Tag Archives: terrorism

The Las Vegas shooting

There has allegedly been a shooting in Las Vegas with 20 dead and 100 injured, although it looks like another hoax to me. It’s of course too early to say anything for sure.

A couple of eye witnesses, whose accounts do not sound that credible, say that the shots sounded like fireworks. One of them was who was Joe Pitzel was interviewed by CNN. At the end of the interview the reporter seems to be coaching him: “Did you hear the gunshots pause and start up again?” Joe responds: “Yeah, like they were loading clips.”

Eyewitness News interviewed a woman called Christine. She also thought the shots were fireworks. The reporter seems to be coaching her as well around 1:55 in the video about how she said off camera that she tried to help people.

Based on the photos that I’ve seen, there doesn’t seem be much blood or injuries. One photo has a woman lying down with a bloody leg, but you cannot see the injuries that she supposedly has.

Carrying an “injured” person, but where are the injuries?
The only blood I’ve seen so far.

 

Sure, the pictures show confusion at the site, but I am not yet convinced there was an actual shooting.

There were rumours on the internet that the shooter was a man called Stephen Craig Paddock, and he was just named as the official culprit as I finished writing this. He was supposedly accompanied by a woman called Marilou Danley.

The shooting happened during the concert of Jason Aldean whose name happens to be 33 in Pythagorean numerology. The alleged shooting also happened opposite to the Luxor hotel, which is a pyramid.

It’s too early to say anything for sure, but this event seems highly dubious.

 

EDIT:

This might just be a weird timestamp thing, but according to Google an article on Marilou Danley that mentions her connection to the shooter and it was created 9 hours ago on tagaloglang.com. The shooting happened around 10 p.m Pacific time on October 1st. It’s now 4 p.m., so the shooting should have happened 6 hours ago, so the webpage was created  3 hours before the event. I suppose the article might have been created beforehand on Danley, if she was a celebrity of some sort in the Philippines, and changed afterwards to mention her connection to the shooter.

https://www.tagaloglang.com/marilou-danley/

 

I checked Google cache of the article. This snapshot was taken 2 Oct 2017 08:42 GMT. This would be 1:42 a.m. Pacific time. I wonder if that is also when the article was created? If so, why does Google say it’s older? It might just be a weird glitch. The Wayback Machine didn’t have a snapshot of the article.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ilVhaCUtWeUJ:https://www.tagaloglang.com/marilou-danley/+&cd=24&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=fi&client=firefox-b

 

The page has been updated from the Google cache version to include a photo of her posing. Maybe this webpage is part of her crisis actor portfolio?

 

Links

CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/02/us/las-vegas-shooting-live/index.html

Vegas shooting ‘sounded like fireworks’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6gzJllE-Ps

Advertisements

Is this the organization that has contrived the terror attacks in Europe?

The Bureau of False Flags might have been found, although it seems more like a private corporation than a governmental bureau. In his interview with SGT Report Ole Dammegard mentioned a website he found: Crisis Solutions, or Crisis Cloud. This organization seems to be involved in staging crisis simulations.

 

Can it really be this obvious? “The clue is in the name”. The logo sort of looks like 666 and tentacles like Ole Dammegard pointed out.

 

The Company

The website of Crisis Solutions says they are “Europe’s leading crisis simulation company” and they’ve been doing this since 2000. Their managing director is Richard Whitby. According to his LinkedIn he’s been in that role since 2003. Whitby brag’s in his message on the website that:

“Crisis Solutions delivered the very first ‘Market-Wide Exercise’, involving more than 100 organisations and thousands of participants in a day-long simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector. We were also a key part of the UK Government’s preparations to provide resilience against cyber attacks during the London Olympics.”

Could this “simulated terror attack on London’s financial sector refer to the 7/7 attack in London in 2005?

One interesting point is that Crisis Solutions was started already in 2000, that was before 9/11. I guess they had the lobes for business or something since they predicted that terrorism and counter-terrorism will be big business in the years to follow.

 

What They Do

Here’s a bit more on what they do:

“Crisis Solutions specialises in getting organisations crisis ready: we set about this by running crisis simulation exercises and crisis workshops.”

“We plan and deploy crisis simulation exercises that feel REAL.”

They have also developed a “secure exercise web portal” called Crisis Cloud: “This includes simulated news videos, news stores [sic] that are updated as the exercise progresses, together with social media activity and interactive web pages where you can post internal and external statements.”

