Tag Archives: yggdrasil

Kabbalistic Origins of the Copernican Model

The Copernican heliocentric model and the Big Bang are the basis to the understanding of the cosmology of modern science. Those who tend to look at things critically have probably found these claims somewhat questionable, and there are claims that these ideas, and others concepts of modern science, such as Evolution, are actually of occult or religious origin. There is also alleged Jesuit involvement in our current understanding of the universe. While there are certainly plenty of material on the internet about this, I decided to take a look at it myself. In this article I’ll focus on Nicolaus Copernicus and his ideas. Next time I’ll look at the Big Bang.

However before I move on, I’d like to share my take on the Jesuits, or the claim you see here and there: “It’s the Jesuits.” Jesuits are actually the first conspiratorial group I ever heard about. When I was a child learned that Jesuits embodied the maxim: the ends justify the means. I’m not sure where I learned, maybe from my parents, but ever since I had had the idea of Jesuits of being some sort of conspiratorial cabal. That was years before I even heard the names Freemason or Illuminati. Then around ten years ago, when I was getting serious about learning about conspiracies and secret societies, I heard from a Christian friend that Jesuits are actually really nice, he said they are sort of like hippies. That confused me greatly.  He seemed to be describing a completely different group from the historical Jesuits. Both because I suppose I associated Jesuits with my former childhood self, and my friend’s confusing comments, I hadn’t looked much into Jesuit conspiracy theories in my conspiracy theorist “career”, but maybe a couple years ago I saw some articles about Jesuit universities.

I’ll this article from NY Times as an example from 2013. It describes how the Jesuit Georgetown college celebrated OUTober, an LGBT gay-parade with students prancing around wearing pink shirts. My friend’s view of Jesuits must have originated from these kind of liberal, tolerant modern Jesuit colleges. The Jesuits have been, and still are, all about pursuing their own nefarious agendas and subverting society’s values. It’s just that the times are different, and they are using different methods nowadays. A few centuries ago they were probably more focused on sequestering knowledge, assassination and more traditional cloak and dagger stuff, now they are putting on a benevolent mask and are engaging in social engineering, such as LGBT agenda.

Yet I still do not agree that “it is the Jesuits”. You see and hear these people saying “it’s the Jesuits and that guy never mentions the Jesuits, so he must be a shill”. The next guy says: “No, it’s actually the Freemasons. You’re the shill.” Whereas the third guy claims: “It’s the Jews.” I think these groups, and many others are part of the secret society control system, but I do not know who or what group is on top of it all, nor do I trust anyone who claims they know the truth, unless they are a member of the group that rules over all other groups.

 

Copernicus and Kabbalah

Let’s move on to Nicolaus Copernicus and the heliocentric model of the solar system. Before Copernicus’ theories, most Europeans believed in the geocentric Ptolemaic system. According to Wikipedia, Copernicus had formulated his theory already in 1510, but his book “On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres” was published after his death in 1543. Interestingly in the Controversy-section of the article it states:

“The immediate result of the 1543 publication of Copernicus’s book was only mild controversy. At the Council of Trent (1545–63) neither Copernicus’s theory nor calendar reform (which would later use tables deduced from Copernicus’s calculations) were discussed. It has been much debated why it was not until six decades after the publication of De revolutionibus that the Catholic Church took any official action against it, even the efforts of Tolosani going unheeded. Catholic side opposition only commenced seventy-three years later, when it was occasioned by Galileo.”

I suppose the Catholic church created the controversy on purpose, since Copernicus’ theories had not caught on in the regular people. So they turned Galileo into this oppressed anti-hero basically to advertise the Copernican model as the new and exciting thing that the establishment supposedly is afraid. Sort of how they got a lot of people, myself included, to support Donald Trump. (Although my support of him wasn’t really so much because the establishment pretended to hate him, but because of Hillary Clinton and Pizzagate, but that’s another story.)

