Tag Archives: Syria

What is the Origin of the Elite Bloodlines?

It seems to be an established fact that there is an elite bloodline, or a mix of bloodlines, that rule our world. Many conspiracy theorists have described 12 Illuminati bloodlines, while I don’t know if the number is accurate or not, I haven’t seen anyone really dispute the existence of these bloodlines. Even main stream society seems to submissively accept that these bloodlines are a fact. For example most US presidents have been related to each other and to European royalty. The main stream media has even dicussed how Dick Cheney and Barack Obama are related.

The question then is why is this royal bloodline significant? What makes them different, why do they always seem to be in power? From what I see, among conspiracy theorists the prevailing theory is that they have descended from the Nephilim, fallen angels, or possibly the serpent from Eden through Cain. There are variations to this, such as they were descended from Annunaki aliens or reptilians, but in the end the narrative is that the elite bloodlines are evil because they descended from evil non-human entities. And I don’t think it’s a bad theory, but it’s still just a theory, so I will propose another one.

 

Seed of Abraham

Genesis 17:4-8 states:

Gen 17:4  As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations.
Gen 17:5  Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.
Gen 17:6  And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee.
Gen 17:7  And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
Gen 17:8  And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.

God formed “an everlasting covenant” with Abraham and his seed to make him “a father of many nations”, and “kings will come out of” Abraham, which presumable means he will be the progenitor of many kings. Perhaps the seed of Abraham still is ruling many nations through his kings. If this is true, and the elite bloodlines of today are the seed of Abraham, then it would imply two different possibilities: either the God that came to Abraham to make a covenant with him was an evil one, or it was the true God and the only way for anyone to rule over the earth is through the seed of Abraham.

In Genesis 17:1 God, or LORD, says Abram (as he was still known) was perfect (or complete, whole, sound, without blemish, or entirely in accord with truth and fact).  This is why God chose to make the covenant with him. Then why are the elites of today so evil and corrupt then? Perhaps that is reason for their generational Satanist, MK Ultra mind control rituals. That is why the Illuminati trannies seem to exist. God had decided that the seed of Abraham will be kings over nations, and the other side cannot change that, but if they manage to control the seed, they can control the world. This might be what has happened. I’m not saying this necessarily true, but I am putting it out there as an alternative.

If my theory is correct, it would be utterly pointless to try start a revolution to oust the elite bloodlines from power. It would be pointless to hate them. The only way to free ourselves would be to free the elites from the mind control.

 

Canaan and the Goys

Before I finish, I’d like to take a look at a couple of interesting words from Genesis 17. The word “nations” is used a few times. The original Hebrew word is “goy”, which is certainly familiar as the Jews tend to call non-Jews that, and it supposedly refers to cattle. According to Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary the word has the following meanings:

1) nation, people (noun masculine)
1a) nation, people
1a1) usually of non-Hebrew people
1a2) of descendants of Abraham
1a3) of Israel
1b) of swarm of locusts, other animals (figuratively)
1c) Goyim? = “nations” (noun proper masculine)

Goy means nation, non-Hebrews, Israel, and descendants of Abraham. Does this mean that all of us non-Jews are the true descendants of Abraham and the true Israelites, and the Jews envy us for this?

Another interesting tidbit in Genesis 17 is: “And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession”.

What is Canaan then? According to Ancient.eu “Canaan was the name of a large and prosperous country (at times independent, at others a tributary to Egypt) which corresponds roughly to present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Israel and was also known as Phoenicia.”

The Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary gives the following definitions for Canaan:

Canaan = “lowland”
1) the 4th son of Ham and the progenitor of the Phoenicians and of the various nations who peopled the seacoast of Palestine (noun proper masculine)
2) the land west of the Jordan peopled by the descendants of Canaan and subsequently conquered by the Israelites under Joshua (noun proper locative)
3) merchant, trader (noun masculine)

God promised Canaan as an everlasting possessions to the non-Hebrew seed of Abraham. Canaan was inhabited by the Phoenicians, which was conquered by the goy-Israelites, and became known as Israel. It would seem to me that the modern day Jews are the descendants of Canaan, or the Phoenicians, Brown-Driver-Briggs even mentions how Canaan can mean “merchant” or “trader”. If the information presented above is correct, even the Bible itself would seem to state that the Jews have no right to Israel, Syria or other adjacent locations. In fact, the land was held by the Jews a long time ago, but God decided it should go to the goyim, for an eternity.

It would appear that the Cananite/Phoenician/Jews that pretend to be Israelites want their old land back. That is why Zionism was invented to “return” Israel to the Jews under false pretenses, and why there is a war in Syria right now.

I am not trying to twist this into any kind of “anti-Semitic” narrative. I am merely describing what I see.

 

Links:

Is ruling in the genes? All presidents bar one are directly descended from a medieval English king: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html

History and Purpose of the Freemasons and other Secret Societies: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/masons.htm

Canaan: http://www.ancient.eu/canaan/

 

Alt-Right protests against Donald Trump’s new alleged War

Alt-Right leaders Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch were protesting against Donald Trump firing missiles at the Shayrat air base in Syria. They allege that Trump is going to start another war in the Middle-East. If that is true, Trump certainly should be condemned, but I am fairly certain these Alt-Right figures don’t have all of the facts, nor do they really care about them. These wannabe politicians are just doing it for the attention.

Another interesting thing is that Richard Spencer was supposedly attacked and beat up by Antifa after his protest. So basically the Alt-Right “Neo-Nazis” are protesting against war, whereas the Antifa Communists are supporting wars of the American imperium. None of this makes any sense. I am glad though to see my enemies fight against each other, since it is difficult to say which I despise more, the Alt-Right (especially Spencer’s and Enoch’s faction of it), or Antifa. However, since Spencer and Enoch have a name and face I can hate, and Antifa is just an amorphous blob of faceless Commie thugs, I have to go with the Alt-Right.

 

If the Alt-Right, that now seems to be denouncing Donald Trump, truly had ever supported him, they would not turn their backs on Trump simply based on this one incident. This is proof enough that Spencer and his cohorts were all “Hail Trump”, because it was politically beneficial for them to do so at the time. Now a new wind is blowing, and these opportunists with no backbone are changing direction.

I don’t want to defend Trump, however, on his decision to attack the Syrian air base. The alleged gas attack sounds like it was a lie, or a false flag. At least I haven’t seen any actual evidence of it happening, so why would Trump retaliate against Syria based on such a flimsy accusation? Does he really want to start another was like in Iraq or Libya? I hope not, but I don’t know. Nobody who is not an insider knows what motivated him. I do think there is something else going on in the background, but I don’t want to speculate what. I certainly do not trust any of the narratives that are going on in the main stream media, and I’ve seen plenty people on the internet trying to push an anti-Trump narrative. On top of it all, I do not ever want to be on the same side with Richard Spencer as he’d likely stab me in the butt, so I’m going to assume Trump knows what he is doing. I don’t like it, and I’ve said before I think Trump is a con man, but in a den full of rapists, murderers, pedophiles, usurers and Satanists, a liar might be your best friend.

Let’s see after a few days or weeks what has happened. Has the conflict escalated to a US-backed war against Assad, are they heading toward an all out war between US and Russia, or will things cool down after this one missile incident? If Trump really does plan to invade, rape and destroy Syria as his predecessors have done to several other Middle-Eastern countries, Trump does not deserve anyone’s support. Spencer and Enoch though are not demonstrating against Trump because they are so concerned about the well-being of people. This is just another publicity stunt.