They make crisis exercises that are believable, and they have a computer program, Crisis Cloud, that I suppose mimicks real media and social media in reporting on the development of the situation. Now what I’m thinking is whether sometimes, or all times, this simulated media environment is actually connected to the real world? In other words, simulated terrorist attacks are reported in simulated media, but are shown to the public as if it was real. That is a possibility.

Another section “CRISIS CLOUD – YOUR SCENARIO, OUR REALISM” states the following:

“Crisis Cloud is tailored to your specific exercise requirements, but a typical example will include:

  • News stories based on the scenario. Stories are updated as the crisis exercise progresses
  • News videos to bring the immediacy of media scrutiny
  • Client pages for internal and external statements
  • A Twitter inspired social media page that is accessible to players and updated in real time”

They admit they make fake news based on their fake scenarios. They also have fake social media accounts doing this. The question then, once again is, do they pass off these fake stories to the general public as real news, or are they truly confined to the people involved with the simulation?

 

“Fighting” Terrorism

There’s a “Current Threats” section on the website. One of the pages is about terrorism. It says the following:

“Britain is currently on its second highest alert level of ‘severe’, as a terrorist attack is considered highly likely. This is hardly surprising given the recent devastating terrorist attacks on mainland Europe.

On 7th January 2015 two armed men forced their way into the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo where they killed 12 and injured 11 others.

Then on the 13th November 2015 Paris was subjected to a series of coordinated terrorist attacks with suicide bomb outside the Stade de France, several shootings, and a suicide bombing, at cafés and restaurants, and the mass shooting at a rock concert in the Bataclan theatre. 130 people were killed; 89 at the Bataclan theatre, and another 368 injured.

On the morning of 22 March 2016, three coordinated suicide bombings occurred in Belgium, killing 32 members of the public and three terrorists, and injuring more than 300.”

It appears as if it was written back in 2016, or possibly early 2017, since it mentions terror attacks in France and Belgium, but merely suggests at the possibility of such attacks in Britain. The people who wrote this must be Nostradamus, since they guessed correctly that there will be terror attacks in Britain. Or alternatively, I’m wondering if this is an indirect way of admitting/bragging that Crisis Solutions orchestrated these attacks/simulations/hoaxes, and the reference to Britain being on high security alert is an advert that they will strike there next?

There’s one section on the website saying how social media is an important part of crisis management: “Social media is the perfect platform to disseminate messages to as wide an audience as possible.”

They also says that “Social media, digital media, the new media, call it what you will, has the unique ability to break and make stories.” Clearly this company is interested in creating believable stories, i.e. and not so interested in helping security services strengthen themselves to prevent further crises.

 

What I think about it

There’s probably more interesting tidbits on the website to go into, but I want to discuss the implications of this website. Is it real, a red herring, or a hoax? At least I’m pretty sure it’s not just a hoax by a troll. The company seems real, the LinkedIn account of the manager seems real, and I found their webpage back in Wayback Machine going back to 2001. The website appears to have existed over 15 years.

Then again, when you look at the website it seems a bit too obvious that Crisis Solutions is all about managing false flags and crisis actors. This might be some sort of red herring to direct conspiracy researchers away from the truth. For all I know the website was made a month ago, and all of the alleged history of the company, including the Wayback Machine snapshots and LinkedIn profile have been faked. People who are capable to managing false flags and hoaxes across the world would surely be capable of faking the history of such a company.

But maybe it is real. If Crisis Solutions is behind manufactoring false flags, then maybe the globalist conspirators behind it don’t really care should a handful of conspiracy nuts know about it. After all, what can we do about it? That’s the heart of the question: what can we do with this information? Crisis Solutions exists, can we somehow prove it has orchestrated false flags in the past? Can we somehow force the police to investigate the company? Can we expose them somehow? I don’t know if there is anything we can do, but maybe someone else has a better idea.

 

Links:

Ole Dammegard with SGT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNntN-RbAfw

Crisis Solutions: http://www.crisis-solutions.com

Richard Whitby LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-whitby-185322b/?ppe=1

Crisis Solutions on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20170601000000*/http://www.crisis-solutions.com

The Manchester Terrorist Bombing and Eric Schiffer

I already mentioned Eric Schiffer in my first article on the Manchester terrorist attack after an Ariana Grande concert. I am now even more convinced that the attack was a false flag or a hoax, since I’ve seen some very obvious crisis actor videos, or Disingenuous Relatives of Victims. I’ll probably write about that at a later date, but now I’ll focus on a person who might be somehow involved in the false flag: Eric Schiffer.

 

Schiffer / Grande Connection

A couple of days after the attack, Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News about the attack. His role in the interview was that of a “crisis management expert”. As far as I know Eric Schiffer was not anywhere near the attack site, nor is he even British. He does, however, state in the interview that he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.”

