beautiful man abducted by Zeus (Jupiter) to be his cup-bearer. Wikipedia explains this about him: “The myth was a model for the Greek social custom of paiderastía, the socially acceptable erotic relationship between an adult male and an adolescent male. The Latin form of the name was Catamitus (and also ‘Ganymedes’), from which the English word ‘catamite’ is derived.” A man abducted for his beauty by Zeus and associated with pedophilia.

Io was a mortal woman whom Zeus lusted after, and she became his lover. She was turned a heifer at some point. Interestingly Wikipedia says that the “ancients connected Io with the Moon”, and in Aeschylus’ Prometheus Unbound “she refers to herself as ‘the horned virgin’, both bovine and lunar.” This reminds me of the various Virgin Mary icons with her standing on a crescent moon.



Europa too was a woman abducted by Zeus. The Rape of Europa is a well-known phrase, and unfortunately a well-known event in recent years.

What do these mythological connections mean then? I naturally don’t know, but I have a few interpretations. Ganymede was a beautiful man whom Zeus (Jupiter) took a liking to and was associated with pederasty, and Io and Europa were women whom Zeus liked. All were mortals. This certainly sounds a bit like Genesis 6:2; “That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.” Perhaps Zeus (Jupiter) refers to Nephilim, demons, aliens, or just the occult elite who are going to revel in even more twisted Pizzagate-like debauchery.

Then again, perhaps the connection between Jupiter, Ganymede and Io refers to the trinity of Osiris, Horus and Isis. Zeus took the form of an eagle when he abducted Ganymede, and Horus is a falcon-headed man. Io is associated with the moon and horns as is Isis. Though I’m not sure where Europa fits in with this. I’m also not sure what is the significance of Trappist monks with this. Maybe the word Trappist should be interpreted literally, as in people who make traps. Are the secret society occultists setting some sort of trap?

Many conspiracy researchers claim that the elites worship Saturn. Saturn is the father of Jupiter. Jupiter killed him and became the chief deity. These 7 exoplanets might be Jupiter’s army that heralds the dawn of a new era, Saturn getting replaced with Jupiter. Whether this would make things better or worse, I cannot say.

I don’t know to what all of this refers, but I certainly don’t believe any of NASA’s claims at face value. I find a symbolical or occult explanation for these alleged discoveries a much more reasonable one. NASA comes up with a new discovery or accomplishment every couple of years ago that gets science-geeks excited for a few weeks and then it blows over. People forget, and in the end nothing concrete gets done. Science does not actually advance. No new technologies are developed. Whether it’s the alleged trip to Mars that people are supposedly planning, a new discovery, or even the supposed discovery of the Higgs-Boson God particle a few years ago. I know that wasn’t NASA, but it’s still part of the same scientism-industry. All of this is still just a more sophisticated form of celebrity gossip. It’s there just to distract you, or to somehow psychically manipulate you.

Pedophilia has certainly been in the headlines recently. There was, and hopefully still is Pizzagate, just a few days ago Milo Yiannopoulos was kicked from CPAC for supposed pedophiliac comments, and George Takei seems to be undergoing a similar scandal. Ganymede seems to refer to the same thing, but I’m sure what it all means. I hope it simply means that the crimes of these pederasts will be exposed and they will get judged.



Seven Earth-Sized Planets Have Been Spotted Around a Nearby Star: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/seven-exoplanets/517446/

Trappists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trappists

Armand Jean le Bouthillier de Rancé: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_Jean_le_Bouthillier_de_Ranc%C3%A9

Ganymede: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganymede_(mythology)


My stuff on Jupiter:

Jupiter Ascending symbolism and messages: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/jupiter-ascending/

Trump’s Victory suggests a shift in the Power Structure of the Secret Societies: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/11/14/trump-victory-secret-society/

NASA found Earth’s “cousin”

NASA claims to have found ‘Earth’s bigger, older cousin’. Sounds like  empty hype to me. The new planet, Kepler-452b, is situated somewhat similarly to Earth in relation to its sun, so it could theoretically maybe have life. Although “NASA can’t say for sure whether the planet is rocky like ours or has water and air”. So basically they haven’t said anything. It’s like seeing a small rock protruding from earth and suggesting it might be the antenna for a massive ancient space ship buried underground.

I don’t expect NASA to find any actual signs of life on that planet, since I don’t think NASA actually explore anything. I think they mostly make stuff up. I question whether Kepler-452b even exists. For all I know they made it up. How about some actual pictures, some evidence other than an artist’s rendition of what the planet looks like. I have more faith in the existence of Kashyyyk than what NASA is selling me.

I predict that NASA won’t provide any solid evidence about this planet containing signs of life. They may have some more vague promises, but I don’t expect them ever to pan out. And if they do, I’d wager it is a hoax.



NASA finds ‘Earth’s bigger, older cousin’: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/23/us/feat-nasa-kepler-planet-discovery/

Smoke rings in the air, Ring of Fire in space

Three days ago a ring of smoke appeared high in the sky in Kazakhstan.  Yesterday a ring of fire was detected out there is space. I don’t know if there is a connection, so I’m going to say, why not.

RT news says: “A strange black circle was spotted in the sky above a village in northern Kazakhstan. Baffled residents captured the mysterious spectacle on video as it hovered in the air for fifteen minutes before dissipating.”



