Tag Archives: White Man’s Burden

The Faustian West

People of European stock, or the “White” people, do have enemies to be sure, and many of them would be happy to see the White Genocide become a reality, yet at the heart of the matter I would it is not really a White Genocide, but White Suicide. It’s us who are allowing it to happen, and we’ve been working on it for a long time.


Faustian Demon

There’s a psychological or spiritual malady in us that makes us resent ourselves for being infected by it, and also makes us want to look away from it and focus on something else, give us a distraction. Spengler called the West a “Faustian culture”, i.e. having made a deal with the devil in order to gain power. The Western man has lost contact with nature and replaced that with constant strive for technological progress. Spengler probably meant the Faustian pact to be allegorical, but I leaning toward the pact to more literal, even though the demon might be one of our own creation.

John Lash speaks of the same phenomena in “Not in His Image” where he bases his argument that extra-terrestrial Archons have infected our minds on ancient Gnostic literature. Paul Levy describes the phenomenon by the Native American term Wetiko. I do not know where this spiritual malady originated, whether it was brought by an evil invader, or we created it ourselves, but I certainly do agree it exists.

This malady makes us uncomfortable in silence, when we are alone with ourselves. We always have to have something to do. Work, movies, music, video games, projects to work for. Like Carl Jung put it: “There is no coming to consciousness without pain. People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own Soul. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.” It is not only that we avoid looking into our demon-tainted soul, but doing so we allow the demon to use us to cause havoc.



Like I said earlier, we have many enemies: invading Islamist forces, Jewish control over the media, science and so on, manipulation by secret societies. However, I will argue that those enemies would not have attainted such influence over us had we not allowed them to do so.

For one, half of the Western people see no problem with invading Islamists, and to accuse Jews of doing something bad is anti-semitic hatred, and believing in secret societies is crazy conspiracy theory. They are willingly ignorant of these threats to their existence, because on one hand they have created the problem themselves and therefore don’t want to face their own mistake, and on the other, subconsciously they understand these threats spell their doom, and they welcome it.

The other half of the West (yes these are very rough generalizations) understand the threat we are facing, and are willing to fight it. However, they wish to externalize the threat, and talk about “Jewish tribal breeding strategies” and such, or Islamic barbarism, without taking into account how they themselves, or their ancestors have worked to build up these threats. It’s easy to blame the Jews or the Illuminati for this or that, but it’s difficult to admit where you have worked against your own self-interest. In effect, fighting against these threats gives us an excuse not to look at root cause of the problem, which is ourselves.

On one side the Western people welcome their own destruction since they subconsciously know they are being possessed by this demon, whereas the other side wants an external enemy to fight against so they don’t have to face the real enemy.


The West always shoots itself in the Foot

I’ve heard it mentioned many times that native Englishmen are a minority in London, and when I visited the Heathrow airport I noticed that the vast majority of employees are Indian or Pakistani. Also the Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris had a lot of Africans working in it, although the ratio with native French people was more equal. Why is this the case then? I would say it is imperialism. Britain colonized India over a hundred years ago, and now Britain is overrun by Indians. France colonized parts of Africa, and now their country is overrun by Africans (both Black and Arabic ones). How does that work? I cannot say I describe the whole process, but I would say it has something to do with making these racially, culturally and religiously foreign nations part of their empires will naturally make it easier for people from those countries to migrate to Europe.

Let’s take the Rotherham scandal in England. Pakistani immigrants raped hundreds of British girls during a period of over ten years. The authorities knew about it, but didn’t do squat. While of course the Pakistani men bear a lot responsibility for these crimes, the root cause is that the British men did nothing to protect their girls. The main problem is not that the foxes eat your chickens, but that you allowed foxes to guard the henhouse. The Pakistanis wouldn’t be there if it weren’t for the Brits making it possible. In fact, Pakistan wouldn’t probably even exist if it wasn’t for the British empire. The region was controlled by the Sikh empire from 1799-1849 until it was defeated by the British East India Trading Company in the Anglo-Sikh wars.

I see the White Man’s Burden-ideology at its core to be an excuse not to focus on the problems at home, and do something else somewhere else to distract one’s attention from the Faustian demon.

The modern state of Israel too would not exist if it wasn’t for the support of the British and Americans. Europeans have known for centuries that the Jews are troublemakers to say the least, yet they were allowed into this position of power. Israel could not wield the power over US foreign policy if Israel did not exist. I don’t think the Jews are the manipulative masterminds they are sometimes made out to be. They are devious and deceptive, but their lies need a willing audience to take effect.

Even the colonization of America by Europeans is, at least partially, due to the unwillingness to fix problems at home, and instead escape from them and ultimately bring the problems elsewhere. Without going into what happened in America between Europeans and the natives, the motive for colonizing the Americas was based on escapism. Many pioneers and colonists went to America escape the religious persecution in Europe. Instead of fixing problems at home, they escaped to America. I understand the sentiment myself. I’d like there to be a pure and pristine continent, or perhaps a planet in Alpha Centauri, where I could escape to start anew, but the problem would migrate with myself.

The post-World War times have plenty of examples of Westerners creating problems for themselves that they can fix later. Look at America setting up Saddam Hussein in Iraq only to declare war on him later. Same thing with the Taliban, or Gaddafi.

The New World Order is not a conspiracy, but an openly declared political agenda, as it has been announced by countless people such as David Rockerfeller, Henry Kissinger and George Bush senior. Yet people who have pointed this out time and time again have been ridiculed and ignored. In effect, Westerners have been complicit in this agenda by their silence.



It is clear that Westerners have been complicit in the crimes against themselves time and time again. The argument that we’ve been manipulated by the Jews or the Illuminati works only to a certain limit. It’s like the maxim George W. Bush couldn’t say: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” The people of the West have been fooled countless times. It’s not that our enemies are so smart or powerful, but we’d rather buy their lies since it gives us the excuse not to take responsibility for our own actions. I suggest we change that. I don’t want Islam to overrun Europe, I don’t want Jews to control over us, and I don’t want the New World Order to become reality. It’s not enough to fight against these threats as we have to recognize there is something psychologically wrong with us that keeps creating enemies for us to fight.

Apparently Spengler believed that for the Faustian man there is no redemption. All he can do is face the inevitable end without courage and dignity. While I do agree that we have to have courage and dignity, but I think the demon can be exorcised. However, that is more difficult than falling battle against overwhelming odds like Davy Crockett.


P.S. It is possible that other people than Westerners are also affected by the same mind virus, but it manifests differently. Arabs, for example, might be affected as well, but their virus manifests as religious fanaticism instead of desire for “progress”.



Oswald Spengler and ‘Faustian culture’: https://faustianeurope.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/oswald-spengler-and-faustian-culture/

John Lash- The Archons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loCoTx99yAg

Red Ice Radio – Paul Levy – Hour 1 – Dispelling Wetiko: Breaking the Curse of Evil: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5J2NtM3pWg

“There’s panic at London Heathrow…”: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/panic-at-london-heathrow/

Anglo-Sikh wars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Sikh_wars

Sikh empire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_Empire

Religion and the Founding of the American Republic: https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel01.html


Accepting Refugees is the new White Man’s Burden?

Europe is flooding with refugees from Africa and the Middle-East, as everyone knows. The question is why? No, the answer is not humanitarian concerns. No-one in the bureaucracy gives a flying fuck about human beings. They use such terminology only when it suits them to manipulate the short-sighted masses.

Sure it’s nice and humane to give aid to those less fortunate, but it’s even more human to have a degree of common sense. If people of Europe were like Jesus who could indefinitely multiply to fish and bread to feed the masses, I’m sure they’d do it. Alas, we cannot do that, and we have a limited amount of resources, and most of our money seems to be going through a Black Hole somewhere in Greece, we can easily say Europe does not have the resources to carry all of Africa and Middle-East on its shoulders. It would be nice to do so, like it would be nice to feed that beggar on the street, but when the option is feeding your family or the beggar, the choice should be clear. Yet it’s not apparently.

The majority though, seems unwilling to take reality into account when dealing with mass immigration, since they don’t want to be called racist, hater, Nazi or Islamophobe. And no, they do not care about the poor Africans, not genuinely. They just want live their little lives, and play along to avoid being tried by the Inquisition for heresy, which nowadays means saying something politically incorrect. If indeed the masses cared about Africa, for instance, they would have done something about their governments before they murdered thousands of Libyans and destroyed the country’s infrastructure four years ago. Obama and French president Sarkozy were instrumental in promoting the destruction of Libya. Where was the humanitarian concern back then? But of course no-one could oppose Obama, since that would be racist.

I have this crazy extremist New Age ideology of trying to fix problems before they become problems, such as Europeans and Americans having done before something about their insane governments before they managed to destroy Libya and sodomized Gaddafi to death. I did sympathize with Libyans back then, still do. But I don’t want them as refugees in my country of Finland, since it’s not our responsibility. We have enough of our own problems with the EU, US and traitorous politicians.

I think the Libyan refugees should get to move into the White House (or Rainbow House as it is nowadays), or the French presidential mansion, since they’re the ones responsible. They should also pay war reparations to Libya. But not the countries that didn’t have anything to do with the Libyan war.

How about we stop being reactionary, and stop the globalist war machine before they destroy countries and try to force their populations to become refugees? I’m sure it’s a beneficial arrangement for both parties. The European nations don’t get the extra burden of refugees, and the people from the “third world” countries do not get their families murdered and country bombed to hell. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a bleeding heart liberal who cares about them poor Africans and Muslims, or a right-wing racist who hates them. It’s best for all of us if their countries don’t get bombed to bits.

If at this point you think I’m some racist right-winger, I suggest you go pop a few anti-propaganda pills first. Let’s look at this situation in Europe and the refugee countries. Seemingly endless floods of people are pouring into Europe. Is it not prudent to ask why? Instead of acting emotionally, and say they’re people too, and we should help them. If you care that much, why don’t you go help them personally instead of just passively acquiescing to anything the media, the EU and the government says? You don’t really care about them. You just want to be a “good person” who isn’t judged or labelled by society.

So why are the people flooding into Europe? Are the African and Middle-Eastern countries simply so shitty, they’re no place for human beings to live in? If so, why is that so? Are the people there somehow incapable of taking care of themselves? They need us nice White folk to take care of them. Is this the updated version of White Man’s burden? In the 19th century Europeans invaded other countries with the pretext of educating the savages. I thought nowadays that practice is seen as racist. Nowadays White Man is no longer invading the countries of other men (they’re just bombing them to bits), but the “savages” are heading into our countries. Same shit, different direction. The attitude that we are somehow better than other people is as racist now as it was then.

The root of the problem is, however, the practice of spreading democracy. In Libya it meant the destruction of the country’s infrastructure, and ass-raping the president to death with a bayonet. This is what democracy looks like! Now they are doing the same in Syria. Ukraine is more or less in the same boat even though it’s a White country. It is a well-oiled engine of destruction and destitution. Unless we do something now, Syria and Ukraine (maybe Yemen too), will be in as crippled as Libya in a few years.

I have a radical suggestion, or more of redefinition of our so-called racial imperative; the White Man’s Burden is not to civilize or democratize the savages, but to stop the insane machine that is our governments from causing any more havoc. Compassion for the refugees is meaningless emotional porn, I’d rather make sure the military industrial complex does not cause any more refugees.

And voting won’t make any fucking difference. Action will.




Gaddafi’s last moments: ‘I saw the hand holding the gun and I saw it fire’: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/20/muammar-gaddafi-killing-witnesses