Ariana Grande has described her mother as follows: “My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.” This was mentioned in an Illuminati Watcher article. Ariana’s mother is Joan Grande. Based on LinkedIn, the company seems to be HMC Communiations. Assuming that’s the correct Joan Grande. There’s no profile picture, and very little information about her.

 

Eric gets around

Eric Schiffer seems to have his finger in many pies. His own website says he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants.” His LinkedIn profile also states he is the chairman of DigitalMarketing.com.

He has also been interviewed many times by various media organizations, so he seems to be well-connected among the elite.  In 2014 he was interviewed by Newsmax TV as an economist.  In 2016 he was a “tech expert” in a CGTN America clip. There are dozens of his interviews on Youtube.

Schiffer has been quoted by Salon about his statement on Donald Trump’s alleged anti-Semitic ties. In 2015 he wrote an article on The Washington Times how people shouldn’t be too politically correct when talking about Islamic terrorism. He was quoted by Forbes in connection to the controversy that PewDiePie is allegedly a Nazi. He is involved with a charity called “The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Annual Gala”. I’m not sure if Schiffer himself is a Jew, but his girlfriend Dr. Jenn Mann is.

These are just a few examples of how Eric Schiffer seems to be well-respected and connected in global elite, although I hadn’t heard about him before. Perhaps Americans know him better though.

 

Eric’s Companies

Now I’ll take a look at the companies Schiffer is involved with. Patriarch Organization or Patriarch Equity sounds like a sinister umbrella organization from a B-movie. And as far as I know they are, since I didn’t find much information about what they actually do, and with whom they are connected. They apparently control businesses in the digital industry and develop them somehow. I don’t know which businesses they have “helped”.

Digital Marketing (DM) sounds a less ominous version of Patriarch. They seem to be involved with, as the name suggests, marketing in digital media. The client list of the company is interesting though. It has some big names: Activision, Du Pont, Intel, Microsoft, Boeing, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Fox and you can see the rest below.

 

I just realized Eric Schiffer was interviewed by Fox News and Fox is a client of his company. Isn’t that sort of a conflict of interest?

Anyway, something tells DM isn’t just helping faceless corporations make more money, but is involved in manipulating people’s opinions on a deeper level.

 

Reputation Management

Speaking of manipulating people’s opinions, let’s check out Reputation Management Consultants (RMC). This is where it gets good. It is as the name suggests involved in salvaging people’s reputations.

 

This includes suppression of information: “RMC offers much more than a fast suppression of negative search listings. Our compelling, quality content will be created and placed with your branding in mind.”

This is as it sounds: if search engines keep offering negative opinions on you, RMC will somehow manipulate the results to make you seem better.

 

They help “high-profile businesses and individuals”, such as politicians, high profile business owners, multinational corporations and local not-for-profit organizations.

 

They suppress negative views of their client by promoting existing press releases, or they write their own propaganda pieces to make you look good. They also create “Social Network profiles” to help their client. Sounds like paid shills to me.

 

They allege to be a successfull business, and work with “the wealthiest men and women in the world and high profile invididuals”. I wonder who exactly has been their client? Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, all of them?

 

I don’t know if all of this is legal, but sounds morally questionable as hell. You basically pay this corporation to lie for you across the internet and media. Not to mention that Eric Schiffer is also connected to Digital Marketing that works with defense contractors like Du Pont and Boeing, i.e. the military-industrial complex. Therefore I wouldn’t be suprised if the online shills you see, especially after false flags like the Manchester bombing, are controlled by RMC. I also suspect Eric Schiffer, or one of his companies, were somehow involved with the Manchester attack, or alleged attack. Perhaps they hire or control crisis actors as well. I cannot prove anything, yet. So this is still just my hunch.

That’s all I have now. I should probably check out Joan Grande’s company, HMC Communications, and verify that this Joan is actually Ariana Grande’s mother. I’m not very good at researching the backgrounds and connections of corporations, or their money trails, so I hope if someone else can do deeper research on Patriarch especially.