 

Links:

Alt-Right Protests Syria War at White House with Richard Spencer: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/85084935853904281

Richard Spencer Just Got His Ass Kicked and Glitter Bombed [VIDEOS]: https://antifascistnews.net/2017/04/09/richard-spencer-just-got-his-ass-kicked-and-glitter-bombed-videos/

The seeds Trump is sowing…

Donald Trump hasn’t been the President of the United States of America for even a week, but it appears as if he’s already made a plenty of concrete decisions. And I must say I’m liking what I’ve seen so far.

The US military has already attacked the “moderate rebels” also known as ISIS in the Middle-East. Today the Associated Press even reported that the Russian warplanes have co-operated with a US-led coalition in Syria. I assume they attacked ISIS, and not Assad’s forces. If US and Russia are co-operating to get rid of ISIS, I think it is great news. ISIS was created by the Obama administration and/or Israel, so Trump if is sending his military to destroy them he is already undoing some of the damage Obama had caused.

The US is also withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and Trump wants to renegotiate NAFTA. This is great news as well.

The most shocking move by Trump yet is the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017, which suggests that the United States is quitting the United Nations. The UN is an evil Luciferian (see Lucis Trust) globalist organization seeking world domination, and at best it’s impotent in its alleged humanitarian efforts. To mention a few examples of the harm done by UN, they invited Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn to preach their feminist gospel to them a bit over a year ago. Then there’s of course Agenda 21, Codex Alimentarius and all that.

Though to rain on Trump’s parade a bit, he’s been cozying with Israel even more than other Presidents, such as being friend’s with Netanyahu and he is planning to move the American embassy to Jerusalem. Trump’s Zionist sympathies are not a minor concern, but I am willing to wait and see where all of this leads to.

Let’s get back to the positive things that Trump has done, and look at them from a skeptical angle. While wiping out ISIS is a good thing, however if he continues on the warpath to other countries after that, such as attacking Iran, that is terrible. Bombing ISIS might just be the first step a whole new War on Terror.

Even if Trump cancels TPP and renegotiates NAFTA, he might end up making new trade deals that end up being even more harmful.

Quitting from the United Nations might be a perfect excuse for the globalist establishment to paint Trump as the new Hitler, well they’ve already done that, but do it in a more believable way, and start a new World War. Europe against US and Russia? Who knows what they’re scheming.

Yet I don’t want fall into the conspiracy theorist’s fallacy where the enemy (be it the Illuminati, Jews, globalists, et. al.) is all-powerful, or  everything that happens has been somehow been orchestrated by them. The enemy is after all like the wizard of Oz, and most of its power comes from us believing in it. Perhaps Trump is genuine, or perhaps he is a puppet for benign forces instead of the same malignant ones we’ve used to seeing. Maybe Trump is playing 4D chess with the Zionists while acting like their friend, but setting them up to fall somehow.

So far, Trump’s actions make him seem genuine, that he wants the best for his people, and doesn’t want to wreck the rest of the world either. Although I am moderately optimistic on Trump’s intentions, my spider sense is tingling that whenever things seem to be going too well, something bad is going to happen eventually…

4dchesss

 

 

Links:

Day 1: Mad Dog Mattis bombs ISIS positions 31 times: http://www.trunews.com/article/day-1-mad-dog-mattis-bombs-isis-positions-31-times

US and Russia co-operating in Syria: https://archive.is/JgpnR

Trade Deals Working For All Americans: https://archive.is/chGcN

American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193

Accepting Refugees is the new White Man’s Burden?

Europe is flooding with refugees from Africa and the Middle-East, as everyone knows. The question is why? No, the answer is not humanitarian concerns. No-one in the bureaucracy gives a flying fuck about human beings. They use such terminology only when it suits them to manipulate the short-sighted masses.

Sure it’s nice and humane to give aid to those less fortunate, but it’s even more human to have a degree of common sense. If people of Europe were like Jesus who could indefinitely multiply to fish and bread to feed the masses, I’m sure they’d do it. Alas, we cannot do that, and we have a limited amount of resources, and most of our money seems to be going through a Black Hole somewhere in Greece, we can easily say Europe does not have the resources to carry all of Africa and Middle-East on its shoulders. It would be nice to do so, like it would be nice to feed that beggar on the street, but when the option is feeding your family or the beggar, the choice should be clear. Yet it’s not apparently.

The majority though, seems unwilling to take reality into account when dealing with mass immigration, since they don’t want to be called racist, hater, Nazi or Islamophobe. And no, they do not care about the poor Africans, not genuinely. They just want live their little lives, and play along to avoid being tried by the Inquisition for heresy, which nowadays means saying something politically incorrect. If indeed the masses cared about Africa, for instance, they would have done something about their governments before they murdered thousands of Libyans and destroyed the country’s infrastructure four years ago. Obama and French president Sarkozy were instrumental in promoting the destruction of Libya. Where was the humanitarian concern back then? But of course no-one could oppose Obama, since that would be racist.

I have this crazy extremist New Age ideology of trying to fix problems before they become problems, such as Europeans and Americans having done before something about their insane governments before they managed to destroy Libya and sodomized Gaddafi to death. I did sympathize with Libyans back then, still do. But I don’t want them as refugees in my country of Finland, since it’s not our responsibility. We have enough of our own problems with the EU, US and traitorous politicians.

I think the Libyan refugees should get to move into the White House (or Rainbow House as it is nowadays), or the French presidential mansion, since they’re the ones responsible. They should also pay war reparations to Libya. But not the countries that didn’t have anything to do with the Libyan war.

How about we stop being reactionary, and stop the globalist war machine before they destroy countries and try to force their populations to become refugees? I’m sure it’s a beneficial arrangement for both parties. The European nations don’t get the extra burden of refugees, and the people from the “third world” countries do not get their families murdered and country bombed to hell. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a bleeding heart liberal who cares about them poor Africans and Muslims, or a right-wing racist who hates them. It’s best for all of us if their countries don’t get bombed to bits.

If at this point you think I’m some racist right-winger, I suggest you go pop a few anti-propaganda pills first. Let’s look at this situation in Europe and the refugee countries. Seemingly endless floods of people are pouring into Europe. Is it not prudent to ask why? Instead of acting emotionally, and say they’re people too, and we should help them. If you care that much, why don’t you go help them personally instead of just passively acquiescing to anything the media, the EU and the government says? You don’t really care about them. You just want to be a “good person” who isn’t judged or labelled by society.

So why are the people flooding into Europe? Are the African and Middle-Eastern countries simply so shitty, they’re no place for human beings to live in? If so, why is that so? Are the people there somehow incapable of taking care of themselves? They need us nice White folk to take care of them. Is this the updated version of White Man’s burden? In the 19th century Europeans invaded other countries with the pretext of educating the savages. I thought nowadays that practice is seen as racist. Nowadays White Man is no longer invading the countries of other men (they’re just bombing them to bits), but the “savages” are heading into our countries. Same shit, different direction. The attitude that we are somehow better than other people is as racist now as it was then.

The root of the problem is, however, the practice of spreading democracy. In Libya it meant the destruction of the country’s infrastructure, and ass-raping the president to death with a bayonet. This is what democracy looks like! Now they are doing the same in Syria. Ukraine is more or less in the same boat even though it’s a White country. It is a well-oiled engine of destruction and destitution. Unless we do something now, Syria and Ukraine (maybe Yemen too), will be in as crippled as Libya in a few years.

I have a radical suggestion, or more of redefinition of our so-called racial imperative; the White Man’s Burden is not to civilize or democratize the savages, but to stop the insane machine that is our governments from causing any more havoc. Compassion for the refugees is meaningless emotional porn, I’d rather make sure the military industrial complex does not cause any more refugees.

And voting won’t make any fucking difference. Action will.

 

 

Links:

Gaddafi’s last moments: ‘I saw the hand holding the gun and I saw it fire’: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/20/muammar-gaddafi-killing-witnesses