Tag Archives: war

The Economist Tarot card Tower and friends turning against each other

Last November I wrote about the annual Economist cover featuring eight Tarot cards. I theorized the card spread, i.e. how the cards were laid out, represented the four quarters of a year, spring, summer, autumn and winter. The first two cards on the left, the Tower and Death, represent spring of 2017. The card on top, Tower is the major aspect, whereas Death represents the minor aspect of the quartal. So far, I think my analysis was accurate on at least some points.

 

The Tower of Dissent

I wrote the following about the Tower:

“The Tower represents upheaval. It may look like an outside force strikes the tower, but it is actually derived from psychological principles. They often result from “neglected and mishandled situations”. One example given by [Rachel] Pollack for the Tower is friends turning against you.”

I also suggested the possibility that the far-left and Catholics join forces to fight other Christians. I haven’t seen evidence of this so-far, but I did expound on the notion of friends turning against each other by suggesting that Trump might turn against his supporters.

Last week Trump allegedly fired missiles at Shayrat air base after an alleged gas attack by Assad. This has lead many people to allege that Trump has turned into a neo-con who is going to start a full invasion of Syria. I overused the word “allege” on purpose, as these things are mere allegations that people people tend to make based on questionable information gleaned from the media.

What I have seen so far is more like so-called supporters of Trump are turning on him, such as certain people in the Alt-Right who were raising a toast to Trump a few months ago and saying “Hail Trump”. This is just the most recent example of this backstabbery.

In January of this year, it came out that Mike Enoch of the Right Stuff and Daily Shoah had been tricking his audience as he was married to a fag-hag Jewish woman, and Mike himself might even be a Jew. Naturally a lot of people turned on him, since he has been deceiving them.

In February or early March another controversy arose with the prominent Pizzagate “researcher” David Seaman being revealed as a con man who seemed to be in the business for the “buzz”, which allowed him to make money. A lot of people turned on him.

In the course last few months, although it started already back in late 2016, a controversy has been brewing in the Youtube “Skeptic Community” as some people in the community such as Armoured Skeptic, Shoe0nHead and Mundane Matt had accepted a sponsorship deal from a company called behind an app and a website called Candid. The app is supposed to be an anonymous social media service that resembles Twitter, and there’s an AI that censors offensive material. On top of that the vast majority of the employees of the company have worked for Google, and there are suggestions that the AI employed by Candid is the same as Google’s Jigsaw.

The controversy with Candid arose when these Youtubers who are supposedly pro-free speech and against censorship signed on with this pro-censorship app, moreover they lied about some of their associations with it, and censored people in their Youtube comment section when they tried to talk about it. Once again, a lot of people turned on these people.

The case with all of these people turning on their friends and allies is very much from “neglected and mishandled situations”, therefore it is good that this has happened. People have shed the illusions away.

The Trump situation though is slightly different in my opinion. I don’t think he is a neo-con, but that’s not to say he’s a good guy either. I honestly still don’t know what to think about him. I do think he is an agent of change, real change and not like Obama. Whether the change will be better, worse or neither I don’t know. Yet the people, such as the Alt-Right who are so eager to protest against this man they supposedly supported reveal their duplicitous and opportunistic nature once again.

 

Death Card

The Death card represents that minor aspect of spring on 2017. I noted in my previous article that it represents the four horsemen of the apocalypse: pestilence, war, famine and death. The river in the card is dried with a single fish in it, whereas in the normal Rider-Waite tarot there’s a flowing river that according to Rachel Pollack “signifies the unity of change and eternity”. I commented that I don’t see any change in the Economist’s card. Perhaps the dried river means that the specter of apocalypse hangs over us, but it lacks any actual substance. Recently there have been plenty of hints that a new war will occur: Trump shooting missiles to Syria, China sending 150,000 troops to the border of North Korea, Pyongyang supposedly evacuating 25% of its population, just yesterday US military dropped a MOAB in Afghanistan.