 

Links:

Ariana Grande speaks out on UK deadly blast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

Joan Grande: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joan-grande-a2538510/

Eric Schiffer: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

Eric Schiffer: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ericschiffer/

Newsmax TV interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

Damage control: How does Donald Trump convince Americans he’s not an anti-Semite when he’s surrounded by them?: http://www.salon.com/2017/03/19/damage-control-how-does-donald-trump-convince-americans-hes-not-an-anti-semite-when-hes-surrounded-by-them/

Say no to walking on eggshells: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/21/eric-schiffer-say-no-walking-eggshells/

Here’s Why PewDiePie Will Still Earn Millions, Even After Anti-Semitic Videos: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maddieberg/2017/02/16/heres-why-pewdiepie-will-still-earn-millions-even-after-anti-semitic-videos/#1884bc024e68

Philanthropist and Socialite Eric Schiffer, Attends The Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters Gala Hosted by Larry King: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/01/prweb337818.htm

Patriarch: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

Digital Marketing: http://digitalmarketing.com/

Reputation Management Consultants: https://www.reputationmanagementconsultants.com

Questionable Details in the Manchester Attack

I’ve been looking more into the Manchester terrorist attack that occured during or after an Ariana Grande concert on Monday. It increasingly seems like a hoax or a drill rather than an actual terrorist attack.

 

Balloon Pop

Apparently someone tweeted from the arena just after the alleged explosion that they heard a big balloon pop, but everyone else freaked out because of it.

 

Masonic Symbolism

I saw someone on the internet point out that one of the pictures supposedly portraying one of the survivors resembles a hoodwinker Freemason. The clothes are similar, as are the pant-legs.

 

Manchester Arena Note

Yesterday there was a note on the Manchester Arena website confirming that there was an “incident”:

“We can confirm there was an incident as people were leaving the Ariana Grande show last night.

The incident took place outside the venue in a public place.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims.

Please follow @gmpolice on Twitter for all further updates.”

 

I didn’t see this note anymore on their website, so I’m glad I saved it yesterday. I find the wording curious: “We can confirm there was an incident”. It sort of suggests that there was uncertainty whether or not the there was an “incident”. Why call it incident, and not an attack, explosion or something clearer?

Another interesting bit is how they state that the “incident took place outside the venue in a public place”. It sounds rather legalize. It happened in a public place so we are no culpable in way. Also I thought the alleged explosion happened at the ticket office, so wouldn’t it still technically be in the arena, and not a public place?

 

Professional Photographer at the Scene

The photographer who took most of the pictures of the aftermath of the bombing is Joel Goodman. He is a professional photographer and a suspicious character.

These staged looking pictures were taken by him, as was the picture above showing the man dressed in white with leg injuries.

 

Our friend Joel has also tweeted his support for Comet Ping Pong in the past. I wonder if he’s friends with Alefantis?

 

Living Dead Girl

Youtuber Lift the Veil noticed something interesting. One girl, Gerogina Callander,  who was allegedly killed in the attack looks very much like a survivor from the event, Jessica.

The girl on the left is Georgina, who allegedly died, and Jessica is on the right. They look very similar, especially on Lift the Veil’s video. On this screenshot they don’t look as alike, because the lighting and the facial expressions on the girls are different, so I recommend watching the video.

 

But wait, there’s more. Another Youtuber, Russianvids, made a rebuttal to this video. He says the two girls look similar on purpose, but they are actually two different girls. Russianvids suggests that this done to discredit conspiracy researchers who will eventually catch on with this similarily and claim they are the same, but after that someone can prove they are two different girls. This would discredit anyone who says this was false flag or a hoax attack. I find Russianvids’ argument compelling.

Moreover, Russianvids point out that both girls, Georgina and Jessica had met Ariana Grande a couple of years ago and took a picture with her. This was apparently at the same event, since Ariana Grande seems to be wearing the same clothes in both pictures with the girls. There’s no way this is a coincidence.

Georgina and Ariana
Jessica and Ariana with a third chick

 

That’s not all. Day before the concert, Georgina had said on her Twitter account: “Kill me kill me kill me please tell me they are coming to manchester tomorrow”. She was probably talking about Ariana and her band when she said “they”. Yet if she was going to the concert, wouldn’t she have a ticket and she should know they were coming to Manchester. Then again I don’t really understand teen girl logic. However, this sounds more like some magical spell or ritual thingy that she’s saying “kill me” and then she is allegedly killed.

One last thing is to refer to Lift the Veil’s video. In it two girls, Jessica and her friend are being interviewed. Jessica’s friend sounds like a lousy actor and does not sound at all like she underwent a life threatening situation recently. Jessica is at least convincing in her performance that she is grieving, but she does not seem to be shedding tears.

 

The Announcement

There is a video that someone apparently took with their cellphone as they were leaving the concert arena. There is an announcent in the PA that goes as follows: “Ladies and gentlemen, please take your time. There’s no need to [unclear words] (punt shot?). There’s no problems here. Just take your time and exit the building.”