Let’s get back to Copernicus. His book was called “On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres”. Just the name itself reminds me of the Tree of Life of Kabbalah and Sephiroth spheres on it, or the Norse World Tree with the hanging worlds on it.

 

I used to think this similarity pretty much proves there is some truth to Kabbalah and the ancient myths, but now I am skeptical of the modern cosmology, so I am more inclined to think the “scientists” who have been pushing this model do so because their religion says so. Nowadays many of the flat earthers believe in the Biblical geocentric, domed-model. I suppose I am one of them, but I am happy to admit I could be wrong. There does seem to be some sort spiritual and scientific battle between these two religious concept going on. One of them could be right, and one wrong, or perhaps both are simply religious ideas.

Anyway, the heliocentric model that Copernicus was pushing is rather Kabbalistic. A Kabbala site called Revealing Science of God says: “It should be noted that the 16th century also witnessed perhaps the first scientific verification of Kabbalist teaching with the book written by Copernicus. The Kabbalists never taught the Earth to be the center of the universe, and Copernicus’ discovery proved them right.”

Another blogger on WordPress had written an article titled: “Copernicus And His Kabbalistic Methods”. He quotes Copernicus saying: “Nor is it necessary that these hypotheses should be true, nor indeed even probable, but it is sufficient if they merely produce calculations which agree with the observations…” This sort of reasoning does indeed seem Kabbalistic.

Torahscience.org has an article states that the Torah, i.e. the first five books of the Old Testament, has a geocentric universe. However, when a “holy” Rabbi Ruzhiner was presented with Copernicus’ theories, people expected him to deny them, however the Rabbi responded as follows:

“When he was informed of this, the Holy Ruzhiner remained completely composed and his response was a very special one. He said that whether the earth revolves around the sun or the sun revolves around the earth depends on the service of the tzaddikim, the righteous Jews of the generation. The answer to the question of “What revolves around what?” is not an absolute answer. If, for instance, the tzaddikim in this generation would serve God in a manner in which it would be correct to see Pluto as the center of the solar system, then in some mysterious way scientific discoveries would adapt to reflect that change.”

Those “tzaddikim” are probably the good Jews who believe in Kabbalah and the Talmud instead of the Torah.

Later on the article gives another example of this: “Accordingly, the variation between geocentricism and heliocentricism can be compared to a difference between a service of God that sees man (on earth) as the center, with God, as it were, revolving around man and caring for all of man’s needs; or perceiving God as the center, whereby man is obligated to God and His commandments.”

According to Kabbalah, it would seem, anything can be anything as long as you can bullshit and fast talk others to believe in it. Even the laws of nature and God are subject one’s ability to make stuff up. I have noticed similar things have permeated all aspects of modern society. Feminism is one example. They say rape is power + privilege, and since White women have them, they cannot be raped. Alternatively, a woman who had consensual sex with man can turn the act post coitum into a rape if she regrets later her promiscuity. Once again, twisting words around can supposedly change reality to suit one’s needs.

I do not know whether Nicolaus Copernicus had studied the Kabbalah, but he did seem to adhere to many Kabbalistic notions. I also do not know if there is any connection between Copernicus and the Jesuits. The Jesuit order was officially formed 1540 and Copernicus died 1543, so it is possible they might have had something to do with it, but I haven’t seen any actual evidence of this.

 

The Catholics

The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy says that during Copernicus’ lifetime, the Catholic church seemed to be fine with his theories:

“Pope Clement VII (r. 1523–1534) had reacted favorably to a talk about Copernicus’s theories, rewarding the speaker with a rare manuscript. There is no indication of how Pope Paul III, to whom On the Revolutions was dedicated reacted; however, a trusted advisor, Bartolomeo Spina of Pisa (1474–1546) intended to condemn it but fell ill and died before his plan was carried out. Thus, in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy.”