I don’t think any of this means that things will escalate into full-blown World War 3, or the events of the apocalypse, but that they are there to either feed our fears of such a thing happening, or to feed the bloodlust of certain people. This is why the Death card has all of these deadly things happening, but it is only the minor aspect of spring, so we’re only supposed to think about it, not actually experience it.

 

What to Expect?

Assuming that I am correct in my interpretation, what will we see next? The first three months of the year have passed, and we should already be in the second quartal. The cards are Judgement and The Magician.

In the Judgement card Trump is sitting on the world as the king or god of the world. This suggests his dominance. Rachel Pollack’s description on the tarot is ““reality of life has changed”. I expect the claim that Trump has turned neo-con, or that he is being controlled by his daughter Ivanka or Jared Kushner, to be intentional disinfo from the Trump administration. Perhaps we’re about to see Trump’s version of the Night of the Long Knives that he is pretending to show weakness to lure out those who only pretend to be his friends only to destroy them later.

So far, many people seem to think that Trump does not know what he is doing, or that he’s being manipulated by this or that person, but I think that is about to change. He will show his power. Whether it’s good or bad for the rest of us, I do not know, but he will change things.

I don’t know how to expect to see The Magician card to manifest itself in the next few months. The possibilities are too varied.

 

Links:

My earlier stuff on the Economist tarot:

https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/11/23/the-economists-2017-tarot-cover-part-1/

https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2016/11/24/the-economists-2017-tarot-cover-part-2/

Alt-Right protests against Donald Trump’s new alleged War

Alt-Right leaders Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch were protesting against Donald Trump firing missiles at the Shayrat air base in Syria. They allege that Trump is going to start another war in the Middle-East. If that is true, Trump certainly should be condemned, but I am fairly certain these Alt-Right figures don’t have all of the facts, nor do they really care about them. These wannabe politicians are just doing it for the attention.

Another interesting thing is that Richard Spencer was supposedly attacked and beat up by Antifa after his protest. So basically the Alt-Right “Neo-Nazis” are protesting against war, whereas the Antifa Communists are supporting wars of the American imperium. None of this makes any sense. I am glad though to see my enemies fight against each other, since it is difficult to say which I despise more, the Alt-Right (especially Spencer’s and Enoch’s faction of it), or Antifa. However, since Spencer and Enoch have a name and face I can hate, and Antifa is just an amorphous blob of faceless Commie thugs, I have to go with the Alt-Right.

 

If the Alt-Right, that now seems to be denouncing Donald Trump, truly had ever supported him, they would not turn their backs on Trump simply based on this one incident. This is proof enough that Spencer and his cohorts were all “Hail Trump”, because it was politically beneficial for them to do so at the time. Now a new wind is blowing, and these opportunists with no backbone are changing direction.

I don’t want to defend Trump, however, on his decision to attack the Syrian air base. The alleged gas attack sounds like it was a lie, or a false flag. At least I haven’t seen any actual evidence of it happening, so why would Trump retaliate against Syria based on such a flimsy accusation? Does he really want to start another was like in Iraq or Libya? I hope not, but I don’t know. Nobody who is not an insider knows what motivated him. I do think there is something else going on in the background, but I don’t want to speculate what. I certainly do not trust any of the narratives that are going on in the main stream media, and I’ve seen plenty people on the internet trying to push an anti-Trump narrative. On top of it all, I do not ever want to be on the same side with Richard Spencer as he’d likely stab me in the butt, so I’m going to assume Trump knows what he is doing. I don’t like it, and I’ve said before I think Trump is a con man, but in a den full of rapists, murderers, pedophiles, usurers and Satanists, a liar might be your best friend.

Let’s see after a few days or weeks what has happened. Has the conflict escalated to a US-backed war against Assad, are they heading toward an all out war between US and Russia, or will things cool down after this one missile incident? If Trump really does plan to invade, rape and destroy Syria as his predecessors have done to several other Middle-Eastern countries, Trump does not deserve anyone’s support. Spencer and Enoch though are not demonstrating against Trump because they are so concerned about the well-being of people. This is just another publicity stunt.

 

Links:

Alt-Right Protests Syria War at White House with Richard Spencer: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/85084935853904281

Richard Spencer Just Got His Ass Kicked and Glitter Bombed [VIDEOS]: https://antifascistnews.net/2017/04/09/richard-spencer-just-got-his-ass-kicked-and-glitter-bombed-videos/

The Progressive Left isn’t the sole Culprit in the Downfall of the West

Nowadays it’s very popular to blame the Progressive Left, Social Justice Warriors, or Marxists for our problems. And to a certain extent we should, since they have created many of our problems or allowed troublemakers to enter our countries. However, that’s not the whole story.

The Right, whether it’s the Alt-Right, New Right or just the Right, likes to emphasize the role of the Left in the European Immigration Crisis, for example, yet it wasn’t created by the Left but by the Right. Remember something that happened 15 years ago, an event called 9/11? After that the United States, along with the Coalition of the Willing, invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. He bombed Pakistan and Yemen as well. Obama simply continued Bush’s policies in the Middle-East. In fact, he has bombed twice as many countries as Bush did, most notably Libya and Syria. The US has supported the “moderate rebels”, i.e. ISIS, in Syria which is the main excuse for the Immigration Crisis. However, not all of the refugees are from Syria.

Let’s take a look at this chart from BBC. It notes the top 10 countries in 2015 from which people applied for asylum in the EU.

AsylumSeekersEU

While I’m not saying that chart is completely accurate, and things may be different in 2016, it still gives a rough picture of what is going on. Syria is the top country for asylum seekers understandably, but numbers 2 and 3 are Afghanistan and Iraq, countries that Bush invaded. In fact, every country in the list have been attacked by the US in the last 20 years, except maybe Eritrea, Nigeria and Iran (and I don’t want to check right now).

Bill Clinton bombed Kosovo and Albania in the 90s. Both Bush and Obama have bombed Pakistan. The US has meddled with the internal affairs of Ukraine creating a civil war of sorts. The United States is the one that has created the Immigration Crisis in Europe, not the Progressive Left. Both political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, have contributed to the situation. It is wrong to blame only one side of the political spectrum for it.

It is true that the Leftists in Europe have opened doors for countless invaders, but these invaders would have no excuse call themselves refugees hadn’t the Right-winger Bush started World War III in the Middle-East. The existence of the Left-Right dichotomy in politics is a joke and a distraction at your expense. I had thought that people had gotten wise to it years ago, but apparently that is not the case as is evidenced by the rise of the Alt-Right. People still prefer to play this game with two competing teams simply for the pleasure of beating the opponent and gloating over it, instead of actually fixing problems. As if Trump was any better than Hillary. As if the far Right is any better than the far Left.

The eagle has two wings, both are working against you. The right one is acting all tough and causing trouble. Once you get tired of it, the left one blames you for the destruction caused by the right one, and tells you to repent and open your doors to parasites. Now everyone is getting fed up with the parasites, so they want the right one back. Apparently the West has not learned this lesson in 2016.

 

Links:

Obama Has Bombed Twice as Many Countries as Bush: https://alibertarianfuture.com/big-government/war-big-government/obama-bombed-twice-many-countries-bush/

Migrant crisis: Migration to Europe explained in seven charts: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911

Children’s Crusade of the Modern Left

The event called the Children’s Crusade occurred in 1212 when Europeans got the brilliant idea that children could peacefully convert Muslims in Jerusalem into Christianity. I guess the reasoning was that since children are so innocent they could melt the icy hearts of the Saracens. Possibly as much as 30,000 people participated. Of course the crusade was a complete disaster. None of the crusaders even reached the Holy Land. The children were sold into slavery or died in a shipwreck, and so on.

Wikipedia says that historians aren’t sure to what extent the story is true or not, but it appears to have a basis in historical fact even if it is a bit embellished. The Children’s Crusade must be one of the dumbest mass undertakings in history, because the success margin of the operation was based on complete fantasies. Moreover, the adults sanctioning it were clearly negligent in their responsibility of taking care of children. They doomed tens of thousands of children based on insane fantasies. What underlines its stupidity even more is that Europeans had been waging war against the Saracens for centuries, and earned their ire and distrust. Had the first crusade been a peaceful one, there might have been at least some conceivable possibility of success, but sending children into hostile territory after over a century of wars is incomprehensible. But I guess it doesn’t matter if none of the children reached the Holy Land anyway.

This is more or less what the left-governed Western world is doing today. People are increasingly unwilling in facing the harsh realities of life, and instead choose to bet on fantasies that make them feel good. The West has been crusading in the Middle-East for a couple of decades now; George W. Bush even referred to the War on Terror as a crusade. The West is still waging these wars, which isn’t the best method for making friends. However, in the Europe and America the governments treat the Muslims immigrants as if they’re friends and welcome them into our countries. These modern crusades should never have been started in the first place, and it is utterly insane that they are still going on, but what is more insane is that the West treats Middle-Easterners and Muslims who live in their own lands as enemies, but once they cross the border into Europe, they’re supposedly transformed into friends. This is not how friendship or diplomacy works.

The Children’s Crusade of the left is not limited to relations between the West and the Middle-East. Youtuber Common Filth has been preaching how leftists, and left-leaning West, only care about their “feels”. What makes them feel nice and comfortable is most important, instead of making sure that our children have a future, for example. The West is obsessed about transient hedonism and tolerance of various deviant expressions of people’s identities. Anything practical, realistic and natural is a secondary concern.

It is regarded as progress that children consider themselves gender fluid, and wanting to get a sex-change operation. It is frowned upon if someone points this is stupid and insane, since it makes people feel bad when you point out they’re wrong. People have given up on reality as it is too difficult to affect positive change in it, so they turn to instant gratification and fantasies. This is probably how it was in Europe 800 years ago. They failed to hold Jerusalem by force, which you can argue was morally wrong or right, but at least in the real world, if you want to hold a peace of land you have to fight for it. Eventually the Europeans grew tired and weak in spirit, and there was little will to fight for anything. So they withdrew into destructive fantasies.

Westerners today no longer care to ensure that our children have a future in the real world, so they experiment on them in various ways, and pretend its endearing. Boys become princesses, girls become boys, children are purple penguins. Parents don’t take care of their purple penguins, so they put them in front of the TV, give them iPads to distract them or they’re just relinquished to the state. Soon enough pedophilia will just be regarded as an expression of love. If you speak out against this, you are a hater. Fuck hate; make love to children.

The Second Children’s Crusade has been marching forward for a good time now. I hope it crashes and burns sooner and not later, so more people are not suckered in.

 

P.S.

I really recommend everyone to listen to Common Filth Radio. He can explain the decadence of the West much more vividly than I.

 

Links:

Children’s Crusade: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Crusade

Children’s Crusade: http://global.britannica.com/event/Childrens-Crusade

Tenth Crusade: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Crusade_%28CounterPunch%29

Common filth: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb9NIDFFW4KOqc6hGBnFBhg/videos

A prime example of the Children’s Crusade today: http://www.infowars.com/german-police-covering-up-rapes-so-as-not-to-legitimize-critics-of-mass-migration/

Accepting Refugees is the new White Man’s Burden?

Europe is flooding with refugees from Africa and the Middle-East, as everyone knows. The question is why? No, the answer is not humanitarian concerns. No-one in the bureaucracy gives a flying fuck about human beings. They use such terminology only when it suits them to manipulate the short-sighted masses.

Sure it’s nice and humane to give aid to those less fortunate, but it’s even more human to have a degree of common sense. If people of Europe were like Jesus who could indefinitely multiply to fish and bread to feed the masses, I’m sure they’d do it. Alas, we cannot do that, and we have a limited amount of resources, and most of our money seems to be going through a Black Hole somewhere in Greece, we can easily say Europe does not have the resources to carry all of Africa and Middle-East on its shoulders. It would be nice to do so, like it would be nice to feed that beggar on the street, but when the option is feeding your family or the beggar, the choice should be clear. Yet it’s not apparently.

The majority though, seems unwilling to take reality into account when dealing with mass immigration, since they don’t want to be called racist, hater, Nazi or Islamophobe. And no, they do not care about the poor Africans, not genuinely. They just want live their little lives, and play along to avoid being tried by the Inquisition for heresy, which nowadays means saying something politically incorrect. If indeed the masses cared about Africa, for instance, they would have done something about their governments before they murdered thousands of Libyans and destroyed the country’s infrastructure four years ago. Obama and French president Sarkozy were instrumental in promoting the destruction of Libya. Where was the humanitarian concern back then? But of course no-one could oppose Obama, since that would be racist.

I have this crazy extremist New Age ideology of trying to fix problems before they become problems, such as Europeans and Americans having done before something about their insane governments before they managed to destroy Libya and sodomized Gaddafi to death. I did sympathize with Libyans back then, still do. But I don’t want them as refugees in my country of Finland, since it’s not our responsibility. We have enough of our own problems with the EU, US and traitorous politicians.

I think the Libyan refugees should get to move into the White House (or Rainbow House as it is nowadays), or the French presidential mansion, since they’re the ones responsible. They should also pay war reparations to Libya. But not the countries that didn’t have anything to do with the Libyan war.

How about we stop being reactionary, and stop the globalist war machine before they destroy countries and try to force their populations to become refugees? I’m sure it’s a beneficial arrangement for both parties. The European nations don’t get the extra burden of refugees, and the people from the “third world” countries do not get their families murdered and country bombed to hell. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a bleeding heart liberal who cares about them poor Africans and Muslims, or a right-wing racist who hates them. It’s best for all of us if their countries don’t get bombed to bits.

If at this point you think I’m some racist right-winger, I suggest you go pop a few anti-propaganda pills first. Let’s look at this situation in Europe and the refugee countries. Seemingly endless floods of people are pouring into Europe. Is it not prudent to ask why? Instead of acting emotionally, and say they’re people too, and we should help them. If you care that much, why don’t you go help them personally instead of just passively acquiescing to anything the media, the EU and the government says? You don’t really care about them. You just want to be a “good person” who isn’t judged or labelled by society.

So why are the people flooding into Europe? Are the African and Middle-Eastern countries simply so shitty, they’re no place for human beings to live in? If so, why is that so? Are the people there somehow incapable of taking care of themselves? They need us nice White folk to take care of them. Is this the updated version of White Man’s burden? In the 19th century Europeans invaded other countries with the pretext of educating the savages. I thought nowadays that practice is seen as racist. Nowadays White Man is no longer invading the countries of other men (they’re just bombing them to bits), but the “savages” are heading into our countries. Same shit, different direction. The attitude that we are somehow better than other people is as racist now as it was then.

The root of the problem is, however, the practice of spreading democracy. In Libya it meant the destruction of the country’s infrastructure, and ass-raping the president to death with a bayonet. This is what democracy looks like! Now they are doing the same in Syria. Ukraine is more or less in the same boat even though it’s a White country. It is a well-oiled engine of destruction and destitution. Unless we do something now, Syria and Ukraine (maybe Yemen too), will be in as crippled as Libya in a few years.

I have a radical suggestion, or more of redefinition of our so-called racial imperative; the White Man’s Burden is not to civilize or democratize the savages, but to stop the insane machine that is our governments from causing any more havoc. Compassion for the refugees is meaningless emotional porn, I’d rather make sure the military industrial complex does not cause any more refugees.

And voting won’t make any fucking difference. Action will.

 

 

Links:

Gaddafi’s last moments: ‘I saw the hand holding the gun and I saw it fire’: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/20/muammar-gaddafi-killing-witnesses