This is supposedly after the explosion. “No problems here”? I can understand they are trying to make the crowd remain calm, but this doesn’t sound like there has been a serious explosion/ terrorist attack. It sounds more like a drill.

This clip can be seen on another of Lift the Veil’s videos around 35:18.

 

Concertgoers in Confusion

I found a little clip interviewing a few different survivors of this horrendous attack. There’s girl being interviewed around 0:10. She says: “It was just a real loud bang. We have no idea what it were, but… Everyone just started running. We didn’t think anything of it, but then everyone was screaming at us to run so…”

Then after that one young man is being interviewed with a friend next to him. He says they heard the bang too, but according to him people were saying it was a speaker. Then people “chilled out”. As they went to the exit, he says there was blood across the floor and the ran. As he starts talking about the blood he develops a smile on his face. After that he says they went outside and there was girl bleeding .

The girl seems like she is genuine. That she was actually at the concert, heard a loud bang and then followed the crowd when they ran away. From this, I get the impression that possible some of the people in the audience might have been sort of agents provocateur, or agents panicateur. Their purpose was to cause panic after the bang.

The young with his calm demeanor and smile does not seem genuine. I think he is lying, although the smile could result from nervousness and incredulity. He might have simply been planning to go a concert and have fun, and not expect to see any people bleeding as it’s something you usually see only in the movies. However, I don’t find him credible. I just think he is a bad actor.

 

I am not saying anything definite yet, but this whole thing seems contrived. So far it seems like another false flag or a hoax, like we’ve seen in the past. I’ve also seen plenty of shills in Youtube comment sections and internet forums trying to dissuade people from investigating this, and trying to convince you it wasn’t certainly a false flag.

 

Links:

Manchester Arena: http://www.manchester-arena.com/

Manchester Bombing False Flag – Dead Victim is Alive!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-ufj7swnHc&t=1s

Response Video To “Lift The Veil” Comparison Of Georgina vs. Jessica – 100% Predictive Programming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNGHWJFaHQo

Manchester Bombing False Flag | Another Hoax in the UK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpLI8WNlVt8

Manchester terror attack: Concertgoers describe hearing loud bang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xeuy6cp6CU

 

 

 

 

Ariana Grande concert bombing: Where’s the blood and the bodies?

The Bureau of False Flags strikes again. Probably. Last night a suicide bomber allegedly blew himself up, and at least 22 other people, in an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England. So far I haven’t seen much evidence of dead people nor of any explosion.

 

The Evidence

These couple of images are the most evidence I’ve seen so far of any explosion. The first one’s been shared by several media outlets. There’s a girl with ripped jeans and a bandage on her knee being escorted by police officers. The girl though doesn’t look injured. There’s no wounds on her legs. There’s some blood on her arm, which I initially missed. But I don’t even see dust or dirt on her. How do her jeans just rip from an explosion and leave her intact? I’ve seen similar questionable physics in other terrorist attacks.

 

I saw this picture on the CNN website. It has a middle-aged man being escorted by another man. He has bandages on both of his legs, and tge bandage on his right leg is a bit bloody. This at least looks somewhat real, so it actually might be real. Although this guy looks pretty clean otherwise. If he was caught in the explosion, he was probably on the fringes of the blast area. Still, I’d expect to see some dust or blood from other victims on his clothes. Unless he changed his clothes to look good in the photoshoot.

 

There are videos of people escaping from the venue and screaming in panic. They’re holding pink balloons. I assume they got them at the concert. I’ve heard testimonies of people claiming there was an explosion, but so far the only evidence of an explosion is a video from outside the concert venue from a car’s dashcam. You can hear a boom and see a bright flash. The guy in the car shouts “No!” a few seconds after the explosion. He sounds like he is sleeping and having a nightmare, or something. It sounds weird, off and delayed.

I do think there was a loud boom, and probably a bright flash, but I still aren’t convinced there was an actual explosion. The audience may simply have been deceive to think there was an actual explosion.

And if there was a real bomb and an explosion, how did the bomber get his bomb through security? Western nations have been beefing up their security measures year by year ever since 9/11, but they never yield results. The only terrorist attacks the authorities have managed to curb before they happen, are ones that have been orchestrated by the authorities themselves, such as the FBI has done in the US.

It’s of course too early to say what this event was: a false flag, a hoax, or a “genuine” terrorist attack. You might argue, what’s the point of faking such an attack? Wouldn’t it just be easier to set the bomb and blow up a bunch of people? The people behind these attacks clearly have very low scruples. If they have no qualms about pretending to kill people indiscriminately, why would they mind killing people either? Perhaps it is an issue of legality. The people working for the hypothetical Bureau of False Flags might be have certain criteria they have to follow, such as not killing people, i.e. damaging the property of the state. These people could be engaged in developing highly advanced propaganda, but that’s all they are allowed to do: use smoke and mirrors. In this sense it’s basically your fault if you believe the story they told, the same as if you go see a Hollywood movie and think it’s real. These people are only doing performance art.

Wasn’t there a law signed in the US around the time of Sandy Hook that allows the media to legally lie to you? This Ariana Grande concert was in the UK, so the same law shouldn’t apply, but there might be similar laws in the UK.

 

Pushing Propaganda

I first heard about this alleged terrorist attack this morning as I woke up and switched on Youtube on my phone. There was video by Stefan Molyneux discussing this incident. I usually don’t watch his videos, but since it seemed there was a new terrorist attack I was curious.

Naturally, as you might expect from Molyneux, his video had little in the terms of relevant content and was mostly emotionally manipulative. He was describing graphic images of people running from the concert hall with blood and body parts all over them. So far, I’ve seen nothing like it. Very little blood, no detached body parts. I’d like to see the videos he’s seen of the attack.

Molyneux was also indirectly but obviously suggesting that it was another terrorist attack by Muslims. This is probably true, but so far the identity of the alleged attacker hasn’t been revealed. Yet, Molyneux is spinning his usual emotionally manipulative narrative. He ends the video by saying: “Do you wanna be popular, or do you want to live?”

He’s pushing the Dark Hero narrative that I’ve seen in the movies, video games and the Alt-Right media over the years: to survive and fight the monsters, you have to become worse than the monsters. This is once again like Albert Pike described in his alleged letter to Giuseppe Mazzini about goading the regular people to rise up to exterminate the Nihilist and atheist revolutionaries, and end up dooming themselves.

Naturally I do oppose the Islamization of Europe. It’s is a real threat whether or not terrorist attacks like these have been perpetrated by Muslims or intelligence agencies as false flags. Yet people like Molyneux and many others who point their fingers only at Muslims and other superficial troublemakers like Liberal elites, are behaving like if in the Lord of the Rings you were warning the Free Peoples against orc armies, but ignoring the existence of Sauron and the Ring Wraiths.

As a philosopher, Molyneux is a complete fraud. Either he is too dumb to see this, or he is working for the wrong side.

 

Occult Stuff

I found an article on the Illuminati Watcher website from 2013 discussing how Ariana Grande is fascinated by demons and magic. Perhaps this attack was some sort of occult ritual. I wonder what song Ariana Grande sang just prior to the alleged explosion?

She’s also worked for Nickelodeon and like most other pop stars is probably under MK Ultra mind control. Last year there was even some incident of her licking donuts in a donut shop.

 

Conclusion

It’s still too early to say what this event was, but using Occam’s Razor the most logical explanation is that it’s false flag or a hoax some sort, since that’s how most terrorist attacks turn out to be. Moreover, the most widely circulated picture of the attack looks hokey as heck. But I’ll have to wait and see what sort of evidence turns up.

 

EDIT:

I found an intriguing interview on Fox News regarding this terrorist attack. They are interviewing “crisis management expert” Eric Schiffer. He is the CEO of Patriarch Equity.

The interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdrYhXEfGnw

The reason, I suppose, for this interview is to tell you how to feel, and how to passively accept terrorism.  Since as far as I know, Eric Schiffer wasn’t at the concert. He doesn’t have any special information on the incident. He does mention, however, he knows Ariana Grande’s family: “She, I’m sure, is very devastated. I know the family.” This is interesting, since the Illuminati Watcher article quotes Ariana saying:

“My mom is a CEO and owns a company that manufactures communications equipment for the Marines and the Navy, so she’s not really the housewife type, if you get what I’m saying.”

So she works for the military-industrial complex. I wonder if Eric Schiffer’s Patriarch also co-operates with them. At the very least, it seems Ariana Grande’s family and Schiffer seem to belong to the same elite circles.

Finding what Patriarch Equity does is not so easy. First of all there are a few different companies that use some variation of the name Patriarch. But I think the one that Schiffer leads is this one: http://www.patriarch.com/private-equity/

They deal with developing and improving “businesses in the digital industry”. It doesn’t seem like “crisis management” company though. Yet Patriarch seems very shadowy to me. The About Us section does not even mention any names of the employees. It doesn’t mention Eric Schiffer as the CEO. I did find Eric Schiffer’s website though: http://www.ericschiffer.com/

It mentions he is the “Chairman and CEO of Patriarch Equity, and serves as chairman of Reputation Management Consultants. Most of all he enjoys his charity work on behalf of the Clinton Health Access Initiative and Benevolent.net.” He worked with the Clintons? Interesting.

Schiffer’s website also says: “Eric Schiffer is a best-selling author, and a successful entrepreneur.” He’s written some books, and apparently he’s an entrepreneur. It doesn’t mention here either that he’s a “crisis management expert”. Perhaps he’s a “crisis actor management expert”. He does seem to be a man of many talents as I found a couple of other interviews with him on Youtube:

In this Newsmax TV clip from 2014 he’s on as an economist or something talking about gas prices and Iraq: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9RpHnEMis

A CGTN America clip from 2016 has Schiffer on as “tech expert”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJXqbH2YnS0

I’m not sure if he’s an actor or some sort of conspirator mastermind. I have a hunch that Patriarch Equity might be somehow tied to the hypothetical Bureau of False Flags. Patriarch might have been somehow involved in this attack. So far, these are only hunches, though. This guy seems suspicious though.

Maybe the Feminists were right all along: there might be a patriarchy controlling us.

 

 

Links:

Fans evacuate Ariana Grande concert arena after blast :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jnL_e6RCQI

Dashcam captures moment of the explosion: http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/05/23/explosion-dashcam-video-sg-mobile-orig.cnn

What Pisses Me Off About The Ariana Grande Terrorist Attack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzAQwATXZ4o

Ariana Grande talks demons and magic in interview with Complex: http://illuminatiwatcher.com/ariana-grande-talks-demons-and-magic-in-interview-with-complex/

How Albert Pike’s letter can aid us in the Nationalist Revival: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/pikes-letter/

ARIANA GRANDE NAMED IN DNC LEAK?!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gWMDYAwtM4

Another False Flag in Paris or Mandela Effect?

Seems like Bureau of False Flags is at it again. A gunman killed a police officer in Paris, France, near Champs Elysees. Two others were apparently injured, and the gunman died as well. According to the media at least. Except last night when I saw this news story before going to sleep, the RT article I read said there were two attackers. Today when I woke up, all of the media sources I’ve seen are saying there was only one, including the same RT article. This must be Mandela Effect, right?

 

The Second Gunman already forgotten

No. I found a website, News Sniffer, that records the changes that news articles undergo as they’re updated. Every instance of the article is recorded. The RT article did originally say:

“The assault was “very probably” a “terrorist act,” with two attackers apparently involved, Reuters reported, citing police source. Howver, there is no official confirmation of that so far.”

Now there is no reference to this second attacker. I’ve heard the same story so many times I’ve forgotten most of them. A terrorist attack occurs or a crazy gunman goes on a rampage, initially there are reports of two or more assailants, but eventually it’s reduced to a lone nut. Sometimes the media at least has the decency to state that there were reports of two attackers, but they were mistaken, however this time it has been brushed aside entirely.

A couple of examples of two attackers in a shooting where one of them is discarded from the official story are the Utøya massacre in Norway in 2011, when Anders Breivik allegedly shot nearly a 100 people, and in 2012, James Holmes allegedly shot up a movie theater showing a Batman movie. Certain eye witnesses claimed he had had an accomplice, but he’s been erased from history as well.

Then there’s a little event you might have heard of, the JFK assassination.

 

The Election

The timing of this attack is convenient as the French presidential election is only a few days away. Some people are already saying this attack has confirmed the victory for Marine Le Pen. News articles on the terrorist attack have a similar structure to them. RT reports on the attack, and then posts the Twitter responses of candidates Marine Le Pen and François Fillon. BBC reports on the attack and asks “Could the attack influence the elections?”. CNN reports on the attack and has a big sub-headline “Elections on Sunday”.

Clearly they want you to be thinking of this incident when the French go vote. So was this a false flag to make Le Pen win? Possibly, maybe not. Last year in Britain before the Brexit vote, a remainer MP, Jo Cox, was killed by a right-wing Lone Nut™. Despite this Brexit happened. Perhaps the global conspirators want the French to feel the need for Le Pen, but they will fix the election in favour of Fillon to make the French feel even more desperate to possibly cause a civil war, or a new French Revolution.

Then again, the psy-op may have simply shifted from left to right. I was happy that Brexit happened, I was relieved when Trump won the presidency and I hope Le Pen wins as well. Yet I suggest to remain vigilant. The entity or entities behind these false flags, wars and everything else might simply be manipulating us into another cul-de-sac. I certainly am not clear to what extent the anti-globalist sentiment that has arisen in recent years is a genuine threat to their establishment, or simply another red herring.