So Pope Clement VII, who appears to have died before Copernicus, reacted favourably to his theories, and the Pope who succeeded him was Paul III to whom Copernicus dedicated his book. Had the Catholic church been hostile to Copernicus’ theories, you might interpret this as a kind of FU from Copernicus, however it does not appear that was the case. There probably were many individuals who did not appreaciate his un-Biblical cosmology, but overall, as Stanford Encyclopedia stated, the heliocentric system was not a heresy.

Interestingly, as is mentioned above, Pope Paul III’s advisor, Bartolomeo Spina, wanted to condemn Copernicus’ book, and presumably he could have influenced the Pope as well, but he fell ill and died. Convenient, wouldn’t you say? Perhaps he was poisoned. His Wikipedia page doesn’t say much, but it says Bartolomeo Spina was involved in prosecuting witches, so he probably understood the Copernical model as the occult concept that it is.

There are some claims that Nicolaus Copernicus may have been a prist. At least he did not marry, and he was a member of the Third Order of Saint Dominic, which is some sort of lay Dominican order. The New Advent website states:

“After his university studies Copernicus practised medicine for six years (1506-1512) at Heilsberg, being sought by bishops and princes, but especially by the poor, whom he served gratis. There is no document to show that Copernicus ever received higher orders. His medical practice, which was only private, would not speak against him being a priest, and the fact that in 1537 King Sigismund of Poland put his name on the list of four candidates for the vacant episcopal seat of Ermland, makes it probable that, at least in later life, he had entered the priesthood.”

So he might have died a Catholic priest. I’ve uncovered no evidence of any involvement of Jesuits with Copernicus himself. The Catholic church, however, did seem be in good relations with him.

Copernicus certainly seems to have been influenced by the Kabbalah, and it was all approved by the Catholic church.

Next time I’ll focus on the Big Bang theory and it’s obvious occult origins.

 

Links:

A Rainbow Over Catholic Colleges
How Georgetown Became a Gay-Friendly Campus: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/how-georgetown-became-a-gay-friendly-campus.html

Nicolaus Copernicus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus

One Possible History of Kabbalism: http://www.revealingscienceofgod.com/index.php?page=one-possible-history-of-kabbalism

Copernicus And His Kabbalistic Methods: https://migchels.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/copernicus-and-his-kabbalistic-methods/

Science Versus Torah?: http://www.torahscience.org/natsci/astronomy_rav2.htm

Nicolaus Copernicus: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/copernicus/

Bartolommeo Spina: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartolommeo_Spina

Do you have a calling to be Third Order of St. Dominic?: http://www.sacredheart-op.org/Vocations.htm

Copernicus: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04352b.htm

The Jesuits & The Globe Earth: The Mother Of All Conspiracies!: https://www.worldslastchance.com/end-time-prophecy/the-jesuits-the-globe-earth-the-mother-of-all-conspiracies.html

Prism Monolith on the Dark Side of the Moon and it’s connection to Bifröst

I’ve still been obsessed by what Tracy Twyman wrote about Cain and Baphomet in Clock Shavings, and I think I found some parallels to it in Norse myth. But first, I wanna get one thing out of the way.

Pink Floyd’s album cover for Dark Side of the Moon is (in)famous, with a black triangle or pyramid acting as a prism to reflect a white beam into a rainbow beam.

 

This quite obviously has something to do with the black cube in hell, which is a prism where Cain and Baphomet are trapped. Except this black monolith is on the moon according to the album name. Perhaps the moon and hell are actually the same thing, in realms without time or space such details do not matter whether they are above or below. Alternatively the moon might be a reflection of hell.

There’s one Christian Youtuber, Round SaturnsEye, discussing lot of the same stuff as Twyman is. In one video he showed that the Dark Side of the Moon picture is lacking something. It makes a circle like the Ouroboros serpent.