Mail Online claims that the “[Fire] Ring is an illusion created by the chance alignment of two galaxies”. Sounds ominously Lovecraftian. They say: “A mysterious ‘ring of fire’ has been spotted in space thanks to Albert Einstein’s theory of relatively.” “Relatively.” Haahaa.

I know everyone makes mistakes, but since it’s the mass media, I’m taking the liberty to act like Nelson from the Simpsons.

Anyways I’m not confident they really know what the ring of fire is. I think they’re just trying to come up with some explanation. Here’s the ring.



A Youtuber TheScariestMovieEver made a video of the smoke ring. He says it’s not the first that has appeared. Apparently there have been a few others spotted around the world, but only since 2013. Weird.

TheScariestMovieEver suggests the smoke rings might be a symptom of the spiritual starting to manifest in our world. Portals to other dimensions or something like that. I don’t think that’s a bad explanation, but quite frankly I don’t know what the smoke ring, or the ring of fire is. I’m going to guess the ring of fire is the Ring of Power just forged by Sauron, and the smoke rings are residue from the process that somehow alter reality be their presence.

I think we need François Hollande to use his palantír to find out what the origin of the rings is.

(I’m not mocking TheScariestMovieEver, just Hollande.)



Similar smoke rings have been detected above Anaheim near a Disney amusement park June 30th 2015:



Smoke machine? Portal to hell? Mysterious black ring in sky baffles Kazakh village: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyyVXb_-hDw

Mysterious blazing circle is seen in space: Alma captures Einstein’s ring 12 billion light years away in highest resolution images yet: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3029359/Mysterious-blazing-circle-seen-space-Alma-captures-Einstein-s-ring-12-billion-light-years-away-highest-resolution-images-yet.html#ixzz3WgorRsN8

“Black Smoke Portals” Opening in Skies Around The World (2015): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWM0twSuBQY

Don’t just mention the Reptilians, give me something more concrete

I saw on David Icke’s website a trailer to an upcoming documentary Don’t Mention the Reptilians. The film name is a quote, I believe, of what people have said to Icke, that he can talk about all of the conspiracy stuff, but “don’t mention the reptilians”. Although I don’t think the documentary is specifically by or about Icke, but he seems to be interviewed in it.

I started following David Icke’s work several years ago, and I’ve learned a lot of conspiracy facts from him, but in the last couple of years I’ve went intellectually the other way. I still respect his contribution, read his website and all that, but don’t agree with him on some details, and so on. His most controversial contribution is, of course, making the reptilian issue somewhat main stream. I’ve went back and forth on what I think about the reptilians, and I still don’t know what to make of it, really.

There are accounts of people encountering alien or inter-dimensional reptilians, I’m fairly certain they weren’t simply made up by Icke, or any single person. I think it can be said there is a phenomenon of people encountering reptilians, but that’s as far as it seems to go. It is not known whether the reptilians’ true nature is as they seem, or maybe they’re not freaky governmental mind control experiment, or manifestation of our inner demons in the outer world, or persistent hallucinations.

I’ve seen dozens of people making countless videos on Youtube talking and hypothesizing about the reptilians, yet the problem is, they’re mainly repeating the stuff they heard somewhere else. And I can’t really blame them. When I first heard about the idea that these intelligent, mystical reptiles rule our planet I laughed. The second time, I thought it was a silly idea, but the third time I thought “what if…?” Most people who discuss the reptilian issue are probably like this. They’ve figured it’s not such a silly explanation after all, however very few of us actually know anything about them. We just repeat what we’ve heard, and hope that somehow turns into actual knowledge.

We really need some sort of breakthrough on the issue to go forward with any reptilian hypothesis, otherwise it’s just flinging the same ball back and forth. And if in fact they are elusive interdimensional entities, how could we have any breakthrough unless they want to reveal themselves more? Alternatively if the reptilians are a hoax in some sense, how could we have more information about them that wasn’t false? Maybe somebody could uncover the governmental agency’s documents that started the whole hoax, for instance? It’s just we can’t count on anything revelatory happening.

I’m tired of looking at the same information all over again, but this time with a slight twist. I’m not saying we shouldn’t talk about the reptilians, in fact I’d welcome honest, philosophical discussion on whether or not the reptilian hypothesis makes sense. Unfortunately there seems no middle-ground in the alternative media. Most people tend to either reject or embrace the story. We should approach the reptilian issue philosophically, not emotionally, or based on our individual belief systems.

I don’t see the reptilian question going anywhere anytime soon. Still, compared to the Ufology crowd, the reptilian stuff is fairly new. The UFO research community haven’t really uncovered anything new in decades either, at least nothing concrete I’m aware of. The most significant shift that I know is that, instead of thinking UFOs are craft from other planet controlled by ETs, people are starting to think perhaps they’re something more interdimensional or demonic. I find that hypothesis more appealing than the outer space theory, and it would certainly connect it to the reptilians, but that is all very hypothetical still.

I haven’t seen the Don’t Mention the Reptilians documentary, since it’s not out yet, but somehow I don’t think it’s gonna reveal anything new. I wish I was wrong.



The trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eHjQxwd_8M

Don’t Mention the Reptilians-stuff: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUzkJATWF2qX8onRJae96GA/videos