 

Links:

Police officer killed, 2 seriously injured in Paris Champs Elysees attack of ‘terrorist nature’: https://www.rt.com/news/385468-officer-killed-shooting-paris/

Different versions of the RT article: https://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/1365820/diff/1/2

Paris shooting: Gunman was ‘focus of anti-terror’ probe: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39663300

Paris gunman who killed police officer known to security forces, source says: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/20/europe/champs-elyses-in-paris-closed/index.html

Norway attacks: the unanswered questions: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/24/norway-attacks-unaswered-questions

Eyewitness Account: James Holmes Possible Second Shooter in tragic Batman Denver Shooting: https://www.infowars.com/james-holmes-possible-second-shooter-in-tragic-batman-denver-shooting-eyewitness-account/

Terrorism never changes

Another terrorist attack occurred in London the other day and all of the same patterns repeat. The media says the attacker was connected with ISIS. Right-wingers say we have to stop Islamic immigration. Leftists say Muslims dindu nuffin. Conspiracy theorists claim it was a false flag, or that it was a hoax and nobody died. I’ve seen the same pattern so many times. Nothing ever changes.

Usually when you get down to the details of events like these, they turn out to be false flags of some sort, and even if they were “organic” terrorist attacks, they were still set into place by the same globalist forces that manufacture false flags, as the Islamic terrorists were allowed into Europe by them. Yet in the end, it does nothing to change the situation when conspiracy researchers tear apart the official narrative. These things still keep happening. Why? What’s the point in this whole game?

Fear is certainly one obvious purpose for these terrorist attacks. Fear is used to control the masses. The latest attack in London might be used as an excuse to cancel Brexit, if the politicians try to claim they need the protection of EU to fight against terrorism. Yet the people who orchestrate these events must know that there will always some independent researchers who points out the falsities in the official story. I think the imperators of terror are well aware of it, and leave obvious clues on purpose. They weave a symphony with at least two different layers to it, one for those who buy the official story, and one for those who don’t. Terrorism, false flags, hoaxed events have become so banal that they evoke little fear in a great amount of people. So instead the imperators of terror distract those people with the conspiracy angle. Instead of actually doing something to topple the shadow elite, you’re chasing another white rabbit down the hole. It’s a bit like watching a detective TV-show.

I sometimes think these terrorist attacks are so frequent because the intelligence agencies have a Bureau of False Flags. They have a whole bunch of people employed with a huge budget so they gotta keep churning out those terrorist attacks, otherwise they’d be out of a job. It’s sort of like Hollywood; they haven’t had a unique idea for a movie in 15 years, but they have to keep making movies since the industry is already there. So perhaps the only way to stop terrorism is to go after the Deep State. Shouting at the media won’t help. Exposing the false flag on Youtube won’t help.

While I do not wish to dissuade anyone away from the pursuit of truth, but I’m really beginning to see it as a waste of time to delve too deeply into these terrorist attacks. The underlying facts remain the same whether or not you have a conspiratorial or a main stream view of things: there are plenty of Muslims in Europe (some in America as well) that commit violent crimes. I do think that when it comes to most terrorist attacks, Muslims are used as patsies, but people from Islamic countries have perpetrated various acts of violence, especially rape, in several European countries over the recent years. It’s a catch 22-situation; if you blame Muslims for terrorism, you are buying a lie, but if you say that Muslims haven’t done anything wrong, you’re buying another.

Whether you consider yourself right-wing, left-wing, conspiracy theorist or main stream, the facts still remain the same. The Deep State in the US and certain European countries (and perhaps one or two Middle-Easterns ones as well) have started all sorts of wars and troubles in the Middle-East, which has eventually lead to throngs of people coming to Europe and starting troubles here. Whether you’re a hard core right-wing nationalist who cares about the safety of your people most, or a left-winger who has compassion for those poor Muslims, your ultimate enemy is the Deep State, that has destabilized their homelands and forced them to go elsewhere. If you really care about helping Muslims, you’d stop fantasizing about the hetero-normative White patriarchy and recognize the Deep State as your enemy.

I do think that details, and the truth in general, matter, especially when it comes to suspected false flags, but you still shouldn’t lose track of the big picture. I think a lot of conspiracy minded people just go into autoplay when they see a possible false flag and start analysing the components, and in effect cease thinking about what it all means in the end. The same patterns repeat. Stop getting distracted by the heads of the hydra, go for the body.