 

That made me think of two things: Saturn and Bifröst from Norse mythology. A year ago I wrote about the European Space Agency showing a picture of Saturn’s rainbow rings. I also questioned the gay pride movement’s usage of the rainbow flag: “Perhaps this “pride” stuff is not about gay pride after all. Maybe the seemingly noble goal of sexual equality is used to entice useful idiots as bannermen for another cause. Could this cause be the Saturnian rainbow perchance?”

What this all means then? I don’t know, but I’d wager somehow the black prism somehow (alchemically?) changes the nature of light, it circles around Saturn and comes back to the moon to do another loop. This, I guess, would be David Icke’s moon-Saturn matrix. However, I couldn’t tell you whether it’s some evil satanic plot to imprison us in a this loop, or if this simply a metaphysical function of the world.

Anyways, for the sake of completeness I have to include this picture before moving on:

 

In Norse mythology the Bifröst is the rainbow bridge that connects the different worlds on world tree, Yggdrasil. I’ve long thought there are similarities to the Kabbalistic tree of life. Both have spheres suspended from it, and each contain worlds. The worlds on both trees may differ in their content, but the basic idea is very similar.

 

 

Would the tubes that connect the spheres on the tree of life be the Bifröst then? Is the dark monolith on the moon used to create the Bifröst to connect the worlds, or perhaps the monolith is used to create an artificial version of the Bifröst for demons to escape hell? Or the monolith prism is used to connect to the Bifröst so demons gain access to it. During Ragnarök, the Norse version of the apocalypse, the Muspell or sons of Muspell, who are fire giants or fire demons, attempt to cross the bridge, but it breaks.

Tracy Twyman mentions that many mythologies refer to a war in ancient times between two brothers. In the Judeo-Christian context this is the war in Eden between Cain and his brother aided by the Dohir kings (and the fall of Atlantis according to Baphomet). In Norse myth there’s the war between  Æsir and Vanir. It’s not quite clear what the difference between these two groups is.

Wikipedia shows these two pictures about the Vanir:

Freja

 

Freyr

 

It makes me think Aryan. Wikipedia comments that the Vanir “are a group of gods associated with fertility, wisdom, nature, magic, and the ability to see the future.” Perhaps they are the Nordic aliens. And I’ve heard it theorized that the aliens are merely people from the future. This could be why they can see the future. But I’m getting side-tracked here. The point is there was this war between two powerful factions in the ancient Norse world as in the Judeo-Christian world.

 

According to Tracy Twyman there isn’t just one cosmic cube, but two. In addition to the black cube, which she says is the city, Enoch, there’s a white cube, in heaven, I think. When the cubes meet the world will be destroyed except for the ones safe in the white cube. She associates the white cube New Jerusalem from the New Testament. New Jerusalem is a shining city that lands of earth after all of the turmoil and suffering after the events of the apocalypse have passed, and does something nice for the righteous survivors. I’ve wondered about New Jerusalem previously, and I’ve thought it sounds like a cosmic false flag or problem-reaction-solution alien mother ship. After people are exhausted with the end of the world scenario, the mother ship comes down and promises them all sorts of nice stuff. At this point no-one bothers to ask what their true intentions are. Anyways, this is just my paranoid conception of it.

Assuming the off-chance that I am wrong, New Jerusalem might be this white cubical floating city, or Ark. I think Asgård, the home of the Æsir might be the same exact thing. The kingdom of Asgård is the heaven in the Norse mythology, but also there is the city of Asgård, which is sometimes depicted as a floating city.

 

There are other parallel’s that I see, but I have to do something else, so I’ll finish here for now. I’ll continue with the stuff later.

Jolan tru! (It’s a Romulan greeting from Star Trek. I don’t know why I felt like saying it.)

 

Links:

“2015: Year of Light” // How Lucifer is using CERN to crack time (R$E): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueezh-MeSRQ

Saturn, Rainbows and other gay stuff: https://concordiaabchao.wordpress.com/2014/11/03/saturn-rainbows-and-other-gay-stuff/

Bifröst: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifr%C3%B6st

Muspelheim: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muspelheim

Vanir: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanir